Changes for page User Needs
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 21:53
To version 1.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/19 08:55
on 2025/12/19 08:55
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -9,156 +9,45 @@ 9 9 == 1. Core Reading & Discovery == 10 10 11 11 === UN-1: Trust Assessment at a Glance === 12 -**As** an article reader (any content type), 13 -**I want** to see a trust score and overall verdict summary at a glance, 12 +**As** an article reader (any content type), 13 +**I want** to see a trust score and overall verdict summary at a glance, 14 14 **so that** I can quickly decide if the content is worth my time to read in detail. 15 15 16 16 **Maps to**: FR7 (Automated Verdicts), NFR3 (Transparency) 17 17 18 18 === UN-2: Claim Extraction and Verification === 19 -**As** an article reader, 20 -**I want** to see the key factual claims extracted from content with verification verdicts (likelihood ranges + uncertainty ratings) for each relevant scenario, 19 +**As** an article reader, 20 +**I want** to see the key factual claims extracted from content with verification verdicts (likelihood ranges + uncertainty ratings) for each relevant scenario, 21 21 **so that** I can distinguish proven facts from speculation and understand context-dependent truth. 22 22 23 23 **Maps to**: FR1 (Claim Intake), FR4 (Scenario Generation), FR7 (Automated Verdicts) 24 24 25 -=== UN-3: ArticleSummary withFactHarborAnalysisSummary===26 -**As** an article reader, 27 -**I want** to see a narticle summary(thedocument'sposition,keyclaims,and reasoning)side-by-sidewith FactHarbor'sanalysis summary (sourcecredibilityassessment,claim-by-claimverdicts, methodology evaluation,and overall quality verdict),28 -**so that** I can quickly understand both what thedocument claimsandFactHarbor'scomplete analysis of its credibilitywithout readingthefulldetailedreport.25 +=== UN-3: Summary with Verdict Context === 26 +**As** an article reader, 27 +**I want** to see a concise summary of the article's main claims alongside verdict summaries for each scenario, 28 +**so that** I can quickly understand both what is claimed and how credible those claims are under different interpretations. 29 29 30 -**Maps to**: FR7 (Automated Verdicts), FR6 (Scenario Comparison) , FR12 (Two-Panel Summary View - Article Summary with FactHarbor Analysis Summary)30 +**Maps to**: FR7 (Automated Verdicts), FR6 (Scenario Comparison) 31 31 32 -==== Example: Two-Panel Summary Layout ==== 33 - 34 -|=**ARTICLE SUMMARY**|=**FACTHARBOR ANALYSIS SUMMARY** 35 -|((( 36 -**FactHarbor Summary: AHA Alcohol & Heart Health Statement (2025)** 37 - 38 -**Source:** American Heart Association Scientific Statement, //Circulation//, June 2025 39 -**Credibility:** Very High (peer-reviewed expert consensus) 40 - 41 -=== The Big Picture === 42 -**Old belief:** "A glass of wine is good for your heart" 43 -**New position:** We're no longer sure that's true 44 - 45 -=== Key Findings === 46 - 47 -|=**Drinking Level**|=**Verdict** 48 -|Heavy (≥3 drinks/day)|(% style="color:red" %)❌ **Harmful** – consistent across ALL studies 49 -|Moderate (1-2 drinks/day)|(% style="color:orange" %)❓ **Uncertain** – benefits may have been overstated 50 -|None|(% style="color:green" %)✅ **Don't start drinking for heart health** 51 - 52 -=== Why the Shift? === 53 -Newer genetic studies (Mendelian randomization) found **no evidence** that moderate drinking protects the heart. The apparent benefits in older studies were likely due to lifestyle differences and methodological bias. 54 - 55 -=== AHA Bottom Line === 56 -(% class="box" %) 57 -((( 58 -If you don't drink, don't start. If you do drink, keep it to ≤2/day (men) or ≤1/day (women). Focus on proven healthy behaviors instead—exercise, diet, not smoking. 59 - 60 -//The "wine for heart health" era appears to be over.