Changes for page POC Summary (POC1 & POC2)
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 09:44
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,14 +1,15 @@ 1 - #FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary1 += FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary 2 2 **Consolidated Document - No Timelines** 3 3 **Date:** December 19, 2025 4 4 5 +--- 5 5 6 - ##1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE7 +== 1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE 7 7 8 - ###POC Goal9 +=== POC Goal 9 9 Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention. 10 10 11 - ###POC Output (4 Components Only)12 +=== POC Output (4 Components Only) 12 12 13 13 **1. ANALYSIS SUMMARY** 14 14 - 3-5 sentences ... ... @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ 30 30 31 31 **Total output: ~200-300 words** 32 32 33 - ###What's NOT in POC34 +=== What's NOT in POC 34 34 35 35 ❌ Scenarios (multiple interpretations) 36 36 ❌ Evidence display (supporting/opposing lists) ... ... @@ -42,13 +42,13 @@ 42 42 ❌ Export, sharing features 43 43 ❌ Any other features 44 44 45 - ###Critical Requirement46 +=== Critical Requirement 46 46 47 47 **FULLY AUTOMATED - NO MANUAL EDITING** 48 48 49 49 This is non-negotiable. POC tests whether AI can do this without human intervention. 50 50 51 - ###POC Success Criteria52 +=== POC Success Criteria 52 52 53 53 **Passes if:** 54 54 - ✅ AI extracts 3-5 factual claims automatically ... ... @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ 63 63 - ❌ Requires manual editing for most analyses (> 50%) 64 64 - ❌ Team loses confidence in approach 65 65 66 - ###POC Architecture67 +=== POC Architecture 67 67 68 68 **Frontend:** Simple input form + results display 69 69 **Backend:** Single API call to Claude (Sonnet 4.5) ... ... @@ -70,14 +70,15 @@ 70 70 **Processing:** One prompt generates complete analysis 71 71 **Database:** None required (stateless) 72 72 73 - ###POC Philosophy74 +=== POC Philosophy 74 74 75 75 > "Build less, learn more, decide faster. Test the hardest part first." 76 76 78 +--- 77 77 78 - ##2. Gap Analysis - Strategic Framework80 +== 2. Gap Analysis - Strategic Framework 79 79 80 - ###Framework Definition82 +=== Framework Definition 81 81 82 82 **Importance = f(risk, impact, strategy)** 83 83 - Risk: What breaks if we don't have this? ... ... @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ 89 89 - Legal: External requirements/deadlines? 90 90 - Promises: Commitments to stakeholders? 91 91 92 - ###18 Gaps Identified94 +=== 18 Gaps Identified 93 93 94 94 **Category 1: Accessibility & Inclusivity** 95 95 1. WCAG 2.1 Compliance ... ... @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ 125 125 17. Media Archiving 126 126 18. Advanced Search 127 127 128 - ###Importance/Urgency Analysis130 +=== Importance/Urgency Analysis 129 129 130 130 **VERY HIGH Importance + HIGH Urgency:** 131 131 1. **Accessibility (WCAG)** ... ... @@ -147,10 +147,11 @@ 147 147 6. **Mobile Apps** - 90%+ users on mobile, but web-first viable 148 148 7. **ClaimReview Schema** - SEO/discoverability, can add anytime 149 149 152 +--- 150 150 151 - ##1.7 POC Alignment with Full Specification154 +== 1.7 POC Alignment with Full Specification 152 152 153 - ###POC Intentional Simplifications156 +=== POC Intentional Simplifications 154 154 155 155 **POC1 tests core AI capability, not full architecture:** 156 156 ... ... @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ 174 174 - Iterative: Add complexity based on POC1 learnings 175 175 - Risk management: Prove concept before major investment 176 176 177 - ###Full System Architecture (Future)180 +=== Full System Architecture (Future) 178 178 179 179 **Workflow:** 180 180 {{code}} ... ... @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ 195 195 - Mode 2: AI-Generated (POC uses this) 196 196 - Mode 3: AKEL-Generated (Human-Reviewed) 197 197 198 - ###POC vs. Full System Summary201 +=== POC vs. Full System Summary 199 199 200 200 |=Aspect|=POC1|=Full System 201 201 |Scenarios|None (deferred to POC2)|Core component with versioning ... ... @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ 205 205 |Publication|Mode 2 only|Modes 1/2/3 with risk-based routing 206 206 |Quality Gates|4 simplified checks|Full validation infrastructure 207 207 208 - ###Gap Between POC and Beta211 +=== Gap Between POC and Beta 209 209 210 210 **Significant architectural expansion needed:** 211 211 1. Scenario generation component design and implementation ... ... @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ 226 226 - Personalization: How much without filter bubbles? 