Skip to Content

Changes for page POC Summary (POC1 & POC2)

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 21:53
From version 2.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/24 21:53
Change comment: Imported from XAR
To version 1.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/19 16:13
Change comment: Imported from XAR

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -POC Summary (POC1 & POC2)
1 +POC Summary
Content
... ... @@ -1,25 +1,20 @@
1 -= POC Summary (POC1 & POC2) =
1 +# FactHarbor - Complete Analysis Summary
2 +**Consolidated Document - No Timelines**
3 +**Date:** December 19, 2025
2 2  
5 +---
3 3  
4 -{{info}}
5 -**This page describes POC1 v0.4+ (3-stage pipeline with caching).**
7 +## 1. POC Specification - DEFINITIVE
6 6  
7 -For complete implementation details, see [[POC1 API & Schemas Specification>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.API-and-Schemas.WebHome]].
8 -{{/info}}
9 -
10 -
11 -
12 -== 1. POC Specification ==
13 -
14 -=== POC Goal
9 +### POC Goal
15 15  Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention.
16 16  
17 -=== POC Output (4 Components Only)
12 +### POC Output (4 Components Only)
18 18  
19 19  **1. ANALYSIS SUMMARY**
20 20  - 3-5 sentences
21 21  - How many claims found
22 -- Distribution of verdicts
17 +- Distribution of verdicts
23 23  - Overall assessment
24 24  
25 25  **2. CLAIMS IDENTIFICATION**
... ... @@ -36,25 +36,25 @@
36 36  
37 37  **Total output: ~200-300 words**
38 38  
39 -=== What's NOT in POC
34 +### What's NOT in POC
40 40  
41 -❌ Scenarios (multiple interpretations)
42 -❌ Evidence display (supporting/opposing lists)
43 -❌ Source links
44 -❌ Detailed reasoning chains
45 -❌ User accounts, history, search
46 -❌ Browser extensions, API
47 -❌ Accessibility, multilingual, mobile
48 -❌ Export, sharing features
36 +❌ Scenarios (multiple interpretations)
37 +❌ Evidence display (supporting/opposing lists)
38 +❌ Source links
39 +❌ Detailed reasoning chains
40 +❌ User accounts, history, search
41 +❌ Browser extensions, API
42 +❌ Accessibility, multilingual, mobile
43 +❌ Export, sharing features
49 49  ❌ Any other features
50 50  
51 -=== Critical Requirement
46 +### Critical Requirement
52 52  
53 53  **FULLY AUTOMATED - NO MANUAL EDITING**
54 54  
55 55  This is non-negotiable. POC tests whether AI can do this without human intervention.
56 56  
57 -=== POC Success Criteria
52 +### POC Success Criteria
58 58  
59 59  **Passes if:**
60 60  - ✅ AI extracts 3-5 factual claims automatically
... ... @@ -69,97 +69,185 @@
69 69  - ❌ Requires manual editing for most analyses (> 50%)
70 70  - ❌ Team loses confidence in approach
71 71  
72 -=== POC Architecture
67 +### POC Architecture
73 73  
74 -**Frontend:** Simple input form + results display
75 -**Backend:** Single API call to Claude (Sonnet 4.5)
76 -**Processing:** One prompt generates complete analysis
69 +**Frontend:** Simple input form + results display
70 +**Backend:** Single API call to Claude (Sonnet 4.5)
71 +**Processing:** One prompt generates complete analysis
77 77  **Database:** None required (stateless)
78 78  
79 -=== POC Philosophy
74 +### POC Philosophy
80 80  
81 81  > "Build less, learn more, decide faster. Test the hardest part first."
82 82  
83 -=== Context-Aware Analysis (Experimental POC1 Feature) ===
78 +---
84 84  
85 -**Problem:** Article credibility ≠ simple average of claim verdicts
80 +## 2. Gap Analysis - Strategic Framework
86 86  
87 -**Example:** Article with accurate facts (coffee has antioxidants, antioxidants fight cancer) but false conclusion (therefore coffee cures cancer) would score as "mostly accurate" with simple averaging, but is actually MISLEADING.
