Wiki source code of Gap Analysis

Version 1.1 by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/19 16:13

Show last authors
1 = Gap Analysis - User Needs & Requirements =
2
3 **Status:** ✅ Analysis Complete
4 **Purpose:** Identify missing features by comparing against global research and best practices
5
6 ---
7
8 == 1. Analysis Framework ==
9
10 === 1.1 Importance Formula ===
11
12 **Importance = f(risk, impact, strategy)**
13
14 * **Risk:** What are the consequences if we don't have this feature?
15 * **Impact:** How many users affected? How severe?
16 * **Strategy:** How well does this align with FactHarbor's mission and strategic goals?
17
18 **Importance Levels:**
19 * **VERY HIGH:** Critical to mission, high risk if missing, affects majority of users
20 * **HIGH:** Important for success, significant impact, strong strategic alignment
21 * **MEDIUM:** Valuable but not critical, moderate impact
22 * **LOW:** Nice-to-have, limited impact
23
24 ---
25
26 === 1.2 Urgency Formula ===
27
28 **Urgency = f(fail fast and learn, legal, promises made)**
29
30 * **Fail fast and learn:** Do we need to validate assumptions quickly?
31 * **Legal:** Are there legal requirements or external deadlines?
32 * **Promises made:** Have we committed this to stakeholders, funders, or partners?
33
34 **Urgency Levels:**
35 * **HIGH:** External deadlines, legal requirements, or critical testing needed
36 * **MEDIUM:** Strategic opportunity, growing trends, competitive pressure
37 * **LOW:** No external pressure, can add anytime
38
39 ---
40
41 === 1.3 Context Matters ===
42
43 **Important principle:** Importance and urgency change based on milestone context.
44
45 * **POC:** Only basic features urgent
46 * **Beta:** More features become urgent for user testing
47 * **Release:** Legal/compliance becomes critical
48
49 **Priorities are not absolute - they're contextual.**
50
51 ---
52
53 == 2. Gap Categories ==
54
55 We identified **18 gaps** across **8 categories**:
56
57 === Category 1: Accessibility & Inclusivity ===
58 * Gap 1.1: WCAG 2.1 Compliance
59 * Gap 1.2: Multilingual Support
60
61 === Category 2: Platform Integration & Distribution ===
62 * Gap 2.1: Browser Extensions
63 * Gap 2.2: Embeddable Widgets
64 * Gap 2.3: ClaimReview Schema
65
66 === Category 3: Media Verification ===
67 * Gap 3.1: Image/Video/Audio Verification
68
69 === Category 4: Mobile & Offline Access ===
70 * Gap 4.1: Mobile Apps / PWA
71 * Gap 4.2: Offline Access
72
73 === Category 5: Education & Media Literacy ===
74 * Gap 5.1: Educational Resources
75 * Gap 5.2: Media Literacy Integration
76
77 === Category 6: Collaboration & Community ===
78 * Gap 6.1: Professional Collaboration Tools
79 * Gap 6.2: Community Discussion
80
81 === Category 7: Export & Sharing ===
82 * Gap 7.1: Export Capabilities
83 * Gap 7.2: Social Sharing Optimization
84
85 === Category 8: Advanced Features & Analytics ===
86 * Gap 8.1: User Analytics
87 * Gap 8.2: Personalization
88 * Gap 8.3: Media Archiving
89 * Gap 8.4: Advanced Search
90
91 ---
92
93 == 3. Critical Gaps ==
94
95 === 3.1 Gap: WCAG 2.1 Accessibility Compliance ===
96
97 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed in current requirements
98 **Importance:** VERY HIGH
99 **Urgency:** HIGH (legal requirement)
100
101 **Why Important:**
102 * **Risk:** CRITICAL
103 * Legal liability (European Accessibility Act enforced June 28, 2025)
104 * Lawsuits, fines up to $250,000 (Accessible Canada Act)
105 * Cannot operate in EU market without compliance