// 61 -))) 62 -)))|((( 63 -**FactHarbor Analysis Summary** 64 - 65 -**Document:** AHA Scientific Statement on Alcohol and Cardiovascular Disease (2025) 66 - 67 -=== Source Assessment === 68 -**Credibility:** (% style="color:green" %)**VERY HIGH**(%%) – Official AHA statement, peer-reviewed, expert panel, published in top journal (//Circulation//) 69 - 70 -=== Analysis Findings === 71 - 72 -|=**Claim in Document**|=**FactHarbor Verdict**|=**Confidence** 73 -|Heavy drinking harms heart health|(% style="color:green" %)**STRONGLY SUPPORTED**|(% style="color:green" %)**95%** 74 -|Moderate drinking benefits uncertain|(% style="color:green" %)**WELL SUPPORTED**|(% style="color:green" %)**85%** 75 -|Prior "cardioprotective" claims overstated|(% style="color:green" %)**SUPPORTED**|(% style="color:green" %)**80%** 76 -|More research needed|**APPROPRIATE**|N/A 77 - 78 -=== Assessment === 79 - 80 -(% style="color:green" %)✅(%%) **Strengths:** Transparent about methodological limitations, incorporates newer Mendelian randomization evidence, appropriately cautious, avoids overstatement 81 - 82 -(% style="color:green" %)✅(%%) **Methodology:** Sound synthesis of observational and genetic evidence 83 - 84 -(% style="color:orange" %)⚠️(%%) **Limitation:** Still relies heavily on observational data; RCT evidence limited 85 - 86 -=== Verdict on the Statement Itself === 87 - 88 -(% class="box successmessage" %) 89 -((( 90 -**WELL-SUPPORTED SCIENTIFIC SYNTHESIS** – The AHA statement is credible, balanced, and appropriately reflects the current state of evidence. It correctly signals a shift away from previous assumptions about moderate drinking benefits without overclaiming in either direction. 91 -))) 92 - 93 -**Analysis ID:** FH-AHA-ALCO-2025-12-17 94 -))) 95 - 96 -**Key Elements of Two-Panel Layout**: 97 - 98 -**Left Panel (Article Summary)**: 99 -* Document title and source 100 -* Source credibility (document's own authority) 101 -* "The Big Picture" - old belief vs. new position 102 -* "Key Findings" - document's main claims in structured format 103 -* "Why the Shift?" - document's reasoning 104 -* "Bottom Line" - document's conclusion 105 - 106 -**Right Panel (FactHarbor Analysis Summary)**: 107 -* FactHarbor's source assessment (independent credibility check) 108 -* Claim-by-claim analysis with verdicts and confidence scores 109 -* Assessment of methodology (strengths/limitations) 110 -* Overall verdict on the document itself 111 -* Analysis ID for reference 112 - 113 -**Design Principle**: User sees **what they claim** and **FactHarbor's complete analysis** side-by-side without scrolling. 114 - 115 115 === UN-4: Social Media Fact-Checking === 116 -**As** a social media user, 117 -**I want** to check claims in posts before sharing, 33 +**As** a social media user, 34 +**I want** to check claims in posts before sharing, 118 118 **so that** I can avoid spreading misinformation. 119 119 120 120 **Maps to**: FR1 (Claim Intake), FR7 (Automated Verdicts), NFR1 (Performance - fast processing) 121 121 122 -=== UN-17: In-Article Claim Highlighting === 123 -**As** a reader viewing an article, 124 -**I want** to see factual claims highlighted with color-coded credibility indicators (green for well-supported, yellow for uncertain, red for refuted), 125 -**so that** I can immediately identify which statements are trustworthy and which require skepticism without interrupting my reading flow. 126 - 127 -**Maps to**: FR7 (Automated Verdicts), FR13 (In-Article Claim Highlighting), NFR1 (Performance - real-time highlighting) 128 - 129 -==== Visual Concept ==== 130 - 131 -When reading an article on FactHarbor: 132 - 133 -(% style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#f5f5f5; padding:10px; display:block;" %) 134 -((( 135 -Regular article text flows normally... 136 - 137 -(% style="background-color:#90EE90; padding:2px 5px;" %)This claim is well-supported by evidence(%%) and you can continue reading... 138 - 139 -More context and explanation... 140 - 141 -(% style="background-color:#FFD700; padding:2px 5px;" %)This claim is uncertain with conflicting evidence(%%) but the article continues... 142 - 143 -Additional information... 144 - 145 -(% style="background-color:#FFB6C6; padding:2px 5px;" %)This claim has been refuted by research(%%) and understanding that helps readers... 146 -))) 147 - 148 -**Hover/Click on any highlighted claim** → See verdict, confidence score, and evidence summary 149 - 150 150 == 2. Source Tracing & Credibility == 151 151 152 152 === UN-5: Source Provenance and Track Records === 153 -**As** an article reader, 154 -**I want** to trace each piece of evidence back to its original source and see that source's historical track record, 42 +**As** an article reader, 43 +**I want** to trace each piece of evidence back to its original source and see that source's historical track record, 155 155 **so that** I can assess the reliability of the information chain and learn which sources are consistently trustworthy. 