Changes for page POC Summary (POC1 & POC2)
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 09:44
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,13 +1,14 @@ 1 - =FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary1 +# FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary 2 2 **Consolidated Document - No Timelines** 3 3 **Date:** December 19, 2025 4 4 5 -== 1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE 6 6 7 -=== POC Goal 6 +## 1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE 7 + 8 +### POC Goal 8 8 Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention. 9 9 10 - ===POC Output (4 Components Only)11 +### POC Output (4 Components Only) 11 11 12 12 **1. ANALYSIS SUMMARY** 13 13 - 3-5 sentences ... ... @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ 29 29 30 30 **Total output: ~200-300 words** 31 31 32 - ===What's NOT in POC33 +### What's NOT in POC 33 33 34 34 ❌ Scenarios (multiple interpretations) 35 35 ❌ Evidence display (supporting/opposing lists) ... ... @@ -41,13 +41,13 @@ 41 41 ❌ Export, sharing features 42 42 ❌ Any other features 43 43 44 - ===Critical Requirement45 +### Critical Requirement 45 45 46 46 **FULLY AUTOMATED - NO MANUAL EDITING** 47 47 48 48 This is non-negotiable. POC tests whether AI can do this without human intervention. 49 49 50 - ===POC Success Criteria51 +### POC Success Criteria 51 51 52 52 **Passes if:** 53 53 - ✅ AI extracts 3-5 factual claims automatically ... ... @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ 62 62 - ❌ Requires manual editing for most analyses (> 50%) 63 63 - ❌ Team loses confidence in approach 64 64 65 - ===POC Architecture66 +### POC Architecture 66 66 67 67 **Frontend:** Simple input form + results display 68 68 **Backend:** Single API call to Claude (Sonnet 4.5) ... ... @@ -69,35 +69,175 @@ 69 69 **Processing:** One prompt generates complete analysis 70 70 **Database:** None required (stateless) 71 71 72 - ===POC Philosophy73 +### POC Philosophy 73 73 74 74 > "Build less, learn more, decide faster. Test the hardest part first." 75 75 76 76 78 +## 2. Gap Analysis - Strategic Framework 77 77 78 - ===Context-AwareAnalysis (Experimental POC1 Feature) ===80 +### Framework Definition 79 79 80 -**Problem:** Article credibility ≠ simple average of claim verdicts 82 +**Importance = f(risk, impact, strategy)** 83 +- Risk: What breaks if we don't have this? 84 +- Impact: How many users? How severe? 85 +- Strategy: Does it advance FactHarbor's mission? 81 81 82 -**Example:** Article with accurate facts (coffee has antioxidants, antioxidants fight cancer) but false conclusion (therefore coffee cures cancer) would score as "mostly accurate" with simple averaging, but is actually MISLEADING. 87 +**Urgency = f(fail fast and learn, legal, promises made)** 88 +- Fail fast: Do we need to test assumptions? 89 +- Legal: External requirements/deadlines? 90 +- Promises: Commitments to stakeholders? 83 83 84 -**Solution (POC1 Test):** Approach 1 - Single-Pass Holistic Analysis 85 -* Enhanced AI prompt to evaluate logical structure 86 -* AI identifies main argument and assesses if it follows from evidence 87 -* Article verdict may differ from claim average 88 -* Zero additional cost, no architecture changes 92 +### 18 Gaps Identified 89 89 90 -**Testing:** 91 -* 30-article test set 92 -* Success: ≥70% accuracy detecting misleading articles 93 -* Marked as experimental 94 +**Category 1: Accessibility & Inclusivity** 95 +1. WCAG 2.1 Compliance 96 +2. Multilingual Support 94 94 95 -**See:** [[Article Verdict Problem>>Test.FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Article-Verdict-Problem]] for full analysis and solution approaches. 