106 * Retrofitting is 100x more expensive than building in from start
107 * **Impact:** 15-20% of population (1+ billion people) excluded without accessibility
108 * Affects blind, low-vision, deaf, motor impairments, cognitive disabilities
109 * "86% of companies report improved customer satisfaction after implementing accessibility" (Forrester)
110 * **Strategy:** CRITICAL ALIGNMENT
111 * Mission: "empower users to make informed judgments" - cannot empower if inaccessible
112 * Vision: "a world where decisions are grounded in evidence" - for ALL people
113 * Inclusivity is core to nonprofit mission
114
115 **Why Urgent:**
116 * **Legal:** VERY HIGH
117 * European Accessibility Act (EAA) enforced June 28, 2025
118 * Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) - ongoing requirement in US
119 * Accessible Canada Act - penalties up to $250,000
120 * Cannot launch in EU without compliance
121 * **Fail fast:** Not applicable (accessibility is proven requirement, not experimental)
122 * **Promises:** Depends on public mission statements and funding commitments
123
124 **Missing Requirements:**
125 * WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance
126 * Screen reader compatibility (ARIA labels, semantic HTML)
127 * Keyboard navigation (no mouse required)
128 * Color-blind friendly design (not relying solely on color)
129 * Adjustable text size and contrast
130 * Captions/transcripts for video content
131 * Alternative text for images and visualizations
132
133 **Recommended New Requirements:**
134 * **NFR6: Accessibility** - Platform must conform to WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards
135 * **NFR7: Assistive Technology Support** - Compatible with screen readers, voice navigation, keyboard-only usage
136 * **FR14: Accessibility Settings** - User-configurable contrast, text size, reduced motion options
137
138 **When to Address:** Must be built into platform from start (retrofitting prohibitively expensive)
139
140 **Research Evidence:**
141 * "72% of organizations have digital accessibility policy, 85% see it as competitive advantage" (Level Access 2024)
142 * European Accessibility Act (EAA) enforcement begins June 28, 2025
143 * "Accessible websites see 20% increase in traffic and engagement" (W3C WAI)
144 * "86% of companies report improved customer satisfaction after implementing accessibility" (Forrester)
145
146 ---
147
148 === 3.2 Gap: Educational Resources & Onboarding ===
149
150 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed in current requirements
151 **Importance:** VERY HIGH
152 **Urgency:** HIGH (critical for adoption)
153
154 **Why Important:**
155 * **Risk:** CRITICAL
156 * Platform fails if users cannot understand Evidence Models
157 * Misinterpretation of scenarios/verdicts undermines mission
158 * High abandonment rate without onboarding (industry standard: 75% drop-off without onboarding)
159 * Wasted investment if no one can use the platform
160 * **Impact:** Affects 100% of new users
161 * "Fact-checking organizations increasingly provide media literacy education" (Mesquita et al. 2024)
162 * Determines whether platform succeeds or fails
163 * **Strategy:** CRITICAL ALIGNMENT
164 * Mission: "help people make sense of complex, contested information"
165 * Vision: Requires users to understand methodology
166 * Cannot achieve transparency without explaining concepts
167
168 **Why Urgent:**
169 * **Fail fast:** VERY HIGH
170 * Must validate that Evidence Models are comprehensible to users
171 * Need to test if onboarding actually works
