Changes for page POC Summary (POC1 & POC2)

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 09:44

From version 1.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/23 18:19
Change comment: Imported from XAR
To version 3.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/23 21:14
Change comment: Imported from XAR

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,14 +1,13 @@
1 -# FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary
1 += FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary
2 2  **Consolidated Document - No Timelines**
3 3  **Date:** December 19, 2025
4 4  
5 +== 1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE
5 5  
6 -## 1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE
7 -
8 -### POC Goal
7 +=== POC Goal
9 9  Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention.
10 10  
11 -### POC Output (4 Components Only)
10 +=== POC Output (4 Components Only)
12 12  
13 13  **1. ANALYSIS SUMMARY**
14 14  - 3-5 sentences
... ... @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
30 30  
31 31  **Total output: ~200-300 words**
32 32  
33 -### What's NOT in POC
32 +=== What's NOT in POC
34 34  
35 35  ❌ Scenarios (multiple interpretations)
36 36  ❌ Evidence display (supporting/opposing lists)
... ... @@ -42,13 +42,13 @@
42 42  ❌ Export, sharing features
43 43  ❌ Any other features
44 44  
45 -### Critical Requirement
44 +=== Critical Requirement
46 46  
47 47  **FULLY AUTOMATED - NO MANUAL EDITING**
48 48  
49 49  This is non-negotiable. POC tests whether AI can do this without human intervention.
50 50  
51 -### POC Success Criteria
50 +=== POC Success Criteria
52 52  
53 53  **Passes if:**
54 54  - ✅ AI extracts 3-5 factual claims automatically
... ... @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
63 63  - ❌ Requires manual editing for most analyses (> 50%)
64 64  - ❌ Team loses confidence in approach
65 65  
66 -### POC Architecture
65 +=== POC Architecture
67 67  
68 68  **Frontend:** Simple input form + results display
69 69  **Backend:** Single API call to Claude (Sonnet 4.5)
... ... @@ -70,175 +70,14 @@
70 70  **Processing:** One prompt generates complete analysis
71 71  **Database:** None required (stateless)
72 72  
73 -### POC Philosophy
72 +=== POC Philosophy
74 74  
75 75  > "Build less, learn more, decide faster. Test the hardest part first."
76 76  
76 +== 2. Key Strategic Recommendations
77 77  
78 -## 2. Gap Analysis - Strategic Framework
78 +=== Immediate Actions
79 79  
80 -### Framework Definition
81 -
82 -**Importance = f(risk, impact, strategy)**
83 -- Risk: What breaks if we don't have this?
84 -- Impact: How many users? How severe?
85 -- Strategy: Does it advance FactHarbor's mission?
86 -
87 -**Urgency = f(fail fast and learn, legal, promises made)**
88 -- Fail fast: Do we need to test assumptions?
89 -- Legal: External requirements/deadlines?
90 -- Promises: Commitments to stakeholders?
91 -
92 -### 18 Gaps Identified
93 -
94 -**Category 1: Accessibility & Inclusivity**
95 -1. WCAG 2.1 Compliance
96 -2. Multilingual Support
97 -
98 -**Category 2: Platform Integration**
99 -3. Browser Extensions
100 -4. Embeddable Widgets
101 -5. ClaimReview Schema
102 -
103 -**Category 3: Media Verification**
104 -6. Image/Video/Audio Verification
105 -
106 -**Category 4: Mobile & Offline**
107 -7. Mobile Apps / PWA
108 -8. Offline Access
109 -
110 -**Category 5: Education & Media Literacy**
111 -9. Educational Resources
112 -10. Media Literacy Integration
113 -
114 -**Category 6: Collaboration & Community**
115 -11. Professional Collaboration Tools
116 -12. Community Discussion
117 -
118 -**Category 7: Export & Sharing**
119 -13. Export Capabilities (PDF, CSV)
120 -14. Social Sharing Optimization
121 -
122 -**Category 8: Advanced Features**
123 -15. User Analytics
124 -16. Personalization
125 -17. Media Archiving
126 -18. Advanced Search
127 -
128 -### Importance/Urgency Analysis
129 -
130 -**VERY HIGH Importance + HIGH Urgency:**
131 -1. **Accessibility (WCAG)**
132 - - Risk: Legal liability, 15-20% users excluded
133 - - Urgency: European Accessibility Act (June 28, 2025)
134 - - Action: Must be built from start (retrofitting 100x more expensive)
135 -
136 -2. **Educational Resources**
137 - - Risk: Platform fails if users can't understand
138 - - Urgency: Required for any adoption
139 - - Action: Basic onboarding essential
140 -
141 -**HIGH Importance + MEDIUM Urgency:**
142 -3. **Browser Extensions** - Standard user expectation, test demand first
143 -4. **Media Verification** - Cannot address visual misinformation without it
144 -5. **Multilingual** - Global mission requires it, plan early
145 -
146 -**HIGH Importance + LOW Urgency:**
147 -6. **Mobile Apps** - 90%+ users on mobile, but web-first viable
148 -7. **ClaimReview Schema** - SEO/discoverability, can add anytime
149 -
150 -
151 -## 1.7 POC Alignment with Full Specification
152 -
153 -### POC Intentional Simplifications
154 -
155 -**POC1 tests core AI capability, not full architecture:**
156 -
157 -**What POC Tests:**
158 -- Can AI extract claims from articles?
