Wiki source code of Global Rules
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2026/02/08 08:26
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
1.1 | 1 | = Global Rules = |
| |
1.3 | 2 | |
| |
1.1 | 3 | **Last Updated:** December 17, 2025 These rules apply to all FactHarbor users, content, and processes. |
| 4 | **FactHarbor's Role:** Collect, aggregate, and summarize information that already exists. FactHarbor does not create original information or conduct investigations. | ||
| |
1.3 | 5 | |
| |
1.1 | 6 | == 1. Core Principles == |
| |
1.3 | 7 | |
| |
1.1 | 8 | === 1.1 Seek Truth === |
| |
1.3 | 9 | |
| |
1.1 | 10 | * Truth is the primary goal |
| 11 | * Evaluate existing information fairly | ||
| 12 | * Weight evidence by quality, not preference | ||
| 13 | * Update understanding as evidence changes | ||
| 14 | * Acknowledge uncertainty clearly | ||
| |
1.3 | 15 | |
| |
1.1 | 16 | === 1.2 Act Independently === |
| |
1.3 | 17 | |
| |
1.1 | 18 | * Free from obligation to any interest except truth |
| 19 | * Commercial interests in claim outcomes are disqualifying | ||
| 20 | * Disclose conflicts that might bias evaluation | ||
| 21 | * Independence from funders and sponsors | ||
| |
1.3 | 22 | |
| |
1.1 | 23 | === 1.3 Be Accountable and Transparent === |
| |
1.3 | 24 | |
| |
1.1 | 25 | **Strive to:** |
| |
1.3 | 26 | |
| |
1.1 | 27 | * Make reasoning traceable where feasible |
| 28 | * Cite sources whenever possible | ||
| 29 | * Disclose conflicts of interest | ||
| 30 | * Mark AI involvement | ||
| 31 | * Correct mistakes promptly when discovered | ||
| 32 | * Explain decisions when challenged | ||
| 33 | **Goal:** Maximum transparency within practical constraints. Perfect traceability may not always be achievable, but the commitment to transparency remains. | ||
| |
1.3 | 34 | |
| |
1.1 | 35 | === 1.4 Intellectual Humility === |
| |
1.3 | 36 | |
| |
1.1 | 37 | * Acknowledge uncertainty |
| 38 | * Correct mistakes promptly | ||
| 39 | * Respect expertise but verify - anyone/any source could be wrong, biased, or dishonest | ||
| 40 | * Welcome disagreement | ||
| 41 | * Seek consensus, don't force it | ||
| |
1.3 | 42 | |
| |
1.1 | 43 | == 2. Source Evaluation == |
| |
1.3 | 44 | |
| |
1.1 | 45 | === 2.1 Source Evaluation Criteria === |
| |
1.3 | 46 | |
| |
1.1 | 47 | **Sources are evaluated by track record, not credentials.** |
| 48 | **Evaluation Factors:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 49 | |
| |
1.1 | 50 | * **Accuracy history:** Has the source been reliable in the past? |
| 51 | * **Correction policy:** Do they promptly correct errors? | ||
| 52 | * **Methodology transparency:** Do they show their work? | ||
| 53 | * **Independence:** Are they free from controlling interests? | ||
| 54 | * **Trusted Contributorise:** Do they have relevant knowledge? | ||
| 55 | * **Consistency:** Do multiple independent sources agree? | ||
| 56 | **Track Record Over Title:** | ||
| 57 | ✅ Government statistics from agencies with documented accuracy (Swiss Federal Statistical Office, etc.) | ||
| 58 | ✅ Peer-reviewed research from journals with strong retraction/correction practices | ||
| 59 | ✅ Journalism from outlets with fact-checking and correction policies | ||
| 60 | **Red Flags:** | ||
| 61 | * Consistent refusal to correct proven errors | ||
| 62 | * Conflicts of interest not disclosed | ||
| 63 | * Methodology hidden or vague | ||
| 64 | * Single-source claims without verification | ||
| 65 | * History of misinformation | ||
| 66 | * Authoritarian control (government sources) | ||
| 67 | **Principle:** Evaluate each source's track record individually. No type of source is automatically trustworthy. | ||
| |
1.3 | 68 | |
| |
1.1 | 69 | === 2.2 Multiple Sources === |
| |
1.3 | 70 | |
| |
1.1 | 71 | * Use multiple independent sources when possible |
| 72 | * Cross-reference claims | ||
| 73 | * Note when only single source available | ||
| 74 | * Prefer primary sources over secondary | ||
| |
1.3 | 75 | |
| |
1.1 | 76 | === 2.3 Source Attribution === |