172 * Quick iteration needed based on user confusion
173 * Test with beta users before full launch
174 * **Legal:** None
175 * **Promises:** HIGH if public statements include "user-friendly" or "accessible to all"
176
177 **Missing Requirements:**
178 * Onboarding tutorial (interactive walkthrough)
179 * Video tutorials explaining concepts
180 * FAQ section
181 * Glossary (scenarios, confidence scores, verdicts, assumptions)
182 * Example analyses with explanations
183 * "How to read a FactHarbor analysis" guide
184 * Best practices documentation
185
186 **Recommended New Requirements:**
187 * **UN-23: Learn How to Fact-Check** - Educational resources for understanding methodology
188 * **FR26: Onboarding Tutorial** - Interactive first-time user walkthrough
189 * **FR27: Educational Resources Hub** - Guides, videos, FAQs, glossary
190 * **FR28: Curriculum Materials** - Resources for educators to use FactHarbor in classrooms
191
192 **When to Address:** Basic onboarding at launch (POC needs 1-page explainer, Beta needs comprehensive resources)
193
194 **Research Evidence:**
195 * "Critical media literacy fosters resilience against misinformation" (McDougall 2019)
196 * Teen Fact-Checking Networks operating globally (MediaWise 2024)
197 * "Fact-checking organizations increasingly provide media literacy education" (Mesquita et al. 2024)
198
199 ---
200
201 == 4. High Importance Gaps ==
202
203 === 4.1 Gap: Browser Extensions ===
204
205 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed
206 **Importance:** HIGH
207 **Urgency:** MEDIUM
208
209 **Why Important:**
210 * **Risk:** MEDIUM - Competitive disadvantage, reduced adoption
211 * **Impact:** MEDIUM-HIGH - Significantly improves UX for active fact-checkers
212 * **Strategy:** HIGH ALIGNMENT - Meet users where misinformation spreads (in their browsers)
213
214 **Why Urgent:**
215 * **Fail fast:** MEDIUM - Should validate that users actually want browser extensions
216 * **Legal:** None
217 * **Promises:** LOW unless explicitly promised to early adopters
218
219 **Missing Requirements:**
220 * Chrome/Firefox/Safari browser extensions
221 * Right-click context menu for selected text
222 * Inline highlighting of claims on any webpage
223 * Quick verdict tooltips without leaving page
224 * Save/bookmark fact-checks
225
226 **Recommended:**
227 * **UN-18: In-Context Fact-Checking** - Browser extension for real-time verification
228 * **FR17: Browser Extensions** - Chrome, Firefox, Safari with context menu
229 * **FR18: Cross-Site Highlighting** - Highlight and analyze claims on any website
230
231 **When to Address:** Test web platform first, then build extension MVP if user demand validated
232
233 **Research Evidence:**
234 * "3-click verification: Select → Right-click → Verify" is standard UX pattern
235 * Extensions like UnCovered, Pino, InVID/WeVerify widely adopted
236 * NewsGuard browser extension demonstrates market acceptance
237
238 ---
239
240 === 4.2 Gap: Media Verification (Images/Videos/Audio) ===
241
242 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed
243 **Importance:** VERY HIGH
244 **Urgency:** MEDIUM
245
246 **Why Important:**
247 * **Risk:** HIGH - Cannot address major category of misinformation (visual/audio)
248 * **Impact:** VERY HIGH - Visual misinformation is primary vector
249 * **Strategy:** CRITICAL ALIGNMENT - Mission incomplete without multimedia fact-checking
250
251 **Why Urgent:**
252 * **Fail fast:** VERY HIGH - Should test approach quickly (partner vs. build?)
