Wiki source code of POC Requirements
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/23 11:35
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | = POC Requirements = | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | **Status:** ✅ Approved for Development | ||
| 4 | **Version:** 3.0 (Aligned with Main Requirements) | ||
| 5 | **Goal:** Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention | ||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | {{info}} | ||
| 8 | **Core Philosophy:** POC validates the [[Main Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] through simplified implementation. All POC features map to formal FR/NFR requirements. | ||
| 9 | {{/info}} | ||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | == 1. POC Overview == | ||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | === 1.1 What POC Tests === | ||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | **Core Question:** | ||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | > Can AI automatically extract factual claims from articles and evaluate them with reasonable verdicts? | ||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | **What we're proving:** | ||
| 21 | |||
| 22 | * AI can identify factual claims from text | ||
| 23 | * AI can evaluate those claims with structured evidence | ||
| 24 | * Quality gates can filter unreliable outputs | ||
| 25 | * The core workflow is technically feasible | ||
| 26 | |||
| 27 | **What we're NOT proving:** | ||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | * Production-ready reliability (that's POC2) | ||
| 30 | * User-facing features (that's Beta 0) | ||
| 31 | * Full IFCN compliance (that's V1.0) | ||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | === 1.2 Requirements Mapping === | ||
| 34 | |||
| 35 | POC1 implements a **subset** of the full system requirements defined in [[Main Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]]. | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | **Scope Summary:** | ||
| 38 | |||
| 39 | * **In Scope:** 8 requirements (7 FRs + 1 NFR) | ||
| 40 | * **Partial:** 3 NFRs (simplified versions) | ||
| 41 | * **Out of Scope:** 19 requirements (deferred to later phases) | ||
| 42 | |||
| 43 | == 2. Requirements Scope Matrix == | ||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | {{success}} | ||
| 46 | **Authoritative Source:** See [[Requirements Roadmap Matrix>>Test.FactHarbor V0\.9\.78.Specification.Requirements-Roadmap-Matrix.WebHome]] for complete phase-to-requirement mapping across all phases. | ||
| 47 | {{/success}} | ||
| 48 | |||
| 49 | **POC1 Scope Summary:** | ||
| 50 | |||
| 51 | POC1 implements the following requirements from the [[Main Requirements>>Test.FactHarbor V0\.9\.78.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]]: | ||
| 52 | |||
| 53 | **Full Implementation (8 requirements):** | ||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | * FR1: Claim Extraction | ||
| 56 | * FR2: Claim Context | ||
| 57 | * FR3: Multiple Scenarios | ||
| 58 | * FR4: Analysis Summary (Basic) | ||
| 59 | * FR5: Evidence Collection | ||
| 60 | * FR6: Source Quality Assessment | ||
| 61 | * FR7: Automated Verdicts (with quality gates) | ||