| |
1.3 | 77 | |
| |
1.1 | 78 | * Always cite sources clearly |
| 79 | * Link to original when online | ||
| 80 | * Include author, publication, date | ||
| 81 | * Archive links for unstable URLs | ||
| |
1.3 | 82 | |
| |
1.1 | 83 | == 3. Neutrality in Summarization == |
| |
1.3 | 84 | |
| |
1.1 | 85 | === 3.1 Neutral Language === |
| |
1.3 | 86 | |
| |
1.1 | 87 | **Descriptive, not prescriptive:** |
| |
1.3 | 88 | |
| |
1.1 | 89 | * ✅ "Policy reduced emissions by 15%" |
| 90 | **Balanced presentation:** | ||
| 91 | * Show competing views proportional to evidence | ||
| 92 | * Don't hide inconvenient evidence | ||
| 93 | * Weight by quality, not just quantity | ||
| 94 | **Precise, not loaded (in FactHarbor summaries):** | ||
| 95 | * ✅ "Protesters" **Note:** Source materials may contain loaded language. Quote exactly when citing sources, but use neutral language in FactHarbor's own summaries and analysis. | ||
| |
1.3 | 96 | |
| |
1.1 | 97 | === 3.2 No Cherry-Picking === |
| |
1.3 | 98 | |
| |
1.1 | 99 | * Present full picture |
| 100 | * Include contrary evidence | ||
| 101 | * Show trends, not just selected points | ||
| 102 | * Acknowledge limitations | ||
| |
1.3 | 103 | |
| |
1.1 | 104 | === 3.3 Context Matters === |
| |
1.3 | 105 | |
| |
1.1 | 106 | * Provide historical context |
| 107 | * Show comparisons | ||
| 108 | * Explain significance | ||
| 109 | * Present expert perspective | ||
| |
1.3 | 110 | |
| |
1.1 | 111 | === 3.4 Statistical Literacy === |
| |
1.3 | 112 | |
| |
1.1 | 113 | * Distinguish absolute vs percentage |
| 114 | * Show baselines and comparisons | ||
| 115 | * Note confidence intervals | ||
| 116 | * Distinguish correlation from causation | ||
| |
1.3 | 117 | |
| |
1.1 | 118 | == 4. Accuracy and Corrections == |
| |
1.3 | 119 | |
| |
1.1 | 120 | === 4.1 Accuracy Standards === |
| |
1.3 | 121 | |
| |
1.1 | 122 | * Verify facts before using |
| 123 | * Check spelling, dates, numbers | ||
| 124 | * Confirm quotes and attribution | ||
| 125 | * Cross-check details | ||
| |
1.3 | 126 | |
| |
1.1 | 127 | === 4.2 Corrections === |
| |
1.3 | 128 | |
| |
1.1 | 129 | Correct errors promptly and prominently: |
| 130 | ``` | ||
| 131 | CORRECTION: [Date] - [What was wrong and correction] | ||
| 132 | ``` | ||
| |
1.3 | 133 | |
| |
1.1 | 134 | === 4.3 Updates === |
| |
1.3 | 135 | |
| |
1.1 | 136 | When new information emerges: |
| 137 | ``` | ||
| 138 | UPDATE: [Date] - [New information] | ||
| 139 | ``` | ||
| |
1.3 | 140 | |
| |
1.1 | 141 | == 5. Conflicts of Interest == |
| |
1.3 | 142 | |
| |
1.1 | 143 | === 5.1 Commercial Interests Prohibited === |
| |
1.3 | 144 | |
| |
1.1 | 145 | Contributors with direct commercial interests in claim outcomes cannot contribute to those claims. |
| 146 | **Disqualifying:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 147 | |
| |
1.1 | 148 | * Paid to promote/attack claim |
| 149 | * Stock/investment affected by verdict | ||
| 150 | * Employment contingent on outcome | ||
| 151 | * Consulting fees tied to position | ||
| |
1.3 | 152 | |
| |
1.1 | 153 | === 5.2 Other Conflicts - Disclosure Required === |
| |
1.3 | 154 | |
| |
1.1 | 155 | Disclose: |
| |
1.3 | 156 | |
| |
1.1 | 157 | * Personal relationships to subjects |
| 158 | * Professional stake in conclusion | ||
| 159 | * Prior public positions on exact claim | ||
| 160 | * Ideological commitments affecting judgment | ||
| 161 | Format: | ||
| 162 | ``` | ||
| 163 | COI: [Clear description] | ||
| 164 | ``` | ||
| |
1.3 | 165 | |
| |
1.1 | 166 | === 5.3 When to Recuse === |
| |
1.3 | 167 | |
| |
1.1 | 168 | * Direct commercial interest (always) |
| 169 | * Cannot evaluate objectively | ||
| 170 | * Appearance of bias would harm credibility | ||
| |
1.3 | 171 | |
| |
1.1 | 172 | == 6. Topic Scope == |
| |
1.3 | 173 | |
| |
1.1 | 174 | === 6.1 What's In Scope === |
| |
1.3 | 175 | |
| |
1.1 | 176 | **All factual claims where information exists.** |
| 177 | FactHarbor collects, aggregates, and summarizes available information. FactHarbor does not create information. | ||