253 * **Legal:** None
254 * **Promises:** MEDIUM (depends on mission statements)
255
256 **Missing Requirements:**
257 * Reverse image search integration
258 * Video frame extraction and analysis
259 * Audio deepfake detection
260 * EXIF metadata extraction
261 * Synthetic media detection (AI-generated content)
262
263 **Recommended:**
264 * **UN-20: Media Verification** - Image, video, audio fact-checking
265 * **FR22: Image Verification** - Reverse search, EXIF, synthetic detection
266 * **FR23: Video Verification** - Frame analysis, metadata, deepfake detection
267 * **FR24: Audio Verification** - Voice deepfakes, audio forensics
268
269 **When to Address:** Pilot with existing tools (InVID, TinEye) before building in-house
270
271 **Research Evidence:**
272 * "Most deception relies on decontextualization" of images (Cazzamatta 2025)
273 * "Deepfakes targeting political figures raise concerns" (Corsi et al. 2024)
274 * InVID/WeVerify used by professional fact-checkers (AFP 2024)
275
276 ---
277
278 === 4.3 Gap: Multilingual Support ===
279
280 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed
281 **Importance:** HIGH
282 **Urgency:** MEDIUM
283
284 **Why Important:**
285 * **Risk:** HIGH - Mission limited to English speakers (~20% of world)
286 * **Impact:** VERY HIGH - Excludes 80% of world population
287 * **Strategy:** CRITICAL ALIGNMENT - Vision of "a world where decisions are grounded in evidence" - not just English-speaking world
288
289 **Why Urgent:**
290 * **Fail fast:** MEDIUM - Test which languages users need, validate translation quality early
291 * **Legal:** None
292 * **Promises:** MEDIUM-HIGH if mission statement emphasizes "global" or "world"
293
294 **Missing Requirements:**
295 * Interface available in multiple languages
296 * Content translation/analysis in non-English languages
297 * Right-to-left (RTL) language support (Arabic, Hebrew)
298 * Locale-specific formatting (dates, numbers, currencies)
299 * Character encoding for non-Latin scripts
300
301 **Recommended:**
302 * **FR15: Multilingual Interface** - UI in 10+ languages
303 * **FR16: Multilingual Content Analysis** - AKEL analyzes claims in multiple languages
304 * **NFR8: Internationalization (i18n)** - RTL support, character encodings, locale formatting
305
306 **When to Address:** Plan early, prove English platform first, start with 2-3 strategic languages
307
308 **Research Evidence:**
309 * 443 fact-checking projects operate in 70+ languages globally (Duke 2025)
310 * "LLMs better at fact-checking in low-resource languages than expected" (ACL 2024)
311 * "Multilingual capabilities essential for global inclusivity" (O3 World 2024)
312
313 ---
314
315 === 4.4 Gap: Mobile Apps / PWA ===
316
317 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed
318 **Importance:** HIGH
319 **Urgency:** LOW
320
321 **Why Important:**
322 * **Risk:** MEDIUM - Reduced engagement, poor mobile experience
323 * **Impact:** HIGH - 90%+ users access news on mobile
324 * **Strategy:** MEDIUM - Better UX but not core to methodology
325
326 **Why Urgent:**
327 * **Fail fast:** MEDIUM - Test if mobile users behave differently, PWA first
328 * **Legal:** None
329 * **Promises:** LOW unless specified in grants/partnerships
330
331 **Missing Requirements:**
332 * iOS/Android native apps
333 * Progressive Web App (PWA) capabilities
334 * Camera submission for visual claims
335 * Push notifications
336 * Offline mode
337
338 **Recommended:**
339 * **UN-21: Mobile-Native Experience** - Native apps for iOS/Android
340 * **FR25: Native Mobile Apps** - Full mobile capabilities
341 * **NFR9: Progressive Web App** - Installable, offline, push notifications