82 +### Framework Definition
88 88  
89 -**Solution (POC1 Test):** Approach 1 - Single-Pass Holistic Analysis
90 -* Enhanced AI prompt to evaluate logical structure
91 -* AI identifies main argument and assesses if it follows from evidence
92 -* Article verdict may differ from claim average
93 -* Zero additional cost, no architecture changes
84 +**Importance = f(risk, impact, strategy)**
85 +- Risk: What breaks if we don't have this?
86 +- Impact: How many users? How severe?
87 +- Strategy: Does it advance FactHarbor's mission?
94 94  
95 -**Testing:**
96 -* 30-article test set
97 -* Success: ≥70% accuracy detecting misleading articles
98 -* Marked as experimental
89 +**Urgency = f(fail fast and learn, legal, promises made)**
90 +- Fail fast: Do we need to test assumptions?
91 +- Legal: External requirements/deadlines?
92 +- Promises: Commitments to stakeholders?
99 99  
100 -**See:** [[Article Verdict Problem>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Article-Verdict-Problem]] for full analysis and solution approaches.
94 +### 18 Gaps Identified
101 101  
102 -== 2. POC2 Specification ==
96 +**Category 1: Accessibility & Inclusivity**
97 +1. WCAG 2.1 Compliance
98 +2. Multilingual Support
103 103  
104 -=== POC2 Goal ===
105 -Prove that AKEL produces high-quality outputs consistently at scale with complete quality validation.
100 +**Category 2: Platform Integration**
101 +3. Browser Extensions
102 +4. Embeddable Widgets
103 +5. ClaimReview Schema
106 106  
107 -=== POC2 Enhancements (From POC1) ===
105 +**Category 3: Media Verification**
106 +6. Image/Video/Audio Verification
108 108  
109 -**1. COMPLETE QUALITY GATES (All 4)**
110 -* Gate 1: Claim Validation (from POC1)
111 -* Gate 2: Evidence Relevance ← NEW
112 -* Gate 3: Scenario Coherence ← NEW
113 -* Gate 4: Verdict Confidence (from POC1)
108 +**Category 4: Mobile & Offline**
109 +7. Mobile Apps / PWA
110 +8. Offline Access
114 114  
115 -**2. EVIDENCE DEDUPLICATION (FR54)**
116 -* Prevent counting same source multiple times
117 -* Handle syndicated content (AP, Reuters)
118 -* Content fingerprinting with fuzzy matching
119 -* Target: >95% duplicate detection accuracy
112 +**Category 5: Education & Media Literacy**
113 +9. Educational Resources
114 +10. Media Literacy Integration
120 120  
121 -**3. CONTEXT-AWARE ANALYSIS (Conditional)**
122 -* **If POC1 succeeds (≥70%):** Implement as standard feature
123 -* **If POC1 promising (50-70%):** Try weighted aggregation approach
124 -* **If POC1 fails (<50%):** Defer to post-POC2
125 -* Detects articles with accurate claims but misleading conclusions
116 +**Category 6: Collaboration & Community**
117 +11. Professional Collaboration Tools
118 +12. Community Discussion
126 126  
127 -**4. QUALITY METRICS DASHBOARD (NFR13)**
128 -* Track hallucination rates
129 -* Monitor gate performance
130 -* Evidence quality metrics
131 -* Processing statistics
120 +**Category 7: Export & Sharing**
121 +13. Export Capabilities (PDF, CSV)
122 +14. Social Sharing Optimization
132 132  
133 -=== What's Still NOT in POC2 ===
124 +**Category 8: Advanced Features**
125 +15. User Analytics
126 +16. Personalization
127 +17. Media Archiving
128 +18. Advanced Search
134 134  
135 -❌ User accounts, authentication
136 -❌ Public publishing interface
137 -❌ Social sharing features
138 -❌ Full production security (comes in Beta 0)
139 -❌ In-article claim highlighting (comes in Beta 0)
130 +### Importance/Urgency Analysis
140 140  
141 -=== Success Criteria ===
132 +**VERY HIGH Importance + HIGH Urgency:**
133 +1. **Accessibility (WCAG)**
134 + - Risk: Legal liability, 15-20% users excluded
135 + - Urgency: European Accessibility Act (June 28, 2025)
136 + - Action: Must be built from start (retrofitting 100x more expensive)
142 142  
143 -**Quality:**
144 -* Hallucination rate <5% (target: <3%)
145 -* Average quality rating ≥8.0/10
