Wiki source code of Roles & Publication Modes
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2026/02/08 08:27
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
1.1 | 1 | = Roles & Publication Modes = |
| 2 | |||
| 3 | **Version:** 0.9.70 | ||
| 4 | **Last Updated:** December 21, 2025 | ||
| 5 | **Status:** CORRECTED - Automation Philosophy Consistent | ||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | This page defines user roles and publication modes in FactHarbor. | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | == 1. User Roles == | ||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | === 1.1 Contributors === | ||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | **Who**: Community members who suggest system improvements | ||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | **Responsibilities:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 17 | |
| |
1.1 | 18 | * Participate in sampling audits (analyze patterns, not individual outputs) |
| 19 | * Suggest algorithm/prompt improvements based on findings | ||
| 20 | * Document systematic issues observed | ||
| 21 | * Contribute to system improvement discussions | ||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | **Can:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 24 | |
| |
1.1 | 25 | * Edit published content (changes apply immediately, Wikipedia-style) |
| 26 | * Flag quality issues (for sampling audit) | ||
| 27 | * Earn reputation through contributions | ||
| 28 | * Participate in RFC (Request for Comments) processes | ||
| 29 | |||
| 30 | **Cannot:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 31 | |
| |
1.1 | 32 | * Approve content before publication |
| 33 | * Override quality gates | ||
| 34 | * Act as gatekeepers | ||
| 35 | * Manually fix individual AI outputs | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | **Note**: Contributors improve THE SYSTEM, not individual outputs. | ||
| 38 | |||
| 39 | |||
| 40 | === 1.2 Trusted Contributors === | ||
| 41 | |||
| 42 | **Who**: Contributors with proven track record and domain expertise | ||
| 43 | |||
| 44 | **Responsibilities:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 45 | |
| |
1.1 | 46 | * Same as Contributors, plus: |
| 47 | * Review complex algorithm changes | ||
| 48 | * Provide domain expertise on contested claims | ||
| 49 | * Mentor new contributors | ||
| 50 | |||
| 51 | **Can:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 52 | |
| |
1.1 | 53 | * Everything Contributors can do, plus: |
| 54 | * Participate in higher-level system design decisions | ||
| 55 | * Review RFC proposals | ||
| 56 | * Access more detailed system metrics | ||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | **Cannot:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 59 | |
| |
1.1 | 60 | * Approve content before publication |
| 61 | * Override quality gates | ||
| 62 | * Act as gatekeepers | ||
| 63 | |||
| 64 | **Important**: "Trusted" refers to judgment quality, NOT approval authority. | ||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | === 1.3 Moderators === | ||
| 68 | |||
| 69 | **Who**: Team members focused on community health and abuse prevention | ||
| 70 | |||
| 71 | **Responsibilities:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 72 | |
| |
1.1 | 73 | * Handle abuse, spam, and harassment |
| 74 | * Enforce community guidelines | ||
| 75 | * Respond to user reports | ||
| 76 | * Manage bans and appeals | ||
| 77 | |||
| 78 | **Can:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 79 | |
| |
1.1 | 80 | * Hide abusive content |
| 81 | * Ban users for policy violations | ||
| 82 | * Review appeals | ||
| 83 | * Escalate serious issues to Governing Team | ||
| 84 | |||
| 85 | **Cannot:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 86 | |
| |
1.1 | 87 | * Approve content for publication |
| 88 | * Review content quality before publication | ||
| 89 | * Override quality gates for content | ||
| 90 | * Act as editorial gatekeepers | ||
| 91 | |||
| 92 | **Critical Distinction:** | ||
| 93 | ``` | ||
| 94 | Moderators handle: ABUSE (spam, harassment, violations) | ||
| 95 | Moderators DO NOT handle: CONTENT QUALITY (that's automated) | ||
| 96 | ``` | ||
| 97 | |||
| 98 | |||
| 99 | === 1.4 Domain Trusted Contributors (Optional, Task-Specific) === | ||
| 100 | |||
| 101 | **Who**: Subject matter specialists invited for specific high-stakes disputes | ||
| 102 | |||
| 103 | **Not a permanent role**: Contacted externally when needed for contested claims in their domain | ||
| 104 | |||
| 105 | **When used:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 106 | |
| |
1.1 | 107 | * Medical claims with life/safety implications |