342
343 **When to Address:** Responsive web first, PWA to test mobile patterns, native apps if validated
344
345 **Research Evidence:**
346 * "Mobile apps with accessibility features experience 30% higher engagement" (MMA 2024)
347 * 90%+ of adults access news via mobile devices (Pew 2024)
348
349 ---
350
351 === 4.5 Gap: ClaimReview Schema ===
352
353 **Status:** ❌ Not addressed
354 **Importance:** HIGH
355 **Urgency:** LOW
356
357 **Why Important:**
358 * **Risk:** LOW-MEDIUM - Reduced discoverability (won't appear in Google search)
359 * **Impact:** MEDIUM-HIGH - Affects all users via SEO
360 * **Strategy:** MEDIUM - Distribution mechanism, not core methodology
361
362 **Why Urgent:**
363 * **Fail fast:** LOW - Already proven by 200,000+ fact-checks globally
364 * **Legal:** None
365 * **Promises:** None
366
367 **Missing Requirements:**
368 * ClaimReview structured data markup
369 * Submit to Google Fact Check Explorer
370 * MediaReview for multimedia content
371
372 **Recommended:**
373 * **FR20: ClaimReview Schema** - Structured data markup
374 * **FR21: Search Engine Integration** - Submit to fact-check indexes
375
376 **When to Address:** Add anytime after content library exists (can be retroactive)
377
378 **Research Evidence:**
379 * 200,000+ fact-checks use ClaimReview globally (Duke 2024)
380 * Enables appearance in Google/Bing search results
381
382 ---
383
384 == 5. Medium Importance Gaps ==
385
386 === 5.1 Gap: Embeddable Widgets ===
387
388 **Importance:** MEDIUM
389 **Urgency:** LOW
390
391 **Missing:** JavaScript widgets for publishers to embed fact-checks
392
393 **When:** Only if publishers commit to using it
394
395 ---
396
397 === 5.2 Gap: Export Capabilities ===
398
399 **Importance:** MEDIUM
400 **Urgency:** LOW
401
402 **Missing:** PDF export, print optimization, CSV/JSON data export
403
404 **When:** Based on user requests
405
406 ---
407
408 === 5.3 Gap: Professional Collaboration Tools ===
409
410 **Importance:** MEDIUM
411 **Urgency:** LOW
412
413 **Missing:** Organization workspaces, claim assignment, internal discussion
414
415 **When:** Only if organizations commit
416
417 ---
418
419 === 5.4 Gap: Social Sharing Optimization ===
420
421 **Importance:** MEDIUM
422 **Urgency:** LOW
423
424 **Missing:** Open Graph tags, Twitter Cards, short URLs, WhatsApp optimization
425
426 **When:** Iterative improvement based on usage
427
428 ---
429
430 === 5.5 Gap: Media Archiving ===
431
432 **Importance:** MEDIUM
433 **Urgency:** LOW
434
435 **Missing:** Automatic archiving of sources, Wayback Machine integration, media preservation
436
437 **When:** After launch, retroactive archiving is fine
438
439 **Research Evidence:**
440 * "Images/videos often disappear after fact-checking" (MediaVault 2024)
441 * IFCN DisinfoArchiving uses WACZ format (InVID 2024-2025)
442
443 ---
444
445 == 6. Lower Priority Gaps ==
446
447 === 6.1 Gap: User Analytics ===
448
449 **Importance:** MEDIUM
450 **Urgency:** LOW
451
452 **Missing:** Privacy-respecting usage analytics, feedback systems
453
454 ---
455
456 === 6.2 Gap: Personalization ===
457
458 **Importance:** LOW
459 **Urgency:** N/A
460
461 **Strategic Decision Needed:** How much personalization without creating filter bubbles?
462
463 **Recommendation:** Limited only (language, accessibility preferences) - NO content filtering
464
465 ---
466
467 === 6.3 Gap: Community Discussion ===
468
469 **Importance:** LOW
470 **Urgency:** N/A
471
472 **Strategic Decision Needed:** Should FactHarbor allow public comments or remain evidence-focused?
473
474 **Question to resolve:** Evidence platform vs. community platform?