98 +**Category 2: Platform Integration** 99 +3. Browser Extensions 100 +4. Embeddable Widgets 101 +5. ClaimReview Schema 96 96 97 -== 2. Key Strategic Recommendations 103 +**Category 3: Media Verification** 104 +6. Image/Video/Audio Verification 98 98 99 -=== Immediate Actions 106 +**Category 4: Mobile & Offline** 107 +7. Mobile Apps / PWA 108 +8. Offline Access 100 100 110 +**Category 5: Education & Media Literacy** 111 +9. Educational Resources 112 +10. Media Literacy Integration 113 + 114 +**Category 6: Collaboration & Community** 115 +11. Professional Collaboration Tools 116 +12. Community Discussion 117 + 118 +**Category 7: Export & Sharing** 119 +13. Export Capabilities (PDF, CSV) 120 +14. Social Sharing Optimization 121 + 122 +**Category 8: Advanced Features** 123 +15. User Analytics 124 +16. Personalization 125 +17. Media Archiving 126 +18. Advanced Search 127 + 128 +### Importance/Urgency Analysis 129 + 130 +**VERY HIGH Importance + HIGH Urgency:** 131 +1. **Accessibility (WCAG)** 132 + - Risk: Legal liability, 15-20% users excluded 133 + - Urgency: European Accessibility Act (June 28, 2025) 134 + - Action: Must be built from start (retrofitting 100x more expensive) 135 + 136 +2. **Educational Resources** 137 + - Risk: Platform fails if users can't understand 138 + - Urgency: Required for any adoption 139 + - Action: Basic onboarding essential 140 + 141 +**HIGH Importance + MEDIUM Urgency:** 142 +3. **Browser Extensions** - Standard user expectation, test demand first 143 +4. **Media Verification** - Cannot address visual misinformation without it 144 +5. **Multilingual** - Global mission requires it, plan early 145 + 146 +**HIGH Importance + LOW Urgency:** 147 +6. **Mobile Apps** - 90%+ users on mobile, but web-first viable 148 +7. **ClaimReview Schema** - SEO/discoverability, can add anytime 149 + 150 + 151 +## 1.7 POC Alignment with Full Specification 152 + 153 +### POC Intentional Simplifications 154 + 155 +**POC1 tests core AI capability, not full architecture:** 156 + 157 +**What POC Tests:** 158 +- Can AI extract claims from articles? 159 +- Can AI evaluate claims with reasonable verdicts? 160 +- Is fully automated approach viable? 161 +- Is output comprehensible to users? 162 + 163 +**What POC Excludes (Intentionally):** 164 +- ❌ Scenarios (deferred to POC2 - open architectural questions remain) 165 +- ❌ Evidence display (deferred to POC2) 166 +- ❌ Multi-component AKEL pipeline (simplified to single API call) 167 +- ❌ Quality gate infrastructure (simplified basic checks) 168 +- ❌ Production data model (stateless POC) 169 +- ❌ Review workflow system (no review queue) 170 + 171 +**Why Simplified:** 172 +- Fail fast: Test hardest part first (AI capability) 173 +- Learn before building: POC1 informs architecture decisions 174 +- Iterative: Add complexity based on POC1 learnings 175 +- Risk management: Prove concept before major investment 176 + 177 +### Full System Architecture (Future) 178 + 179 +**Workflow:** 180 +{{code}} 181 +Claims → Scenarios → Evidence → Verdicts 182 +{{/code}} 183 + 184 +**AKEL Components:** 185 +- Orchestrator 186 +- Claim Extractor & Classifier 187 +- Scenario Generator 188 +- Evidence Summarizer 189 +- Contradiction Detector 190 +- Quality Gate Validator 191 +- Audit Sampling Scheduler 192 + 193 +**Publication Modes:** 194 +- Mode 1: Draft-Only 195 +- Mode 2: AI-Generated (POC uses this) 196 +- Mode 3: AKEL-Generated (Human-Reviewed) 197 + 198 +### POC vs. Full System Summary 199 + 200 +|=Aspect|=POC1|=Full System 201 +|Scenarios|None (deferred to POC2)|Core component with versioning 202 +|Workflow|3 steps (input/process/output)|6 phases with quality gates 203 +|AKEL|Single API call|Multi-component orchestrated pipeline 204 +|Data|Stateless (no DB)|PostgreSQL + Redis + S3 205 +|Publication|Mode 2 only|Modes 1/2/3 with risk-based routing 206 +|Quality Gates|4 simplified checks|Full validation infrastructure 207 + 208 +### Gap Between POC and Beta 209 + 210 +**Significant architectural expansion needed:** 211 +1. Scenario generation component design and implementation 212 +2. Evidence Model full structure 213 +3. Multi-phase workflow with gates 214 +4. Component-based AKEL architecture 215 +5. Production data model and storage 216 +6. Review workflow and audit systems 217 + 218 +**POC proves concept. Beta builds product.