Wiki source code of Requirements Priority Matrix
Version 2.1 by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/22 20:48
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | = Requirements Importance Matrix = | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | This page shows all functional, non-functional, and user needs requirements ordered by urgency and importance. | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | **Note:** Implementation phases (POC1, POC2, Beta 0, V1.0) are defined in [[POC Requirements>>Test.FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] and [[Implementation Roadmap>>Test.FactHarbor.Roadmap.WebHome]], not in this importance matrix. | ||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | == Importance and Urgency Levels == | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | **How Requirements are Prioritized:** | ||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | * **Importance** = f(risk, impact, strategy) | ||
| 12 | * What happens if we don't do this? (risk) | ||
| 13 | * How much value does it create? (impact) | ||
| 14 | * Does it align with our strategic direction? (strategy) | ||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | * **Urgency** = f(fail fast and learn, legal, promises made) | ||
| 17 | * Do we need this to validate core assumptions? (fail fast and learn) | ||
| 18 | * Are we legally required to have this? (legal) | ||
| 19 | * Have we committed to delivering this? (promises made) | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | **Importance Levels:** | ||
| 22 | * **CRITICAL** - System doesn't work without it, or major safety/legal risk | ||
| 23 | * **HIGH** - Core functionality, essential for success | ||
| 24 | * **MEDIUM** - Important but not blocking | ||
| 25 | * **LOW** - Nice to have, can be deferred | ||
| 26 | |||
| 27 | **Urgency Levels:** | ||
| 28 | * **HIGH** - Immediate need (critical for proof of concept) | ||
| 29 | * **MEDIUM** - Important but not immediate | ||
| 30 | * **LOW** - Future enhancement | ||
| 31 | |||
| 32 | == Functional & Non-Functional Requirements == | ||
| 33 | |||
| 34 | All requirements are sorted by Urgency (HIGH → LOW), then Importance (CRITICAL → LOW). | ||
| 35 | |||
| 36 | |= ID |= Title |= Importance |= Urgency |= Comment | ||
| 37 | | **HIGH URGENCY** |||| | ||
| 38 | | **FR7** | Automated Verdicts (Enhanced with Quality Gates) | CRITICAL | HIGH | Core AKEL capability - system cannot function without automated verdict generation | ||
| 39 | | **NFR11** | AKEL Quality Assurance Framework | CRITICAL | HIGH | Without quality gates, automated analysis cannot be trusted | ||
| 40 | | **FR4** | Analysis Summary (Enhanced with Quality Metadata) | HIGH | HIGH | Essential for users to understand and trust verdicts | ||
| 41 | | **MEDIUM URGENCY** |||| | ||
| 42 | | **NFR12** | Security Controls | CRITICAL | MEDIUM | Essential for production deployment | ||
| 43 | | **FR44** | ClaimReview Schema Implementation | HIGH | MEDIUM | Required for search engine discoverability | ||
| 44 | | **FR45** | User Corrections Notification System | HIGH | MEDIUM | Critical for user trust and transparency | ||
| 45 | | **FR48** | Safety Framework for Contributors | HIGH | MEDIUM | Protects contributors from harassment | ||
| 46 | | **NFR13** | Quality Metrics Transparency | HIGH | MEDIUM | Users need to understand quality levels | ||
| 47 | | **FR46** | Image Verification System | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | | ||
| 48 | | **FR47** | Archive.org Integration | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | | ||
| 49 | | **FR49** | A/B Testing Framework | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | | ||
| 50 | | **LOW URGENCY** |||| | ||
| 51 | | **FR50** | OSINT Toolkit Integration | HIGH | LOW | Valuable capability for future phases | ||
| 52 | | **FR51** | Video Verification System | HIGH | LOW | Valuable capability for future phases | ||
| 53 | | **FR52** | Interactive Detection Training | MEDIUM | LOW | | ||
| 54 | | **FR53** | Cross-Organizational Sharing | MEDIUM | LOW | | ||
| 55 | | **FR54** | Evidence Deduplication | CRITICAL | LOW | Essential for data integrity and user trust | ||
| 56 | |||
| 57 | **Total:** 16 requirements (13 Functional, 3 Non-Functional) | ||
| 58 | |||
| 59 | **Total:** 20 User Needs | ||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | == See Also == | ||
| 62 | |||
| 63 | * [[Requirements>>Test.FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] - Detailed requirement specifications | ||
| 64 | * [[POC Requirements>>Test.FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] - POC1 scope and simplifications | ||
| 65 | * [[Implementation Roadmap>>Test.FactHarbor.Roadmap.WebHome]] - Phase-by-phase implementation plan | ||
| 66 | * [[User Needs>>Test.FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.User Needs.WebHome]] - Foundation that drives these requirements |