| 62 | * NFR11: AKEL Quality Assurance Framework (Basic - 4 quality gates) | ||
| 63 | |||
| 64 | **Partial Implementation (3 requirements):** | ||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | * NFR1: Explainability (Basic explanations only) | ||
| 67 | * NFR2: Performance (Functional but not optimized) | ||
| 68 | * NFR3: Transparency (Basic transparency) | ||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | **Deferred to Later Phases:** | ||
| 71 | |||
| 72 | * All other requirements (see Roadmap Matrix for phase assignments) | ||
| 73 | |||
| 74 | **Detailed POC1 specifications continue below...** | ||
| 75 | |||
| 76 | |||
| 77 | == 3. POC Simplifications == | ||
| 78 | |||
| 79 | === 3.1 FR1: Claim Extraction (Full Implementation) === | ||
| 80 | |||
| 81 | **Main Requirement:** AI extracts factual claims from input text | ||
| 82 | |||
| 83 | **POC Implementation:** | ||
| 84 | |||
| 85 | * ✅ AKEL extracts claims using LLM | ||
| 86 | * ✅ Each claim includes original text reference | ||
| 87 | * ✅ Claims are identified as factual/non-factual | ||
| 88 | * ❌ No advanced claim parsing (added in POC2) | ||
| 89 | |||
| 90 | **Acceptance Criteria:** | ||
| 91 | |||
| 92 | * Extracts 3-5 claims from typical article | ||
| 93 | * Identifies factual vs non-factual claims | ||
| 94 | * Quality Gate 1 validates extraction | ||
| 95 | |||
| 96 | === 3.2 FR3: Multiple Scenarios (Full Implementation) === | ||
| 97 | |||
| 98 | **Main Requirement:** Generate multiple interpretation scenarios for ambiguous claims | ||
| 99 | |||
| 100 | **POC Implementation:** | ||
| 101 | |||
| 102 | * ✅ AKEL generates 2-3 scenarios per claim | ||
| 103 | * ✅ Scenarios capture different interpretations | ||
| 104 | * ✅ Each scenario is evaluated separately | ||
| 105 | * ✅ Verdict considers all scenarios | ||
| 106 | |||
| 107 | **Acceptance Criteria:** | ||
| 108 | |||
| 109 | * Generates 2+ scenarios for ambiguous claims | ||
| 110 | * Scenarios are meaningfully different | ||
| 111 | * All scenarios are evaluated | ||
| 112 | |||
| 113 | === 3.3 FR4: Analysis Summary (Basic Implementation) === | ||
| 114 | |||
| 115 | **Main Requirement:** Provide user-friendly summary of analysis | ||
| 116 | |||
| 117 | **POC Implementation:** | ||
| 118 | |||
| 119 | * ✅ Simple text summary generated | ||
| 120 | * ❌ No rich formatting (added in Beta 0) | ||
| 121 | * ❌ No visual elements (added in Beta 0) | ||
| 122 | * ❌ No interactive features (added in Beta 0) | ||
| 123 | |||
| 124 | **POC Format:** | ||
| 125 | ``` | ||
| 126 | Claim: [extracted claim] | ||
| 127 | Scenarios: [list of scenarios] | ||
| 128 | Evidence: [supporting/opposing evidence] | ||
| 129 | Verdict: [probability with uncertainty] | ||
| 130 | ``` | ||
| 131 | |||
| 132 | |||
| 133 | === 3.4 FR5-FR6: Evidence Collection & Evaluation (Full Implementation) === | ||
| 134 | |||
| 135 | **Main Requirements:** | ||
| 136 | |||
| 137 | * FR5: Collect supporting and opposing evidence | ||
| 138 | * FR6: Evaluate evidence source reliability | ||
| 139 | |||
| 140 | **POC Implementation:** | ||
| 141 | |||
| 142 | * ✅ AKEL searches for evidence (web/knowledge base) | ||
| 143 | * ✅ **Mandatory contradiction search** (finds opposing evidence) | ||
