Changes for page POC Specification
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 21:53
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -POC (Proofof Concept)1 +POC Specification - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,100 +1,61 @@ 1 -= POC (Proofof Concept)=1 += POC Specification = 2 2 3 -**Status:** ✅ Planning Complete - Ready for Development 4 -**Version:** 1.0 5 -**Goal:** Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention 3 +**This section contains detailed specifications for FactHarbor POC phases.** 6 6 7 - ---5 +**Core Philosophy:** Prove the AKEL automation works before building production features. Each POC phase validates critical technical capabilities. 8 8 9 -== Overview == 7 +{{warning}} 8 +**Critical Innovation in POC1 Context-Aware Analysis:** 10 10 11 -POC1 tests the c oreFactHarbor capability:CanAI automaticallyextractfactual claimsfromarticlesandevaluate themwithreasonableverdicts?10 +POC1 tests whether AI can understand that an article's overall credibility is not simply the average of its individual claim verdicts. An article with mostly accurate facts can still be misleading if it draws unsupported conclusions. 12 12 13 -**What POC Tests:** 14 -* AI claim extraction from article text 15 -* AI verdict generation with confidence scores 16 -* Fully automated approach viability (no human editing) 17 -* Output comprehensibility to users 12 +See [[Article Verdict Problem>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Article-Verdict-Problem]] for full discussion. 13 +{{/warning}} 18 18 19 -**What POC Excludes (Intentional Simplifications):** 20 -* Scenarios (deferred to POC2 - architectural questions remain) 21 -* Evidence display (deferred) 22 -* Production infrastructure (simplified single-call architecture) 23 -* Full data model (stateless POC) 15 +== POC Phase Navigation == 24 24 25 -**Key Decision:** Test AI capability first, add architectural complexity in POC2 based on learnings. 17 +* **[[POC Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]]** Complete POC1 & POC2 specification (v4.0) 18 +* **[[POC Summary>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Summary]]** Executive overview 19 +* **[[Article Verdict Problem>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Article-Verdict-Problem]]** Why context-aware analysis matters 26 26 27 - ---21 +== Roadmap Navigation == 28 28 29 -== POC Documentation == 23 +* **[[POC1 Roadmap>>FactHarbor.Roadmap.POC1.WebHome]]** Core Workflow with Quality Gates 24 +* **[[POC2 Roadmap>>FactHarbor.Roadmap.POC2.WebHome]]** Robust Quality & Reliability 25 +* **[[Requirements Roadmap Matrix>>FactHarbor.Roadmap.Requirements-Roadmap-Matrix.WebHome]]** Phase assignments 30 30 31 -**POC-Specific Pages:** 32 -* [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] - Complete POC specification (17 sections, 1,197 lines) 33 -* [[Summary>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Summary]] - Executive overview and consolidated analysis 27 +== Key Specifications == 34 34 35 -- --29 +**POC1 Goal:** Prove AI can extract claims and evaluate them with context-aware analysis 36 36 37 -== Related Specification Pages == 38 - 39 -**Core Specification:** 40 -* [[Requirements (Full System)>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] - FR1-FR13, NFR1-NFR5 41 -* [[User Needs>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.User Needs]] - UN-1 through UN-17 42 -* [[Gap Analysis>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.GapAnalysis]] - Feature gaps, proposes FR14-FR43 43 - 44 -**Architecture & Design:** 45 -* [[Architecture>>FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] - System architecture and design 46 -* [[AKEL>>FactHarbor.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]] - AI subsystem 47 -* [[Data Model>>FactHarbor.Specification.Data Model.WebHome]] - Database schema 48 -* [[Workflows>>FactHarbor.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]] - Process workflows 49 - 50 ---- 51 - 52 -== Key POC Specifications == 53 - 54 -**Output Components (4):** 55 -1. Analysis Summary (3-5 sentences) 31 +**POC1 Output:** 5 components 32 +1. Analysis Summary (context-aware, 4-6 sentences) 56 56 2. Claims Identification (3-5 claims) 57 -3. Claims Verdicts (verdict + confidence + risk tier + reasoning per claim) 58 -4. Article Summary (optional, 3-5 sentences) 34 +3. Claims Verdicts (verdict + confidence + reasoning) 35 +4. Article Summary (optional) 36 +5. Usage Statistics (cost tracking) 59 59 60 -**Publication Mode:** Mode 2 (AI-Generated, No Prior Human Review) 38 +**POC1 Philosophy:** 39 +* Context-aware analysis (article ≠ sum of claims) 40 +* Cost efficiency tracking (viable at scale) 41 +* Fail-fast learning (test critical capabilities) 61 61 62 -**Quality Gates:** 4 simplified gates (Source Quality, Contradiction Search, Uncertainty, Structural Integrity) 43 +**POC1 Success Criteria:** 44 +* AI quality ≥70% (including context-aware assessment) 45 +* Cost per analysis <$0.05 (target) 46 +* Minimal manual editing (<30%) 63 63 64 -** SuccessCriteria:**≥70%AIqualitywithoutmanual editing48 +**POC1 → POC2 Decision Gate:** GO / NO-GO / ITERATE 65 65 66 - ---50 +See [[POC Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] for complete specification. 67 67 68 68 == POC vs. Full System == 69 69 70 -|=Aspect|=POC1|=Full System 71 -|Scenarios|None (deferred to POC2)|Core component (Claims → Scenarios → Verdicts) 72 -|Workflow|3 steps|6 phases with quality gates 73 -|AKEL|Single API call|Multi-component orchestrated pipeline 74 -|Data|Stateless (no DB)|PostgreSQL + Redis + S3 75 -|Architecture|Simplified proof-of-concept|Production architecture 76 -|Requirements|FR-POC-1 to FR-POC-7|FR1-FR43 (full system) 54 +|= Feature |= POC1 |= POC2 |= Full System 55 +| Scenarios | ❌ Deferred | ✅ Multiple | ✅ + Persistence 56 +| Evidence Display | ❌ None | ✅ With sources | ✅ + Quality scoring 57 +| Quality Gates | 🟡 4 simplified | ✅ 6 comprehensive | ✅ + ML validation 58 +| Database | ❌ Stateless | ✅ PostgreSQL | ✅ + Redis + S3 59 +| User Contributions | ❌ Read-only | ✅ Enabled | ✅ + Reputation 77 77 78 -**Gap Between POC and Beta:** Significant architectural expansion needed (scenarios, components, data model). 79 - 80 ---- 81 - 82 -== Decision Gate == 83 - 84 -After POC testing complete, team makes one of three decisions: 85 - 86 -**GO (Proceed to POC2):** AI quality ≥70%, approach validated 87 -**NO-GO (Pivot or Stop):** AI quality < 60%, fundamental flaws identified 88 -**ITERATE (Improve POC):** AI quality 60-70%, specific improvements needed 89 - 90 ---- 91 - 92 -**Next Steps:** 93 -1. Review [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] for detailed specifications 94 -2. Review [[Gap Analysis>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.GapAnalysis]] for feature priorities 95 -3. Begin POC development 96 -4. Test with diverse articles 97 -5. Make GO/NO-GO decision 98 - 99 -**Document Version:** 2.0 (Updated after Specification Cross-Check) 100 - 61 +**