227 227 - Media verification: Partner with existing tools or build? 228 228 229 - ###Key Insight: Milestones Change Priorities232 +=== Key Insight: Milestones Change Priorities 230 230 231 231 **POC:** Only educational resources urgent (basic explainer) 232 232 **Beta:** Accessibility becomes urgent (test with diverse users) ... ... @@ -234,10 +234,11 @@ 234 234 235 235 **Importance/urgency are contextual, not absolute.** 236 236 240 +--- 237 237 238 - ##3. Key Strategic Recommendations242 +== 3. Key Strategic Recommendations 239 239 240 - ###Immediate Actions244 +=== Immediate Actions 241 241 242 242 **For POC:** 243 243 1. Focus on core functionality only (claims + verdicts) ... ... @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ 251 251 3. Research media verification options (partner vs build) 252 252 4. Evaluate browser extension approach 253 253 254 - ###Testing Strategy258 +=== Testing Strategy 255 255 256 256 **POC Tests:** Can AI do this without humans? 257 257 **Beta Tests:** What do users need? What works? What doesn't? ... ... @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ 259 259 260 260 **Key Principle:** Test assumptions before building features. 261 261 262 - ###Build Sequence (ImportanceOrder)266 +=== Build Sequence (Priority Order) 263 263 264 264 **Must Build:** 265 265 1. Core analysis (claims + verdicts) ← POC ... ... @@ -277,52 +277,54 @@ 277 277 9. Export features ← Based on user requests 278 278 10. Everything else ← Based on validation 279 279 280 - ###Decision Framework284 +=== Decision Framework 281 281 282 282 **For each feature, ask:** 283 283 1. **Importance:** Risk + Impact + Strategy alignment? 284 284 2. **Urgency:** Fail fast + Legal + Promises? 285 285 3. **Validation:** Do we know users want this? 286 -4. ** Importance:** When should we build it?290 +4. **Priority:** When should we build it? 287 287 288 288 **Don't build anything without answering these questions.** 289 289 294 +--- 290 290 291 - ##4. Critical Principles296 +== 4. Critical Principles 292 292 293 - ###Automation First298 +=== Automation First 294 294 - AI makes content decisions 295 295 - Humans improve algorithms 296 296 - Scale through code, not people 297 297 298 - ###Fail Fast303 +=== Fail Fast 299 299 - Test assumptions quickly 300 300 - Don't build unvalidated features 301 301 - Accept that experiments may fail 302 302 - Learn from failures 303 303 304 - ###Evidence Over Authority309 +=== Evidence Over Authority 305 305 - Transparent reasoning visible 306 306 - No single "true/false" verdicts 307 307 - Multiple scenarios shown 308 308 - Assumptions made explicit 309 309 310 - ###User Focus315 +=== User Focus 311 311 - Serve users' needs first 312 312 - Build what's actually useful 313 313 - Don't build what's just "cool" 314 314 - Measure and iterate 315 315 316 - ###Honest Assessment321 +=== Honest Assessment 317 317 - Don't cherry-pick examples 318 318 - Document failures openly 319 319 - Accept limitations 320 320 - No overpromising 321 321 327 +--- 322 322 323 - ##5. POC Decision Gate329 +== 5. POC Decision Gate 324 324 325 - ###After POC, Choose:331 +=== After POC, Choose: 326 326 327 327 **GO (Proceed to Beta):** 328 328 - AI quality ≥70% without editing ... ... @@ -342,39 +342,41 @@ 342 342 - Addressable with better prompts 343 343 - Test again after changes 344 344 351 +--- 345 345 346 - ##6. Key Risks & Mitigations353 +== 6. Key Risks & Mitigations 347 347 348 - ###Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough355 +=== Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough 349 349 **Mitigation:** Extensive prompt testing, use best models 350 350 **Acceptance:** POC might