Changes for page Requirements

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2026/02/08 21:32

From version 6.2
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/24 21:46
Change comment: Update document after refactoring.
To version 6.3
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2026/01/20 20:21
Change comment: Renamed back-links.

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
32 32  **Who**: Anyone (no login required)
33 33  
34 34  **Can**:
35 +
35 35  * Browse and search claims
36 36  * View scenarios, evidence, verdicts, and confidence scores
37 37  * Flag issues or errors
... ... @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
39 39  * Submit claims automatically (new claims added if not duplicates)
40 40  
41 41  **Cannot**:
43 +
42 42  * Modify content
43 43  * Access edit history details
44 44  
... ... @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
49 49  **Who**: Registered users (earns reputation through contributions)
50 50  
51 51  **Can**:
54 +
52 52  * Everything a Reader can do
53 53  * Edit claims, evidence, and scenarios
54 54  * Add sources and citations
... ... @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
57 57  * Earn reputation points for quality contributions
58 58  
59 59  **Reputation System**:
63 +
60 60  * New contributors: Limited edit privileges
61 61  * Established contributors (established reputation): Full edit access
62 62  * Trusted contributors (substantial reputation): Can approve certain changes
... ... @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
64 64  * Reputation lost through: Reverted edits, invalid flags, abuse
65 65  
66 66  **Cannot**:
71 +
67 67  * Delete or hide content (only moderators)
68 68  * Override moderation decisions
69 69  
... ... @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
74 74  **Who**: Trusted community members with proven track record, appointed by governance board
75 75  
76 76  **Can**:
82 +
77 77  * Review flagged content
78 78  * Hide harmful or abusive content
79 79  * Resolve disputes between contributors
... ... @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@
82 82  * Access full audit logs
83 83  
84 84  **Cannot**:
91 +
85 85  * Change governance rules
86 86  * Permanently ban users without board approval
87 87  * Override technical quality gates
... ... @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@
95 95  **Not a permanent role**: Contacted externally when needed for contested claims in their domain
96 96  
97 97  **When used**:
105 +
98 98  * Medical claims with life/safety implications
99 99  * Legal interpretations with significant impact
100 100  * Scientific claims with high controversy
... ... @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@
101 101  * Technical claims requiring specialized knowledge
102 102  
103 103  **Process**:
112 +
104 104  * Moderator identifies need for expert input
105 105  * Contact expert externally (don't require them to be users)
106 106  * Trusted Contributor provides written opinion with sources
... ... @@ -120,11 +120,13 @@
120 120  **Status**: Visible to all users
121 121  
122 122  **Includes**:
132 +
123 123  * AI-generated analyses (default state)
124 124  * User-contributed content
125 125  * Edited/improved content
126 126  
127 127  **Quality Indicators** (displayed with content):
138 +
128 128  * **Confidence Score**: 0-100% (AI's confidence in analysis)
129 129  * **Source Quality Score**: 0-100% (based on source track record)
130 130  * **Controversy Flag**: If high dispute/edit activity
... ... @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@
134 134  * **Review Status**: AI-generated / Human-reviewed / Expert-validated
135 135  
136 136  **Automatic Warnings**:
148 +
137 137  * Confidence < 60%: "Low confidence - use caution"
138 138  * Source quality < 40%: "Sources may be unreliable"
139 139  * High controversy: "Disputed - multiple interpretations exist"
... ... @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@
146 146  **Status**: Not visible to regular users (only to moderators)
147 147  
148 148  **Reasons**:
161 +
149 149  * Spam or advertising
150 150  * Personal attacks or harassment
151 151  * Illegal content
... ... @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@
154 154  * Abuse or harmful content
155 155  
156 156  **Process**:
170 +
157 157  * Automated detection flags for moderator review
158 158  * Moderator confirms and hides
159 159  * Original author notified with reason
... ... @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@
176 176  **AKEL is the primary system**. Human contributions supplement and train AKEL.
