Wiki source code of Gap Analysis

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2026/02/08 08:24

Show last authors
1 = Gap Analysis - User Needs & Requirements =
2
3 **Status:** ✅ Analysis Complete
4 **Purpose:** Identify missing features by comparing against global research and best practices
5
6 ----
7
8 == 1. Analysis Framework ==
9
10 === 1.1 Importance Formula ===
11
12 **Importance = f(risk, impact, strategy)**
13
14 * **Risk:** What are the consequences if we don't have this feature?
15 * **Impact:** How many users affected? How severe?
16 * **Strategy:** How well does this align with FactHarbor's mission and strategic goals?
17
18 **Importance Levels:**
19
20 * **VERY HIGH:** Critical to mission, high risk if missing, affects majority of users
21 * **HIGH:** Important for success, significant impact, strong strategic alignment
22 * **MEDIUM:** Valuable but not critical, moderate impact
23 * **LOW:** Nice-to-have, limited impact
24
25 ----
26
27 === 1.2 Urgency Formula ===
28
29 **Urgency = f(fail fast and learn, legal, promises made)**
30
31 * **Fail fast and learn:** Do we need to validate assumptions quickly?
32 * **Legal:** Are there legal requirements or external deadlines?
33 * **Promises made:** Have we committed this to stakeholders, funders, or partners?
34
35 **Urgency Levels:**
36
37 * **HIGH:** External deadlines, legal requirements, or critical testing needed
38 * **MEDIUM:** Strategic opportunity, growing trends, competitive pressure
39 * **LOW:** No external pressure, can add anytime
40
41 ----
42
43 === 1.3 Context Matters ===
44
45 **Important principle:** Importance and urgency change based on milestone context.
46
47 * **POC:** Only basic features urgent
48 * **Beta:** More features become urgent for user testing
49 * **Release:** Legal/compliance becomes critical
50
51 **Priorities are not absolute - they're contextual.**
52
53 ----
54
55 == 2. Gap Categories ==
56
57 We identified **18 gaps** across **8 categories**:
58
59 === Category 1: Accessibility & Inclusivity ===
60
61 * Gap 1.1: WCAG 2.1 Compliance
62 * Gap 1.2: Multilingual Support
63
64 === Category 2: Platform Integration & Distribution ===
65
66 * Gap 2.1: Browser Extensions
67 * Gap 2.2: Embeddable Widgets
68 * Gap 2.3: ClaimReview Schema
69
70 === Category 3: Media Verification ===
71
72 * Gap 3.1: Image/Video/Audio Verification
73
74 === Category 4: Mobile & Offline Access ===
75
76 * Gap 4.1: Mobile Apps / PWA
77 * Gap 4.2: Offline Access
78
79 === Category 5: Education & Media Literacy ===
80
81 * Gap 5.1: Educational Resources
82 * Gap 5.2: Media Literacy Integration
83
84 === Category 6: Collaboration & Community ===
85
86 * Gap 6.1: Professional Collaboration Tools
87 * Gap 6.2: Community Discussion
88
89 === Category 7: Export & Sharing ===
90
91 * Gap 7.1: Export Capabilities
92 * Gap 7.2: Social Sharing Optimization
93
94 === Category 8: Advanced Features & Analytics ===
95
96 * Gap 8.1: User Analytics
97 * Gap 8.2: Personalization
98 * Gap 8.3: Media Archiving
99 * Gap 8.4: Advanced Search
100
101 ----
102
103 == 3. Critical Gaps ==
104
105 === 3.1 Gap: WCAG 2.1 Accessibility Compliance ===
106
107 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed in current requirements
108 **Importance:** VERY HIGH
109 **Urgency:** HIGH (legal requirement)
110
111 **Why Important:**
112
113 * **Risk:** CRITICAL
114 * Legal liability (European Accessibility Act enforced June 28, 2025)
115 * Lawsuits, fines up to $250,000 (Accessible Canada Act)
116 * Cannot operate in EU market without compliance
