Wiki source code of Large Donations Policy & Strategy
Version 1.1 by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/21 14:01
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | = Large Donations Policy & Strategy = | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | **Version:** 1.0 | **Last Updated:** December 21, 2025 | **Status:** DRAFT | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | ---- | ||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | == Executive Summary == | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | {{info}} | ||
| 10 | **Core Principle:** No single donor may finance more than **20% of annual budget** (exception: competitive public funding programs like Innosuisse). | ||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | **Why:** Editorial independence is the foundation of fact-checking credibility. Large donations create perception of bias, even when none exists. | ||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | **IFCN Requirement:** International Fact-Checking Network demands full funding transparency and proven independence. | ||
| 15 | {{/info}} | ||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | **Quick Decision Guide:** | ||
| 18 | |||
| 19 | * **CHF 5K-80K** → Accept (if <20% budget) + Publish donor name | ||
| 20 | * **CHF 80K-200K** → Spread over years OR reduce to 20% | ||
| 21 | * **CHF 200K-1M** → Propose foundation model | ||
| 22 | * **>CHF 1M** → Endowment structure only (capital separate, only returns flow) | ||
| 23 | |||
| 24 | **Always Reject:** | ||
| 25 | * Political parties | ||
| 26 | * Media companies (Facebook, Google News, etc.) | ||
| 27 | * Donor demands editorial control | ||
| 28 | * Pharma companies (frequent fact-check subject) | ||
| 29 | * Donors involved in active fact-checks | ||
| 30 | |||
| 31 | ---- | ||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | == 1. Legal Framework (Switzerland) == | ||
| 34 | |||
| 35 | === Tax Deductibility for Donors === | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | **Federal Tax:** | ||
| 38 | * Maximum deductible: 20% of net income | ||
| 39 | * Example: Income CHF 500,000 → max. CHF 100,000 deductible | ||
| 40 | |||
| 41 | **Cantonal Taxes:** | ||
| 42 | * Most cantons: 10-20% | ||
| 43 | * Zurich: 20% | ||
| 44 | * Zug: 20% | ||
| 45 | * Geneva: 20% | ||
| 46 | |||
| 47 | **Example:** Donor with CHF 1M income can deduct max. CHF 200,000 (20%). If they donate CHF 500,000, only CHF 200,000 is tax-deductible. | ||
| 48 | |||
| 49 | === No Legal Limits === | ||
| 50 | |||
| 51 | Swiss law has NO cap on donation amounts. Donors can give CHF 1M, 5M, 10M - but only a portion is tax-deductible. | ||
| 52 | |||
| 53 | === Anti-Money Laundering === | ||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | For very large donations (CHF 100,000+): | ||
| 56 | * Verify donor identity | ||
| 57 | * Document source of funds | ||
| 58 | * Report suspicious transactions to MROS | ||
| 59 | |||
| 60 | ---- | ||
| 61 | |||
| 62 | == 2. IFCN/EFCSN Requirements == | ||
| 63 | |||
| 64 | {{warning}} | ||
| 65 | **IFCN Code of Principles requires:** | ||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | **Principle 2 - Funding Transparency** | ||
| 68 | All fact-checking organizations must be transparent about funding sources. | ||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | **Principle 3 - Methodology Transparency** | ||
| 71 | Organizations must explain their fact-checking methodology. | ||
| 72 | |||
| 73 | **Principle 4 - Open & Honest Corrections** | ||
| 74 | Organizations must have transparent corrections policy. | ||
| 75 | {{/warning}} | ||