159 -- Can AI evaluate claims with reasonable verdicts?
160 -- Is fully automated approach viable?
161 -- Is output comprehensible to users?
162 -
163 -**What POC Excludes (Intentionally):**
164 -- ❌ Scenarios (deferred to POC2 - open architectural questions remain)
165 -- ❌ Evidence display (deferred to POC2)
166 -- ❌ Multi-component AKEL pipeline (simplified to single API call)
167 -- ❌ Quality gate infrastructure (simplified basic checks)
168 -- ❌ Production data model (stateless POC)
169 -- ❌ Review workflow system (no review queue)
170 -
171 -**Why Simplified:**
172 -- Fail fast: Test hardest part first (AI capability)
173 -- Learn before building: POC1 informs architecture decisions
174 -- Iterative: Add complexity based on POC1 learnings
175 -- Risk management: Prove concept before major investment
176 -
177 -### Full System Architecture (Future)
178 -
179 -**Workflow:**
180 -{{code}}
181 -Claims → Scenarios → Evidence → Verdicts
182 -{{/code}}
183 -
184 -**AKEL Components:**
185 -- Orchestrator
186 -- Claim Extractor & Classifier
187 -- Scenario Generator
188 -- Evidence Summarizer
189 -- Contradiction Detector
190 -- Quality Gate Validator
191 -- Audit Sampling Scheduler
192 -
193 -**Publication Modes:**
194 -- Mode 1: Draft-Only
195 -- Mode 2: AI-Generated (POC uses this)
196 -- Mode 3: AKEL-Generated (Human-Reviewed)
197 -
198 -### POC vs. Full System Summary
199 -
200 -|=Aspect|=POC1|=Full System
201 -|Scenarios|None (deferred to POC2)|Core component with versioning
202 -|Workflow|3 steps (input/process/output)|6 phases with quality gates
203 -|AKEL|Single API call|Multi-component orchestrated pipeline
204 -|Data|Stateless (no DB)|PostgreSQL + Redis + S3
205 -|Publication|Mode 2 only|Modes 1/2/3 with risk-based routing
206 -|Quality Gates|4 simplified checks|Full validation infrastructure
207 -
208 -### Gap Between POC and Beta
209 -
210 -**Significant architectural expansion needed:**
211 -1. Scenario generation component design and implementation
212 -2. Evidence Model full structure
213 -3. Multi-phase workflow with gates
214 -4. Component-based AKEL architecture
215 -5. Production data model and storage
216 -6. Review workflow and audit systems
217 -
218 -**POC proves concept. Beta builds product.**
219 -
220 -
221 -**MEDIUM Importance + LOW Urgency:**
222 -8-14. All other features - valuable but not urgent
223 -
224 -**Strategic Decisions Needed:**
225 -- Community discussion: Allow or stay evidence-focused?
226 -- Personalization: How much without filter bubbles?
227 -- Media verification: Partner with existing tools or build?
