Changes for page POC Summary (POC1 & POC2)

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 09:44

From 1.1 to 2.1

From version 2.1

edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/23 18:49

Change comment: Imported from XAR

To version 6.1

edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/24 09:44

Change comment: Renamed from xwiki:Test.FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Summary

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
--= FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary
--**Consolidated Document - No Timelines**
--**Date:** December 19, 2025
++= POC Summary (POC1 & POC2) =
-----
++== 1. POC Specification ==
--== 1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE
--
  === POC Goal
  Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention.
@@ -75,172 +75,91 @@
  > "Build less, learn more, decide faster. Test the hardest part first."
-----
--== 2. Gap Analysis - Strategic Framework
--=== Framework Definition
++=== Context-Aware Analysis (Experimental POC1 Feature) ===
--**Importance = f(risk, impact, strategy)**
--- Risk: What breaks if we don't have this?
--- Impact: How many users? How severe?
--- Strategy: Does it advance FactHarbor's mission?
++**Problem:** Article credibility ≠ simple average of claim verdicts
--**Urgency = f(fail fast and learn, legal, promises made)**
--- Fail fast: Do we need to test assumptions?
--- Legal: External requirements/deadlines?
--- Promises: Commitments to stakeholders?
++**Example:** Article with accurate facts (coffee has antioxidants, antioxidants fight cancer) but false conclusion (therefore coffee cures cancer) would score as "mostly accurate" with simple averaging, but is actually MISLEADING.
--=== 18 Gaps Identified
++**Solution (POC1 Test):** Approach 1 - Single-Pass Holistic Analysis
++* Enhanced AI prompt to evaluate logical structure
++* AI identifies main argument and assesses if it follows from evidence
++* Article verdict may differ from claim average
++* Zero additional cost, no architecture changes
--**Category 1: Accessibility & Inclusivity**
--1. WCAG 2.1 Compliance
--2. Multilingual Support
++**Testing:**
++* 30-article test set
++* Success: ≥70% accuracy detecting misleading articles
++* Marked as experimental
--**Category 2: Platform Integration**
--3. Browser Extensions
--4. Embeddable Widgets
--5. ClaimReview Schema
++**See:** [[Article Verdict Problem>>Test.FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Article-Verdict-Problem]] for full analysis and solution approaches.
--**Category 3: Media Verification**
--6. Image/Video/Audio Verification
--**Category 4: Mobile & Offline**
--7. Mobile Apps / PWA
--8. Offline Access
++== 2. POC2 Specification ==
--**Category 5: Education & Media Literacy**
--9. Educational Resources
--10. Media Literacy Integration
++=== POC2 Goal ===
++Prove that AKEL produces high-quality outputs consistently at scale with complete quality validation.
--**Category 6: Collaboration & Community**
--11. Professional Collaboration Tools
--12. Community Discussion
++=== POC2 Enhancements (From POC1) ===
--**Category 7: Export & Sharing**
--13. Export Capabilities (PDF, CSV)
--14. Social Sharing Optimization
++**1. COMPLETE QUALITY GATES (All 4)**
++* Gate 1: Claim Validation (from POC1)
++* Gate 2: Evidence Relevance ← NEW
++* Gate 3: Scenario Coherence ← NEW
++* Gate 4: Verdict Confidence (from POC1)
--**Category 8: Advanced Features**
--15. User Analytics
--16. Personalization
--17. Media Archiving
--18. Advanced Search
++**2. EVIDENCE DEDUPLICATION (FR54)**
++* Prevent counting same source multiple times
++* Handle syndicated content (AP, Reuters)
++* Content fingerprinting with fuzzy matching
++* Target: >95% duplicate detection accuracy
--=== Importance/Urgency Analysis
++**3. CONTEXT-AWARE ANALYSIS (Conditional)**
++* **If POC1 succeeds (≥70%):** Implement as standard feature
++* **If POC1 promising (50-70%):** Try weighted aggregation approach
++* **If POC1 fails (<50%):** Defer to post-POC2
++* Detects articles with accurate claims but misleading conclusions
--**VERY HIGH Importance + HIGH Urgency:**
--1. **Accessibility (WCAG)**
--   - Risk: Legal liability, 15-20% users excluded
--   - Urgency: European Accessibility Act (June 28, 2025)
--   - Action: Must be built from start (retrofitting 100x more expensive)
++**4. QUALITY METRICS DASHBOARD (NFR13)**
++* Track hallucination rates
++* Monitor gate performance
++* Evidence quality metrics
++* Processing statistics
--2. **Educational Resources**
--   - Risk: Platform fails if users can't understand
--   - Urgency: Required for any adoption
--   - Action: Basic onboarding essential
++=== What's Still NOT in POC2 ===
--**HIGH Importance + MEDIUM Urgency:**
--3. **Browser Extensions** - Standard user expectation, test demand first
--4. **Media Verification** - Cannot address visual misinformation without it
--5. **Multilingual** - Global mission requires it, plan early
++❌ User accounts, authentication
++❌ Public publishing interface
++❌ Social sharing features
++❌ Full production security (comes in Beta 0)
++❌ In-article claim highlighting (comes in Beta 0)
--**HIGH Importance + LOW Urgency:**
--6. **Mobile Apps** - 90%+ users on mobile, but web-first viable
