Changes for page POC Summary (POC1 & POC2)
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 09:44
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,15 +1,14 @@ 1 - =FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary1 +# FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary 2 2 **Consolidated Document - No Timelines** 3 3 **Date:** December 19, 2025 4 4 5 ---- 6 6 7 - ==1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE6 +## 1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE 8 8 9 - ===POC Goal8 +### POC Goal 10 10 Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention. 11 11 12 - ===POC Output (4 Components Only)11 +### POC Output (4 Components Only) 13 13 14 14 **1. ANALYSIS SUMMARY** 15 15 - 3-5 sentences ... ... @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ 31 31 32 32 **Total output: ~200-300 words** 33 33 34 - ===What's NOT in POC33 +### What's NOT in POC 35 35 36 36 ❌ Scenarios (multiple interpretations) 37 37 ❌ Evidence display (supporting/opposing lists) ... ... @@ -43,13 +43,13 @@ 43 43 ❌ Export, sharing features 44 44 ❌ Any other features 45 45 46 - ===Critical Requirement45 +### Critical Requirement 47 47 48 48 **FULLY AUTOMATED - NO MANUAL EDITING** 49 49 50 50 This is non-negotiable. POC tests whether AI can do this without human intervention. 51 51 52 - ===POC Success Criteria51 +### POC Success Criteria 53 53 54 54 **Passes if:** 55 55 - ✅ AI extracts 3-5 factual claims automatically ... ... @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ 64 64 - ❌ Requires manual editing for most analyses (> 50%) 65 65 - ❌ Team loses confidence in approach 66 66 67 - ===POC Architecture66 +### POC Architecture 68 68 69 69 **Frontend:** Simple input form + results display 70 70 **Backend:** Single API call to Claude (Sonnet 4.5) ... ... @@ -71,15 +71,14 @@ 71 71 **Processing:** One prompt generates complete analysis 72 72 **Database:** None required (stateless) 73 73 74 - ===POC Philosophy73 +### POC Philosophy 75 75 76 76 > "Build less, learn more, decide faster. Test the hardest part first." 77 77 78 ---- 79 79 80 - ==2. Gap Analysis - Strategic Framework78 +## 2. Gap Analysis - Strategic Framework 81 81 82 - ===Framework Definition80 +### Framework Definition 83 83 84 84 **Importance = f(risk, impact, strategy)** 85 85 - Risk: What breaks if we don't have this? ... ... @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ 91 91 - Legal: External requirements/deadlines? 92 92 - Promises: Commitments to stakeholders? 93 93 94 - ===18 Gaps Identified92 +### 18 Gaps Identified 95 95 96 96 **Category 1: Accessibility & Inclusivity** 97 97 1. WCAG 2.1 Compliance ... ... @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ 127 127 17. Media Archiving 128 128 18. Advanced Search 129 129 130 - ===Importance/Urgency Analysis128 +### Importance/Urgency Analysis 131 131 132 132 **VERY HIGH Importance + HIGH Urgency:** 133 133 1. **Accessibility (WCAG)** ... ... @@ -149,11 +149,10 @@ 149 149 6. **Mobile Apps** - 90%+ users on mobile, but web-first viable 150 150 7. **ClaimReview Schema** - SEO/discoverability, can add anytime 151 151 152 ---- 153 153 154 - ==1.7 POC Alignment with Full Specification151 +## 1.7 POC Alignment with Full Specification 155 155 156 - ===POC Intentional Simplifications153 +### POC Intentional Simplifications 157 157 158 158 **POC1 tests core AI capability, not full architecture:** 159 159 ... ... @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ 177 177 - Iterative: Add complexity based on POC1 learnings 178 178 - Risk management: Prove concept before major investment 179 179 180 - ===Full System Architecture (Future)177 +### Full System Architecture (Future) 181 181 182 182 **Workflow:** 183 183 {{code}} ... ... @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ 198 198 - Mode 2: AI-Generated (POC uses this) 199 199 - Mode 3: AKEL-Generated (Human-Reviewed) 200 200 201 - ===POC vs. Full System Summary198 +### POC vs. Full System Summary 202 202 203 203 |=Aspect|=POC1|=Full System 204 204 |Scenarios|None (deferred to POC2)|Core component with versioning ... ... @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ 208 208 |Publication|Mode 2 only|Modes 1/2/3 with risk-based routing 209 209 |Quality Gates|4 simplified checks|Full validation infrastructure 210 210 211 - ===Gap Between POC and Beta208 +### Gap Between POC and Beta 212 212 213 213 **Significant architectural expansion needed:** 214 214 1. Scenario generation component design and implementation ... ... @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ 229 229 - Personalization: How much without filter bubbles? 