Skip to Content

Wiki source code of Workflows

Version 2.1 by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/18 12:54
Show last authors
1 = Workflows =
2 FactHarbor workflows are **simple, automated, focused on continuous improvement**.
3 == 1. Core Principles ==
4 * **Automated by default**: AI processes everything
5 * **Publish immediately**: No centralized approval (removed in V0.9.50)
6 * **Quality through monitoring**: Not gatekeeping
7 * **Fix systems, not data**: Errors trigger improvements
8 * **Human-in-loop**: Only for edge cases and abuse
9 == 2. Claim Submission Workflow ==
10 ```
11 User submits → Duplicate detection → Categorization → Processing queue → User receives ID
12 ```
13 **Timeline**: Seconds
14 **No approval needed**
15
16 == 2.5 Claim and Scenario Workflow ==
17
18 {{include reference="FactHarbor.Specification.Diagrams.Claim and Scenario Workflow.WebHome"/}}
19
20 == 3. Automated Analysis Workflow ==
21 ```
22 Claim from queue
23 ↓
24 Evidence gathering (AKEL)
25 ↓
26 Source evaluation (track record check)
27 ↓
28 Scenario generation
29 ↓
30 Verdict synthesis
31 ↓
32 Risk assessment
33 ↓
34 Quality gates (confidence > 40%? risk < 80%?)
35 ↓
36 Publish OR Flag for improvement
37 ```
38 **Timeline**: 10-30 seconds
39 **90%+ published automatically**
40 == 3.5 Evidence and Verdict Workflow ==
41 {{include reference="FactHarbor.Specification.Diagrams.Evidence and Verdict Workflow.WebHome"/}}
42 == 4. Publication Workflow ==
43 **Standard (90%+)**: Pass quality gates → Publish immediately with confidence scores
44 **High Risk (<10%)**: Risk > 80% → Moderator review
45 **Low Quality**: Confidence < 40% → Improvement queue → Re-process
46 == 5. User Contribution Workflow ==
47 ```
48 Contributor edits → System validates → Applied immediately → Logged → Reputation earned
49 ```
50 **No approval required** (Wikipedia model)
51 **New contributors** (<50 reputation): Limited to minor edits
52 == 5.5 Quality and Audit Workflow ==
53
54 {{include reference="FactHarbor.Specification.Diagrams.Quality and Audit Workflow.WebHome"/}}
55
56
57 == 6. Flagging Workflow ==
58 ```
59 User flags issue → Categorize (abuse/quality) → Automated or manual resolution
60 ```
61 **Quality issues**: Add to improvement queue → System fix → Auto re-process
62 **Abuse**: Moderator review → Action taken
63 == 7. Moderation Workflow ==
64 **Automated pre-moderation**: 95% published automatically
65 **Moderator queue**: Only high-risk or flagged content
66 **Appeal process**: Different moderator → Governing Team if needed
67 == 8. System Improvement Workflow ==
68 **Weekly cycle**:
69 ```
70 Monday: Review error patterns
71 Tuesday-Wednesday: Develop fixes
72 Thursday: Test improvements
73 Friday: Deploy & re-process
74 Weekend: Monitor metrics
75 ```
76 **Error capture**:
77 ```
78 Error detected → Categorize → Root cause → Improvement queue → Pattern analysis
79 ```
80 **A/B Testing**:
81 ```
82 New algorithm → Split traffic (90% control, 10% test) → Run 1 week → Compare metrics → Deploy if better
83 ```
84 == 9. Quality Monitoring Workflow ==
85 **Continuous**: Every hour calculate metrics, detect anomalies
86 **Daily**: Update source track records, aggregate error patterns
87 **Weekly**: System improvement cycle, performance review
88 == 10. Source Track Record Workflow ==
89 **Initial score**: New source starts at 50 (neutral)
90 **Daily updates**: Calculate accuracy, correction frequency, update score
91 **Continuous**: All claims using source recalculated when score changes
92 == 11. Re-Processing Workflow ==
93 **Triggers**: System improvement deployed, source score updated, new evidence, error fixed
94 **Process**: Identify affected claims → Re-run AKEL → Compare → Update if better → Log change
95 == 12. Related Pages ==
96 * [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]]
97 * [[Architecture>>FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]]
98 * [[Data Model>>FactHarbor.Specification.Data Model.WebHome]]