| 76 | |||
| 77 | **What IFCN requires:** | ||
| 78 | 1. Publish all funders above threshold | ||
| 79 | 2. Prove financial independence | ||
| 80 | 3. No conflicts of interest | ||
| 81 | 4. Editorial firewall - no influence on fact-checks | ||
| 82 | |||
| 83 | **Typical thresholds among IFCN members:** | ||
| 84 | * Publish donors above CHF 1,000-5,000 | ||
| 85 | * Extra transparency for donors above CHF 10,000-50,000 | ||
| 86 | * Written editorial firewall agreements | ||
| 87 | |||
| 88 | **Examples from IFCN Members:** | ||
| 89 | |||
| 90 | **Full Fact (UK)** | ||
| 91 | * Publishes all donors over £1,000 | ||
| 92 | * Policy: "No funder has any influence over our fact-checking" | ||
| 93 | |||
| 94 | **FactCheck.org (USA)** | ||
| 95 | * Publishes all donors over $1,000 | ||
| 96 | * Maximum: Single donor may NOT finance >10% of budget | ||
| 97 | |||
| 98 | **Correctiv (Germany)** | ||
| 99 | * Publishes all donors over €5,000 | ||
| 100 | * Rule: No single source may exceed 20% of budget | ||
| 101 | |||
| 102 | ---- | ||
| 103 | |||
| 104 | == 3. Risk Analysis == | ||
| 105 | |||
| 106 | **Credibility Risks by Donation Amount:** | ||
| 107 | |||
| 108 | |=Amount|=Risk Level|=Notes | ||
| 109 | |CHF 10K-50K|**Low**|No problem with transparency | ||
| 110 | |CHF 50K-200K|**Medium**|Needs clear governance rules | ||
| 111 | |CHF 200K-1M|**High**|Could be >20% budget → dangerous | ||
| 112 | |>CHF 1M|**Very High**|Almost certainly >50% → toxic for credibility | ||
| 113 | |||
| 114 | **Specific Risks:** | ||
| 115 | |||
| 116 | {{error}} | ||
| 117 | **Risk 1: Perceived Dependence** | ||
| 118 | Even if untrue, perception damages credibility. Public thinks: "FactHarbor won't fact-check against main donor." | ||
| 119 | **Solution:** Transparency + Editorial Firewall | ||
| 120 | {{/error}} | ||
| 121 | |||
| 122 | {{error}} | ||
| 123 | **Risk 2: Actual Influence** | ||
| 124 | Donor tries to influence fact-checks. Example: "I donate CHF 500K, but don't fact-check my company." | ||
| 125 | **Solution:** Clear contracts, no editorial rights, return donation if violated | ||
| 126 | {{/error}} | ||
| 127 | |||
| 128 | {{warning}} | ||
| 129 | **Risk 3: IFCN/EFCSN Rejection** | ||
| 130 | Too much dependence on single donor → IFCN could deny signatory status, EFCSN could reject membership | ||
| 131 | {{/warning}} | ||
| 132 | |||
| 133 | {{warning}} | ||
| 134 | **Risk 4: Partnership Problems** | ||
| 135 | dpa, SRF, Full Fact might refuse cooperation if they question independence | ||
| 136 | {{/warning}} | ||
| 137 | |||
| 138 | ---- | ||
| 139 | |||
| 140 | == 4. Solution: The 20% Rule == | ||
| 141 | |||
| 142 | {{success}} | ||
| 143 | **Implement These Rules:** | ||
| 144 | |||
| 145 | **1. Publication Threshold** | ||
| 146 | * Publish all donors above **CHF 5,000** (name, amount, optional purpose) | ||
| 147 | * Publication: On website and in annual report | ||
| 148 | |||
| 149 | **2. Maximum Rule (CRITICAL!)** | ||
| 150 | * Single donor maximum **20% of annual budget** | ||
| 151 | * Example: Budget CHF 500K → max. CHF 100K per donor | ||
| 152 | * Exception: Multi-year commitments with exit strategy | ||
| 153 | |||
| 154 | **3. Editorial Firewall** | ||
| 155 | * Written declaration: Donor has NO say in fact-checks | ||
| 156 | * In donation contract: Explicitly stated | ||
| 157 | * If violated: Return donation immediately | ||
| 158 | |||
| 159 | **4. Diversification Goal** | ||
| 160 | * Minimum 5 funding sources | ||
| 161 | * No source >30% over 2+ years | ||
| 162 | {{/success}} | ||
| 163 | |||
| 164 | **Add to Bylaws:** | ||
| 165 | |||