** 219 + 220 + 221 +**MEDIUM Importance + LOW Urgency:** 222 +8-14. All other features - valuable but not urgent 223 + 224 +**Strategic Decisions Needed:** 225 +- Community discussion: Allow or stay evidence-focused? 226 +- Personalization: How much without filter bubbles? 227 +- Media verification: Partner with existing tools or build? 228 + 229 +### Key Insight: Milestones Change Priorities 230 + 231 +**POC:** Only educational resources urgent (basic explainer) 232 +**Beta:** Accessibility becomes urgent (test with diverse users) 233 +**Release:** Legal requirements become critical (WCAG, GDPR) 234 + 235 +**Importance/urgency are contextual, not absolute.** 236 + 237 + 238 +## 3. Key Strategic Recommendations 239 + 240 +### Immediate Actions 241 + 101 101 **For POC:** 102 102 1. Focus on core functionality only (claims + verdicts) 103 103 2. Create basic explainer (1 page) ... ... @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ 110 110 3. Research media verification options (partner vs build) 111 111 4. Evaluate browser extension approach 112 112 113 - ===Testing Strategy254 +### Testing Strategy 114 114 115 115 **POC Tests:** Can AI do this without humans? 116 116 **Beta Tests:** What do users need? What works? What doesn't? ... ... @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ 118 118 119 119 **Key Principle:** Test assumptions before building features. 120 120 121 - ===Build Sequence (PriorityOrder)262 +### Build Sequence (Importance Order) 122 122 123 123 **Must Build:** 124 124 1. Core analysis (claims + verdicts) ← POC ... ... @@ -136,51 +136,53 @@ 136 136 9. Export features ← Based on user requests 137 137 10. Everything else ← Based on validation 138 138 139 - ===Decision Framework280 +### Decision Framework 140 140 141 141 **For each feature, ask:** 142 142 1. **Importance:** Risk + Impact + Strategy alignment? 143 143 2. **Urgency:** Fail fast + Legal + Promises? 144 144 3. **Validation:** Do we know users want this? 145 -4. ** Priority:** When should we build it?286 +4. **Importance:** When should we build it? 146 146 147 147 **Don't build anything without answering these questions.** 148 148 149 -== 4. Critical Principles 150 150 151 -=== Automation First 291 +## 4. Critical Principles 292 + 293 +### Automation First 152 152 - AI makes content decisions 153 153 - Humans improve algorithms 154 154 - Scale through code, not people 155 155 156 - ===Fail Fast298 +### Fail Fast 157 157 - Test assumptions quickly 158 158 - Don't build unvalidated features 159 159 - Accept that experiments may fail 160 160 - Learn from failures 161 161 162 - ===Evidence Over Authority304 +### Evidence Over Authority 163 163 - Transparent reasoning visible 164 164 - No single "true/false" verdicts 165 165 - Multiple scenarios shown 166 166 - Assumptions made explicit 167 167 168 - ===User Focus310 +### User Focus 169 169 - Serve users' needs first 170 170 - Build what's actually useful 171 171 - Don't build what's just "cool" 172 172 - Measure and iterate 173 173 174 - ===Honest Assessment316 +### Honest Assessment 175 175 - Don't cherry-pick examples 176 176 - Document failures openly 177 177 - Accept limitations 178 178 - No overpromising 179 179 180 -== 5. POC Decision Gate 181 181 182 - ===AfterPOC,Choose:323 +## 5. POC Decision Gate 183 183 325 +### After POC, Choose: 326 + 184 184 **GO (Proceed to Beta):** 185 185 - AI quality ≥70% without editing 186 186 - Approach validated ... ... @@ -199,37 +199,39 @@ 199 199 - Addressable with better prompts 200 200 - Test again after changes 201 201 202 -== 6. Key Risks & Mitigations 203 203 204 -=== Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough 346 +## 6. Key Risks & Mitigations 347 + 348 +### Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough 205 205 **Mitigation:** Extensive prompt testing, use best models 206 206 **Acceptance:** POC might fail - that's what testing reveals 207 207 208 - ===Risk 2: Users Don't Understand Output352 +### Risk 2: Users Don't Understand Output 209 209 **Mitigation:** Create clear explainer, test with real users 210 210 **Acceptance:** Iterate on explanation until