--7. **ClaimReview Schema** - SEO/discoverability, can add anytime
++=== Success Criteria ===
-----
++**Quality:**
++* Hallucination rate <5% (target: <3%)
++* Average quality rating ≥8.0/10
++* Gates identify >95% of low-quality outputs
--== 1.7 POC Alignment with Full Specification
++**Performance:**
++* All 4 quality gates operational
++* Evidence deduplication >95% accurate
++* Quality metrics tracked continuously
--=== POC Intentional Simplifications
++**Context-Aware (if implemented):**
++* Maintains ≥70% accuracy detecting misleading articles
++* <15% false positive rate
--**POC1 tests core AI capability, not full architecture:**
++**Total Output Size:** Similar to POC1 (~220-350 words per analysis)
--**What POC Tests:**
--- Can AI extract claims from articles?
--- Can AI evaluate claims with reasonable verdicts?
--- Is fully automated approach viable?
--- Is output comprehensible to users?
--**What POC Excludes (Intentionally):**
--- ❌ Scenarios (deferred to POC2 - open architectural questions remain)
--- ❌ Evidence display (deferred to POC2)
--- ❌ Multi-component AKEL pipeline (simplified to single API call)
--- ❌ Quality gate infrastructure (simplified basic checks)
--- ❌ Production data model (stateless POC)
--- ❌ Review workflow system (no review queue)
--**Why Simplified:**
--- Fail fast: Test hardest part first (AI capability)
--- Learn before building: POC1 informs architecture decisions
--- Iterative: Add complexity based on POC1 learnings
--- Risk management: Prove concept before major investment
--=== Full System Architecture (Future)
--**Workflow:**
--{{code}}
--Claims → Scenarios → Evidence → Verdicts
--{{/code}}
++== 2. Key Strategic Recommendations
--**AKEL Components:**
--- Orchestrator
--- Claim Extractor & Classifier
--- Scenario Generator
--- Evidence Summarizer
--- Contradiction Detector
--- Quality Gate Validator
--- Audit Sampling Scheduler
--
--**Publication Modes:**
--- Mode 1: Draft-Only
--- Mode 2: AI-Generated (POC uses this)
--- Mode 3: AKEL-Generated (Human-Reviewed)
--
--=== POC vs. Full System Summary
--
--|=Aspect|=POC1|=Full System
--|Scenarios|None (deferred to POC2)|Core component with versioning
--|Workflow|3 steps (input/process/output)|6 phases with quality gates
--|AKEL|Single API call|Multi-component orchestrated pipeline
--|Data|Stateless (no DB)|PostgreSQL + Redis + S3
--|Publication|Mode 2 only|Modes 1/2/3 with risk-based routing
--|Quality Gates|4 simplified checks|Full validation infrastructure
--
--=== Gap Between POC and Beta
--
--**Significant architectural expansion needed:**
--1. Scenario generation component design and implementation
--2. Evidence Model full structure
--3. Multi-phase workflow with gates
--4. Component-based AKEL architecture
--5. Production data model and storage
--6. Review workflow and audit systems
--
--**POC proves concept. Beta builds product.**
--
--
--**MEDIUM Importance + LOW Urgency:**
--8-14. All other features - valuable but not urgent
--
--**Strategic Decisions Needed:**
--- Community discussion: Allow or stay evidence-focused?
--- Personalization: How much without filter bubbles?
--- Media verification: Partner with existing tools or build?
--
--=== Key Insight: Milestones Change Priorities
--
--**POC:** Only educational resources urgent (basic explainer)
--**Beta:** Accessibility becomes urgent (test with diverse users)
--**Release:** Legal requirements become critical (WCAG, GDPR)
--
--**Importance/urgency are contextual, not absolute.**
--
-----
--
--== 3. Key Strategic Recommendations
--
  === Immediate Actions
  **For POC:**
@@ -291,8 +291,6 @@
  **Don't build anything without answering these questions.**
-----
--
  == 4. Critical Principles
  === Automation First
@@ -324,8 +324,6 @@
  - Accept limitations
  - No overpromising
-----
--
  == 5. POC Decision Gate
  === After POC, Choose:
@@ -348,8 +348,6 @@
  - Addressable with better prompts
  - Test again after changes
-----
--
  == 6. Key Risks & Mitigations
  === Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough
@@ -372,8 +372,6 @@
  **Mitigation:** Strict scope discipline, say NO to additions
  **Acceptance:** POC is minimal by design
-----
--
  == 7. Success Metrics
  === POC Success
@@ -395,8 +395,6 @@
  - Public discourse improves
  - Trust in evidence increases
-----
--
  == 8. What Makes FactHarbor Different
  === Not Traditional Fact-Checking
@@ -417,8 +417,6 @@
  - ✅ Making process transparent
  - ✅ Enabling informed decisions
-----
--
  == 9. Core Philosophy
  **Three Pillars:**
@@ -441,8 +441,6 @@
  - Evaluate source quality
  - Avoid cherry-picking
-----
--
  == 10. Next Actions
  === Immediate
@@ -463,8 +463,6 @@
  □ Learn from failures
  □ Stay focused on mission
-----
--
  == Summary of Summaries
  **POC Goal:** Prove AI can do this automatically
@@ -479,8 +479,6 @@
  **Strategy:** Test first, build second. Fail fast. Stay focused.
  **Philosophy:** Scenarios, transparency, evidence. No false certainty.
-----
--
  == Document Status
  **This document supersedes all previous analysis documents.**
@@ -494,7 +494,5 @@
  **Previous documents are archived for reference but this is the authoritative summary.**
-----
--
  **End of Consolidated Summary**

Changes for page POC Summary (POC1 & POC2)

Summary

Details

Applications

Navigation

Need help?