117 * Retrofitting is 100x more expensive than building in from start
118 * **Impact:** 15-20% of population (1+ billion people) excluded without accessibility
119 * Affects blind, low-vision, deaf, motor impairments, cognitive disabilities
120 * "86% of companies report improved customer satisfaction after implementing accessibility" (Forrester)
121 * **Strategy:** CRITICAL ALIGNMENT
122 * Mission: "empower users to make informed judgments" - cannot empower if inaccessible
123 * Vision: "a world where decisions are grounded in evidence" - for ALL people
124 * Inclusivity is core to nonprofit mission
125
126 **Why Urgent:**
127
128 * **Legal:** VERY HIGH
129 * European Accessibility Act (EAA) enforced June 28, 2025
130 * Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) - ongoing requirement in US
131 * Accessible Canada Act - penalties up to $250,000
132 * Cannot launch in EU without compliance
133 * **Fail fast:** Not applicable (accessibility is proven requirement, not experimental)
134 * **Promises:** Depends on public mission statements and funding commitments
135
136 **Missing Requirements:**
137
138 * WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance
139 * Screen reader compatibility (ARIA labels, semantic HTML)
140 * Keyboard navigation (no mouse required)
141 * Color-blind friendly design (not relying solely on color)
142 * Adjustable text size and contrast
143 * Captions/transcripts for video content
144 * Alternative text for images and visualizations
145
146 **Recommended New Requirements:**
147
148 * **NFR6: Accessibility** - Platform must conform to WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards
149 * **NFR7: Assistive Technology Support** - Compatible with screen readers, voice navigation, keyboard-only usage
150 * **FR14: Accessibility Settings** - User-configurable contrast, text size, reduced motion options
151
152 **When to Address:** Must be built into platform from start (retrofitting prohibitively expensive)
153
154 **Research Evidence:**
155
156 * "72% of organizations have digital accessibility policy, 85% see it as competitive advantage" (Level Access 2024)
157 * European Accessibility Act (EAA) enforcement begins June 28, 2025
158 * "Accessible websites see 20% increase in traffic and engagement" (W3C WAI)
159 * "86% of companies report improved customer satisfaction after implementing accessibility" (Forrester)
160
161 ----
162
163 === 3.2 Gap: Educational Resources & Onboarding ===
164
165 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed in current requirements
166 **Importance:** VERY HIGH
167 **Urgency:** HIGH (critical for adoption)
168
169 **Why Important:**
170
171 * **Risk:** CRITICAL
172 * Platform fails if users cannot understand Evidence Models
173 * Misinterpretation of scenarios/verdicts undermines mission
174 * High abandonment rate without onboarding (industry standard: 75% drop-off without onboarding)
175 * Wasted investment if no one can use the platform
176 * **Impact:** Affects 100% of new users
177 * "Fact-checking organizations increasingly provide media literacy education" (Mesquita et al. 2024)
178 * Determines whether platform succeeds or fails
179 * **Strategy:** CRITICAL ALIGNMENT
180 * Mission: "help people make sense of complex, contested information"
181 * Vision: Requires users to understand methodology
182 * Cannot achieve transparency without explaining concepts
183
184 **Why Urgent:**
185
186 * **Fail fast:** VERY HIGH
187 * Must validate that Evidence Models are comprehensible to users
188 * Need to test if onboarding actually works