| 166 | {{code language="text"}} | ||
| 167 | § 10 - Financing and Donations | ||
| 168 | |||
| 169 | 1. The association finances itself through: | ||
| 170 | - Grants (Innosuisse, Gebert Rüf, etc.) | ||
| 171 | - Donations from individuals and organizations | ||
| 172 | - Services (within nonprofit regulations) | ||
| 173 | |||
| 174 | 2. Transparency: | ||
| 175 | a) All funders above CHF 5,000 are published annually | ||
| 176 | b) Annual report with detailed financial overview | ||
| 177 | |||
| 178 | 3. Independence: | ||
| 179 | a) No single funder may finance more than 20% of annual budget | ||
| 180 | b) Donors have NO say in fact-checks whatsoever | ||
| 181 | c) Editorial Firewall must be in all agreements | ||
| 182 | |||
| 183 | 4. Exceptions: | ||
| 184 | Competitive public funding (Innosuisse, SNF, etc.) exempt | ||
| 185 | from 20% rule when secured through academic partner. | ||
| 186 | {{/code}} | ||
| 187 | |||
| 188 | ---- | ||
| 189 | |||
| 190 | == 5. Foundation Model (for CHF 1M+ donations) == | ||
| 191 | |||
| 192 | When someone wants to donate very large amounts: | ||
| 193 | |||
| 194 | **Option 1: Separate Foundation** | ||
| 195 | * Donor establishes own foundation with CHF 1M+ | ||
| 196 | * Foundation funds FactHarbor long-term at <20% annually | ||
| 197 | * FactHarbor remains independent | ||
| 198 | * Advantage: Foundation can fund other projects too | ||
| 199 | |||
| 200 | **Option 2: Endowment Model** | ||
| 201 | * CHF 2M+ as capital stock in FactHarbor Foundation | ||
| 202 | * Only returns (3-5%) flow to association → CHF 60-100K/year | ||
| 203 | * Advantage: Sustainable, never >20% of budget | ||
| 204 | |||
| 205 | **Option 3: Matching Fund** | ||
| 206 | * Donor matches other donations up to CHF 500K | ||
| 207 | * Example: For every CHF 1 donated, major donor gives CHF 1 | ||
| 208 | * Advantage: Encourages diversification automatically | ||
| 209 | |||
| 210 | ---- | ||
| 211 | |||
| 212 | == 6. Governance Safeguards == | ||
| 213 | |||
| 214 | === Independent Ethics Advisory Board === | ||
| 215 | |||
| 216 | **Establish:** | ||
| 217 | * 3-5 independent experts (journalism, academia, ethics) | ||
| 218 | * Task: Monitor independence | ||
| 219 | * Authority: Can reject donations if conflict of interest | ||
| 220 | |||
| 221 | === Donation Rejection Policy === | ||
| 222 | |||
| 223 | {{error}} | ||
| 224 | **Always Reject:** | ||
| 225 | * Political party → REJECT | ||
| 226 | * Media company → Only with strict firewall (critical!) | ||
| 227 | * Government direct grant (except competitive public funding) → Critically review | ||
| 228 | * Donor demands editorial control → REJECT | ||
| 229 | * Donor involved in active fact-checks → REJECT | ||
| 230 | {{/error}} | ||
| 231 | |||
| 232 | **Examples:** | ||
| 233 | |||
| 234 | ✗ Meta/Facebook donates CHF 500K → **REJECT** (fact-check subject!) | ||
| 235 | ✗ Political party donates CHF 100K → **REJECT** | ||
| 236 | ✅ Philanthropic foundation donates CHF 100K → **OK** (with transparency) | ||
| 237 | ✅ Tech company outside media CHF 50K → **OK** (e.g., SAP) | ||
| 238 | |||
| 239 | === Conflict Management Process === | ||
| 240 | |||
| 241 | **When large donation arrives:** | ||
| 242 | |||
| 243 | **Step 1: Due Diligence (Board)** | ||
| 244 | * Who is the donor? | ||
| 245 | * Any conflicts of interest? | ||
| 246 | * Is source of funds clear? | ||
| 247 | |||
| 248 | **Step 2: Ethics Board Review** | ||
| 249 | * Automatic for >CHF 50,000 | ||
| 250 | * Recommendation: Accept / Reject / Conditions | ||
| 251 | |||
| 252 | **Step 3: Transparency Protocol** | ||
| 253 | * Document donation | ||