146 -* Gates identify >95% of low-quality outputs
138 +2. **Educational Resources**
139 + - Risk: Platform fails if users can't understand
140 + - Urgency: Required for any adoption
141 + - Action: Basic onboarding essential
147 147  
148 -**Performance:**
149 -* All 4 quality gates operational
150 -* Evidence deduplication >95% accurate
151 -* Quality metrics tracked continuously
143 +**HIGH Importance + MEDIUM Urgency:**
144 +3. **Browser Extensions** - Standard user expectation, test demand first
145 +4. **Media Verification** - Cannot address visual misinformation without it
146 +5. **Multilingual** - Global mission requires it, plan early
152 152  
153 -**Context-Aware (if implemented):**
154 -* Maintains ≥70% accuracy detecting misleading articles
155 -* <15% false positive rate
148 +**HIGH Importance + LOW Urgency:**
149 +6. **Mobile Apps** - 90%+ users on mobile, but web-first viable
150 +7. **ClaimReview Schema** - SEO/discoverability, can add anytime
156 156  
157 -**Total Output Size:** Similar to POC1 (~220-350 words per analysis)
152 +---
158 158  
159 -== 2. Key Strategic Recommendations
154 +## 1.7 POC Alignment with Full Specification
160 160  
161 -=== Immediate Actions
156 +### POC Intentional Simplifications
162 162  
158 +**POC1 tests core AI capability, not full architecture:**
159 +
160 +**What POC Tests:**
161 +- Can AI extract claims from articles?
162 +- Can AI evaluate claims with reasonable verdicts?
163 +- Is fully automated approach viable?
164 +- Is output comprehensible to users?
165 +
166 +**What POC Excludes (Intentionally):**
167 +- ❌ Scenarios (deferred to POC2 - open architectural questions remain)
168 +- ❌ Evidence display (deferred to POC2)
169 +- ❌ Multi-component AKEL pipeline (simplified to single API call)
170 +- ❌ Quality gate infrastructure (simplified basic checks)
171 +- ❌ Production data model (stateless POC)
172 +- ❌ Review workflow system (no review queue)
173 +
174 +**Why Simplified:**
175 +- Fail fast: Test hardest part first (AI capability)
176 +- Learn before building: POC1 informs architecture decisions
177 +- Iterative: Add complexity based on POC1 learnings
178 +- Risk management: Prove concept before major investment
179 +
180 +### Full System Architecture (Future)
181 +
182 +**Workflow:**
183 +{{code}}
184 +Claims → Scenarios → Evidence → Verdicts
185 +{{/code}}
186 +
187 +**AKEL Components:**
188 +- Orchestrator
189 +- Claim Extractor & Classifier
190 +- Scenario Generator
191 +- Evidence Summarizer
192 +- Contradiction Detector
193 +- Quality Gate Validator
194 +- Audit Sampling Scheduler
195 +
196 +**Publication Modes:**
197 +- Mode 1: Draft-Only
198 +- Mode 2: AI-Generated (POC uses this)
199 +- Mode 3: AKEL-Generated (Human-Reviewed)
200 +
201 +### POC vs. Full System Summary
202 +
203 +|=Aspect|=POC1|=Full System
204 +|Scenarios|None (deferred to POC2)|Core component with versioning
205 +|Workflow|3 steps (input/process/output)|6 phases with quality gates
206 +|AKEL|Single API call|Multi-component orchestrated pipeline
207 +|Data|Stateless (no DB)|PostgreSQL + Redis + S3
208 +|Publication|Mode 2 only|Modes 1/2/3 with risk-based routing
209 +|Quality Gates|4 simplified checks|Full validation infrastructure
210 +
211 +### Gap Between POC and Beta
212 +
213 +**Significant architectural expansion needed:**
214 +1. Scenario generation component design and implementation
215 +2. Evidence Model full structure
216 +3. Multi-phase workflow with gates
217 +4. Component-based AKEL architecture
218 +5. Production data model and storage
219 +6. Review workflow and audit systems
220 +
221 +**POC proves concept. Beta builds product.**
222 +
223 +
224 +**MEDIUM Importance + LOW Urgency:**
225 +8-14. All other features - valuable but not urgent
226 +
227 +**Strategic Decisions Needed:**
228 +- Community discussion: Allow or stay evidence-focused?