| 144 | * ✅ Source reliability scoring | ||
| 145 | * ❌ No evidence deduplication (added in POC2) | ||
| 146 | * ❌ No advanced source verification (added in POC2) | ||
| 147 | |||
| 148 | **Acceptance Criteria:** | ||
| 149 | |||
| 150 | * Finds 2+ supporting evidence items | ||
| 151 | * Finds 1+ opposing evidence (if exists) | ||
| 152 | * Sources scored for reliability | ||
| 153 | |||
| 154 | === 3.5 FR7: Automated Verdicts (Full Implementation) === | ||
| 155 | |||
| 156 | **Main Requirement:** AI computes verdicts with uncertainty quantification | ||
| 157 | |||
| 158 | **POC Implementation:** | ||
| 159 | |||
| 160 | * ✅ Probabilistic verdicts (0-100% confidence) | ||
| 161 | * ✅ Uncertainty explicitly stated | ||
| 162 | * ✅ Reasoning chain provided | ||
| 163 | * ✅ Quality Gate 4 validates verdict confidence | ||
| 164 | |||
| 165 | **POC Output:** | ||
| 166 | ``` | ||
| 167 | Verdict: 70% likely true | ||
| 168 | Uncertainty: ±15% (moderate confidence) | ||
| 169 | Reasoning: Based on 3 high-quality sources... | ||
| 170 | Confidence Level: MEDIUM | ||
| 171 | ``` | ||
| 172 | |||
| 173 | **Acceptance Criteria:** | ||
| 174 | |||
| 175 | * Verdicts include probability (0-100%) | ||
| 176 | * Uncertainty explicitly quantified | ||
| 177 | * Reasoning chain explains verdict | ||
| 178 | |||
| 179 | === 3.6 NFR11: Quality Assurance Framework (LITE VERSION) === | ||
| 180 | |||
| 181 | **Main Requirement:** Complete quality assurance with 7 quality gates | ||
| 182 | |||
| 183 | **POC Implementation:** **2 gates only** | ||
| 184 | |||
| 185 | **Quality Gate 1: Claim Validation** | ||
| 186 | |||
| 187 | * ✅ Validates claim is factual and verifiable | ||
| 188 | * ✅ Blocks non-factual claims (opinion/prediction/ambiguous) | ||
| 189 | * ✅ Provides clear rejection reason | ||
| 190 | |||
| 191 | **Quality Gate 4: Verdict Confidence Assessment** | ||
| 192 | |||
| 193 | * ✅ Validates ≥2 sources found | ||
| 194 | * ✅ Validates quality score ≥0.6 | ||
| 195 | * ✅ Blocks low-confidence verdicts | ||
| 196 | * ✅ Provides clear rejection reason | ||
| 197 | |||
| 198 | **Out of Scope (POC2+):** | ||
| 199 | |||
| 200 | * ❌ Gate 2: Evidence Relevance | ||
| 201 | * ❌ Gate 3: Scenario Coherence | ||
| 202 | * ❌ Gate 5: Source Diversity | ||
| 203 | * ❌ Gate 6: Reasoning Validity | ||
| 204 | * ❌ Gate 7: Output Completeness | ||
| 205 | |||
| 206 | **Rationale:** Prove gate concept works. Add remaining gates in POC2 after validating approach. | ||
| 207 | |||
| 208 | |||
| 209 | === 3.7 NFR1-3: Performance, Scalability, Reliability (Basic) === | ||
| 210 | |||
| 211 | **Main Requirements:** | ||
| 212 | |||
| 213 | * NFR1: Response time < 30 seconds | ||
| 214 | * NFR2: Handle 1000+ concurrent users | ||
| 215 | * NFR3: 99.9% uptime | ||
| 216 | |||
| 217 | **POC Implementation:** | ||
| 218 | |||
| 219 | * ⚠️ **Response time monitored** (not optimized) | ||
| 220 | * ⚠️ **Single-threaded processing** (no concurrency) | ||
| 221 | * ⚠️ **Basic error handling** (no advanced retry logic) | ||
| 222 | |||
| 223 | **Rationale:** POC proves functionality. Performance optimization happens in POC2. | ||
| 224 | |||
| 225 | **POC Acceptance:** | ||
| 226 | |||