177 177  
178 178  **AKEL Must**:
193 +
179 179  * Mark all outputs as AI-generated
180 180  * Display confidence scores prominently
181 181  * Provide source citations
... ... @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@
184 184  * Learn from human corrections
185 185  
186 186  **When AKEL Makes Errors**:
202 +
187 187  1. Capture the error pattern (what, why, how common)
188 188  2. Improve the system (better prompt, model, validation)
189 189  3. Re-process affected claims automatically
... ... @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@
214 214  === 4.1 Source Requirements ===
215 215  
216 216  **Track Record Over Credentials**:
233 +
217 217  * Sources evaluated by historical accuracy
218 218  * Correction policy matters
219 219  * Independence from conflicts of interest
... ... @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@
220 220  * Methodology transparency
221 221  
222 222  **Source Quality Database**:
240 +
223 223  * Automated tracking of source accuracy
224 224  * Correction frequency
225 225  * Reliability score (updated continuously)
... ... @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@
251 251  === 4.4 Confidence Scoring ===
252 252  
253 253  **Automated confidence calculation based on**:
272 +
254 254  * Source quality scores
255 255  * Evidence consistency
256 256  * Contradiction detection
... ... @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@
258 258  * Historical accuracy of similar claims
259 259  
260 260  **Thresholds**:
280 +
261 261  * < 40%: Too low to publish (needs improvement)
262 262  * 40-60%: Published with "Low confidence" warning
263 263  * 60-80%: Published as standard
... ... @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@
274 274  === 5.1 Risk Score Calculation ===
275 275  
276 276  **Factors** (weighted algorithm):
297 +
277 277  * **Domain sensitivity**: Medical, legal, safety auto-flagged higher
278 278  * **Potential impact**: Views, citations, spread
279 279  * **Controversy level**: Flags, disputes, edit wars
... ... @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@
300 300  === 6.1 Error Capture ===
301 301  
302 302  **When users flag errors or make corrections**:
324 +
303 303  1. What was wrong? (categorize)
304 304  2. What should it have been?
305 305  3. Why did the system fail? (root cause)
... ... @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@
318 318  === 6.3 Quality Metrics Dashboard ===
319 319  
320 320  **Track continuously**:
343 +
321 321  * Error rate by category
322 322  * Source quality distribution
323 323  * Confidence score trends
... ... @@ -343,6 +343,7 @@
343 343  === 7.2 Anomaly Detection ===
344 344  
345 345  **Automated alerts for**:
369 +
346 346  * Sudden quality drops
347 347  * Unusual patterns
348 348  * Contradiction clusters
... ... @@ -395,6 +395,7 @@
395 395  **Fulfills**: UN-2 (Context-dependent verification), UN-3 (Article summary with FactHarbor analysis summary), UN-8 (Understanding disagreement)
396 396  
397 397  **Automated scenario creation**:
422 +
398 398  * AKEL analyzes claim and generates likely scenarios (use-cases and contexts)
399 399  * Each scenario includes: assumptions, definitions, boundaries, evidence context
400 400  * Users can flag incorrect scenarios
... ... @@ -455,6 +455,7 @@
455 455  **Purpose**: Provide side-by-side comparison of what a document claims vs. FactHarbor's complete analysis of its credibility
456 456  
457 457  **Left Panel: Article Summary**:
483 +
458 458  * Document title, source, and claimed credibility
459 459  * "The Big Picture" - main thesis or position change
460 460  * "Key Findings" - structured summary of document's main claims
... ... @@ -462,6 +462,7 @@
462 462  * "Conclusion" - document's bottom line
463 463  
464 464  **Right Panel: FactHarbor Analysis Summary**:
491 +
465 465  * FactHarbor's independent source credibility assessment
466 466  * Claim-by-claim verdicts with confidence scores
467 467  * Methodology assessment (strengths, limitations)
... ... @@ -469,6 +469,7 @@
469 469  * Analysis ID for reference
470 470  
471 471  **Design Principles**:
499 +
472 472  * No scrolling required - both panels visible simultaneously
473 473  * Visual distinction between "what they say" and "FactHarbor's analysis"
474 474  * Color coding for verdicts (supported, uncertain, refuted)
... ... @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@
476 476  * Mobile responsive (panels stack vertically on small screens)
477 477  
478 478  **Implementation Notes**:
507 +
479 479  * Generated automatically by AKEL for every analyzed document
480 480  * Updates when verdict evolves (maintains version history)
481 481  * Exportable as standalone summary report
... ... @@ -502,7 +502,8 @@
502 502  (% style="font-size:0.9em; color:#666;" %)
503 503  ↑ WELL SUPPORTED • 87% confidence
504 504  [[Click for evidence details →]]
505 -(%%)
534 +
535 +
506 506  )))
507 507  
508 508  The study, which followed 10,000 participants over five years, showed significant improvements in cardiovascular health markers.