229 +- Personalization: How much without filter bubbles?
230 +- Media verification: Partner with existing tools or build?
231 +
232 +### Key Insight: Milestones Change Priorities
233 +
234 +**POC:** Only educational resources urgent (basic explainer)
235 +**Beta:** Accessibility becomes urgent (test with diverse users)
236 +**Release:** Legal requirements become critical (WCAG, GDPR)
237 +
238 +**Importance/urgency are contextual, not absolute.**
239 +
240 +---
241 +
242 +## 3. Key Strategic Recommendations
243 +
244 +### Immediate Actions
245 +
163 163  **For POC:**
164 164  1. Focus on core functionality only (claims + verdicts)
165 165  2. Create basic explainer (1 page)
... ... @@ -172,15 +172,15 @@
172 172  3. Research media verification options (partner vs build)
173 173  4. Evaluate browser extension approach
174 174  
175 -=== Testing Strategy
258 +### Testing Strategy
176 176  
177 -**POC Tests:** Can AI do this without humans?
178 -**Beta Tests:** What do users need? What works? What doesn't?
260 +**POC Tests:** Can AI do this without humans?
261 +**Beta Tests:** What do users need? What works? What doesn't?
179 179  **Release Tests:** Is it production-ready?
180 180  
181 181  **Key Principle:** Test assumptions before building features.
182 182  
183 -=== Build Sequence (Priority Order)
266 +### Build Sequence (Priority Order)
184 184  
185 185  **Must Build:**
186 186  1. Core analysis (claims + verdicts) ← POC
... ... @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@
198 198  9. Export features ← Based on user requests
199 199  10. Everything else ← Based on validation
200 200  
201 -=== Decision Framework
284 +### Decision Framework
202 202  
203 203  **For each feature, ask:**
204 204  1. **Importance:** Risk + Impact + Strategy alignment?
