Changes for page POC Requirements (POC1 & POC2)

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -14,11 +14,9 @@
14	14	=== 1.1 What POC Tests ===
15	15
16	16	**Core Question:**
17		-
18	18	> Can AI automatically extract factual claims from articles and evaluate them with reasonable verdicts?
19	19
20	20	**What we're proving:**
21		-
22	22	* AI can identify factual claims from text
23	23	* AI can evaluate those claims with structured evidence
24	24	* Quality gates can filter unreliable outputs
...	...	@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
25	25	* The core workflow is technically feasible
26	26
27	27	**What we're NOT proving:**
28		-
29	29	* Production-ready reliability (that's POC2)
30	30	* User-facing features (that's Beta 0)
31	31	* Full IFCN compliance (that's V1.0)
...	...	@@ -35,15 +35,15 @@
35	35	POC1 implements a **subset** of the full system requirements defined in [[Main Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]].
36	36
37	37	**Scope Summary:**
38		-
39	39	* **In Scope:** 8 requirements (7 FRs + 1 NFR)
40	40	* **Partial:** 3 NFRs (simplified versions)
41	41	* **Out of Scope:** 19 requirements (deferred to later phases)
42	42
	39	+
43	43	== 2. POC1 Scope ==
44	44
45	45	{{success}}
46		-**Authoritative Source for Phase Mapping:** [[Requirements Roadmap Matrix>>Test.FactHarbor V0\.9\.82.Roadmap.Requirements-Roadmap-Matrix.WebHome]]
	43	+**Authoritative Source for Phase Mapping:** [[Requirements Roadmap Matrix>>Test.FactHarbor.Roadmap.Requirements-Roadmap-Matrix.WebHome]]
47	47
48	48	The Roadmap Matrix is the single source of truth for which requirements are implemented in which phases. This page provides POC1-specific implementation details only.
49	49	{{/success}}
...	...	@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@
56	56	| **NFR11** | Quality Assurance Framework | 4 quality gates implemented
57	57
58	58	**POC1 also implements these workflow components** (detailed as FR1-FR6, FR8, FR11, FR13 in implementation sections below):
59		-
60	60	* Claim extraction (FR1)
61	61	* Claim context (FR2)
62	62	* Multiple scenarios (FR3)
...	...	@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@
67	67	* In-article highlighting (FR13) - deferred to Beta 0
68	68
69	69	**Partial implementations:**
70		-
71	71	* NFR1 (Explainability) - Basic only
72	72	* NFR2 (Performance) - Functional but not optimized
73	73	* NFR3 (Transparency) - Basic only
...	...	@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@
83	83	**Main Requirement:** AI extracts factual claims from input text
84	84
85	85	**POC Implementation:**
86		-
87	87	* ✅ AKEL extracts claims using LLM
88	88	* ✅ Each claim includes original text reference
89	89	* ✅ Claims are identified as factual/non-factual
...	...	@@ -90,17 +90,16 @@
90	90	* ❌ No advanced claim parsing (added in POC2)
91	91
92	92	**Acceptance Criteria:**
93		-
94	94	* Extracts 3-5 claims from typical article
95	95	* Identifies factual vs non-factual claims
96	96	* Quality Gate 1 validates extraction
97	97
	91	+
98	98	=== 3.2 FR3: Multiple Scenarios (Full Implementation) ===
99	99
100	100	**Main Requirement:** Generate multiple interpretation scenarios for ambiguous claims
101	101
102	102	**POC Implementation:**
103		-
104	104	* ✅ AKEL generates 2-3 scenarios per claim
105	105	* ✅ Scenarios capture different interpretations
106	106	* ✅ Each scenario is evaluated separately
...	...	@@ -107,17 +107,16 @@