228 -
229 -### Key Insight: Milestones Change Priorities
230 -
231 -**POC:** Only educational resources urgent (basic explainer)
232 -**Beta:** Accessibility becomes urgent (test with diverse users)
233 -**Release:** Legal requirements become critical (WCAG, GDPR)
234 -
235 -**Importance/urgency are contextual, not absolute.**
236 -
237 -
238 -## 3. Key Strategic Recommendations
239 -
240 -### Immediate Actions
241 -
242 242  **For POC:**
243 243  1. Focus on core functionality only (claims + verdicts)
244 244  2. Create basic explainer (1 page)
... ... @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
251 251  3. Research media verification options (partner vs build)
252 252  4. Evaluate browser extension approach
253 253  
254 -### Testing Strategy
92 +=== Testing Strategy
255 255  
256 256  **POC Tests:** Can AI do this without humans?
257 257  **Beta Tests:** What do users need? What works? What doesn't?
... ... @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@
259 259  
260 260  **Key Principle:** Test assumptions before building features.
261 261  
262 -### Build Sequence (Importance Order)
100 +=== Build Sequence (Priority Order)
263 263  
264 264  **Must Build:**
265 265  1. Core analysis (claims + verdicts) ← POC
... ... @@ -277,53 +277,51 @@
277 277  9. Export features ← Based on user requests
278 278  10. Everything else ← Based on validation
279 279  
280 -### Decision Framework
118 +=== Decision Framework
281 281  
282 282  **For each feature, ask:**
283 283  1. **Importance:** Risk + Impact + Strategy alignment?
284 284  2. **Urgency:** Fail fast + Legal + Promises?
285 285  3. **Validation:** Do we know users want this?
286 -4. **Importance:** When should we build it?
124 +4. **Priority:** When should we build it?
287 287  
288 288  **Don't build anything without answering these questions.**
289 289  
128 +== 4. Critical Principles
290 290  
291 -## 4. Critical Principles
292 -
293 -### Automation First
130 +=== Automation First
294 294  - AI makes content decisions
295 295  - Humans improve algorithms
296 296  - Scale through code, not people
297 297  
298 -### Fail Fast
135 +=== Fail Fast
299 299  - Test assumptions quickly
300 300  - Don't build unvalidated features
301 301  - Accept that experiments may fail
302 302  - Learn from failures
303 303  
304 -### Evidence Over Authority
141 +=== Evidence Over Authority
305 305  - Transparent reasoning visible
306 306  - No single "true/false" verdicts
307 307  - Multiple scenarios shown
308 308  - Assumptions made explicit
309 309  
310 -### User Focus
147 +=== User Focus
311 311  - Serve users' needs first
312 312  - Build what's actually useful
313 313  - Don't build what's just "cool"
314 314  - Measure and iterate
315 315  
316 -### Honest Assessment
153 +=== Honest Assessment
317 317  - Don't cherry-pick examples
318 318  - Document failures openly
319 319  - Accept limitations
320 320  - No overpromising
321 321  
159 +== 5. POC Decision Gate
322 322  
323 -## 5. POC Decision Gate
161 +=== After POC, Choose:
324 324  
325 -### After POC, Choose:
326 -
327 327  **GO (Proceed to Beta):**
328 328  - AI quality ≥70% without editing
329 329  - Approach validated
... ... @@ -342,39 +342,37 @@
342 342  - Addressable with better prompts
343 343  - Test again after changes
344 344  
181 +== 6. Key Risks & Mitigations
345 345  
346 -## 6. Key Risks & Mitigations
347 -
348 -### Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough
183 +=== Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough
349 349  **Mitigation:** Extensive prompt testing, use best models
350 350  **Acceptance:** POC might fail - that's what testing reveals
351 351  
352 -### Risk 2: Users Don't Understand Output
187 +=== Risk 2: Users Don't Understand Output
353 353  **Mitigation:** Create clear explainer, test with real users
354 354  **Acceptance:** Iterate on explanation until comprehensible
355 355  
356 -### Risk 3: Approach Doesn't Scale
191 +=== Risk 3: Approach Doesn't Scale