... ... @@ -208,41 +208,45 @@
208 208  
209 209  **Don't build anything without answering these questions.**
210 210  
211 -== 4. Critical Principles
294 +---
212 212  
213 -=== Automation First
296 +## 4. Critical Principles
297 +
298 +### Automation First
214 214  - AI makes content decisions
215 215  - Humans improve algorithms
216 216  - Scale through code, not people
217 217  
218 -=== Fail Fast
303 +### Fail Fast
219 219  - Test assumptions quickly
220 220  - Don't build unvalidated features
221 221  - Accept that experiments may fail
222 222  - Learn from failures
223 223  
224 -=== Evidence Over Authority
309 +### Evidence Over Authority
225 225  - Transparent reasoning visible
226 226  - No single "true/false" verdicts
227 227  - Multiple scenarios shown
228 228  - Assumptions made explicit
229 229  
230 -=== User Focus
315 +### User Focus
231 231  - Serve users' needs first
232 232  - Build what's actually useful
233 233  - Don't build what's just "cool"
234 234  - Measure and iterate
235 235  
236 -=== Honest Assessment
321 +### Honest Assessment
237 237  - Don't cherry-pick examples
238 238  - Document failures openly
239 239  - Accept limitations
240 240  - No overpromising
241 241  
242 -== 5. POC Decision Gate
327 +---
243 243  
244 -=== After POC, Choose:
329 +## 5. POC Decision Gate
245 245  
331 +### After POC, Choose:
332 +
246 246  **GO (Proceed to Beta):**
247 247  - AI quality ≥70% without editing
248 248  - Approach validated
... ... @@ -261,37 +261,41 @@
261 261  - Addressable with better prompts
262 262  - Test again after changes
263 263  
264 -== 6. Key Risks & Mitigations
351 +---
265 265  
266 -=== Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough
267 -**Mitigation:** Extensive prompt testing, use best models
353 +## 6. Key Risks & Mitigations
354 +
355 +### Risk 1: AI Quality Not Good Enough
356 +**Mitigation:** Extensive prompt testing, use best models
268 268  **Acceptance:** POC might fail - that's what testing reveals
269 269  
270 -=== Risk 2: Users Don't Understand Output
271 -**Mitigation:** Create clear explainer, test with real users
359 +### Risk 2: Users Don't Understand Output
360 +**Mitigation:** Create clear explainer, test with real users
272 272  **Acceptance:** Iterate on explanation until comprehensible
273 273  
274 -=== Risk 3: Approach Doesn't Scale
275 -**Mitigation:** Start simple, add complexity only when proven
363 +### Risk 3: Approach Doesn't Scale
364 +**Mitigation:** Start simple, add complexity only when proven
276 276  **Acceptance:** POC proves concept, beta proves scale
277 277  
278 -=== Risk 4: Legal/Compliance Issues
279 -**Mitigation:** Plan accessibility early, consult legal experts
367 +### Risk 4: Legal/Compliance Issues
368 +**Mitigation:** Plan accessibility early, consult legal experts
280 280  **Acceptance:** Can't launch publicly without compliance
281 281  
282 -=== Risk 5: Feature Creep
283 -**Mitigation:** Strict scope discipline, say NO to additions
371 +### Risk 5: Feature Creep
372 +**Mitigation:** Strict scope discipline, say NO to additions
284 284  **Acceptance:** POC is minimal by design
285 285  
286 -== 7. Success Metrics
375 +---
287 287  
288 -=== POC Success
377 +## 7. Success Metrics
378 +
379 +### POC Success
289 289  - AI output quality ≥70%
290 290  - Manual editing needed < 30% of time
291 291  - Team confidence: High
292 292  - Decision: GO to beta
293 293  
294 -=== Platform Success (Later)
385 +### Platform Success (Later)
295 295  - User comprehension ≥80%
296 296  - Return user rate ≥30%
297 297  - Flag rate (user corrections) < 10%
... ... @@ -298,34 +298,38 @@
298 298  - Processing time < 30 seconds
299 299  - Error rate < 1%
300 300  
301 -=== Mission Success (Long-term)
392 +### Mission Success (Long-term)
302 302  - Users make better-informed decisions
303 303  - Misinformation spread reduced
304 304  - Public discourse improves
305 305  - Trust in evidence increases
306 306  
307 -== 8. What Makes FactHarbor Different
398 +---