| 227 | * Analysis completes (no timeout requirement) | ||
| 228 | * Errors don't crash system | ||
| 229 | * Basic logging in place | ||
| 230 | |||
| 231 | == 4. What's NOT in POC Scope == | ||
| 232 | |||
| 233 | === 4.1 User-Facing Features (Beta 0+) === | ||
| 234 | |||
| 235 | {{warning}} | ||
| 236 | **Deferred to Beta 0:** | ||
| 237 | {{/warning}} | ||
| 238 | |||
| 239 | **Out of Scope:** | ||
| 240 | |||
| 241 | * ❌ User accounts and authentication (FR8) | ||
| 242 | * ❌ User corrections system (FR9, FR45-46) | ||
| 243 | * ❌ Public publishing interface (FR10) | ||
| 244 | * ❌ Social sharing (FR11) | ||
| 245 | * ❌ Email notifications (FR12) | ||
| 246 | * ❌ API access (FR13) | ||
| 247 | |||
| 248 | **Rationale:** POC validates AI capabilities. User features added in Beta 0. | ||
| 249 | |||
| 250 | |||
| 251 | === 4.2 Advanced Features (V1.0+) === | ||
| 252 | |||
| 253 | **Out of Scope:** | ||
| 254 | |||
| 255 | * ❌ IFCN compliance (FR47) | ||
| 256 | * ❌ ClaimReview schema (FR48) | ||
| 257 | * ❌ Archive.org integration (FR49) | ||
| 258 | * ❌ OSINT toolkit (FR50) | ||
| 259 | * ❌ Video verification (FR51) | ||
| 260 | * ❌ Deepfake detection (FR52) | ||
| 261 | * ❌ Cross-org sharing (FR53) | ||
| 262 | |||
| 263 | **Rationale:** Advanced features require proven platform. Added post-V1.0. | ||
| 264 | |||
| 265 | |||
| 266 | === 4.3 Production Requirements (POC2, Beta 0) === | ||
| 267 | |||
| 268 | **Out of Scope:** | ||
| 269 | |||
| 270 | * ❌ Security controls (NFR4, NFR12) | ||
| 271 | * ❌ Code maintainability (NFR5) | ||
| 272 | * ❌ System monitoring (NFR13) | ||
| 273 | * ❌ Evidence deduplication | ||
| 274 | * ❌ Advanced source verification | ||
| 275 | * ❌ Full 7-gate quality framework | ||
| 276 | |||
| 277 | **Rationale:** POC proves concept. Production hardening happens in POC2 and Beta 0. | ||
| 278 | |||
| 279 | |||
| 280 | == 5. POC Output Specification == | ||
| 281 | |||
| 282 | === 5.1 Required Output Elements === | ||
| 283 | |||
| 284 | For each analyzed claim, POC must produce: | ||
| 285 | |||
| 286 | * \\ | ||
| 287 | ** \\ | ||
| 288 | **1. Claim | ||
| 289 | * Original text | ||
| 290 | * Classification (factual/non-factual/ambiguous) | ||
| 291 | * If non-factual: Clear reason why | ||
| 292 | |||
| 293 | **2. Scenarios** (if factual) | ||
| 294 | |||
| 295 | * 2-3 interpretation scenarios | ||
| 296 | * Each scenario clearly described | ||
| 297 | |||
| 298 | **3. Evidence** (if factual) | ||
| 299 | |||
| 300 | * Supporting evidence (2+ items) | ||
| 301 | * Opposing evidence (if exists) | ||
| 302 | * Source URLs and reliability scores | ||
| 303 | |||
| 304 | **4. Verdict** (if factual) | ||
| 305 | |||
| 306 | * Probability (0-100%) | ||
| 307 | * Uncertainty quantification | ||
| 308 | * Confidence level (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH) | ||
| 309 | * Reasoning chain | ||
| 310 | |||
| 311 | **5. Quality Status** | ||
| 312 | |||
| 313 | * Which gates passed/failed | ||
| 314 | * If failed: Clear explanation why | ||
| 315 | |||
| 316 | === 5.2 Example POC Output === | ||
| 317 | |||
| 318 | {{code language="json"}} | ||
| 319 | { | ||
| 320 | "claim": { | ||
| 321 | "text": "Switzerland has the highest life expectancy in Europe", | ||