156 156 157 157 **Maps to**: FR5 (Evidence Linking), Section 4.1 (Source Requirements - track record system) 158 158 159 159 === UN-6: Publisher Reliability History === 160 -**As** an article reader, 161 -**I want** to see historical accuracy track records for sources and publishers, 49 +**As** an article reader, 50 +**I want** to see historical accuracy track records for sources and publishers, 162 162 **so that** I can learn which outlets are consistently reliable over time. 163 163 164 164 **Maps to**: Section 4.1 (Source Requirements), Data Model (Source entity with track_record_score) ... ... @@ -166,22 +166,22 @@ 166 166 == 3. Understanding the Analysis == 167 167 168 168 === UN-7: Evidence Transparency === 169 -**As** a skeptical reader, 170 -**I want** to see the evidence and reasoning behind each verdict, 58 +**As** a skeptical reader, 59 +**I want** to see the evidence and reasoning behind each verdict, 171 171 **so that** I can judge whether I agree with the assessment and form my own conclusions. 172 172 173 173 **Maps to**: FR5 (Evidence Linking), NFR3 (Transparency) 174 174 175 175 === UN-8: Understanding Disagreement and Consensus === 176 -**As** an article reader, 177 -**I want** to see which scenarios have strong supporting evidence versus which have conflicting evidence or high uncertainty, 65 +**As** an article reader, 66 +**I want** to see which scenarios have strong supporting evidence versus which have conflicting evidence or high uncertainty, 178 178 **so that** I can understand where legitimate disagreement exists versus where consensus is clear. 179 179 180 180 **Maps to**: FR6 (Scenario Comparison), FR7 (Automated Verdicts - uncertainty factors), AKEL Gate 2 (Contradiction Search) 181 181 182 182 === UN-9: Methodology Transparency === 183 -**As** an article reader, 184 -**I want** to understand how likelihood ranges and confidence scores are calculated, 72 +**As** an article reader, 73 +**I want** to understand how likelihood ranges and confidence scores are calculated, 185 185 **so that** I can trust the verification process itself. 186 186 187 187 **Maps to**: NFR3 (Transparency), Architecture (documented algorithms), AKEL (Quality Gates) ... ... @@ -189,15 +189,15 @@ 189 189 == 4. Pattern Recognition & Learning == 190 190 191 191 === UN-10: Manipulation Tactics Detection === 192 -**As** an article reader, 193 -**I want** to see common manipulation tactics or logical fallacies identified in content, 81 +**As** an article reader, 82 +**I want** to see common manipulation tactics or logical fallacies identified in content, 194 194 **so that** I can recognize them elsewhere and become a more critical consumer of information. 195 195 196 196 **Maps to**: AKEL (Bubble Detection), Section 5 (Automated Risk Scoring) 197 197 198 198 === UN-11: Filtered Research === 199 -**As** a researcher, 200 -**I want** to filter content by verification status, confidence levels, and source quality, 88 +**As** a researcher, 89 +**I want** to filter content by verification status, confidence levels, and source quality, 201 201 **so that** I can work only with reliable information appropriate for my research needs. 202 202 203 203 **Maps to**: FR1 (Claim Classification), Section 4.4 (Confidence Scoring), NFR1 (Performance) ... ... @@ -205,15 +205,15 @@ 205 205 == 5. Taking Action == 206 206 207 207 === UN-12: Submit Unchecked Claims === 208 -**As** a reader who finds unchecked claims, 209 -**I want** to submit them for verification, 97 +**As** a reader who finds unchecked claims, 98 +**I want** to submit them for verification, 210 210 **so that** I can help expand fact-checking coverage and contribute to the knowledge base. 211 211 212 212 **Maps to**: FR1 (Claim Intake), Section 1.1 (Reader role) 213 213 214 214 === UN-13: Cite FactHarbor Verdicts === 215 -**As** a content creator, 216 -**I want** to cite FactHarbor verdicts when sharing content, 104 +**As** a content creator, 105 +**I want** to cite FactHarbor verdicts when sharing content, 217 217 **so that** I can add credibility to what I publish and help my audience distinguish fact from speculation. 