107	107	* ✅ Verdict considers all scenarios
108	108
109	109	**Acceptance Criteria:**
110		-
111	111	* Generates 2+ scenarios for ambiguous claims
112	112	* Scenarios are meaningfully different
113	113	* All scenarios are evaluated
114	114
	107	+
115	115	=== 3.3 FR4: Analysis Summary (Basic Implementation) ===
116	116
117	117	**Main Requirement:** Provide user-friendly summary of analysis
118	118
119	119	**POC Implementation:**
120		-
121	121	* ✅ Simple text summary generated
122	122	* ❌ No rich formatting (added in Beta 0)
123	123	* ❌ No visual elements (added in Beta 0)
...	...	@@ -135,12 +135,10 @@
135	135	=== 3.4 FR5-FR6: Evidence Collection & Evaluation (Full Implementation) ===
136	136
137	137	**Main Requirements:**
138		-
139	139	* FR5: Collect supporting and opposing evidence
140	140	* FR6: Evaluate evidence source reliability
141	141
142	142	**POC Implementation:**
143		-
144	144	* ✅ AKEL searches for evidence (web/knowledge base)
145	145	* ✅ **Mandatory contradiction search** (finds opposing evidence)
146	146	* ✅ Source reliability scoring
...	...	@@ -148,17 +148,16 @@
148	148	* ❌ No advanced source verification (added in POC2)
149	149
150	150	**Acceptance Criteria:**
151		-
152	152	* Finds 2+ supporting evidence items
153	153	* Finds 1+ opposing evidence (if exists)
154	154	* Sources scored for reliability
155	155
	145	+
156	156	=== 3.5 FR7: Automated Verdicts (Full Implementation) ===
157	157
158	158	**Main Requirement:** AI computes verdicts with uncertainty quantification
159	159
160	160	**POC Implementation:**
161		-
162	162	* ✅ Probabilistic verdicts (0-100% confidence)
163	163	* ✅ Uncertainty explicitly stated
164	164	* ✅ Reasoning chain provided
...	...	@@ -173,11 +173,11 @@
173	173	```
174	174
175	175	**Acceptance Criteria:**
176		-
177	177	* Verdicts include probability (0-100%)
178	178	* Uncertainty explicitly quantified
179	179	* Reasoning chain explains verdict
180	180
	169	+
181	181	=== 3.6 NFR11: Quality Assurance Framework (LITE VERSION) ===
182	182
183	183	**Main Requirement:** Complete quality assurance with 7 quality gates
...	...	@@ -185,13 +185,11 @@
185	185	**POC Implementation:** **2 gates only**
186	186
187	187	**Quality Gate 1: Claim Validation**
188		-
189	189	* ✅ Validates claim is factual and verifiable
190	190	* ✅ Blocks non-factual claims (opinion/prediction/ambiguous)
191	191	* ✅ Provides clear rejection reason
192	192
193	193	**Quality Gate 4: Verdict Confidence Assessment**
194		-
195	195	* ✅ Validates ≥2 sources found
196	196	* ✅ Validates quality score ≥0.6
197	197	* ✅ Blocks low-confidence verdicts
...	...	@@ -198,7 +198,6 @@
198	198	* ✅ Provides clear rejection reason
199	199
200	200	**Out of Scope (POC2+):**
201		-
202	202	* ❌ Gate 2: Evidence Relevance
203	203	* ❌ Gate 3: Scenario Coherence
204	204	* ❌ Gate 5: Source Diversity
...	...	@@ -211,13 +211,11 @@
211	211	=== 3.7 NFR1-3: Performance, Scalability, Reliability (Basic) ===
212	212
213	213	**Main Requirements:**
214		-
215	215	* NFR1: Response time < 30 seconds
216	216	* NFR2: Handle 1000+ concurrent users
217	217	* NFR3: 99.9% uptime
218	218
219	219	**POC Implementation:**
220		-
221	221	* ⚠️ **Response time monitored** (not optimized)
222	222	* ⚠️ **Single-threaded processing** (no concurrency)
223	223	* ⚠️ **Basic error handling** (no advanced retry logic)
...	...	@@ -225,11 +225,11 @@
225	225	**Rationale:** POC proves functionality. Performance optimization happens in POC2.