189 * Quick iteration needed based on user confusion
190 * Test with beta users before full launch
191 * **Legal:** None
192 * **Promises:** HIGH if public statements include "user-friendly" or "accessible to all"
193
194 **Missing Requirements:**
195
196 * Onboarding tutorial (interactive walkthrough)
197 * Video tutorials explaining concepts
198 * FAQ section
199 * Glossary (scenarios, confidence scores, verdicts, assumptions)
200 * Example analyses with explanations
201 * "How to read a FactHarbor analysis" guide
202 * Best practices documentation
203
204 **Recommended New Requirements:**
205
206 * **UN-23: Learn How to Fact-Check** - Educational resources for understanding methodology
207 * **FR26: Onboarding Tutorial** - Interactive first-time user walkthrough
208 * **FR27: Educational Resources Hub** - Guides, videos, FAQs, glossary
209 * **FR28: Curriculum Materials** - Resources for educators to use FactHarbor in classrooms
210
211 **When to Address:** Basic onboarding at launch (POC needs 1-page explainer, Beta needs comprehensive resources)
212
213 **Research Evidence:**
214
215 * "Critical media literacy fosters resilience against misinformation" (McDougall 2019)
216 * Teen Fact-Checking Networks operating globally (MediaWise 2024)
217 * "Fact-checking organizations increasingly provide media literacy education" (Mesquita et al. 2024)
218
219 ----
220
221 == 4. High Importance Gaps ==
222
223 === 4.1 Gap: Browser Extensions ===
224
225 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed
226 **Importance:** HIGH
227 **Urgency:** MEDIUM
228
229 **Why Important:**
230
231 * **Risk:** MEDIUM - Competitive disadvantage, reduced adoption
232 * **Impact:** MEDIUM-HIGH - Significantly improves UX for active fact-checkers
233 * **Strategy:** HIGH ALIGNMENT - Meet users where misinformation spreads (in their browsers)
234
235 **Why Urgent:**
236
237 * **Fail fast:** MEDIUM - Should validate that users actually want browser extensions
238 * **Legal:** None
239 * **Promises:** LOW unless explicitly promised to early adopters
240
241 **Missing Requirements:**
242
243 * Chrome/Firefox/Safari browser extensions
244 * Right-click context menu for selected text
245 * Inline highlighting of claims on any webpage
246 * Quick verdict tooltips without leaving page
247 * Save/bookmark fact-checks
248
249 **Recommended:**
250
251 * **UN-18: In-Context Fact-Checking** - Browser extension for real-time verification
252 * **FR17: Browser Extensions** - Chrome, Firefox, Safari with context menu
253 * **FR18: Cross-Site Highlighting** - Highlight and analyze claims on any website
254
255 **When to Address:** Test web platform first, then build extension MVP if user demand validated
256
257 **Research Evidence:**
258
259 * "3-click verification: Select → Right-click → Verify" is standard UX pattern
260 * Extensions like UnCovered, Pino, InVID/WeVerify widely adopted
261 * NewsGuard browser extension demonstrates market acceptance
262
263 ----
264
265 === 4.2 Gap: Media Verification (Images/Videos/Audio) ===
266
267 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed
268 **Importance:** VERY HIGH
269 **Urgency:** MEDIUM
270
271 **Why Important:**
272
273 * **Risk:** HIGH - Cannot address major category of misinformation (visual/audio)
274 * **Impact:** VERY HIGH - Visual misinformation is primary vector
275 * **Strategy:** CRITICAL ALIGNMENT - Mission incomplete without multimedia fact-checking
276
277 **Why Urgent:**
278
279 * **Fail fast:** VERY HIGH - Should test approach quickly (partner vs. build?)