| 254 | * Sign firewall agreement | ||
| 255 | * Prepare publication | ||
| 256 | |||
| 257 | **Step 4: Annual Review** | ||
| 258 | * Is diversification adequate? | ||
| 259 | * Does donor exceed 20% threshold? | ||
| 260 | * Exit strategy needed? | ||
| 261 | |||
| 262 | ---- | ||
| 263 | |||
| 264 | == 7. Implementation Steps == | ||
| 265 | |||
| 266 | === Before First Large Donation === | ||
| 267 | |||
| 268 | **Week 1-2: Amend Bylaws** | ||
| 269 | 1. Add § Transparency & Financing | ||
| 270 | 2. Codify 20% rule | ||
| 271 | 3. Define Editorial Firewall | ||
| 272 | 4. Get General Assembly approval | ||
| 273 | |||
| 274 | **Week 3-4: Prepare Documentation** | ||
| 275 | 1. Donation contract template (with firewall clause) | ||
| 276 | 2. Donor due diligence form | ||
| 277 | 3. Rejection letter template | ||
| 278 | |||
| 279 | **Month 2: Website** | ||
| 280 | 1. Create "Our Funding" page | ||
| 281 | 2. List all funders >CHF 5,000 | ||
| 282 | 3. Explain independence principles | ||
| 283 | |||
| 284 | === When Donation Arrives === | ||
| 285 | |||
| 286 | **Step 1: Initial Conversation** | ||
| 287 | Clarify: Motivation? Expectations? Accept 20% rule? Accept transparency? | ||
| 288 | |||
| 289 | **Step 2: Due Diligence** | ||
| 290 | Check: Conflict of interest? Legal source? Exceeds 20%? Political/media connections? | ||
| 291 | |||
| 292 | **Step 3: Ethics Board** (for >CHF 50K) | ||
| 293 | Consult 2-3 external advisors minimum | ||
| 294 | |||
| 295 | **Step 4: Decision** | ||
| 296 | |||
| 297 | **Accept** (if all criteria met): | ||
| 298 | * Sign contract with firewall | ||
| 299 | * Receive donation | ||
| 300 | * Publish on website | ||
| 301 | |||
| 302 | **Reduce:** | ||
| 303 | * Example: Donor wants CHF 200K, budget is CHF 500K | ||
| 304 | * Proposal: Accept CHF 100K (=20%) OR spread over 2 years | ||
| 305 | |||
| 306 | **Restructure** (Foundation Model): | ||
| 307 | * Example: Donor wants CHF 2M | ||
| 308 | * Proposal: Separate foundation gives CHF 60K/year | ||
| 309 | |||
| 310 | **Reject:** | ||
| 311 | * Irresolvable conflict of interest | ||
| 312 | * Donor wants editorial control | ||
| 313 | * Unclear source | ||
| 314 | * Political party/media company | ||
| 315 | |||
| 316 | ---- | ||
| 317 | |||
| 318 | == 8. Example Scenarios == | ||
| 319 | |||
| 320 | === Scenario 1: Tech Billionaire - CHF 500,000 === | ||
| 321 | |||
| 322 | **Context:** | ||
| 323 | * FactHarbor budget: CHF 400K | ||
| 324 | * Donor: Swiss tech entrepreneur | ||
| 325 | * Problem: CHF 500K = 125% of budget → TOO HIGH! | ||
| 326 | |||
| 327 | **Solution Options:** | ||
| 328 | |||
| 329 | {{success}} | ||
| 330 | **Option A: Reduce to CHF 80K (20%)** | ||
| 331 | "Thank you! We can accept maximum CHF 80K to maintain independence. Would you like to spread this over multiple years?" | ||
| 332 | |||
| 333 | **Option B: Foundation Model** | ||
| 334 | "Would you establish a foundation with CHF 500K that funds FactHarbor long-term (CHF 15-25K/year)?" | ||
| 335 | |||
| 336 | **Option C: Matching Fund** | ||
| 337 | "Could you match every donation up to CHF 250K? This helps us build diverse funding." | ||
| 338 | {{/success}} | ||
| 339 | |||
| 340 | {{error}} | ||
| 341 | **DO NOT:** Simply accept CHF 500K → Credibility destroyed! | ||
| 342 | {{/error}} | ||
| 343 | |||
| 344 | === Scenario 2: Pharma Company - CHF 100,000 === | ||
| 345 | |||
| 346 | **Context:** | ||
| 347 | * Donor: Novartis/Roche | ||
| 348 | * Problem: Pharma is frequent fact-check subject! | ||
| 349 | |||
| 350 | {{error}} | ||
| 351 | **REJECT!** | ||
| 352 | |||
| 353 | Rejection letter: | ||
