Wiki source code of Evidence and Verdict Workflow
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 20:34
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | **Evidence & Verdict Workflow** | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | This diagram shows how Evidence supports Verdicts for Scenarios. | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | == Evidence & Verdict Flow == | ||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | **Evidence Collection**: | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | * Contributors attach sources | ||
| 10 | * AKEL retrieves relevant evidence | ||
| 11 | * Reliability assessed (low/medium/high) | ||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | **Verdict Generation**: | ||
| 14 | |||
| 15 | * AKEL proposes verdicts based on evidence | ||
| 16 | * Likelihood ranges calculated | ||
| 17 | * Uncertainty factors identified | ||
| 18 | |||
| 19 | **Approval Process**: | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | * Tier B/C: Reviewer approval sufficient | ||
| 22 | * Tier A: Expert approval required | ||
| 23 | * Version history preserved | ||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | {{include reference="Archive.FactHarbor V0\.9\.23 Lost Data.Specification.Diagrams.Evidence and Verdict Workflow_Mermaid.WebHome"}}{{/include}} |