Changes for page User Needs

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
9	9	== 1. Core Reading & Discovery ==
10	10
11	11	=== UN-1: Trust Assessment at a Glance ===
12		-
13	13	**As** an article reader (any content type),
14	14	**I want** to see a trust score and overall verdict summary at a glance,
15	15	**so that** I can quickly decide if the content is worth my time to read in detail.
...	...	@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
17	17	**Maps to**: FR7 (Automated Verdicts), NFR3 (Transparency)
18	18
19	19	=== UN-2: Claim Extraction and Verification ===
20		-
21	21	**As** an article reader,
22	22	**I want** to see the key factual claims extracted from content with verification verdicts (likelihood ranges + uncertainty ratings) for each relevant scenario,
23	23	**so that** I can distinguish proven facts from speculation and understand context-dependent truth.
...	...	@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
25	25	**Maps to**: FR1 (Claim Intake), FR4 (Scenario Generation), FR7 (Automated Verdicts)
26	26
27	27	=== UN-3: Article Summary with FactHarbor Analysis Summary ===
28		-
29	29	**As** an article reader,
30	30	**I want** to see an article summary (the document's position, key claims, and reasoning) side-by-side with FactHarbor's analysis summary (source credibility assessment, claim-by-claim verdicts, methodology evaluation, and overall quality verdict),
31	31	**so that** I can quickly understand both what the document claims and FactHarbor's complete analysis of its credibility without reading the full detailed report.
...	...	@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
42	42	**Credibility:** Very High (peer-reviewed expert consensus)
43	43
44	44	=== The Big Picture ===
45		-
46	46	**Old belief:** "A glass of wine is good for your heart"
47	47	**New position:** We're no longer sure that's true
48	48
...	...	@@ -54,11 +54,9 @@
54	54	|None|(% style="color:green" %)✅ **Don't start drinking for heart health**
55	55
56	56	=== Why the Shift? ===
57		-
58	58	Newer genetic studies (Mendelian randomization) found **no evidence** that moderate drinking protects the heart. The apparent benefits in older studies were likely due to lifestyle differences and methodological bias.
59	59
60	60	=== AHA Bottom Line ===
61		-
62	62	(% class="box" %)
63	63	(((
64	64	If you don't drink, don't start. If you do drink, keep it to ≤2/day (men) or ≤1/day (women). Focus on proven healthy behaviors instead—exercise, diet, not smoking.
...	...	@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@
71	71	**Document:** AHA Scientific Statement on Alcohol and Cardiovascular Disease (2025)
72	72
73	73	=== Source Assessment ===
74		-
75	75	**Credibility:** (% style="color:green" %)**VERY HIGH**(%%) – Official AHA statement, peer-reviewed, expert panel, published in top journal (//Circulation//)
76	76
77	77	=== Analysis Findings ===
...	...	@@ -103,7 +103,6 @@
103	103	**Key Elements of Two-Panel Layout**:
104	104
105	105	**Left Panel (Article Summary)**:
106		-
107	107	* Document title and source
108	108	* Source credibility (document's own authority)
109	109	* "The Big Picture" - old belief vs. new position
...	...	@@ -112,7 +112,6 @@
112	112	* "Bottom Line" - document's conclusion
113	113
114	114	**Right Panel (FactHarbor Analysis Summary)**:
115		-
116	116	* FactHarbor's source assessment (independent credibility check)
117	117	* Claim-by-claim analysis with verdicts and confidence scores
118	118	* Assessment of methodology (strengths/limitations)
...	...	@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@
122	122	**Design Principle**: User sees **what they claim** and **FactHarbor's complete analysis** side-by-side without scrolling.
123	123
124	124	=== UN-4: Social Media Fact-Checking ===
125		-
126	126	**As** a social media user,
127	127	**I want** to check claims in posts before sharing,
128	128	**so that** I can avoid spreading misinformation.
...	...	@@ -130,7 +130,6 @@
130	130	**Maps to**: FR1 (Claim Intake), FR7 (Automated Verdicts), NFR1 (Performance - fast processing)
131	131
132	132	=== UN-17: In-Article Claim Highlighting ===
133		-
134	134	**As** a reader viewing an article,
135	135	**I want** to see factual claims highlighted with color-coded credibility indicators (green for well-supported, yellow for uncertain, red for refuted),
136	136	**so that** I can immediately identify which statements are trustworthy and which require skepticism without interrupting my reading flow.
...	...	@@ -161,7 +161,6 @@
161	161	== 2. Source Tracing & Credibility ==
162	162
163	163	=== UN-5: Source Provenance and Track Records ===
164		-
165	165	**As** an article reader,
166	166	**I want** to trace each piece of evidence back to its original source and see that source's historical track record,
167	167	**so that** I can assess the reliability of the information chain and learn which sources are consistently trustworthy.
...	...	@@ -169,7 +169,6 @@
169	169	**Maps to**: FR5 (Evidence Linking), Section 4.1 (Source Requirements - track record system)
170	170
171	171	=== UN-6: Publisher Reliability History ===
172		-
173	173	**As** an article reader,
174	174	**I want** to see historical accuracy track records for sources and publishers,
175	175	**so that** I can learn which outlets are consistently reliable over time.
...	...	@@ -179,7 +179,6 @@
179	179	== 3. Understanding the Analysis ==
180	180
181	181	=== UN-7: Evidence Transparency ===
182		-
183	183	**As** a skeptical reader,
184	184	**I want** to see the evidence and reasoning behind each verdict,
185	185	**so that** I can judge whether I agree with the assessment and form my own conclusions.