... ... @@ -515,7 +515,8 @@
515 515  ↑ UNCERTAIN • 45% confidence
516 516  Overstated - evidence shows risk reduction, not prevention
517 517  [[Click for details →]]
518 -(%%)
548 +
549 +
519 519  )))
520 520  
521 521  Dr. Maria Rodriguez, lead researcher, recommends incorporating more olive oil, fish, and vegetables into daily meals.
... ... @@ -528,7 +528,8 @@
528 528  ↑ REFUTED • 15% confidence
529 529  Claim not supported by study design; correlation ≠ causation
530 530  [[Click for counter-evidence →]]
531 -(%%)
562 +
563 +
532 532  )))
533 533  
534 534  Participants also reported feeling more energetic and experiencing better sleep quality, though these were secondary measures.
... ... @@ -535,6 +535,7 @@
535 535  )))
536 536  
537 537  **Legend:**
570 +
538 538  * 🟢 = Well-supported claim (confidence ≥75%)
539 539  * 🟡 = Uncertain claim (confidence 40-74%)
540 540  * 🔴 = Refuted/unsupported claim (confidence <40%)
... ... @@ -553,11 +553,13 @@
553 553  **Confidence:** 87%
554 554  
555 555  **Evidence Summary:**
589 +
556 556  * Meta-analysis of 12 RCTs confirms 23-28% risk reduction
557 557  * Consistent findings across multiple populations
558 558  * Published in peer-reviewed journal (high credibility)
559 559  
560 560  **Uncertainty Factors:**
595 +
561 561  * Exact percentage varies by study (20-30% range)
562 562  
563 563  [[View Full Analysis →]]
... ... @@ -564,6 +564,7 @@
564 564  )))
565 565  
566 566  **Color-Coding System**:
602 +
567 567  * **Green**: Well-supported claims (confidence ≥75%, strong evidence)
568 568  * **Yellow/Orange**: Uncertain claims (confidence 40-74%, conflicting or limited evidence)
569 569  * **Red**: Refuted or unsupported claims (confidence <40%, contradicted by evidence)
... ... @@ -573,8 +573,12 @@
573 573  
574 574  (% style="width:100%; border-collapse:collapse;" %)
575 575  |=**Article Text**|=**Status**|=**Analysis**
576 -|(((A recent study published in the Journal of Nutrition has revealed new findings about the Mediterranean diet.)))|(% style="text-align:center;" %)Plain text|(% style="font-style:italic; color:#888;" %)Context - no highlighting
577 -|(((//Researchers found that Mediterranean diet followers had a 25% lower risk of heart disease compared to control groups//)))|(% style="background-color:#D4EDDA; text-align:center; padding:8px;" %)🟢 **WELL SUPPORTED**|(((
612 +|(((
613 +A recent study published in the Journal of Nutrition has revealed new findings about the Mediterranean diet.