280 * **Legal:** None
281 * **Promises:** MEDIUM (depends on mission statements)
282
283 **Missing Requirements:**
284
285 * Reverse image search integration
286 * Video frame extraction and analysis
287 * Audio deepfake detection
288 * EXIF metadata extraction
289 * Synthetic media detection (AI-generated content)
290
291 **Recommended:**
292
293 * **UN-20: Media Verification** - Image, video, audio fact-checking
294 * **FR22: Image Verification** - Reverse search, EXIF, synthetic detection
295 * **FR23: Video Verification** - Frame analysis, metadata, deepfake detection
296 * **FR24: Audio Verification** - Voice deepfakes, audio forensics
297
298 **When to Address:** Pilot with existing tools (InVID, TinEye) before building in-house
299
300 **Research Evidence:**
301
302 * "Most deception relies on decontextualization" of images (Cazzamatta 2025)
303 * "Deepfakes targeting political figures raise concerns" (Corsi et al. 2024)
304 * InVID/WeVerify used by professional fact-checkers (AFP 2024)
305
306 ----
307
308 === 4.3 Gap: Multilingual Support ===
309
310 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed
311 **Importance:** HIGH
312 **Urgency:** MEDIUM
313
314 **Why Important:**
315
316 * **Risk:** HIGH - Mission limited to English speakers (20% of world)
317 * **Impact:** VERY HIGH - Excludes 80% of world population
318 * **Strategy:** CRITICAL ALIGNMENT - Vision of "a world where decisions are grounded in evidence" - not just English-speaking world
319
320 **Why Urgent:**
321
322 * **Fail fast:** MEDIUM - Test which languages users need, validate translation quality early
323 * **Legal:** None
324 * **Promises:** MEDIUM-HIGH if mission statement emphasizes "global" or "world"
325
326 **Missing Requirements:**
327
328 * Interface available in multiple languages
329 * Content translation/analysis in non-English languages
330 * Right-to-left (RTL) language support (Arabic, Hebrew)
331 * Locale-specific formatting (dates, numbers, currencies)
332 * Character encoding for non-Latin scripts
333
334 **Recommended:**
335
336 * **FR15: Multilingual Interface** - UI in 10+ languages
337 * **FR16: Multilingual Content Analysis** - AKEL analyzes claims in multiple languages
338 * **NFR8: Internationalization (i18n)** - RTL support, character encodings, locale formatting
339
340 **When to Address:** Plan early, prove English platform first, start with 2-3 strategic languages
341
342 **Research Evidence:**
343
344 * 443 fact-checking projects operate in 70+ languages globally (Duke 2025)
345 * "LLMs better at fact-checking in low-resource languages than expected" (ACL 2024)
346 * "Multilingual capabilities essential for global inclusivity" (O3 World 2024)
347
348 ----
349
350 === 4.4 Gap: Mobile Apps / PWA ===
351
352 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed
353 **Importance:** HIGH
354 **Urgency:** LOW
355
356 **Why Important:**
357
358 * **Risk:** MEDIUM - Reduced engagement, poor mobile experience
359 * **Impact:** HIGH - 90%+ users access news on mobile
360 * **Strategy:** MEDIUM - Better UX but not core to methodology
361
362 **Why Urgent:**
363
364 * **Fail fast:** MEDIUM - Test if mobile users behave differently, PWA first
365 * **Legal:** None
366 * **Promises:** LOW unless specified in grants/partnerships
367
368 **Missing Requirements:**
369
370 * iOS/Android native apps
371 * Progressive Web App (PWA) capabilities
372 * Camera submission for visual claims
373 * Push notifications
374 * Offline mode
375
376 **Recommended:**
377
378 * **UN-21: Mobile-Native Experience** - Native apps for iOS/Android
379 * **FR25: Native Mobile Apps** - Full mobile capabilities
380 * **NFR9: Progressive Web App** - Installable, offline, push notifications