230 230 - Media verification: Partner with existing tools or build? 231 231 232 - ===Key Insight: Milestones Change Priorities229 +### Key Insight: Milestones Change Priorities 233 233 234 234 **POC:** Only educational resources urgent (basic explainer) 235 235 **Beta:** Accessibility becomes urgent (test with diverse users) ... ... @@ -237,11 +237,10 @@ 237 237 238 238 **Importance/urgency are contextual, not absolute.** 239 239 240 ---- 241 241 242 - ==3. Key Strategic Recommendations238 +## 3. Key Strategic Recommendations 243 243 244 - ===Immediate Actions240 +### Immediate Actions 245 245 246 246 **For POC:** 247 247 1. Focus on core functionality only (claims + verdicts) ... ... @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ 255 255 3. Research media verification options (partner vs build) 256 256 4. Evaluate browser extension approach 257 257 258 - ===Testing Strategy254 +### Testing Strategy 259 259 260 260 **POC Tests:** Can AI do this without humans? 261 261 **Beta Tests:** What do users need? What works? What doesn't? ... ... @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ 263 263 264 264 **Key Principle:** Test assumptions before building features. 265 265 266 - ===Build Sequence (PriorityOrder)262 +### Build Sequence (Importance Order) 267 267 268 268 **Must Build:** 269 269 1. Core analysis (claims + verdicts) ← POC ... ... @@ -281,54 +281,52 @@ 281 281 9. Export features ← Based on user requests 282 282 10. Everything else ← Based on validation 283 283 284 - ===Decision Framework280 +### Decision Framework 285 285 286 286 **For each feature, ask:** 287 287 1. **Importance:** Risk + Impact + Strategy alignment? 288 288 2. **Urgency:** Fail fast + Legal + Promises? 289 289 3. **Validation:** Do we know users want this? 290 -4. ** Priority:** When should we build it?286 +4. **Importance:** When should we build it? 291 291 292 292 **Don't build anything without answering these questions.** 293 293 294 ---- 295 295 296 - ==4. Critical Principles291 +## 4. Critical Principles 297 297 298 - ===Automation First293 +### Automation First 299 299 - AI makes content decisions 300 300 - Humans improve algorithms 301 301 - Scale through code, not people 302 302 303 - ===Fail Fast298 +### Fail Fast 304 304 - Test assumptions quickly 305 305 - Don't build unvalidated features 306 306 - Accept that experiments may fail 307 307 - Learn from failures 308 308 309 - ===Evidence Over Authority304 +### Evidence Over Authority 310 310 - Transparent reasoning visible 311 311 - No single "true/false" verdicts 312 312 - Multiple scenarios shown 313 313 - Assumptions made explicit 314 314 315 - ===User Focus310 +### User Focus 316 316 - Serve users' needs first 317 317 - Build what's actually useful 318 318 - Don't build what's just "cool" 319 319 - Measure and iterate 320 320 321 - ===Honest Assessment316 +### Honest Assessment 322 322 - Don't cherry-pick examples 323 323 - Document failures openly 324 324 - Accept limitations 325 325 - No overpromising 326 326 327 ---- 328 328 329 - ==5. POC Decision Gate323 +## 5. POC Decision Gate 330 330 331 - ===After POC, Choose:325 +### After POC, Choose: 332 332 333 333 **GO (Proceed to Beta):** 334 334 - AI quality ≥70% without editing ... ... @@ -348,41 +348,39 @@ 348 348 - Addressable with better prompts 349 349 - Test again after changes 350 350 351 ---- 352 352 353 - ==6. Key Risks & Mitigations346 +## 6. Key Risks & Mitigations 354 354 355 - ===Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough348 +### Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough 356 356 **Mitigation:** Extensive prompt testing, use best models 357 357 **Acceptance:** POC