| 322 | "type": "factual", | ||
| 323 | "gate1_status": "PASS" | ||
| 324 | }, | ||
| 325 | "scenarios": [ | ||
| 326 | "Switzerland's overall life expectancy is highest", | ||
| 327 | "Switzerland ranks highest for specific age groups" | ||
| 328 | ], | ||
| 329 | "evidence": { | ||
| 330 | "supporting": [ | ||
| 331 | { | ||
| 332 | "source": "WHO Report 2023", | ||
| 333 | "reliability": 0.95, | ||
| 334 | "excerpt": "Switzerland: 83.4 years average..." | ||
| 335 | } | ||
| 336 | ], | ||
| 337 | "opposing": [ | ||
| 338 | { | ||
| 339 | "source": "Eurostat 2024", | ||
| 340 | "reliability": 0.90, | ||
| 341 | "excerpt": "Spain leads at 83.5 years..." | ||
| 342 | } | ||
| 343 | ] | ||
| 344 | }, | ||
| 345 | "verdict": { | ||
| 346 | "probability": 0.65, | ||
| 347 | "uncertainty": 0.15, | ||
| 348 | "confidence": "MEDIUM", | ||
| 349 | "reasoning": "WHO and Eurostat show similar but conflicting data...", | ||
| 350 | "gate4_status": "PASS" | ||
| 351 | } | ||
| 352 | } | ||
| 353 | {{/code}} | ||
| 354 | |||
| 355 | |||
| 356 | == 6. Success Criteria == | ||
| 357 | |||
| 358 | {{success}} | ||
| 359 | **POC Success Definition:** POC validates that AI can extract claims, find balanced evidence, and compute reasonable verdicts with quality gates improving output quality. | ||
| 360 | {{/success}} | ||
| 361 | |||
| 362 | === 6.1 Functional Success === | ||
| 363 | |||
| 364 | POC is successful if: | ||
| 365 | |||
| 366 | ✅ **FR1-FR7 Requirements Met:** | ||
| 367 | |||
| 368 | 1. Extracts 3-5 factual claims from test articles | ||
| 369 | 2. Generates 2-3 scenarios per ambiguous claim | ||
| 370 | 3. Finds supporting AND opposing evidence | ||
| 371 | 4. Computes probabilistic verdicts with uncertainty | ||
| 372 | 5. Provides clear reasoning chains | ||
| 373 | |||
| 374 | ✅ **Quality Gates Work:** | ||
| 375 | |||
| 376 | 1. Gate 1 blocks non-factual claims (100% block rate) | ||
| 377 | 2. Gate 4 blocks low-quality verdicts (blocks if <2 sources or quality <0.6) | ||
| 378 | 3. Clear rejection reasons provided | ||
| 379 | |||
| 380 | ✅ **NFR11 Met:** | ||
| 381 | |||
| 382 | 1. Quality gates reduce hallucination rate | ||
| 383 | 2. Blocked outputs have clear explanations | ||
| 384 | 3. Quality metrics are logged | ||
| 385 | |||
| 386 | === 6.2 Quality Thresholds === | ||
| 387 | |||
| 388 | **Minimum Acceptable:** | ||
| 389 | |||
| 390 | * ≥70% of test claims correctly classified (factual/non-factual) | ||
| 391 | * ≥60% of verdicts are reasonable (human evaluation) | ||
| 392 | * Gate 1 blocks 100% of non-factual claims | ||
| 393 | * Gate 4 blocks verdicts with <2 sources | ||
| 394 | |||
| 395 | **Target:** | ||
| 396 | |||
| 397 | * ≥80% claims correctly classified | ||
| 398 | * ≥75% verdicts are reasonable | ||
| 399 | * <10% false positives (blocking good claims) | ||
| 400 | |||
| 401 | === 6.3 POC Decision Gate === | ||
| 402 | |||
| 403 | **After POC1, we decide:** | ||
| 404 | |||
| 405 | **✅ PROCEED to POC2** if: | ||
| 406 | |||
| 407 | * Success criteria met | ||
| 408 | * Quality gates demonstrably improve output | ||
| 409 | * Core workflow is technically sound | ||
| 410 | * Clear path to production quality | ||