comprehensible 211 211 212 - ===Risk 3: Approach Doesn't Scale356 +### Risk 3: Approach Doesn't Scale 213 213 **Mitigation:** Start simple, add complexity only when proven 214 214 **Acceptance:** POC proves concept, beta proves scale 215 215 216 - ===Risk 4: Legal/Compliance Issues360 +### Risk 4: Legal/Compliance Issues 217 217 **Mitigation:** Plan accessibility early, consult legal experts 218 218 **Acceptance:** Can't launch publicly without compliance 219 219 220 - ===Risk 5: Feature Creep364 +### Risk 5: Feature Creep 221 221 **Mitigation:** Strict scope discipline, say NO to additions 222 222 **Acceptance:** POC is minimal by design 223 223 224 -== 7. Success Metrics 225 225 226 -=== POC Success 369 +## 7. Success Metrics 370 + 371 +### POC Success 227 227 - AI output quality ≥70% 228 228 - Manual editing needed < 30% of time 229 229 - Team confidence: High 230 230 - Decision: GO to beta 231 231 232 - ===Platform Success (Later)377 +### Platform Success (Later) 233 233 - User comprehension ≥80% 234 234 - Return user rate ≥30% 235 235 - Flag rate (user corrections) < 10% ... ... @@ -236,34 +236,36 @@ 236 236 - Processing time < 30 seconds 237 237 - Error rate < 1% 238 238 239 - ===Mission Success (Long-term)384 +### Mission Success (Long-term) 240 240 - Users make better-informed decisions 241 241 - Misinformation spread reduced 242 242 - Public discourse improves 243 243 - Trust in evidence increases 244 244 245 -== 8. What Makes FactHarbor Different 246 246 247 -=== Not Traditional Fact-Checking 391 +## 8. What Makes FactHarbor Different 392 + 393 +### Not Traditional Fact-Checking 248 248 - ❌ No simple "true/false" verdicts 249 249 - ✅ Multiple scenarios with context 250 250 - ✅ Transparent reasoning chains 251 251 - ✅ Explicit assumptions shown 252 252 253 - ===Not AI Chatbot399 +### Not AI Chatbot 254 254 - ❌ Not conversational 255 255 - ✅ Structured Evidence Models 256 256 - ✅ Reproducible analysis 257 257 - ✅ Verifiable sources 258 258 259 - ===Not Just Automation405 +### Not Just Automation 260 260 - ❌ Not replacing human judgment 261 261 - ✅ Augmenting human reasoning 262 262 - ✅ Making process transparent 263 263 - ✅ Enabling informed decisions 264 264 265 -== 9. Core Philosophy 266 266 412 +## 9. Core Philosophy 413 + 267 267 **Three Pillars:** 268 268 269 269 **1. Scenarios Over Verdicts** ... ... @@ -284,28 +284,30 @@ 284 284 - Evaluate source quality 285 285 - Avoid cherry-picking 286 286 287 -== 10. Next Actions 288 288 289 -=== Immediate 435 +## 10. Next Actions 436 + 437 +### Immediate 290 290 □ Review this consolidated summary 291 291 □ Confirm POC scope agreement 292 292 □ Make strategic decisions on key questions 293 293 □ Begin POC development 294 294 295 - ===Strategic Planning443 +### Strategic Planning 296 296 □ Define accessibility approach 297 297 □ Select initial languages for multilingual 298 298 □ Research media verification partners 299 299 □ Evaluate browser extension frameworks 300 300 301 - ===Continuous449 +### Continuous 302 302 □ Test assumptions before building 303 303 □ Measure everything 304 304 □ Learn from failures 305 305 □ Stay focused on mission 306 306 307 -== Summary of Summaries 308 308 456 +## Summary of Summaries 457 + 309 309 **POC Goal:** Prove AI can do this automatically 310 310 **POC Scope:** 4 simple components, ~200-300 words 311 311 **POC Critical:** Fully automated, no manual editing ... ... @@ -318,8 +318,9 @@ 318 318 **Strategy:** Test first, build second. Fail fast. Stay focused. 319 319 **Philosophy:** Scenarios, transparency, evidence. No false certainty. 320 320 321 -== Document Status 322 322 471 +## Document Status 472 + 323 323 **This document supersedes all previous analysis documents.** 324 324 325 325 All gap analysis, POC specifications, and strategic frameworks are consolidated here without timeline references. ... ... @@ -331,5 +331,6 @@ 331 331 332 332 **Previous documents are archived for reference but this is the authoritative summary.** 333 333 484 + 334 334 **End of Consolidated Summary** 335 335