might fail - that's what testing reveals 358 358 359 - ===Risk 2: Users Don't Understand Output352 +### Risk 2: Users Don't Understand Output 360 360 **Mitigation:** Create clear explainer, test with real users 361 361 **Acceptance:** Iterate on explanation until comprehensible 362 362 363 - ===Risk 3: Approach Doesn't Scale356 +### Risk 3: Approach Doesn't Scale 364 364 **Mitigation:** Start simple, add complexity only when proven 365 365 **Acceptance:** POC proves concept, beta proves scale 366 366 367 - ===Risk 4: Legal/Compliance Issues360 +### Risk 4: Legal/Compliance Issues 368 368 **Mitigation:** Plan accessibility early, consult legal experts 369 369 **Acceptance:** Can't launch publicly without compliance 370 370 371 - ===Risk 5: Feature Creep364 +### Risk 5: Feature Creep 372 372 **Mitigation:** Strict scope discipline, say NO to additions 373 373 **Acceptance:** POC is minimal by design 374 374 375 ---- 376 376 377 - ==7. Success Metrics369 +## 7. Success Metrics 378 378 379 - ===POC Success371 +### POC Success 380 380 - AI output quality ≥70% 381 381 - Manual editing needed < 30% of time 382 382 - Team confidence: High 383 383 - Decision: GO to beta 384 384 385 - ===Platform Success (Later)377 +### Platform Success (Later) 386 386 - User comprehension ≥80% 387 387 - Return user rate ≥30% 388 388 - Flag rate (user corrections) < 10% ... ... @@ -389,37 +389,35 @@ 389 389 - Processing time < 30 seconds 390 390 - Error rate < 1% 391 391 392 - ===Mission Success (Long-term)384 +### Mission Success (Long-term) 393 393 - Users make better-informed decisions 394 394 - Misinformation spread reduced 395 395 - Public discourse improves 396 396 - Trust in evidence increases 397 397 398 ---- 399 399 400 - ==8. What Makes FactHarbor Different391 +## 8. What Makes FactHarbor Different 401 401 402 - ===Not Traditional Fact-Checking393 +### Not Traditional Fact-Checking 403 403 - ❌ No simple "true/false" verdicts 404 404 - ✅ Multiple scenarios with context 405 405 - ✅ Transparent reasoning chains 406 406 - ✅ Explicit assumptions shown 407 407 408 - ===Not AI Chatbot399 +### Not AI Chatbot 409 409 - ❌ Not conversational 410 410 - ✅ Structured Evidence Models 411 411 - ✅ Reproducible analysis 412 412 - ✅ Verifiable sources 413 413 414 - ===Not Just Automation405 +### Not Just Automation 415 415 - ❌ Not replacing human judgment 416 416 - ✅ Augmenting human reasoning 417 417 - ✅ Making process transparent 418 418 - ✅ Enabling informed decisions 419 419 420 ---- 421 421 422 - ==9. Core Philosophy412 +## 9. Core Philosophy 423 423 424 424 **Three Pillars:** 425 425 ... ... @@ -441,31 +441,29 @@ 441 441 - Evaluate source quality 442 442 - Avoid cherry-picking 443 443 444 ---- 445 445 446 - ==10. Next Actions435 +## 10. Next Actions 447 447 448 - ===Immediate437 +### Immediate 449 449 □ Review this consolidated summary 450 450 □ Confirm POC scope agreement 451 451 □ Make strategic decisions on key questions 452 452 □ Begin POC development 453 453 454 - ===Strategic Planning443 +### Strategic Planning 455 455 □ Define accessibility approach 456 456 □ Select initial languages for multilingual 457 457 □ Research media verification partners 458 458 □ Evaluate browser extension frameworks 459 459 460 - ===Continuous449 +### Continuous 461 461 □ Test assumptions before building 462 462 □ Measure everything 463 463 □ Learn from failures 464 464 □ Stay focused on mission 465 465 466 ---- 467 467 468 - ==Summary of Summaries456 +## Summary of Summaries 469 469 470 470 **POC Goal:** Prove AI can do this automatically 471 471 **POC Scope:** 4 simple components, ~200-300 words ... ... @@ -479,9 +479,8 @@ 479 479 **Strategy:** Test first, build second. Fail fast. Stay focused. 480 480 **Philosophy:** Scenarios, transparency, evidence. No false certainty. 481 481 482 ---- 483 483 484 - ==Document Status471 +## Document Status 485 485 486 486 **This document supersedes all previous analysis documents.** 487 487 ... ... @@ -494,7 +494,6 @@ 494 494 495 495 **Previous documents are archived for reference but this is the authoritative summary.** 496 496 497 ---- 498 498 499 499 **End of Consolidated Summary** 500 500