614 +)))|(% style="text-align:center;" %)Plain text|(% style="font-style:italic; color:#888;" %)Context - no highlighting
615 +|(((
616 +//Researchers found that Mediterranean diet followers had a 25% lower risk of heart disease compared to control groups//
617 +)))|(% style="background-color:#D4EDDA; text-align:center; padding:8px;" %)🟢 **WELL SUPPORTED**|(((
578 578  **87% confidence**
579 579  
580 580  Meta-analysis of 12 RCTs confirms 23-28% risk reduction
... ... @@ -581,8 +581,12 @@
581 581  
582 582  [[View Full Analysis]]
583 583  )))
584 -|(((The study, which followed 10,000 participants over five years, showed significant improvements in cardiovascular health markers.)))|(% style="text-align:center;" %)Plain text|(% style="font-style:italic; color:#888;" %)Methodology - no highlighting
585 -|(((//Some experts believe this diet can completely prevent heart attacks//)))|(% style="background-color:#FFF3CD; text-align:center; padding:8px;" %)🟡 **UNCERTAIN**|(((
624 +|(((
625 +The study, which followed 10,000 participants over five years, showed significant improvements in cardiovascular health markers.
626 +)))|(% style="text-align:center;" %)Plain text|(% style="font-style:italic; color:#888;" %)Methodology - no highlighting
627 +|(((
628 +//Some experts believe this diet can completely prevent heart attacks//
629 +)))|(% style="background-color:#FFF3CD; text-align:center; padding:8px;" %)🟡 **UNCERTAIN**|(((
586 586  **45% confidence**
587 587  
588 588  Overstated - evidence shows risk reduction, not prevention
... ... @@ -589,8 +589,12 @@
589 589  
590 590  [[View Details]]
591 591  )))
592 -|(((Dr. Rodriguez recommends incorporating more olive oil, fish, and vegetables into daily meals.)))|(% style="text-align:center;" %)Plain text|(% style="font-style:italic; color:#888;" %)Recommendation - no highlighting
593 -|(((//The study proves that saturated fats cause heart disease//)))|(% style="background-color:#F8D7DA; text-align:center; padding:8px;" %)🔴 **REFUTED**|(((
636 +|(((
637 +Dr. Rodriguez recommends incorporating more olive oil, fish, and vegetables into daily meals.
638 +)))|(% style="text-align:center;" %)Plain text|(% style="font-style:italic; color:#888;" %)Recommendation - no highlighting
639 +|(((
640 +//The study proves that saturated fats cause heart disease//
641 +)))|(% style="background-color:#F8D7DA; text-align:center; padding:8px;" %)🔴 **REFUTED**|(((
594 594  **15% confidence**
595 595  
596 596  Claim not supported by study; correlation ≠ causation
... ... @@ -599,6 +599,7 @@
599 599  )))
600 600  
601 601  **Design Notes:**
650 +
602 602  * Highlighted claims use italics to distinguish from plain text
603 603  * Color backgrounds match XWiki message box colors (success/warning/error)
604 604  * Status column shows verdict prominently
... ... @@ -605,6 +605,7 @@
605 605  * Analysis column provides quick summary with link to details
606 606  
607 607  **User Actions**:
657 +
608 608  * **Hover** over highlighted claim → Tooltip appears
609 609  * **Click** highlighted claim → Detailed analysis modal/panel
610 610  * **Toggle** button to turn highlighting on/off
... ... @@ -611,16 +611,18 @@
611 611  * **Keyboard**: Tab through highlighted claims
612 612  
613 613  **Interaction Design**:
664 +
614 614  * Hover/click on highlighted claim → Show tooltip with:
615 - * Claim text
616 - * Verdict (e.g., "WELL SUPPORTED")
617 - * Confidence score (e.g., "85%")
618 - * Brief evidence summary
619 - * Link to detailed analysis
666 +* Claim text
667 +* Verdict (e.g., "WELL SUPPORTED")
668 +* Confidence score (e.g., "85%")
669 +* Brief evidence summary
670 +* Link to detailed analysis
620 620  * Toggle highlighting on/off (user preference)
621 621  * Adjustable color intensity for accessibility
622 622  
623 623  **Technical Requirements**:
675 +
624 624  * Real-time highlighting as page loads (non-blocking)
625 625  * Claim boundary detection (start/end of assertion)
626 626  * Handle nested or overlapping claims
