Skip to Content
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2026/02/08 08:15
From version 1.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/22 14:22
Change comment: Imported from XAR
To version 1.3
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2026/01/20 20:26
Change comment: Renamed back-links.

Summary

Details

Page properties
Parent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -Test.FactHarbor.Specification.WebHome
1 +Test.FactHarbor pre12 V0\.9\.70.Specification.WebHome
Content
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
1 1  = Federation & Decentralization =
2 +
2 2  **Status**: 🔮 **Planned for V2.0+** (not in V1.0 scope)
3 3  FactHarbor is designed to eventually support federation, but this feature is **deferred until core product is proven and user demand exists**.
5 +
4 4  == V1.0 Scope (Current) ==
7 +
5 5  **Single-node deployment**:
9 +
6 6  * Full-featured standalone instance
7 7  * Read replicas for scaling if needed
8 8  * All features available without federation
... ... @@ -12,14 +12,20 @@
12 12  * Not needed for first 10,000 users
13 13  * Core product must be proven first
14 14  * Build when users explicitly request it
19 +
15 15  == V2.0+ Federation (Future Vision) ==
21 +
16 16  **Implement federation when**:
23 +
17 17  * ✅ 10,000+ users on single node
18 18  * ✅ Users explicitly request decentralization
19 19  * ✅ Core product is stable and mature
20 20  * ✅ Geographic distribution becomes necessary
28 +
21 21  === Federation Features (Future) ===
30 +
22 22  **Independent FactHarbor Instances**:
32 +
23 23  * Each node operates autonomously
24 24  * Local governance and moderation
25 25  * Regional data sovereignty
... ... @@ -39,8 +39,11 @@
39 39  * Collaborative standards development
40 40  * Inter-node arbitration for disputes
41 41  * Federation-level oversight (optional)
52 +
42 42  === Technical Architecture (Future) ===
54 +
43 43  **Sync Protocol**:
56 +
44 44  * ActivityPub-inspired messaging
45 45  * Claim deltas and updates
46 46  * Source verification across nodes
... ... @@ -55,8 +55,11 @@
55 55  * Cross-node queries (opt-in)
56 56  * GDPR compliance per jurisdiction
57 57  * Right to be forgotten respected
71 +
58 58  === Benefits of Federation (Future) ===
73 +
59 59  **Resilience**:
75 +
60 60  * No single point of failure
61 61  * Censorship resistance
62 62  * Geographic redundancy
... ... @@ -76,8 +76,11 @@
76 76  * Multiple independent sources
77 77  * Transparent provenance
78 78  * Community validation
95 +
79 79  === Challenges to Address (Future) ===
97 +
80 80  **Technical Complexity**:
99 +
81 81  * Synchronization protocols
82 82  * Conflict resolution
83 83  * Network reliability
... ... @@ -92,8 +92,11 @@
92 92  * Identity management
93 93  * Seamless cross-node interaction
94 94  * Performance transparency
114 +
95 95  == Why Not V1.0? ==
116 +
96 96  **Reality check**:
118 +
97 97  * Most successful platforms start centralized (Wikipedia, Reddit, GitHub)
98 98  * Federation can be added later (see: Mastodon, Matrix)
99 99  * Core product quality matters more than architecture philosophy
... ... @@ -104,10 +104,14 @@
104 104  * Geographic distribution is required
105 105  * Community governance demands it
106 106  Until then: **Focus on making the core product excellent** 🎯
129 +
107 107  == Related Pages ==
108 -* [[Architecture>>FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] - Current V1.0 architecture
131 +
132 +* [[Architecture>>Archive.FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] - Current V1.0 architecture
109 109  * [[Design Decisions>>FactHarbor.Specification.Design-Decisions]] - Why we defer complexity
110 110  * [[When to Add Complexity>>FactHarbor.Specification.When-to-Add-Complexity]] - Federation triggers
135 +
111 111  == Historical Note ==
137 +
112 112  Previous versions (V0.9.50-0.9.58) included detailed federation specifications. These have been moved to future vision documents. The federation architecture is well-designed and ready to implement when the time comes—we're just not building it in V1.0.
113 113  **See**: `/future-vision/federation-architecture.md` for complete technical specifications (when implemented).