| 178 | **Examples:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 179 | |
| |
1.1 | 180 | * Historical events |
| 181 | * Scientific findings | ||
| 182 | * Policy outcomes | ||
| 183 | * Economic data | ||
| 184 | * Medical information (factual) | ||
| 185 | * Political statements and outcomes | ||
| |
1.3 | 186 | |
| |
1.1 | 187 | === 6.2 What's Out of Scope === |
| |
1.3 | 188 | |
| |
1.1 | 189 | * Pure value judgments without factual basis |
| 190 | * Unfalsifiable metaphysical claims | ||
| 191 | * Pure aesthetic judgments | ||
| 192 | * Personal preferences | ||
| 193 | * Opinions presented as opinions | ||
| |
1.3 | 194 | |
| |
1.1 | 195 | == 7. Community Standards == |
| |
1.3 | 196 | |
| |
1.1 | 197 | === 7.1 Respectful Discourse === |
| |
1.3 | 198 | |
| |
1.1 | 199 | * Assume good faith |
| 200 | * Focus on substance | ||
| 201 | * Professional tone | ||
| 202 | * Patient with disagreement | ||
| |
1.3 | 203 | |
| |
1.1 | 204 | === 7.2 Prohibited === |
| |
1.3 | 205 | |
| |
1.1 | 206 | * Personal attacks |
| 207 | * Insults or harassment | ||
| 208 | * Bad faith arguments | ||
| 209 | * Gaming the system | ||
| |
1.3 | 210 | |
| |
1.1 | 211 | === 7.3 Constructive Criticism === |
| |
1.3 | 212 | |
| |
1.1 | 213 | **When giving feedback:** |
| |
1.3 | 214 | |
| |
1.1 | 215 | * Be specific |
| 216 | * Suggest improvements | ||
| 217 | * Focus on content, not person | ||
| 218 | **When receiving:** | ||
| 219 | * Consider merits | ||
| 220 | * Update if convinced | ||
| 221 | * Respond to substance | ||
| |
1.3 | 222 | |
| |
1.1 | 223 | == 8. System Integrity == |
| |
1.3 | 224 | |
| |
1.1 | 225 | === 8.1 No Manipulation === |
| |
1.3 | 226 | |
| |
1.1 | 227 | Prohibited: |
| |
1.3 | 228 | |
| |
1.1 | 229 | * Multiple accounts |
| 230 | * Coordinated campaigns | ||
| 231 | * Source fabrication | ||
| 232 | * Evidence hiding | ||
| |
1.3 | 233 | |
| |
1.1 | 234 | === 8.2 Automation Disclosure === |
| |
1.3 | 235 | |
| |
1.1 | 236 | Mark all automated contributions: |
| |
1.3 | 237 | |
| |
1.1 | 238 | * Human-written |
| 239 | * AI-assisted | ||
| 240 | * AI-generated | ||
| 241 | * Fully automated (AKEL only) | ||
| |
1.3 | 242 | |
| |
1.1 | 243 | == 9. Enforcement == |
| |
1.3 | 244 | |
| |
1.1 | 245 | **Scope:** This section applies only to **FactHarbor contributors and users**, not to external entities being evaluated. |
| 246 | FactHarbor cannot enforce rules against: | ||
| |
1.3 | 247 | |
| |
1.1 | 248 | * Governments |
| 249 | * Corporations | ||
| 250 | * Media outlets | ||
| 251 | * External sources | ||
| 252 | For external entities, FactHarbor can only: | ||
| 253 | * Evaluate their track record | ||
| 254 | * Document their accuracy/inaccuracy | ||
| 255 | * Flag unreliability | ||
| 256 | * Warn users | ||
| |
1.3 | 257 | |
| |
1.1 | 258 | === 9.1 Progressive Discipline (FactHarbor Participants) === |
| |
1.3 | 259 | |
| |
1.1 | 260 | * Warning |
| 261 | * Temporary suspension | ||
| 262 | * Longer suspension | ||
| 263 | * Permanent ban | ||
| 264 | Exception: Severe violations may result in immediate ban. | ||
| |
1.3 | 265 | |
| |
1.1 | 266 | === 9.2 Appeals === |
| |
1.3 | 267 | |
| |
1.1 | 268 | Appeal with clear grounds and evidence to moderators. |
| |
1.3 | 269 | |
| |
1.1 | 270 | == 10. Updates == |
| |
1.3 | 271 | |
| |
1.1 | 272 | Rules evolve with platform. Major changes require notice and community input. |
| |
1.3 | 273 | |
| |
1.1 | 274 | == 11. Related Documents == |
| |
1.3 | 275 | |
| |
1.4 | 276 | * [[Requirements>>Archive.FactHarbor 2026\.01\.20.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] |
| |
1.1 | 277 | * [[Privacy Policy>>FactHarbor.Organisation.How-We-Work-Together.Privacy-Policy]] |
| 278 | * [[Transparency Policy>>FactHarbor.Organisation.How-We-Work-Together.Transparency-Policy]] | ||
| 279 | * [[Terms of Service>>FactHarbor.Organisation.How-We-Work-Together.Terms-of-Service]] | ||
| 280 | **Version:** 0.9.33 **Foundation:** Truth, Transparency, Independence |