| 108 | * Legal interpretations with significant impact | ||
| 109 | * Scientific claims with high controversy | ||
| 110 | * Technical claims requiring specialized knowledge | ||
| 111 | |||
| 112 | **Process:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 113 | |
| |
1.1 | 114 | * Moderator identifies need for expert input |
| 115 | * Contact expert externally (don't require them to be users) | ||
| 116 | * Trusted Contributor provides written opinion with sources | ||
| 117 | * Opinion added to claim record | ||
| 118 | * Trusted Contributor acknowledged in claim | ||
| 119 | |||
| 120 | **Important**: This is CONSULTATION, not APPROVAL. Their opinion is added to the evidence, not used as a gate. | ||
| 121 | |||
| 122 | **User Needs served**: UN-16 (Expert validation status) | ||
| 123 | |||
| 124 | |||
| 125 | == 2. Publication Modes == | ||
| 126 | |||
| 127 | **Fulfills**: UN-1 (Trust indicators), UN-16 (Review status transparency) | ||
| 128 | |||
| 129 | FactHarbor uses **TWO publication modes** (not three). Focus is on transparency and confidence scoring, not gatekeeping. | ||
| 130 | |||
| 131 | === 2.1 Mode 1: Draft-Only === | ||
| 132 | |||
| 133 | **Status**: Not visible to public | ||
| 134 | |||
| 135 | **When Used:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 136 | |
| |
1.1 | 137 | * Quality gates failed |
| 138 | * Confidence below threshold | ||
| 139 | * Structural integrity issues | ||
| 140 | * Insufficient evidence | ||
| 141 | |||
| 142 | **What Happens:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 143 | |
| |
1.1 | 144 | * Content remains private |
| 145 | * System logs failure reasons | ||
| 146 | * Prompts/algorithms improved based on patterns | ||
| 147 | * Content may be re-processed after improvements | ||
| 148 | |||
| 149 | **NOT "pending human approval"** - it's blocked because it doesn't meet automated quality standards. | ||
| 150 | |||
| 151 | |||
| 152 | === 2.2 Mode 2: AI-Generated (Public) === | ||
| 153 | |||
| 154 | **Status**: Published and visible to all users | ||
| 155 | |||
| 156 | **When Used:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 157 | |
| |
1.1 | 158 | * Quality gates passed |
| 159 | * Confidence ≥ threshold | ||
| 160 | * Meets structural requirements | ||
| 161 | * Sufficient evidence found | ||
| 162 | |||
| 163 | **Includes:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 164 | |
| |
1.1 | 165 | * Confidence score displayed (0-100%) |
| 166 | * Risk tier badge (A/B/C) | ||
| 167 | * Quality indicators | ||
| 168 | * Clear "AI-Generated" labeling | ||
| 169 | * Sampling audit status | ||
| 170 | |||
| 171 | **Labels by Risk Tier:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 172 | |
| |
1.1 | 173 | * **Tier A (High Risk):** "⚠️ AI-Generated - High Impact Topic - Seek Professional Advice" |
| 174 | * **Tier B (Medium Risk):** "🤖 AI-Generated - May Contain Errors" | ||
| 175 | * **Tier C (Low Risk):** "🤖 AI-Generated" | ||
| 176 | |||
| 177 | **User Contributions:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 178 | |
| |
1.1 | 179 | * User edits apply immediately (Wikipedia model) |
| 180 | * All changes logged and versioned | ||
| 181 | * May be selected for sampling audit | ||
| 182 | * Reputation earned for quality contributions | ||
| 183 | |||
| 184 | === REMOVED: Mode 3 === | ||
| 185 | |||
| 186 | **V0.9.50 Decision:** No centralized approval workflow. | ||
| 187 | |||
| 188 | **Rationale:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 189 | |
| |
1.1 | 190 | * Defeats automation purpose |
| 191 | * Creates bottleneck | ||
| 192 | * Inconsistent quality | ||
| 193 | * Not scalable | ||
| 194 | |||
| 195 | **What Replaced It:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 196 | |
| |
1.1 | 197 | * Better quality gates |
| 198 | * Sampling audits for system improvement | ||
| 199 | * Transparent confidence scoring | ||
| 200 | * Risk-based warnings | ||
| 201 | |||
| 202 | == 3. Content States == | ||
| 203 | |||
| 204 | === 3.1 Published === | ||
| 205 | |||
| 206 | **Status**: Visible to all users | ||
| 207 | |||
| 208 | **Includes:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 209 | |
| |
1.1 | 210 | * AI-generated analyses (default state after passing gates) |
| 211 | * User-contributed content | ||
| 212 | * Edited/improved content | ||
| 213 | |||
| 214 | **Quality Indicators** (displayed with content): | ||
| |
1.3 | 215 | |
| |
1.1 | 216 | * **Confidence Score**: 0-100% (AI's confidence in analysis) |
| 217 | * **Source Quality Score**: 0-100% (based on source track record) | ||
| 218 | * **Controversy Flag**: If high dispute/edit activity | ||
| 219 | * **Completeness Score**: % of expected fields filled | ||