226	226
227	227	**POC Acceptance:**
228		-
229	229	* Analysis completes (no timeout requirement)
230	230	* Errors don't crash system
231	231	* Basic logging in place
232	232
	216	+
233	233	== 4. What's NOT in POC Scope ==
234	234
235	235	=== 4.1 User-Facing Features (Beta 0+) ===
...	...	@@ -239,7 +239,6 @@
239	239	{{/warning}}
240	240
241	241	**Out of Scope:**
242		-
243	243	* ❌ User accounts and authentication (FR8)
244	244	* ❌ User corrections system (FR9, FR45-46)
245	245	* ❌ Public publishing interface (FR10)
...	...	@@ -253,7 +253,6 @@
253	253	=== 4.2 Advanced Features (V1.0+) ===
254	254
255	255	**Out of Scope:**
256		-
257	257	* ❌ IFCN compliance (FR47)
258	258	* ❌ ClaimReview schema (FR48)
259	259	* ❌ Archive.org integration (FR49)
...	...	@@ -268,7 +268,6 @@
268	268	=== 4.3 Production Requirements (POC2, Beta 0) ===
269	269
270	270	**Out of Scope:**
271		-
272	272	* ❌ Security controls (NFR4, NFR12)
273	273	* ❌ Code maintainability (NFR5)
274	274	* ❌ System monitoring (NFR13)
...	...	@@ -285,26 +285,21 @@
285	285
286	286	For each analyzed claim, POC must produce:
287	287
288		-*
289		-**
290		-**1. Claim
	269	+**1. Claim**
291	291	* Original text
292	292	* Classification (factual/non-factual/ambiguous)
293	293	* If non-factual: Clear reason why
294	294
295	295	**2. Scenarios** (if factual)
296		-
297	297	* 2-3 interpretation scenarios
298	298	* Each scenario clearly described
299	299
300	300	**3. Evidence** (if factual)
301		-
302	302	* Supporting evidence (2+ items)
303	303	* Opposing evidence (if exists)
304	304	* Source URLs and reliability scores
305	305
306	306	**4. Verdict** (if factual)
307		-
308	308	* Probability (0-100%)
309	309	* Uncertainty quantification
310	310	* Confidence level (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH)
...	...	@@ -311,10 +311,10 @@
311	311	* Reasoning chain
312	312
313	313	**5. Quality Status**
314		-
315	315	* Which gates passed/failed
316	316	* If failed: Clear explanation why
317	317
	293	+
318	318	=== 5.2 Example POC Output ===
319	319
320	320	{{code language="json"}}
...	...	@@ -366,7 +366,6 @@
366	366	POC is successful if:
367	367
368	368	✅ **FR1-FR7 Requirements Met:**
369		-
370	370	1. Extracts 3-5 factual claims from test articles
371	371	2. Generates 2-3 scenarios per ambiguous claim
372	372	3. Finds supporting AND opposing evidence
...	...	@@ -374,21 +374,19 @@
374	374	5. Provides clear reasoning chains
375	375
376	376	✅ **Quality Gates Work:**
377		-
378	378	1. Gate 1 blocks non-factual claims (100% block rate)
379	379	2. Gate 4 blocks low-quality verdicts (blocks if <2 sources or quality <0.6)
380	380	3. Clear rejection reasons provided
381	381
382	382	✅ **NFR11 Met:**
383		-
384	384	1. Quality gates reduce hallucination rate
385	385	2. Blocked outputs have clear explanations
386	386	3. Quality metrics are logged
387	387
	361	+
388	388	=== 6.2 Quality Thresholds ===
389	389
390	390	**Minimum Acceptable:**
391		-
392	392	* ≥70% of test claims correctly classified (factual/non-factual)
393	393	* ≥60% of verdicts are reasonable (human evaluation)
394	394	* Gate 1 blocks 100% of non-factual claims
...	...	@@ -395,17 +395,16 @@
395	395	* Gate 4 blocks verdicts with <2 sources
396	396
397	397	**Target:**
398		-
399	399	* ≥80% claims correctly classified
400	400	* ≥75% verdicts are reasonable
401	401	* <10% false positives (blocking good claims)
402	402
	375	+
403	403	=== 6.3 POC Decision Gate ===
404	404
405	405	**After POC1, we decide:**
406	406
407	407	**✅ PROCEED to POC2** if:
408		-
409	409	* Success criteria met
410	410	* Quality gates demonstrably improve output
411	411	* Core workflow is technically sound
...	...	@@ -412,72 +412,65 @@
412	412	* Clear path to production quality
413	413
414	414	**⚠️ ITERATE POC1** if:
415		-
416	416	* Success criteria partially met
417	417	* Gates work but need tuning
418	418	* Core issues identified but fixable
419	419
420	420	**❌ PIVOT APPROACH** if:
421		-
422	422	* Success criteria not met
423	423	* Fundamental AI limitations discovered
424	424	* Quality gates insufficient
425	425	* Alternative approach needed
426	426
	397	+
427	427	== 7. Test Cases ==
428	428
429	429	=== 7.1 Happy Path ===
430	430
431	431	**Test 1: Simple Factual Claim**
432		-
433	433	* Input: "Paris is the capital of France"
434		-* Expected: Factual, 1 scenario, verdict 95% true
	404	+* Expected: Factual, 1 scenario, verdict ~95% true
435	435
436	436	**Test 2: Ambiguous Claim**
437		-
438	438	* Input: "Switzerland has the highest income in Europe"