...	...	@@ -187,7 +187,6 @@
187	187	**Maps to**: FR5 (Evidence Linking), NFR3 (Transparency)
188	188
189	189	=== UN-8: Understanding Disagreement and Consensus ===
190		-
191	191	**As** an article reader,
192	192	**I want** to see which scenarios have strong supporting evidence versus which have conflicting evidence or high uncertainty,
193	193	**so that** I can understand where legitimate disagreement exists versus where consensus is clear.
...	...	@@ -195,7 +195,6 @@
195	195	**Maps to**: FR6 (Scenario Comparison), FR7 (Automated Verdicts - uncertainty factors), AKEL Gate 2 (Contradiction Search)
196	196
197	197	=== UN-9: Methodology Transparency ===
198		-
199	199	**As** an article reader,
200	200	**I want** to understand how likelihood ranges and confidence scores are calculated,
201	201	**so that** I can trust the verification process itself.
...	...	@@ -205,7 +205,6 @@
205	205	== 4. Pattern Recognition & Learning ==
206	206
207	207	=== UN-10: Manipulation Tactics Detection ===
208		-
209	209	**As** an article reader,
210	210	**I want** to see common manipulation tactics or logical fallacies identified in content,
211	211	**so that** I can recognize them elsewhere and become a more critical consumer of information.
...	...	@@ -213,7 +213,6 @@
213	213	**Maps to**: AKEL (Bubble Detection), Section 5 (Automated Risk Scoring)
214	214
215	215	=== UN-11: Filtered Research ===
216		-
217	217	**As** a researcher,
218	218	**I want** to filter content by verification status, confidence levels, and source quality,
219	219	**so that** I can work only with reliable information appropriate for my research needs.
...	...	@@ -223,7 +223,6 @@
223	223	== 5. Taking Action ==
224	224
225	225	=== UN-12: Submit Unchecked Claims ===
226		-
227	227	**As** a reader who finds unchecked claims,
228	228	**I want** to submit them for verification,
229	229	**so that** I can help expand fact-checking coverage and contribute to the knowledge base.
...	...	@@ -231,7 +231,6 @@
231	231	**Maps to**: FR1 (Claim Intake), Section 1.1 (Reader role)
232	232
233	233	=== UN-13: Cite FactHarbor Verdicts ===
234		-
235	235	**As** a content creator,
236	236	**I want** to cite FactHarbor verdicts when sharing content,
237	237	**so that** I can add credibility to what I publish and help my audience distinguish fact from speculation.
...	...	@@ -241,7 +241,6 @@
241	241	== 6. Professional Use ==
242	242
243	243	=== UN-14: API Access for Integration ===
244		-
245	245	**As** a journalist/researcher,
246	246	**I want** API access to verification data and claim histories,
247	247	**so that** I can integrate fact-checking into my professional workflow without manual lookups.
...	...	@@ -251,7 +251,6 @@
251	251	== 7. Understanding Evolution & Trust Labels ==
252	252
253	253	=== UN-15: Verdict Evolution Timeline ===
254		-
255	255	**As** an article reader,
256	256	**I want** to see how a claim's verdict has evolved over time with clear timestamps,
257	257	**so that** I can understand whether the current assessment is stable or recently changed based on new evidence.
...	...	@@ -259,7 +259,6 @@
259	259	**Maps to**: FR8 (Time Evolution), Data Model (Versioned entities), NFR3 (Transparency)
260	260
261	261	=== UN-16: AI vs. Human Review Status ===
262		-
263	263	**As** an article reader,
264	264	**I want** to know if the verdict was AI-generated, human-reviewed, or expert-validated,
265	265	**so that** I can gauge the appropriate level of trust and understand the review process used.
...	...	@@ -317,7 +317,6 @@
317	317	This section identifies user needs that may emerge as the platform matures:
318	318
319	319	**Potential Future Needs**:
320		-
321	321	* **Collaborative annotation**: Users want to discuss verdicts with others
322	322	* **Personal tracking**: Users want to track claims they're following
323	323	* **Custom alerts**: Users want notifications when tracked claims are updated
...	...	@@ -325,7 +325,6 @@
325	325	* **Comparative analysis**: Users want to compare how different fact-checkers rate the same claim
326	326
327	327	**When to address**: These needs should be considered when:
328		-
329	329	1. User feedback explicitly requests them
330	330	2. Usage metrics show users attempting these workflows
331	331	3. Competitive analysis shows these as differentiators
...	...	@@ -335,11 +335,12 @@
335	335	== 10. Related Pages ==
336	336
337	337	* [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] - Parent page with roles, rules, and functional requirements
338		-* [[Architecture>>Archive.FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] - How requirements are implemented
339		-* [[Data Model>>Archive.FactHarbor.Specification.Data Model.WebHome]] - Data structures supporting user needs
340		-* [[AKEL (AI Knowledge Extraction Layer)>>Archive.FactHarbor.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]] - AI system fulfilling automation needs
	313	+* [[Architecture>>FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] - How requirements are implemented
	314	+* [[Data Model>>FactHarbor.Specification.Data Model.WebHome]] - Data structures supporting user needs
	315	+* [[AKEL (AI Knowledge Extraction Layer)>>FactHarbor.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]] - AI system fulfilling automation needs
341	341	* [[Workflows>>FactHarbor.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]] - User interaction workflows
342	342
	318	+
343	343	== Additional User Needs (V0.9.70) ==
344	344
345	345	=== UN-26: Search Engine Visibility ===
...	...	@@ -367,3 +367,4 @@
367	367	**So that** I can contribute without fear
368	368
369	369	**Requirements:** FR48 (Safety Framework)
	346	+