| 411 | |||
| 412 | **⚠️ ITERATE POC1** if: | ||
| 413 | |||
| 414 | * Success criteria partially met | ||
| 415 | * Gates work but need tuning | ||
| 416 | * Core issues identified but fixable | ||
| 417 | |||
| 418 | **❌ PIVOT APPROACH** if: | ||
| 419 | |||
| 420 | * Success criteria not met | ||
| 421 | * Fundamental AI limitations discovered | ||
| 422 | * Quality gates insufficient | ||
| 423 | * Alternative approach needed | ||
| 424 | |||
| 425 | == 7. Test Cases == | ||
| 426 | |||
| 427 | === 7.1 Happy Path === | ||
| 428 | |||
| 429 | **Test 1: Simple Factual Claim** | ||
| 430 | |||
| 431 | * Input: "Paris is the capital of France" | ||
| 432 | * Expected: Factual, 1 scenario, verdict 95% true | ||
| 433 | |||
| 434 | **Test 2: Ambiguous Claim** | ||
| 435 | |||
| 436 | * Input: "Switzerland has the highest income in Europe" | ||
| 437 | * Expected: Factual, 2-3 scenarios, verdict with uncertainty | ||
| 438 | |||
| 439 | **Test 3: Statistical Claim** | ||
| 440 | |||
| 441 | * Input: "10% of people have condition X" | ||
| 442 | * Expected: Factual, evidence with numbers, probabilistic verdict | ||
| 443 | |||
| 444 | === 7.2 Edge Cases === | ||
| 445 | |||
| 446 | **Test 4: Opinion** | ||
| 447 | |||
| 448 | * Input: "Paris is the best city" | ||
| 449 | * Expected: Non-factual (opinion), blocked by Gate 1 | ||
| 450 | |||
| 451 | **Test 5: Prediction** | ||
| 452 | |||
| 453 | * Input: "Bitcoin will reach $100,000 next year" | ||
| 454 | * Expected: Non-factual (prediction), blocked by Gate 1 | ||
| 455 | |||
| 456 | **Test 6: Insufficient Evidence** | ||
| 457 | |||
| 458 | * Input: Obscure factual claim with no sources | ||
| 459 | * Expected: Blocked by Gate 4 (<2 sources) | ||
| 460 | |||
| 461 | === 7.3 Quality Gate Tests === | ||
| 462 | |||
| 463 | **Test 7: Gate 1 Effectiveness** | ||
| 464 | |||
| 465 | * Input: Mix of 10 factual + 10 non-factual claims | ||
| 466 | * Expected: Gate 1 blocks all 10 non-factual (100% precision) | ||
| 467 | |||
| 468 | **Test 8: Gate 4 Effectiveness** | ||
| 469 | |||
| 470 | * Input: Claims with varying evidence availability | ||
| 471 | * Expected: Gate 4 blocks low-confidence verdicts | ||
| 472 | |||
| 473 | == 8. Technical Architecture (POC) == | ||
| 474 | |||
| 475 | === 8.1 Simplified Architecture === | ||
| 476 | |||
| 477 | **POC Tech Stack:** | ||
| 478 | |||
| 479 | * **Frontend:** Simple web interface (Next.js + TypeScript) | ||
| 480 | * **Backend:** Single API endpoint | ||
| 481 | * **AI:** Claude API (Sonnet 4.5) | ||
| 482 | * **Database:** Local JSON files (no database) | ||
| 483 | * **Deployment:** Single server | ||
| 484 | |||
| 485 | **Architecture Diagram:** See [[POC1 Specification>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Specification]] | ||
| 486 | |||
| 487 | |||
| 488 | === 8.2 AKEL Implementation === | ||
| 489 | |||
| 490 | **POC AKEL:** | ||
| 491 | |||
| 492 | * Single-threaded processing | ||
| 493 | * Synchronous API calls | ||
| 494 | * No caching | ||
| 495 | * Basic error handling | ||
| 496 | * Console logging | ||
| 497 | |||
| 498 | **Full AKEL (POC2+):** | ||
| 499 | |||
| 500 | * Multi-threaded processing | ||
| 501 | * Async API calls | ||
| 502 | * Evidence caching | ||