| 354 | "Thank you for your interest. Unfortunately, we cannot accept as pharmaceutical companies are regularly subject to fact-checks. We must avoid any appearance of conflict of interest (IFCN Code of Principles). Our editorial independence is non-negotiable." | ||
| 355 | {{/error}} | ||
| 356 | |||
| 357 | === Scenario 3: Anonymous Donor - CHF 50,000 === | ||
| 358 | |||
| 359 | **Context:** | ||
| 360 | * Private person wants anonymity | ||
| 361 | * Problem: Contradicts IFCN transparency | ||
| 362 | |||
| 363 | **Solution:** | ||
| 364 | |||
| 365 | {{success}} | ||
| 366 | **Option A: Internal ID, Public Anonymous** | ||
| 367 | "We must know your identity internally (due diligence), but can list you publicly as 'Private individual, CHF 50K'." | ||
| 368 | |||
| 369 | **Option B: Fully Transparent** | ||
| 370 | "For IFCN compliance, we must publish all donors >CHF 5K. Can we list you as '[Name], CHF 50K'?" | ||
| 371 | |||
| 372 | **Option C: Below Threshold** | ||
| 373 | "Would you donate CHF 4,500? Then it's not published." | ||
| 374 | {{/success}} | ||
| 375 | |||
| 376 | {{error}} | ||
| 377 | **DO NOT:** Accept CHF 50K anonymously without internal verification → AML risk, IFCN violation | ||
| 378 | {{/error}} | ||
| 379 | |||
| 380 | === Scenario 4: Government - CHF 200,000 === | ||
| 381 | |||
| 382 | **Context:** | ||
| 383 | * Swiss federal office funding | ||
| 384 | * Problem: Government as funder is critical! | ||
| 385 | |||
| 386 | **Distinguish:** | ||
| 387 | |||
| 388 | {{success}} | ||
| 389 | **Public Funding Programs (OK)** | ||
| 390 | * Innosuisse: ✅ (competitive, scientifically reviewed) | ||
| 391 | * SNSF: ✅ (peer-reviewed) | ||
| 392 | * Structured programs with academic partner: ✅ | ||
| 393 | {{/success}} | ||
| 394 | |||
| 395 | {{error}} | ||
| 396 | **Direct Government Grants (CRITICAL)** | ||
| 397 | * Direct from minister/council: ❌ REJECT | ||
| 398 | * "Government funds fact-checker" → Toxic! | ||
| 399 | {{/error}} | ||
| 400 | |||
| 401 | ---- | ||
| 402 | |||
| 403 | == 9. Donation Contract Template == | ||
| 404 | |||
| 405 | {{code language="text"}} | ||
| 406 | DONATION AGREEMENT | ||
| 407 | |||
| 408 | FactHarbor Association ("Recipient") | ||
| 409 | [Donor Name] ("Donor") | ||
| 410 | |||
| 411 | § 1 - Donation | ||
| 412 | Amount: CHF [AMOUNT] | ||
| 413 | Purpose: General activities ☐ / Specific project ☐ | ||
| 414 | |||
| 415 | § 2 - Editorial Firewall (CRITICAL!) | ||
| 416 | The Donor acknowledges: | ||
| 417 | a) NO say in selection, execution, or evaluation of fact-checks | ||
| 418 | b) Recipient may fact-check ALL topics, including Donor | ||
| 419 | c) Donor will not influence editorial decisions | ||
| 420 | d) Violation → Recipient may return donation | ||
| 421 | |||
| 422 | § 3 - Transparency | ||
| 423 | a) Published on website (name/amount) if >CHF 5,000 | ||
| 424 | b) Mentioned in annual report | ||
| 425 | ☐ Full name ☐ "Private individual" (only if <CHF 50K) | ||
| 426 | |||
| 427 | § 4 - Tax Receipt | ||
| 428 | Recipient issues receipt. Recipient is nonprofit. | ||
| 429 | |||
| 430 | § 5 - No Quid Pro Quo | ||
| 431 | No expectation of services in return. | ||
| 432 | |||
| 433 | § 6 - Return Right | ||
| 434 | Recipient may return if: conflict discovered, violates 20% rule, | ||
| 435 | or other problems. | ||
| 436 | |||
| 437 | § 7 - Law: Swiss law, jurisdiction [LOCATION] | ||
| 438 | |||
| 439 | [DATE] | ||
| 440 | _____________ _____________ | ||
| 441 | Donor President FactHarbor | ||
| 442 | {{/code}} | ||
| 443 | |||
| 444 | ---- | ||
| 445 | |||
| 446 | == 10. Monitoring & Reporting == | ||
| 447 | |||
