Changes for page POC Summary (POC1 & POC2)

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 09:44

From 2.1 to 1.1

From version 6.1

edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/24 09:44

Change comment: Renamed from xwiki:Test.FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Summary

To version 2.1

edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/23 18:49

Change comment: Imported from XAR

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
--= POC Summary (POC1 & POC2) =
++= FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary
++**Consolidated Document - No Timelines**
++**Date:** December 19, 2025
--== 1. POC Specification ==
++---
++== 1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE
++
  === POC Goal
  Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention.
@@ -71,91 +71,172 @@
  > "Build less, learn more, decide faster. Test the hardest part first."
++---
++== 2. Gap Analysis - Strategic Framework
--=== Context-Aware Analysis (Experimental POC1 Feature) ===
++=== Framework Definition
--**Problem:** Article credibility ≠ simple average of claim verdicts
++**Importance = f(risk, impact, strategy)**
++- Risk: What breaks if we don't have this?
++- Impact: How many users? How severe?
++- Strategy: Does it advance FactHarbor's mission?
--**Example:** Article with accurate facts (coffee has antioxidants, antioxidants fight cancer) but false conclusion (therefore coffee cures cancer) would score as "mostly accurate" with simple averaging, but is actually MISLEADING.
++**Urgency = f(fail fast and learn, legal, promises made)**
++- Fail fast: Do we need to test assumptions?
++- Legal: External requirements/deadlines?
++- Promises: Commitments to stakeholders?
--**Solution (POC1 Test):** Approach 1 - Single-Pass Holistic Analysis
--* Enhanced AI prompt to evaluate logical structure
--* AI identifies main argument and assesses if it follows from evidence
--* Article verdict may differ from claim average
--* Zero additional cost, no architecture changes
++=== 18 Gaps Identified
--**Testing:**
--* 30-article test set
--* Success: ≥70% accuracy detecting misleading articles
--* Marked as experimental
++**Category 1: Accessibility & Inclusivity**
++1. WCAG 2.1 Compliance
++2. Multilingual Support
--**See:** [[Article Verdict Problem>>Test.FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Article-Verdict-Problem]] for full analysis and solution approaches.
++**Category 2: Platform Integration**
++3. Browser Extensions
++4. Embeddable Widgets
++5. ClaimReview Schema
++**Category 3: Media Verification**
++6. Image/Video/Audio Verification
--== 2. POC2 Specification ==
++**Category 4: Mobile & Offline**
++7. Mobile Apps / PWA
++8. Offline Access
--=== POC2 Goal ===
--Prove that AKEL produces high-quality outputs consistently at scale with complete quality validation.
++**Category 5: Education & Media Literacy**
++9. Educational Resources
++10. Media Literacy Integration
--=== POC2 Enhancements (From POC1) ===
++**Category 6: Collaboration & Community**
++11. Professional Collaboration Tools
++12. Community Discussion
--**1. COMPLETE QUALITY GATES (All 4)**
--* Gate 1: Claim Validation (from POC1)
--* Gate 2: Evidence Relevance ← NEW
--* Gate 3: Scenario Coherence ← NEW
--* Gate 4: Verdict Confidence (from POC1)
++**Category 7: Export & Sharing**
++13. Export Capabilities (PDF, CSV)
++14. Social Sharing Optimization
--**2. EVIDENCE DEDUPLICATION (FR54)**
--* Prevent counting same source multiple times
--* Handle syndicated content (AP, Reuters)
--* Content fingerprinting with fuzzy matching
--* Target: >95% duplicate detection accuracy
++**Category 8: Advanced Features**
++15. User Analytics
++16. Personalization
++17. Media Archiving
++18. Advanced Search
--**3. CONTEXT-AWARE ANALYSIS (Conditional)**
--* **If POC1 succeeds (≥70%):** Implement as standard feature
--* **If POC1 promising (50-70%):** Try weighted aggregation approach
--* **If POC1 fails (<50%):** Defer to post-POC2
--* Detects articles with accurate claims but misleading conclusions
++=== Importance/Urgency Analysis
--**4. QUALITY METRICS DASHBOARD (NFR13)**
--* Track hallucination rates
--* Monitor gate performance
--* Evidence quality metrics
--* Processing statistics
++**VERY HIGH Importance + HIGH Urgency:**
++1. **Accessibility (WCAG)**
++   - Risk: Legal liability, 15-20% users excluded
++   - Urgency: European Accessibility Act (June 28, 2025)
++   - Action: Must be built from start (retrofitting 100x more expensive)
--=== What's Still NOT in POC2 ===
++2. **Educational Resources**
++   - Risk: Platform fails if users can't understand
++   - Urgency: Required for any adoption
++   - Action: Basic onboarding essential
--❌ User accounts, authentication
--❌ Public publishing interface
--❌ Social sharing features
--❌ Full production security (comes in Beta 0)
--❌ In-article claim highlighting (comes in Beta 0)
++**HIGH Importance + MEDIUM Urgency:**
++3. **Browser Extensions** - Standard user expectation, test demand first
++4. **Media Verification** - Cannot address visual misinformation without it
++5. **Multilingual** - Global mission requires it, plan early
--=== Success Criteria ===
++**HIGH Importance + LOW Urgency:**
++6. **Mobile Apps** - 90%+ users on mobile, but web-first viable