381
382 **When to Address:** Responsive web first, PWA to test mobile patterns, native apps if validated
383
384 **Research Evidence:**
385
386 * "Mobile apps with accessibility features experience 30% higher engagement" (MMA 2024)
387 * 90%+ of adults access news via mobile devices (Pew 2024)
388
389 ----
390
391 === 4.5 Gap: ClaimReview Schema ===
392
393 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed
394 **Importance:** HIGH
395 **Urgency:** LOW
396
397 **Why Important:**
398
399 * **Risk:** LOW-MEDIUM - Reduced discoverability (won't appear in Google search)
400 * **Impact:** MEDIUM-HIGH - Affects all users via SEO
401 * **Strategy:** MEDIUM - Distribution mechanism, not core methodology
402
403 **Why Urgent:**
404
405 * **Fail fast:** LOW - Already proven by 200,000+ fact-checks globally
406 * **Legal:** None
407 * **Promises:** None
408
409 **Missing Requirements:**
410
411 * ClaimReview structured data markup
412 * Submit to Google Fact Check Explorer
413 * MediaReview for multimedia content
414
415 **Recommended:**
416
417 * **FR20: ClaimReview Schema** - Structured data markup
418 * **FR21: Search Engine Integration** - Submit to fact-check indexes
419
420 **When to Address:** Add anytime after content library exists (can be retroactive)
421
422 **Research Evidence:**
423
424 * 200,000+ fact-checks use ClaimReview globally (Duke 2024)
425 * Enables appearance in Google/Bing search results
426
427 ----
428
429 == 5. Medium Importance Gaps ==
430
431 === 5.1 Gap: Embeddable Widgets ===
432
433 **Importance:** MEDIUM
434 **Urgency:** LOW
435
436 **Missing:** JavaScript widgets for publishers to embed fact-checks
437
438 **When:** Only if publishers commit to using it
439
440 ----
441
442 === 5.2 Gap: Export Capabilities ===
443
444 **Importance:** MEDIUM
445 **Urgency:** LOW
446
447 **Missing:** PDF export, print optimization, CSV/JSON data export
448
449 **When:** Based on user requests
450
451 ----
452
453 === 5.3 Gap: Professional Collaboration Tools ===
454
455 **Importance:** MEDIUM
456 **Urgency:** LOW
457
458 **Missing:** Organization workspaces, claim assignment, internal discussion
459
460 **When:** Only if organizations commit
461
462 ----
463
464 === 5.4 Gap: Social Sharing Optimization ===
465
466 **Importance:** MEDIUM
467 **Urgency:** LOW
468
469 **Missing:** Open Graph tags, Twitter Cards, short URLs, WhatsApp optimization
470
471 **When:** Iterative improvement based on usage
472
473 ----
474
475 === 5.5 Gap: Media Archiving ===
476
477 **Importance:** MEDIUM
478 **Urgency:** LOW
479
480 **Missing:** Automatic archiving of sources, Wayback Machine integration, media preservation
481
482 **When:** After launch, retroactive archiving is fine
483
484 **Research Evidence:**
485
486 * "Images/videos often disappear after fact-checking" (MediaVault 2024)
487 * IFCN DisinfoArchiving uses WACZ format (InVID 2024-2025)
488
489 ----
490
491 == 6. Lower Priority Gaps ==
492
493 === 6.1 Gap: User Analytics ===
494
495 **Importance:** MEDIUM
496 **Urgency:** LOW
497
498 **Missing:** Privacy-respecting usage analytics, feedback systems
499
500 ----
501
502 === 6.2 Gap: Personalization ===
503
504 **Importance:** LOW
505 **Urgency:** N/A
506
507 **Strategic Decision Needed:** How much personalization without creating filter bubbles?
508
509 **Recommendation:** Limited only (language, accessibility preferences) - NO content filtering
510
511 ----
512
513 === 6.3 Gap: Community Discussion ===
514
515 **Importance:** LOW
516 **Urgency:** N/A
517
518 **Strategic Decision Needed:** Should FactHarbor allow public comments or remain evidence-focused?
519
520 **Question to resolve:** Evidence platform vs. community platform?