439	439	* Expected: Factual, 2-3 scenarios, verdict with uncertainty
440	440
441	441	**Test 3: Statistical Claim**
442		-
443	443	* Input: "10% of people have condition X"
444	444	* Expected: Factual, evidence with numbers, probabilistic verdict
445	445
	414	+
446	446	=== 7.2 Edge Cases ===
447	447
448	448	**Test 4: Opinion**
449		-
450	450	* Input: "Paris is the best city"
451	451	* Expected: Non-factual (opinion), blocked by Gate 1
452	452
453	453	**Test 5: Prediction**
454		-
455	455	* Input: "Bitcoin will reach $100,000 next year"
456	456	* Expected: Non-factual (prediction), blocked by Gate 1
457	457
458	458	**Test 6: Insufficient Evidence**
459		-
460	460	* Input: Obscure factual claim with no sources
461	461	* Expected: Blocked by Gate 4 (<2 sources)
462	462
	429	+
463	463	=== 7.3 Quality Gate Tests ===
464	464
465	465	**Test 7: Gate 1 Effectiveness**
466		-
467	467	* Input: Mix of 10 factual + 10 non-factual claims
468	468	* Expected: Gate 1 blocks all 10 non-factual (100% precision)
469	469
470	470	**Test 8: Gate 4 Effectiveness**
471		-
472	472	* Input: Claims with varying evidence availability
473	473	* Expected: Gate 4 blocks low-confidence verdicts
474	474
	440	+
475	475	== 8. Technical Architecture (POC) ==
476	476
477	477	=== 8.1 Simplified Architecture ===
478	478
479	479	**POC Tech Stack:**
480		-
481	481	* **Frontend:** Simple web interface (Next.js + TypeScript)
482	482	* **Backend:** Single API endpoint
483	483	* **AI:** Claude API (Sonnet 4.5)
...	...	@@ -490,7 +490,6 @@
490	490	=== 8.2 AKEL Implementation ===
491	491
492	492	**POC AKEL:**
493		-
494	494	* Single-threaded processing
495	495	* Synchronous API calls
496	496	* No caching
...	...	@@ -498,7 +498,6 @@
498	498	* Console logging
499	499
500	500	**Full AKEL (POC2+):**
501		-
502	502	* Multi-threaded processing
503	503	* Async API calls
504	504	* Evidence caching
...	...	@@ -505,6 +505,7 @@
505	505	* Advanced error handling with retry
506	506	* Structured logging + monitoring
507	507
	471	+
508	508	== 9. POC Philosophy ==
509	509
510	510	{{info}}
...	...	@@ -513,55 +513,47 @@
513	513
514	514	=== 9.1 Core Principles ===
515	515
516		-*
517		-**
518		-**1. Prove Concept, Not Production
	480	+**1. Prove Concept, Not Production**
519	519	* POC validates AI can do the job
520	520	* Production quality comes in POC2 and Beta 0
521	521	* Focus on "does it work?" not "is it perfect?"
522	522
523	523	**2. Implement Subset of Requirements**
524		-
525	525	* POC covers FR1-7, NFR11 (lite)
526	526	* All other requirements deferred
527	527	* Clear mapping to [[Main Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]]
528	528
529	529	**3. Quality Gates Validate Approach**
530		-
531	531	* 2 gates prove the concept
532	532	* Remaining 5 gates added in POC2
533	533	* Gates must demonstrably improve quality
534	534
535	535	**4. Iterate Based on Results**
536		-
537	537	* POC results determine next steps
538	538	* Decision gate after POC1
539	539	* Flexibility to pivot if needed
540	540
541		-=== 9.2 Success ===
542	542
543		- Clear Path Forward ===
	501	+=== 9.2 Success = Clear Path Forward ===
544	544
545	545	POC succeeds if we can confidently answer:
546	546
547	547	✅ **Technical Feasibility:**
548		-
549	549	* Can AI extract claims reliably?
550	550	* Can AI find balanced evidence?
551	551	* Can AI compute reasonable verdicts?
552	552
553	553	✅ **Quality Approach:**
554		-
555	555	* Do quality gates improve output?
556	556	* Can we measure and track quality?
557	557	* Is the gate approach scalable?
558	558
559	559	✅ **Production Path:**
560		-
561	561	* Is the core architecture sound?
562	562	* What needs improvement for production?
563	563	* Is POC2 the right next step?
564	564
	520	+
565	565	== 10. Related Pages ==
566	566
567	567	* **[[Main Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]]** - Full system requirements (this POC implements a subset)
...	...	@@ -570,10 +570,11 @@
570	570	* **[[Implementation Roadmap>>FactHarbor.Roadmap.WebHome]]** - POC1, POC2, Beta 0, V1.0 phases
571	571	* **[[User Needs>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.User Needs.WebHome]]** - What users need (drives requirements)
572	572
	529	+
573	573	**Document Owner:** Technical Team
574	574	**Review Frequency:** After each POC iteration
575	575	**Version History:**
576		-
577	577	* v1.0 - Initial POC requirements
578	578	* v2.0 - Updated after specification cross-check
579	579	* v3.0 - Aligned with Main Requirements (FR/NFR IDs added)
	536	+