++7. **ClaimReview Schema** - SEO/discoverability, can add anytime
--**Quality:**
--* Hallucination rate <5% (target: <3%)
--* Average quality rating ≥8.0/10
--* Gates identify >95% of low-quality outputs
++---
--**Performance:**
--* All 4 quality gates operational
--* Evidence deduplication >95% accurate
--* Quality metrics tracked continuously
++== 1.7 POC Alignment with Full Specification
--**Context-Aware (if implemented):**
--* Maintains ≥70% accuracy detecting misleading articles
--* <15% false positive rate
++=== POC Intentional Simplifications
--**Total Output Size:** Similar to POC1 (~220-350 words per analysis)
++**POC1 tests core AI capability, not full architecture:**
++**What POC Tests:**
++- Can AI extract claims from articles?
++- Can AI evaluate claims with reasonable verdicts?
++- Is fully automated approach viable?
++- Is output comprehensible to users?
++**What POC Excludes (Intentionally):**
++- ❌ Scenarios (deferred to POC2 - open architectural questions remain)
++- ❌ Evidence display (deferred to POC2)
++- ❌ Multi-component AKEL pipeline (simplified to single API call)
++- ❌ Quality gate infrastructure (simplified basic checks)
++- ❌ Production data model (stateless POC)
++- ❌ Review workflow system (no review queue)
++**Why Simplified:**
++- Fail fast: Test hardest part first (AI capability)
++- Learn before building: POC1 informs architecture decisions
++- Iterative: Add complexity based on POC1 learnings
++- Risk management: Prove concept before major investment
++=== Full System Architecture (Future)
--== 2. Key Strategic Recommendations
++**Workflow:**
++{{code}}
++Claims → Scenarios → Evidence → Verdicts
++{{/code}}
++**AKEL Components:**
++- Orchestrator
++- Claim Extractor & Classifier
++- Scenario Generator
++- Evidence Summarizer
++- Contradiction Detector
++- Quality Gate Validator
++- Audit Sampling Scheduler
++
++**Publication Modes:**
++- Mode 1: Draft-Only
++- Mode 2: AI-Generated (POC uses this)
++- Mode 3: AKEL-Generated (Human-Reviewed)
++
++=== POC vs. Full System Summary
++
++|=Aspect|=POC1|=Full System
++|Scenarios|None (deferred to POC2)|Core component with versioning
++|Workflow|3 steps (input/process/output)|6 phases with quality gates
++|AKEL|Single API call|Multi-component orchestrated pipeline
++|Data|Stateless (no DB)|PostgreSQL + Redis + S3
++|Publication|Mode 2 only|Modes 1/2/3 with risk-based routing
++|Quality Gates|4 simplified checks|Full validation infrastructure
++
++=== Gap Between POC and Beta
++
++**Significant architectural expansion needed:**
++1. Scenario generation component design and implementation
++2. Evidence Model full structure
++3. Multi-phase workflow with gates
++4. Component-based AKEL architecture
++5. Production data model and storage
++6. Review workflow and audit systems
++
++**POC proves concept. Beta builds product.**
++
++
++**MEDIUM Importance + LOW Urgency:**
++8-14. All other features - valuable but not urgent
++
++**Strategic Decisions Needed:**
++- Community discussion: Allow or stay evidence-focused?
++- Personalization: How much without filter bubbles?
++- Media verification: Partner with existing tools or build?
++
++=== Key Insight: Milestones Change Priorities
++
++**POC:** Only educational resources urgent (basic explainer)
++**Beta:** Accessibility becomes urgent (test with diverse users)
++**Release:** Legal requirements become critical (WCAG, GDPR)
++
++**Importance/urgency are contextual, not absolute.**
++
++---
++
++== 3. Key Strategic Recommendations
++
  === Immediate Actions
  **For POC:**
@@ -206,6 +206,8 @@
  **Don't build anything without answering these questions.**
++---
++
  == 4. Critical Principles
  === Automation First
@@ -237,6 +237,8 @@
  - Accept limitations
  - No overpromising
++---
++
  == 5. POC Decision Gate
  === After POC, Choose:
@@ -259,6 +259,8 @@
  - Addressable with better prompts
  - Test again after changes
++---
++
  == 6. Key Risks & Mitigations
  === Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough
@@ -281,6 +281,8 @@
  **Mitigation:** Strict scope discipline, say NO to additions
  **Acceptance:** POC is minimal by design
++---
++
  == 7. Success Metrics
  === POC Success
@@ -302,6 +302,8 @@
  - Public discourse improves
  - Trust in evidence increases
++---
++
  == 8. What Makes FactHarbor Different
  === Not Traditional Fact-Checking
@@ -322,6 +322,8 @@
  - ✅ Making process transparent
  - ✅ Enabling informed decisions
++---
++
  == 9. Core Philosophy
  **Three Pillars:**
@@ -344,6 +344,8 @@
  - Evaluate source quality
  - Avoid cherry-picking
++---
++
  == 10. Next Actions
  === Immediate
@@ -364,6 +364,8 @@
  □ Learn from failures
  □ Stay focused on mission
++---
++
  == Summary of Summaries
  **POC Goal:** Prove AI can do this automatically
@@ -378,6 +378,8 @@
  **Strategy:** Test first, build second. Fail fast. Stay focused.
  **Philosophy:** Scenarios, transparency, evidence. No false certainty.
++---
++
  == Document Status
  **This document supersedes all previous analysis documents.**
@@ -391,5 +391,7 @@
  **Previous documents are archived for reference but this is the authoritative summary.**
++---
++
  **End of Consolidated Summary**

Changes for page POC Summary (POC1 & POC2)

Summary

Details

Applications

Navigation

Need help?