357 357  **Mitigation:** Start simple, add complexity only when proven
358 358  **Acceptance:** POC proves concept, beta proves scale
359 359  
360 -### Risk 4: Legal/Compliance Issues
195 +=== Risk 4: Legal/Compliance Issues
361 361  **Mitigation:** Plan accessibility early, consult legal experts
362 362  **Acceptance:** Can't launch publicly without compliance
363 363  
364 -### Risk 5: Feature Creep
199 +=== Risk 5: Feature Creep
365 365  **Mitigation:** Strict scope discipline, say NO to additions
366 366  **Acceptance:** POC is minimal by design
367 367  
203 +== 7. Success Metrics
368 368  
369 -## 7. Success Metrics
370 -
371 -### POC Success
205 +=== POC Success
372 372  - AI output quality ≥70%
373 373  - Manual editing needed < 30% of time
374 374  - Team confidence: High
375 375  - Decision: GO to beta
376 376  
377 -### Platform Success (Later)
211 +=== Platform Success (Later)
378 378  - User comprehension ≥80%
379 379  - Return user rate ≥30%
380 380  - Flag rate (user corrections) < 10%
... ... @@ -381,36 +381,34 @@
381 381  - Processing time < 30 seconds
382 382  - Error rate < 1%
383 383  
384 -### Mission Success (Long-term)
218 +=== Mission Success (Long-term)
385 385  - Users make better-informed decisions
386 386  - Misinformation spread reduced
387 387  - Public discourse improves
388 388  - Trust in evidence increases
389 389  
224 +== 8. What Makes FactHarbor Different
390 390  
391 -## 8. What Makes FactHarbor Different
392 -
393 -### Not Traditional Fact-Checking
226 +=== Not Traditional Fact-Checking
394 394  - ❌ No simple "true/false" verdicts
395 395  - ✅ Multiple scenarios with context
396 396  - ✅ Transparent reasoning chains
397 397  - ✅ Explicit assumptions shown
398 398  
399 -### Not AI Chatbot
232 +=== Not AI Chatbot
400 400  - ❌ Not conversational
401 401  - ✅ Structured Evidence Models
402 402  - ✅ Reproducible analysis
403 403  - ✅ Verifiable sources
404 404  
405 -### Not Just Automation
238 +=== Not Just Automation
406 406  - ❌ Not replacing human judgment
407 407  - ✅ Augmenting human reasoning
408 408  - ✅ Making process transparent
409 409  - ✅ Enabling informed decisions
410 410  
244 +== 9. Core Philosophy
411 411  
412 -## 9. Core Philosophy
413 -
414 414  **Three Pillars:**
415 415  
416 416  **1. Scenarios Over Verdicts**
... ... @@ -431,30 +431,28 @@
431 431  - Evaluate source quality
432 432  - Avoid cherry-picking
433 433  
266 +== 10. Next Actions
434 434  
435 -## 10. Next Actions
436 -
437 -### Immediate
268 +=== Immediate
438 438  □ Review this consolidated summary
439 439  □ Confirm POC scope agreement
440 440  □ Make strategic decisions on key questions
441 441  □ Begin POC development
442 442  
443 -### Strategic Planning
274 +=== Strategic Planning
444 444  □ Define accessibility approach
445 445  □ Select initial languages for multilingual
446 446  □ Research media verification partners
447 447  □ Evaluate browser extension frameworks
448 448  
449 -### Continuous
280 +=== Continuous
450 450  □ Test assumptions before building
451 451  □ Measure everything
452 452  □ Learn from failures
453 453  □ Stay focused on mission
454 454  
286 +== Summary of Summaries
455 455  
456 -## Summary of Summaries
457 -
458 458  **POC Goal:** Prove AI can do this automatically
459 459  **POC Scope:** 4 simple components, ~200-300 words
460 460  **POC Critical:** Fully automated, no manual editing
... ... @@ -467,9 +467,8 @@
467 467  **Strategy:** Test first, build second. Fail fast. Stay focused.
468 468  **Philosophy:** Scenarios, transparency, evidence. No false certainty.
469 469  
300 +== Document Status
470 470  
471 -## Document Status
472 -
473 473  **This document supersedes all previous analysis documents.**
474 474  
475 475  All gap analysis, POC specifications, and strategic frameworks are consolidated here without timeline references.
... ... @@ -481,6 +481,5 @@
481 481  
482 482  **Previous documents are archived for reference but this is the authoritative summary.**
483 483  
484 -
485 485  **End of Consolidated Summary**
486 486