218 218 219 219 **Maps to**: FR7 (Automated Verdicts), NFR3 (Transparency - exportable data) ... ... @@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ 221 221 == 6. Professional Use == 222 222 223 223 === UN-14: API Access for Integration === 224 -**As** a journalist/researcher, 225 -**I want** API access to verification data and claim histories, 113 +**As** a journalist/researcher, 114 +**I want** API access to verification data and claim histories, 226 226 **so that** I can integrate fact-checking into my professional workflow without manual lookups. 227 227 228 228 **Maps to**: Architecture (REST API), NFR2 (Scalability), FR11 (Audit Trail) ... ... @@ -230,22 +230,15 @@ 230 230 == 7. Understanding Evolution & Trust Labels == 231 231 232 232 === UN-15: Verdict Evolution Timeline === 233 - 234 -{{warning}} 235 -**Status:** Deferred (Not in V1.0) 236 - 237 -Full verdict evolution timeline has been **dropped from V1.0**. The system will track edit history only. Versioned entities and full evolution tracking are deferred to future releases. 238 -{{/warning}} 239 - 240 -**As** an article reader, 241 -**I want** to see how a claim's verdict has evolved over time with clear timestamps, 122 +**As** an article reader, 123 +**I want** to see how a claim's verdict has evolved over time with clear timestamps, 242 242 **so that** I can understand whether the current assessment is stable or recently changed based on new evidence. 243 243 244 -**Maps to**: ~~FR8 (Deferred)~~, Data Model (Versioned entities), NFR3 (Transparency)126 +**Maps to**: FR8 (Time Evolution), Data Model (Versioned entities), NFR3 (Transparency) 245 245 246 246 === UN-16: AI vs. Human Review Status === 247 -**As** an article reader, 248 -**I want** to know if the verdict was AI-generated, human-reviewed, or expert-validated, 129 +**As** an article reader, 130 +**I want** to know if the verdict was AI-generated, human-reviewed, or expert-validated, 249 249 **so that** I can gauge the appropriate level of trust and understand the review process used. 250 250 251 251 **Maps to**: AKEL (Publication Modes), Section 5 (Risk Tiers), Data Model (AuthorType field) ... ... @@ -256,45 +256,43 @@ 256 256 257 257 === 8.1 Functional Requirements Coverage === 258 258 259 -(% style="width:100%" %) 260 -|=(% style="width:10%" %)FR#|=(% style="width:35%" %)Requirement|=(% style="width:55%" %)Fulfills User Needs 261 -|(% style="width:10%" %)FR1|(% style="width:35%" %)Claim Intake|(% style="width:55%" %)UN-2, UN-4, UN-12 262 -|(% style="width:10%" %)FR4|(% style="width:35%" %)Scenario Generation|(% style="width:55%" %)UN-2, UN-3 263 -|(% style="width:10%" %)FR5|(% style="width:35%" %)Evidence Linking|(% style="width:55%" %)UN-5, UN-7 264 -|(% style="width:10%" %)FR6|(% style="width:35%" %)Scenario Comparison|(% style="width:55%" %)UN-3, UN-8 265 -|(% style="width:10%" %)FR7|(% style="width:35%" %)Automated Verdicts|(% style="width:55%" %)UN-1, UN-2, UN-3, UN-4, UN-13, UN-17 266 -|(% style="width:10%" %)FR8|(% style="width:35%" %)Time Evolution|(% style="width:55%" %)UN-15 267 -|(% style="width:10%" %)FR11|(% style="width:35%" %)Audit Trail|(% style="width:55%" %)UN-14, UN-16 268 -|(% style="width:10%" %)FR12|(% style="width:35%" %)Two-Panel Summary View|(% style="width:55%" %)UN-3 269 -|(% style="width:10%" %)FR13|(% style="width:35%" %)In-Article Claim Highlighting|(% style="width:55%" %)UN-17 141 +| FR# | Requirement | Fulfills User Needs | 142 +|-----|-------------|-------------------| 143 +| FR1 | Claim Intake | UN-2, UN-4, UN-12 | 144 +| FR4 | Scenario Generation | UN-2, UN-3 | 145 +| FR5 | Evidence Linking | UN-5, UN-7 | 146 +| FR6 | Scenario Comparison | UN-3, UN-8 | 147 +| FR7 | Automated Verdicts | UN-1, UN-2, UN-3, UN-4, UN-13 | 148 +| FR8 | Time Evolution | UN-15 | 149 +| FR11 | Audit Trail | UN-14, UN-16 | 270 270 271 271 === 8.2 Non-Functional Requirements Coverage === 272 272 273 - (%style="width:100%"%)274 -| =(% style="width:10%" %)NFR#|=(% style="width:35%" %)Requirement|=(% style="width:55%" %)Fulfills User Needs275 -| (%style="width:10%" %)NFR1|(%style="width:35%" %)Performance|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-4 (fast fact-checking), UN-11 (responsive filtering),UN-17 (real-time highlighting)276 -| (%style="width:10%" %)NFR2|(%style="width:35%" %)Scalability|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-14 (API access at scale)277 -| (%style="width:10%" %)NFR3|(%style="width:35%" %)Transparency|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-1, UN-7, UN-9, UN-13, UN-15153 +| NFR# | Requirement | Fulfills User Needs | 154 +|------|-------------|-------------------| 155 +| NFR1 | Performance | UN-4 (fast fact-checking), UN-11 (responsive filtering) | 156 +| NFR2 | Scalability | UN-14 (API access at scale) | 157 +| NFR3 | Transparency | UN-1, UN-7, UN-9, UN-13, UN-15 | 278 278 279 279 === 8.3 AKEL System Coverage === 280 280 281 - (%style="width:100%"%)282 -| =(% style="width:45%" %)AKEL Component|=(% style="width:55%" %)Fulfills User Needs283 -| (%style="width:45%" %)Quality Gates|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-9 (methodology transparency)284 -| (%style="width:45%" %)Contradiction Search (Gate 2)|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-8 (understanding disagreement)285 -| (%style="width:45%" %)Bubble Detection|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-10 (manipulation tactics)286 -| (%style="width:45%" %)Publication Modes|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-16 (AI vs. human review status)287 -| (%style="width:45%" %)Risk Tiers|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-16 (appropriate review level)161 +| AKEL Component | Fulfills User Needs | 162 +|----------------|-------------------| 163 +| Quality Gates | UN-9 (methodology transparency) | 164 +| Contradiction Search (Gate 2) | UN-8 (understanding disagreement) | 165 +| Bubble Detection | UN-10 (manipulation tactics) | 166 +| Publication Modes | UN-16 (AI vs. human review status) | 167 +| Risk Tiers | UN-16 (appropriate review level) | 288 288 289 289 === 8.4 Data Model Coverage === 290 290 291 - (%style="width:100%"%)292 -| =(% style="width:45%" %)Entity|=(% style="width:55%" %)Fulfills User Needs293 -| (%style="width:45%" %)Source (with track_record_score)|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-5, UN-6 (source reliability)294 -| (%style="width:45%" %)Scenario|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-2, UN-3, UN-8 (context-dependent truth)295 -| (%style="width:45%" %)Verdict (with likelihood_range, uncertainty_factors)|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-1, UN-2, UN-3, UN-8 (detailed assessment)296 -| (%style="width:45%" %)Versioned entities|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-15 (evolution timeline)297 -| (%style="width:45%" %)AuthorType field|(%style="width:55%" %)UN-16 (AI vs. human status)171 +| Entity | Fulfills User Needs | 172 +|--------|-------------------| 173 +| Source (with track_record_score) | UN-5, UN-6 (source reliability) | 174 +| Scenario | UN-2, UN-3, UN-8 (context-dependent truth) | 175 +| Verdict (with likelihood_range, uncertainty_factors) | UN-1, UN-2, UN-3, UN-8 (detailed assessment) | 176 +| Versioned entities | UN-15 (evolution timeline) | 177 +| AuthorType field | UN-16 (AI vs. human status) | 298 298 299 299 == 9. User Need Gaps & Future Considerations == 300 300 ... ... @@ -321,30 +321,3 @@ 321 321 * [[Data Model>>FactHarbor.Specification.Data Model.WebHome]] - Data structures supporting user needs 322 322 * [[AKEL (AI Knowledge Extraction Layer)>>FactHarbor.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]] - AI system fulfilling automation needs 323 323 * [[Workflows>>FactHarbor.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]] - User interaction workflows 324 - 325 -== Additional User Needs (V0.9.70) == 326 - 327 -=== UN-26: Search Engine Visibility === 328 - 329 -**As a** content consumer 330 -**I want** FactHarbor analyses to appear in Google search results 331 -**So that** I can find fact-checks when searching 332 - 333 -**Requirements:** FR44 (ClaimReview schema) 334 - 335 -=== UN-27: Visual Claim Verification === 336 - 337 -**As a** social media user 338 -**I want** to verify images shared with claims 339 -**So that** I can detect manipulated photos 340 - 341 -**Requirements:** FR46 (Image Verification) 342 - 343 -=== UN-28: Safe Contribution Environment === 344 - 345 -**As a** fact-checking contributor 346 -**I want** protection from harassment 347 -**So that** I can contribute without fear 348 - 349 -**Requirements:** FR48 (Safety Framework) 350 -