| 220 | * **Last Updated**: Date of most recent change | ||
| 221 | * **Edit Count**: Number of revisions | ||
| 222 | * **Review Status**: AI-generated / Enhanced by contributors | ||
| 223 | |||
| 224 | **Automatic Warnings:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 225 | |
| |
1.1 | 226 | * Confidence < 60%: "Low confidence - use caution" |
| 227 | * Source quality < 40%: "Sources may be unreliable" | ||
| 228 | * High controversy: "Disputed - multiple interpretations exist" | ||
| 229 | * Medical/Legal/Safety domain: "Seek professional advice" | ||
| 230 | |||
| 231 | **User Needs served**: UN-1 (Trust score), UN-9 (Methodology transparency), UN-15 (Evolution timeline), UN-16 (Review status) | ||
| 232 | |||
| 233 | |||
| 234 | === 3.2 Hidden === | ||
| 235 | |||
| 236 | **Status**: Not visible to regular users (only to moderators) | ||
| 237 | |||
| 238 | **Reasons:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 239 | |
| |
1.1 | 240 | * Spam or advertising |
| 241 | * Personal attacks or harassment | ||
| 242 | * Illegal content | ||
| 243 | * Privacy violations | ||
| 244 | * Deliberate misinformation (verified) | ||
| 245 | * Abuse or harmful content | ||
| 246 | |||
| 247 | **Process:** | ||
| |
1.3 | 248 | |
| |
1.1 | 249 | * Automated detection flags for moderator review |
| 250 | * Moderator confirms and hides | ||
| 251 | * Original author notified with reason | ||
| 252 | * Can appeal to board if disputes moderator decision | ||
| 253 | |||
| 254 | **Note**: Content is hidden, not deleted (for audit trail) | ||
| 255 | |||
| 256 | |||
| 257 | == 4. Role Evolution Path == | ||
| 258 | |||
| 259 | **Contributor Journey:** | ||
| 260 | |||
| 261 | 1. **Visitor** – Explores platform, reads documentation, may raise questions | ||
| 262 | 2. **New Contributor** – Submits first improvements (typo fixes, small clarifications, new issues) | ||
| 263 | 3. **Contributor** – Contributes regularly and follows project conventions | ||
| 264 | 4. **Trusted Contributor** – Has a track record of high-quality work and reliable judgment | ||
| 265 | 5. **Auditor** – Participates in sampling audits (pattern analysis) | ||
| 266 | 6. **Moderator** – Focuses on behavior, tone, and conflict moderation (not content quality) | ||
| 267 | 7. **Domain Expert** (optional) – Offers domain expertise without changing governance authority | ||
| 268 | |||
| 269 | **Key Principle**: Low barrier to entry, transparent criteria for advancement, clear separation between content quality (automated) and behavior moderation (human). | ||
| 270 | |||
| 271 | |||
| 272 | == 5. Principles == | ||
| 273 | |||
| 274 | * **Low barrier to entry** for new contributors | ||
| 275 | * **Transparent criteria** for gaining and losing responsibilities | ||
| 276 | * **Clear separation** between content quality (automated) and behavioral moderation (human) | ||
| 277 | * **Documented processes** for escalation and appeal | ||
| 278 | * **No gatekeeping** for content publication | ||
| 279 | * **Immediate application** of contributions (Wikipedia model) | ||
| 280 | |||
| 281 | == 6. Related Pages == | ||
| 282 | |||
| |
1.7 | 283 | * [[AKEL>>Archive.FactHarbor 2026\.01\.20.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]] - AI system |
| |
1.10 | 284 | * [[Workflows>>Archive.FactHarbor 2026\.01\.20.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]] - Process workflows |
| |
1.8 | 285 | * [[Architecture>>Archive.FactHarbor 2026\.01\.20.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] - System architecture |
| |
1.1 | 286 | * [[Decision Processes>>FactHarbor.Organisation.Decision-Processes.WebHome]] - Governance |
| |
1.9 | 287 | * [[Requirements>>Archive.FactHarbor 2026\.01\.20.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] - All requirements |
| |
1.1 | 288 | |
| 289 | **V0.9.70 CHANGES:** | ||
| 290 | |||
| 291 | **REMOVED:** | ||
| 292 | - All references to "Mode 3" publication | ||
| 293 | - "Contributors validate quality gates" | ||
| 294 | - "Trusted Contributors validate outputs" | ||
| 295 | - "Moderators finalize publication" | ||
| 296 | |||
| 297 | **CLARIFIED:** | ||
| 298 | - Contributors suggest system improvements (not approve outputs) | ||
| 299 | - Moderators handle abuse only (not content quality) | ||
| 300 | - Trusted Contributors provide consultation (not validation) | ||
| 301 | - Domain experts provide opinions (not approval) | ||
| 302 | - Only 2 publication modes (AI-Generated / Draft-Only) | ||
| 303 | |||
| 304 | **ADDED:** | ||
| 305 | - Clear role boundaries | ||
| 306 | - Explicit "cannot" lists for each role | ||
| 307 | - Publication mode details | ||
| 308 | - Content state specifications |