475
476 ---
477
478 === 6.4 Gap: Advanced Search ===
479
480 **Importance:** MEDIUM
481 **Urgency:** LOW
482
483 **Missing:** Elasticsearch, faceted search, advanced filters
484
485 **When:** Only when PostgreSQL search becomes bottleneck
486
487 ---
488
489 === 6.5 Gap: Offline Access ===
490
491 **Importance:** LOW
492 **Urgency:** LOW
493
494 **Missing:** Offline mode, service workers, cached content
495
496 **When:** If user research shows demand
497
498 ---
499
500
501 ---
502
503 == 7. Existing Requirements Reference ==
504
505 **Before proposing new requirements, here's what already exists in the FactHarbor Specification:**
506
507 === 7.1 Existing Functional Requirements (FR1-FR13) ===
508
509 **From Specification/Requirements.WebHome:**
510
511 * **FR1:** Claim Intake - Users submit claims via form or API
512 * **FR2:** Claim Normalization - Standardize to clear assertion format
513 * **FR3:** Claim Classification - Domain, type, risk score, complexity
514 * **FR4:** Scenario Generation - AKEL analyzes claim and generates scenarios
515 * **FR5:** Evidence Linking - Automated evidence discovery and relevance scoring
516 * **FR6:** Scenario Comparison - Side-by-side comparison interface
517 * **FR7:** Automated Verdicts - AKEL generates verdict based on evidence
518 * **FR8:** Time Evolution - Claims update as new evidence emerges
519 * **FR9:** Publication Workflow - Simple automated flow (no multi-stage approval)
520 * **FR10:** Moderation - Focus on abuse, not routine quality
521 * **FR11:** Audit Trail - All edits logged, version history public
522
523 **From User Needs Document (UN-17):**
524
525 * **FR12:** Two-Panel Summary View - Analysis + Article side-by-side
526 * **FR13:** In-Article Claim Highlighting - Visual claim markers in original text
527
528 **Total Existing:** FR1-FR13 (13 functional requirements)
529
530 ---
531
532 === 7.2 Existing Non-Functional Requirements (NFR1-NFR5) ===
533
534 **From Specification/Requirements.WebHome:**
535
536 * **NFR1:** Performance - Processing <30s, search <2s, page load <3s, 99% uptime
537 * **NFR2:** Scalability - Handle 10K claims initially, scale to 1M+, 100K+ concurrent users
538 * **NFR3:** Transparency - All algorithms open source, all data exportable, all decisions documented
539 * **NFR4:** Security & Privacy - Follow privacy policy, secure authentication, data encryption, regular audits
540 * **NFR5:** Maintainability - Modular architecture, automated testing, CI/CD, comprehensive documentation
541
542 **Total Existing:** NFR1-NFR5 (5 non-functional requirements)
543
544 ---
545
546 === 7.3 Requirement Numbering Summary ===
547
548 **Existing Requirements:**
549 * Functional: FR1 through FR13
550 * Non-Functional: NFR1 through NFR5
551
552 **Proposed New Requirements (from Gap Analysis):**
553 * Functional: FR14 through FR43 (30 new)
554 * Non-Functional: NFR6 through NFR10 (5 new)
555
556 **Total After Gap Analysis:**
557 * Functional: FR1-FR43 (43 total)
558 * Non-Functional: NFR1-NFR10 (10 total)
559
560 ---
561
562
563 Based on gap analysis, we recommend adding:
564
565 **8 New User Needs (UN-18 through UN-25):**
566 * UN-18: In-Context Fact-Checking (browser extension)
567 * UN-19: Publisher Integration (embed widgets)
568 * UN-20: Media Verification (images/videos/audio)
569 * UN-21: Mobile-Native Experience (native apps)
570 * UN-22: Offline Access (PWA)
571 * UN-23: Learn How to Fact-Check (education)
572 * UN-24: Professional Collaboration (team tools)
573 * UN-25: Export & Save (PDF, CSV)
574
575 **30 New Functional Requirements (FR14-FR43):**
576 * FR14: Accessibility Settings
577 * FR15-16: Multilingual (Interface, Content Analysis)
578 * FR17-18: Browser Extensions, Cross-Site Highlighting
579 * FR19-20: Embeddable Widget, ClaimReview Schema
580 * FR21: Search Engine Integration
581 * FR22-24: Media Verification (Image, Video, Audio)
582 * FR25: Native Mobile Apps
583 * FR26-30: Education (Onboarding, Resources, Curriculum, Critical Thinking, Pre-bunking)