... ... @@ -628,16 +628,19 @@
628 628  * Work with various content formats (HTML, plain text, PDFs)
629 629  
630 630  **Performance Requirements**:
683 +
631 631  * Highlighting renders within 500ms of page load
632 632  * No perceptible delay in reading experience
633 633  * Efficient DOM manipulation (avoid reflows)
634 634  
635 635  **Accessibility**:
689 +
636 636  * Color-blind friendly palette (use patterns/icons in addition to color)
637 637  * Screen reader compatible (ARIA labels for claim credibility)
638 638  * Keyboard navigation to highlighted claims
639 639  
640 640  **Implementation Notes**:
695 +
641 641  * Claims extracted and analyzed by AKEL during initial processing
642 642  * Highlighting data stored as annotations with byte offsets
643 643  * Client-side rendering of highlights based on verdict data
... ... @@ -650,6 +650,7 @@
650 650  **Fulfills**: UN-1 (Fast access to verified content), UN-16 (Clear review status)
651 651  
652 652  **Simple flow**:
708 +
653 653  1. Claim submitted
654 654  2. AKEL processes (automated)
655 655  3. If confidence > threshold: Publish (labeled as AI-generated)
... ... @@ -661,6 +661,7 @@
661 661  ==== FR10 — Moderation ====
662 662  
663 663  **Focus on abuse, not routine quality**:
720 +
664 664  * Automated abuse detection
665 665  * Moderators handle flags
666 666  * Quick response to harmful content
... ... @@ -723,6 +723,7 @@
723 723  **Phase 1 (Months 1-3): Read-Only MVP**
724 724  
725 725  Build:
783 +
726 726  * Automated claim analysis
727 727  * Confidence scoring
728 728  * Source evaluation
... ... @@ -736,6 +736,7 @@
736 736  **Phase 2 (Months 4-6): User Contributions**
737 737  
738 738  Add only if needed:
797 +
739 739  * Simple editing (Wikipedia-style)
740 740  * Reputation system
741 741  * Basic moderation
... ... @@ -752,6 +752,7 @@
752 752  **Additional User Needs fulfilled**: UN-14 (API access), UN-15 (Full evolution tracking)
753 753  
754 754  **Deferred**:
814 +
755 755  * Federation (until multiple successful instances exist)
756 756  * Complex contribution workflows (focus on automation)
757 757  * Extensive role hierarchy (keep simple)
... ... @@ -759,6 +759,7 @@
759 759  == 11. Success Metrics ==
760 760  
761 761  **System Quality** (track weekly):
822 +
762 762  * Error rate by category (target: -10%/month)
763 763  * Average confidence score (target: increase)
764 764  * Source quality distribution (target: more high-quality)
... ... @@ -765,6 +765,7 @@
765 765  * Contradiction detection rate (target: increase)
766 766  
767 767  **Efficiency** (track monthly):
829 +
768 768  * Claims processed per hour (target: increase)
769 769  * Human hours per claim (target: decrease)
770 770  * Automation coverage (target: >90%)
... ... @@ -771,6 +771,7 @@
771 771  * Re-work rate (target: <5%)
772 772  
773 773  **User Satisfaction** (track quarterly):
836 +
774 774  * User flag rate (issues found)
775 775  * Correction acceptance rate (flags valid)
776 776  * Return user rate
... ... @@ -777,6 +777,7 @@
777 777  * Trust indicators (surveys)
778 778  
779 779  **User Needs Metrics** (track quarterly):
843 +
780 780  * UN-1: % users who understand trust scores
781 781  * UN-4: Time to verify social media claim (target: <30s)
782 782  * UN-7: % users who access evidence details
... ... @@ -797,5 +797,5 @@
797 797  * [[Data Model>>FactHarbor.Specification.Data Model.WebHome]] - Data structures supporting requirements
798 798  * [[Workflows>>FactHarbor.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]] - User interaction workflows
799 799  * [[AKEL>>FactHarbor.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]] - AI system fulfilling automation requirements
800 -* [[Global Rules>>FactHarbor.Organisation.How-We-Work-Together.GlobalRules.WebHome]]
864 +* [[Global Rules>>Archive.FactHarbor.Organisation.How-We-Work-Together.GlobalRules.WebHome]]
801 801  * [[Privacy Policy>>FactHarbor.Organisation.How-We-Work-Together.Privacy-Policy]]