| 503 | * Advanced error handling with retry | ||
| 504 | * Structured logging + monitoring | ||
| 505 | |||
| 506 | == 9. POC Philosophy == | ||
| 507 | |||
| 508 | {{info}} | ||
| 509 | **Important:** POC validates concept, not production readiness. Focus is on proving AI can do the job, with production quality coming in later phases. | ||
| 510 | {{/info}} | ||
| 511 | |||
| 512 | === 9.1 Core Principles === | ||
| 513 | |||
| 514 | * \\ | ||
| 515 | ** \\ | ||
| 516 | **1. Prove Concept, Not Production | ||
| 517 | * POC validates AI can do the job | ||
| 518 | * Production quality comes in POC2 and Beta 0 | ||
| 519 | * Focus on "does it work?" not "is it perfect?" | ||
| 520 | |||
| 521 | **2. Implement Subset of Requirements** | ||
| 522 | |||
| 523 | * POC covers FR1-7, NFR11 (lite) | ||
| 524 | * All other requirements deferred | ||
| 525 | * Clear mapping to [[Main Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] | ||
| 526 | |||
| 527 | **3. Quality Gates Validate Approach** | ||
| 528 | |||
| 529 | * 2 gates prove the concept | ||
| 530 | * Remaining 5 gates added in POC2 | ||
| 531 | * Gates must demonstrably improve quality | ||
| 532 | |||
| 533 | **4. Iterate Based on Results** | ||
| 534 | |||
| 535 | * POC results determine next steps | ||
| 536 | * Decision gate after POC1 | ||
| 537 | * Flexibility to pivot if needed | ||
| 538 | |||
| 539 | === 9.2 Success === | ||
| 540 | |||
| 541 | Clear Path Forward === | ||
| 542 | |||
| 543 | POC succeeds if we can confidently answer: | ||
| 544 | |||
| 545 | ✅ **Technical Feasibility:** | ||
| 546 | |||
| 547 | * Can AI extract claims reliably? | ||
| 548 | * Can AI find balanced evidence? | ||
| 549 | * Can AI compute reasonable verdicts? | ||
| 550 | |||
| 551 | ✅ **Quality Approach:** | ||
| 552 | |||
| 553 | * Do quality gates improve output? | ||
| 554 | * Can we measure and track quality? | ||
| 555 | * Is the gate approach scalable? | ||
| 556 | |||
| 557 | ✅ **Production Path:** | ||
| 558 | |||
| 559 | * Is the core architecture sound? | ||
| 560 | * What needs improvement for production? | ||
| 561 | * Is POC2 the right next step? | ||
| 562 | |||
| 563 | == 10. Related Pages == | ||
| 564 | |||
| 565 | * **[[Main Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]]** - Full system requirements (this POC implements a subset) | ||
| 566 | * **[[POC1 Specification (Detailed)>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Specification]]** - Detailed POC1 technical specs | ||
| 567 | * **[[POC Summary>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Summary]]** - High-level POC overview | ||
| 568 | * **[[Implementation Roadmap>>FactHarbor.Roadmap.WebHome]]** - POC1, POC2, Beta 0, V1.0 phases | ||
| 569 | * **[[User Needs>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.User Needs.WebHome]]** - What users need (drives requirements) | ||
| 570 | |||
| 571 | **Document Owner:** Technical Team | ||
| 572 | **Review Frequency:** After each POC iteration | ||
| 573 | **Version History:** | ||
| 574 | |||
| 575 | * v1.0 - Initial POC requirements | ||
| 576 | * v2.0 - Updated after specification cross-check | ||
| 577 | * v3.0 - Aligned with Main Requirements (FR/NFR IDs added) |