fail - that's what testing reveals 351 351 352 - ###Risk 2: Users Don't Understand Output359 +=== Risk 2: Users Don't Understand Output 353 353 **Mitigation:** Create clear explainer, test with real users 354 354 **Acceptance:** Iterate on explanation until comprehensible 355 355 356 - ###Risk 3: Approach Doesn't Scale363 +=== Risk 3: Approach Doesn't Scale 357 357 **Mitigation:** Start simple, add complexity only when proven 358 358 **Acceptance:** POC proves concept, beta proves scale 359 359 360 - ###Risk 4: Legal/Compliance Issues367 +=== Risk 4: Legal/Compliance Issues 361 361 **Mitigation:** Plan accessibility early, consult legal experts 362 362 **Acceptance:** Can't launch publicly without compliance 363 363 364 - ###Risk 5: Feature Creep371 +=== Risk 5: Feature Creep 365 365 **Mitigation:** Strict scope discipline, say NO to additions 366 366 **Acceptance:** POC is minimal by design 367 367 375 +--- 368 368 369 - ##7. Success Metrics377 +== 7. Success Metrics 370 370 371 - ###POC Success379 +=== POC Success 372 372 - AI output quality ≥70% 373 373 - Manual editing needed < 30% of time 374 374 - Team confidence: High 375 375 - Decision: GO to beta 376 376 377 - ###Platform Success (Later)385 +=== Platform Success (Later) 378 378 - User comprehension ≥80% 379 379 - Return user rate ≥30% 380 380 - Flag rate (user corrections) < 10% ... ... @@ -381,35 +381,37 @@ 381 381 - Processing time < 30 seconds 382 382 - Error rate < 1% 383 383 384 - ###Mission Success (Long-term)392 +=== Mission Success (Long-term) 385 385 - Users make better-informed decisions 386 386 - Misinformation spread reduced 387 387 - Public discourse improves 388 388 - Trust in evidence increases 389 389 398 +--- 390 390 391 - ##8. What Makes FactHarbor Different400 +== 8. What Makes FactHarbor Different 392 392 393 - ###Not Traditional Fact-Checking402 +=== Not Traditional Fact-Checking 394 394 - ❌ No simple "true/false" verdicts 395 395 - ✅ Multiple scenarios with context 396 396 - ✅ Transparent reasoning chains 397 397 - ✅ Explicit assumptions shown 398 398 399 - ###Not AI Chatbot408 +=== Not AI Chatbot 400 400 - ❌ Not conversational 401 401 - ✅ Structured Evidence Models 402 402 - ✅ Reproducible analysis 403 403 - ✅ Verifiable sources 404 404 405 - ###Not Just Automation414 +=== Not Just Automation 406 406 - ❌ Not replacing human judgment 407 407 - ✅ Augmenting human reasoning 408 408 - ✅ Making process transparent 409 409 - ✅ Enabling informed decisions 410 410 420 +--- 411 411 412 - ##9. Core Philosophy422 +== 9. Core Philosophy 413 413 414 414 **Three Pillars:** 415 415 ... ... @@ -431,29 +431,31 @@ 431 431 - Evaluate source quality 432 432 - Avoid cherry-picking 433 433 444 +--- 434 434 435 - ##10. Next Actions446 +== 10. Next Actions 436 436 437 - ###Immediate448 +=== Immediate 438 438 □ Review this consolidated summary 439 439 □ Confirm POC scope agreement 440 440 □ Make strategic decisions on key questions 441 441 □ Begin POC development 442 442 443 - ###Strategic Planning454 +=== Strategic Planning 444 444 □ Define accessibility approach 445 445 □ Select initial languages for multilingual 446 446 □ Research media verification partners 447 447 □ Evaluate browser extension frameworks 448 448 449 - ###Continuous460 +=== Continuous 450 450 □ Test assumptions before building 451 451 □ Measure everything 452 452 □ Learn from failures 453 453 □ Stay focused on mission 454 454 466 +--- 455 455 456 - ##Summary of Summaries468 +== Summary of Summaries 457 457 458 458 **POC Goal:** Prove AI can do this automatically 459 459 **POC Scope:** 4 simple components, ~200-300 words ... ... @@ -467,8 +467,9 @@ 467 467 **Strategy:** Test first, build second. Fail fast. Stay focused. 468 468 **Philosophy:** Scenarios, transparency, evidence. No false certainty. 469 469 482 +--- 470 470 471 - ##Document Status484 +== Document Status 472 472 473 473 **This document supersedes all previous analysis documents.** 474 474 ... ... @@ -481,6 +481,7 @@ 481 481 482 482 **Previous documents are archived for reference but this is the authoritative summary.** 483 483 497 +--- 484 484 485 485 **End of Consolidated Summary** 486 486