308 308  
309 -=== Not Traditional Fact-Checking
400 +## 8. What Makes FactHarbor Different
401 +
402 +### Not Traditional Fact-Checking
310 310  - ❌ No simple "true/false" verdicts
311 311  - ✅ Multiple scenarios with context
312 312  - ✅ Transparent reasoning chains
313 313  - ✅ Explicit assumptions shown
314 314  
315 -=== Not AI Chatbot
408 +### Not AI Chatbot
316 316  - ❌ Not conversational
317 317  - ✅ Structured Evidence Models
318 318  - ✅ Reproducible analysis
319 319  - ✅ Verifiable sources
320 320  
321 -=== Not Just Automation
414 +### Not Just Automation
322 322  - ❌ Not replacing human judgment
323 323  - ✅ Augmenting human reasoning
324 324  - ✅ Making process transparent
325 325  - ✅ Enabling informed decisions
326 326  
327 -== 9. Core Philosophy
420 +---
328 328  
422 +## 9. Core Philosophy
423 +
329 329  **Three Pillars:**
330 330  
331 331  **1. Scenarios Over Verdicts**
... ... @@ -346,42 +346,48 @@
346 346  - Evaluate source quality
347 347  - Avoid cherry-picking
348 348  
349 -== 10. Next Actions
444 +---
350 350  
351 -=== Immediate
352 -□ Review this consolidated summary
353 -□ Confirm POC scope agreement
354 -□ Make strategic decisions on key questions
355 -□ Begin POC development
446 +## 10. Next Actions
356 356  
357 -=== Strategic Planning
358 -□ Define accessibility approach
359 -□ Select initial languages for multilingual
360 -□ Research media verification partners
361 -□ Evaluate browser extension frameworks
448 +### Immediate
449 +□ Review this consolidated summary
450 +□ Confirm POC scope agreement
451 +□ Make strategic decisions on key questions
452 +□ Begin POC development
362 362  
363 -=== Continuous
364 -□ Test assumptions before building
365 -□ Measure everything
366 -□ Learn from failures
367 -□ Stay focused on mission
454 +### Strategic Planning
455 +□ Define accessibility approach
456 +□ Select initial languages for multilingual
457 +□ Research media verification partners
458 +□ Evaluate browser extension frameworks
368 368  
369 -== Summary of Summaries
460 +### Continuous
461 +□ Test assumptions before building
462 +□ Measure everything
463 +□ Learn from failures
464 +□ Stay focused on mission
370 370  
371 -**POC Goal:** Prove AI can do this automatically
372 -**POC Scope:** 4 simple components, ~200-300 words
373 -**POC Critical:** Fully automated, no manual editing
374 -**POC Success:** ≥70% quality without human correction
466 +---
375 375  
376 -**Gap Analysis:** 18 gaps identified, 2 critical (Accessibility + Education)
377 -**Framework:** Importance (risk + impact + strategy) + Urgency (fail fast + legal + promises)
378 -**Key Insight:** Context matters - urgency changes with milestones
468 +## Summary of Summaries
379 379  
380 -**Strategy:** Test first, build second. Fail fast. Stay focused.
381 -**Philosophy:** Scenarios, transparency, evidence. No false certainty.
470 +**POC Goal:** Prove AI can do this automatically
471 +**POC Scope:** 4 simple components, ~200-300 words
472 +**POC Critical:** Fully automated, no manual editing
473 +**POC Success:** ≥70% quality without human correction
382 382  
383 -== Document Status
475 +**Gap Analysis:** 18 gaps identified, 2 critical (Accessibility + Education)
476 +**Framework:** Importance (risk + impact + strategy) + Urgency (fail fast + legal + promises)
477 +**Key Insight:** Context matters - urgency changes with milestones
384 384  
479 +**Strategy:** Test first, build second. Fail fast. Stay focused.
480 +**Philosophy:** Scenarios, transparency, evidence. No false certainty.
481 +
482 +---
483 +
484 +## Document Status
485 +
385 385  **This document supersedes all previous analysis documents.**
386 386  
387 387  All gap analysis, POC specifications, and strategic frameworks are consolidated here without timeline references.
... ... @@ -393,5 +393,7 @@
393 393  
394 394  **Previous documents are archived for reference but this is the authoritative summary.**
395 395  
497 +---
498 +
396 396  **End of Consolidated Summary**
397 397