521
522 ----
523
524 === 6.4 Gap: Advanced Search ===
525
526 **Importance:** MEDIUM
527 **Urgency:** LOW
528
529 **Missing:** Elasticsearch, faceted search, advanced filters
530
531 **When:** Only when PostgreSQL search becomes bottleneck
532
533 ----
534
535 === 6.5 Gap: Offline Access ===
536
537 **Importance:** LOW
538 **Urgency:** LOW
539
540 **Missing:** Offline mode, service workers, cached content
541
542 **When:** If user research shows demand
543
544 ----
545
546
547 ----
548
549 == 7. Existing Requirements Reference ==
550
551 **Before proposing new requirements, here's what already exists in the FactHarbor Specification:**
552
553 === 7.1 Existing Functional Requirements (FR1-FR13) ===
554
555 **From Specification/Requirements.WebHome:**
556
557 * **FR1:** Claim Intake - Users submit claims via form or API
558 * **FR2:** Claim Normalization - Standardize to clear assertion format
559 * **FR3:** Claim Classification - Domain, type, risk score, complexity
560 * **FR4:** Scenario Generation - AKEL analyzes claim and generates scenarios
561 * **FR5:** Evidence Linking - Automated evidence discovery and relevance scoring
562 * **FR6:** Scenario Comparison - Side-by-side comparison interface
563 * **FR7:** Automated Verdicts - AKEL generates verdict based on evidence
564 * **FR8:** Time Evolution - Claims update as new evidence emerges
565 * **FR9:** Publication Workflow - Simple automated flow (no multi-stage approval)
566 * **FR10:** Moderation - Focus on abuse, not routine quality
567 * **FR11:** Audit Trail - All edits logged, version history public
568
569 **From User Needs Document (UN-17):**
570
571 * **FR12:** Two-Panel Summary View - Analysis + Article side-by-side
572 * **FR13:** In-Article Claim Highlighting - Visual claim markers in original text
573
574 **Total Existing:** FR1-FR13 (13 functional requirements)
575
576 ----
577
578 === 7.2 Existing Non-Functional Requirements (NFR1-NFR5) ===
579
580 **From Specification/Requirements.WebHome:**
581
582 * **NFR1:** Performance - Processing <30s, search <2s, page load <3s, 99% uptime
583 * **NFR2:** Scalability - Handle 10K claims initially, scale to 1M+, 100K+ concurrent users
584 * **NFR3:** Transparency - All algorithms open source, all data exportable, all decisions documented
585 * **NFR4:** Security & Privacy - Follow privacy policy, secure authentication, data encryption, regular audits
586 * **NFR5:** Maintainability - Modular architecture, automated testing, CI/CD, comprehensive documentation
587
588 **Total Existing:** NFR1-NFR5 (5 non-functional requirements)
589
590 ----
591
592 === 7.3 Requirement Numbering Summary ===
593
594 **Existing Requirements:**
595
596 * Functional: FR1 through FR13
597 * Non-Functional: NFR1 through NFR5
598
599 **Proposed New Requirements (from Gap Analysis):**
600
601 * Functional: FR14 through FR43 (30 new)
602 * Non-Functional: NFR6 through NFR10 (5 new)
603
604 **Total After Gap Analysis:**
605
606 * Functional: FR1-FR43 (43 total)
607 * Non-Functional: NFR1-NFR10 (10 total)
608
609 ----
610
611
612 Based on gap analysis, we recommend adding:
613
614 **8 New User Needs (UN-18 through UN-25):**
615
616 * UN-18: In-Context Fact-Checking (browser extension)
617 * UN-19: Publisher Integration (embed widgets)
618 * UN-20: Media Verification (images/videos/audio)
619 * UN-21: Mobile-Native Experience (native apps)
620 * UN-22: Offline Access (PWA)
621 * UN-23: Learn How to Fact-Check (education)
622 * UN-24: Professional Collaboration (team tools)
623 * UN-25: Export & Save (PDF, CSV)
624
625 **30 New Functional Requirements (FR14-FR43):**
626
627 * FR14: Accessibility Settings
628 * FR15-16: Multilingual (Interface, Content Analysis)
629 * FR17-18: Browser Extensions, Cross-Site Highlighting
630 * FR19-20: Embeddable Widget, ClaimReview Schema
631 * FR21: Search Engine Integration
632 * FR22-24: Media Verification (Image, Video, Audio)
633 * FR25: Native Mobile Apps
634 * FR26-30: Education (Onboarding, Resources, Curriculum, Critical Thinking, Pre-bunking)