584 * FR31-33: Professional Collaboration (Workspaces, Assignment, Discussion)
585 * FR34-36: Export (PDF, Print, Data)
586 * FR37-39: Social Sharing (Open Graph, Short URLs, Multi-Channel)
587 * FR40: User Feedback System
588 * FR41-43: Archiving (Automatic, Archive.org, Media Preservation)
589
590 **5 New Non-Functional Requirements (NFR6-NFR10):**
591 * NFR6: Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA)
592 * NFR7: Assistive Technology Support
593 * NFR8: Internationalization (i18n)
594 * NFR9: Progressive Web App (PWA)
595 * NFR10: Privacy-Respecting Analytics
596
597 ---
598
599 == 11. Priority Matrix ==
600
601 **Priority based on Importance + Urgency:**
602
603 **CRITICAL (Must Address):**
604 1. Accessibility (WCAG) - Legal + High Impact
605 2. Educational Resources - Adoption Critical
606
607 **HIGH (Strategic Priority):**
608 3. Browser Extensions - User Expectation
609 4. Media Verification - Mission Critical
610 5. Multilingual - Global Strategy
611
612 **MEDIUM (Plan For):**
613 6. Mobile Apps/PWA - User Convenience
614 7. ClaimReview Schema - Discoverability
615 8. Export Capabilities - Professional Users
616 9. Embeddable Widgets - Publisher Adoption
617 10. Professional Collaboration - Organizational Users
618
619 **LOW (Consider Later):**
620 11. Social Sharing Optimization
621 12. Media Archiving
622 13. User Analytics
623 14. Advanced Search
624 15. Offline Access
625 16. Personalization
626 17. Community Discussion
627
628 ---
629
630 == 11. Key Strategic Questions ==
631
632 **Question 1: Accessibility Investment**
633 How comprehensive at launch?
634 * **Required:** WCAG 2.1 AA minimum, keyboard navigation, screen readers
635 * **Enhanced:** Voice navigation, haptic feedback (can add later)
636
637 **Question 2: Multilingual Priorities**
638 Which languages first?
639 * **Recommend:** English, Spanish, French, German, Arabic (major markets + diversity)
640 * **Consider:** Chinese, Japanese, Portuguese, Hindi, Russian
641
642 **Question 3: Media Verification Approach**
643 Build vs. partner?
644 * **Recommend:** Partner initially (InVID, TinEye, existing tools)
645 * **Build:** If demand proven and resources available
646
647 **Question 4: Community Model**
648 Evidence-focused vs. discussion-enabled?
649 * **Option A:** No public discussion (maintain authority model)
650 * **Option B:** Limited discussion (Contributor+ only)
651 * **Option C:** Open discussion (requires moderation resources)
652
653 **Question 5: Mobile Strategy**
654 Native apps vs. PWA?
655 * **Recommend:** PWA first (cross-platform, lower cost)
656 * **Consider:** Native apps if mobile usage dominant
657
658 ---
659
660 == 11. Research Sources ==
661
662 **Academic Research (2024-2025):**
663 * AI-Generated Misinformation (Cazzamatta & Sarısakaloğlu 2025)
664 * Show Me the Work: Fact-Checkers' Requirements for Explainable AI (CHI 2025)
665 * Multilingual Fact-Checking using LLMs (ACL 2024)
666 * Beyond Verification: Media Literacy Education (Mesquita et al. 2024)
667
668 **Industry Reports:**
669 * Duke Reporters' Lab Census 2024-2025 (443 projects, 70+ languages)
670 * Poynter/IFCN State of Fact-Checkers Report
671 * Level Access: State of Digital Accessibility Report 2023-2024
672 * Pew Research Center: News consumption patterns
673
674 **Standards & Compliance:**
675 * WCAG 2.1 (W3C)
676 * European Accessibility Act (EAA) - June 28, 2025
677 * Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
678 * Accessible Canada Act
679 * ClaimReview/MediaReview specifications (Schema.org)
680
681 ---
682
683 == 11. Related Pages ==
684
685 * [[User Needs>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.User Needs]]
686 * [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Requirements.WebHome]]
687 * [[POC Requirements>>FactHarbor.POC.WebHome]]
688 * [[Architecture>>FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]]
689
690 ---
691
692 **Document Status:** ✅ Analysis Complete - Ready for Strategic Planning