635 * FR31-33: Professional Collaboration (Workspaces, Assignment, Discussion)
636 * FR34-36: Export (PDF, Print, Data)
637 * FR37-39: Social Sharing (Open Graph, Short URLs, Multi-Channel)
638 * FR40: User Feedback System
639 * FR41-43: Archiving (Automatic, Archive.org, Media Preservation)
640
641 **5 New Non-Functional Requirements (NFR6-NFR10):**
642
643 * NFR6: Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA)
644 * NFR7: Assistive Technology Support
645 * NFR8: Internationalization (i18n)
646 * NFR9: Progressive Web App (PWA)
647 * NFR10: Privacy-Respecting Analytics
648
649 ----
650
651 == 11. Priority Matrix ==
652
653 **Priority based on Importance + Urgency:**
654
655 **CRITICAL (Must Address):**
656
657 1. Accessibility (WCAG) - Legal + High Impact
658 2. Educational Resources - Adoption Critical
659
660 **HIGH (Strategic Priority):**
661 3. Browser Extensions - User Expectation
662 4. Media Verification - Mission Critical
663 5. Multilingual - Global Strategy
664
665 **MEDIUM (Plan For):**
666 6. Mobile Apps/PWA - User Convenience
667 7. ClaimReview Schema - Discoverability
668 8. Export Capabilities - Professional Users
669 9. Embeddable Widgets - Publisher Adoption
670 10. Professional Collaboration - Organizational Users
671
672 **LOW (Consider Later):**
673
674 1. \\
675 11. Social Sharing Optimization
676 12. Media Archiving
677 13. User Analytics
678 14. Advanced Search
679 15. Offline Access
680 16. Personalization
681 17. Community Discussion
682
683 ----
684
685 == 11. Key Strategic Questions ==
686
687 **Question 1: Accessibility Investment**
688 How comprehensive at launch?
689
690 * **Required:** WCAG 2.1 AA minimum, keyboard navigation, screen readers
691 * **Enhanced:** Voice navigation, haptic feedback (can add later)
692
693 **Question 2: Multilingual Priorities**
694 Which languages first?
695
696 * **Recommend:** English, Spanish, French, German, Arabic (major markets + diversity)
697 * **Consider:** Chinese, Japanese, Portuguese, Hindi, Russian
698
699 **Question 3: Media Verification Approach**
700 Build vs. partner?
701
702 * **Recommend:** Partner initially (InVID, TinEye, existing tools)
703 * **Build:** If demand proven and resources available
704
705 **Question 4: Community Model**
706 Evidence-focused vs. discussion-enabled?
707
708 * **Option A:** No public discussion (maintain authority model)
709 * **Option B:** Limited discussion (Contributor+ only)
710 * **Option C:** Open discussion (requires moderation resources)
711
712 **Question 5: Mobile Strategy**
713 Native apps vs. PWA?
714
715 * **Recommend:** PWA first (cross-platform, lower cost)
716 * **Consider:** Native apps if mobile usage dominant
717
718 ----
719
720 == 11. Research Sources ==
721
722 **Academic Research (2024-2025):**
723
724 * AI-Generated Misinformation (Cazzamatta & Sarısakaloğlu 2025)
725 * Show Me the Work: Fact-Checkers' Requirements for Explainable AI (CHI 2025)
726 * Multilingual Fact-Checking using LLMs (ACL 2024)
727 * Beyond Verification: Media Literacy Education (Mesquita et al. 2024)
728
729 **Industry Reports:**
730
731 * Duke Reporters' Lab Census 2024-2025 (443 projects, 70+ languages)
732 * Poynter/IFCN State of Fact-Checkers Report
733 * Level Access: State of Digital Accessibility Report 2023-2024
734 * Pew Research Center: News consumption patterns
735
736 **Standards & Compliance:**
737
738 * WCAG 2.1 (W3C)
739 * European Accessibility Act (EAA) - June 28, 2025
740 * Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
741 * Accessible Canada Act
742 * ClaimReview/MediaReview specifications (Schema.org)
743
744 ----
745
746 == 11. Related Pages ==
747
748 * [[User Needs>>Archive.FactHarbor 2026\.01\.20.Specification.Requirements.User Needs.WebHome]]
749 * [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Requirements.WebHome]]
750 * [[POC Requirements>>FactHarbor.POC.WebHome]]
751 * [[Architecture>>Archive.FactHarbor 2026\.01\.20.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]]
752
753 ----
754
755 **Document Status:** ✅ Analysis Complete - Ready for Strategic Planning