| 448 | === Quarterly Review === | ||
| 449 | |||
| 450 | **Every Quarter:** | ||
| 451 | * List all donations >CHF 5K | ||
| 452 | * Calculate percentage of each donor | ||
| 453 | * Check if anyone >20% | ||
| 454 | * Identify risk donors | ||
| 455 | * Update website | ||
| 456 | |||
| 457 | === Annual Report === | ||
| 458 | |||
| 459 | {{info}} | ||
| 460 | **Publish:** | ||
| 461 | |||
| 462 | **1. Financial Overview** | ||
| 463 | * Total revenue | ||
| 464 | * Breakdown: Grants / Major donations / Small donations / Services | ||
| 465 | |||
| 466 | **2. All Funders >CHF 5K** | ||
| 467 | * Name, Amount, Percentage of budget | ||
| 468 | |||
| 469 | **3. Independence Statement** | ||
| 470 | "FactHarbor is independent. No funder influences our fact-checks. We follow IFCN Code of Principles." | ||
| 471 | {{/info}} | ||
| 472 | |||
| 473 | === Website: "Our Funding" Page === | ||
| 474 | |||
| 475 | **Include:** | ||
| 476 | |||
| 477 | **Principles:** | ||
| 478 | * 20% Rule | ||
| 479 | * Editorial Firewall | ||
| 480 | * Transparency (publish >CHF 5K) | ||
| 481 | * Diversification (min. 5 sources) | ||
| 482 | |||
| 483 | **Current Funders (example):** | ||
| 484 | |||
| 485 | **Institutional Funding (65%)** | ||
| 486 | * Innosuisse Innovation: CHF 400,000 | ||
| 487 | * ETH Zurich Partnership: CHF 50,000 | ||
| 488 | |||
| 489 | **Foundations & Donations (25%)** | ||
| 490 | * Foundation A: CHF 80,000 | ||
| 491 | * Individual B: CHF 50,000 | ||
| 492 | * Company C: CHF 20,000 | ||
| 493 | |||
| 494 | **Small Donations (10%)** | ||
| 495 | * 234 donors: CHF 65,000 | ||
| 496 | |||
| 497 | **Total: CHF 665,000** | ||
| 498 | |||
| 499 | ---- | ||
| 500 | |||
| 501 | == 11. Long-Term Strategy == | ||
| 502 | |||
| 503 | **Year 1-2: Grants First** | ||
| 504 | * 70% Institutional grants | ||
| 505 | * 20% Foundations/Medium donations | ||
| 506 | * 10% Small donations | ||
| 507 | |||
| 508 | **Year 3-5: Diversify** | ||
| 509 | * 40% Institutional grants | ||
| 510 | * 30% Foundations/Partnerships | ||
| 511 | * 20% Earned income (services, licensing) | ||
| 512 | * 10% Small donations | ||
| 513 | |||
| 514 | **Year 5+: Sustainable** | ||
| 515 | * 30% Endowment returns | ||
| 516 | * 30% Institutional grants | ||
| 517 | * 20% Earned income | ||
| 518 | * 20% Many small donations | ||
| 519 | |||
| 520 | **Diversification Steps:** | ||
| 521 | 1. Combine multiple grants (Innosuisse, Gebert Rüf, Google, Prototype Fund) | ||
| 522 | 2. Corporate partnerships (tech companies, NOT media) - each <CHF 50K | ||
| 523 | 3. Small donor campaigns (1,000 × CHF 50 = CHF 50K) | ||
| 524 | 4. Earned income (workshops, API licensing, consulting) | ||
| 525 | |||
| 526 | ---- | ||
| 527 | |||
| 528 | == Summary & Quick Reference == | ||
| 529 | |||
| 530 | === ✅ DOs === | ||
| 531 | |||
| 532 | {{success}} | ||
| 533 | 1. Enforce 20% rule (exception: competitive public funding) | ||
| 534 | 2. Transparency: Publish all donors >CHF 5K | ||
| 535 | 3. Editorial Firewall: Always in writing | ||
| 536 | 4. Due Diligence: Verify donor identity | ||
| 537 | 5. Ethics Board: Consult for >CHF 50K | ||
| 538 | 6. Diversify: Minimum 5 sources | ||
| 539 | 7. Monitor: Quarterly review | ||
| 540 | {{/success}} | ||
| 541 | |||
| 542 | === ❌ DON'Ts === | ||
| 543 | |||
| 544 | {{error}} | ||
| 545 | 1. NEVER >20% from one donor | ||
| 546 | 2. NEVER political parties | ||
| 547 | 3. NEVER media companies | ||
| 548 | 4. NEVER accept editorial control | ||
| 549 | 5. NEVER without written firewall | ||
| 550 | 6. NEVER without due diligence | ||
| 551 | 7. NEVER hide donors (>CHF 5K) | ||
| 552 | {{/error}} | ||
| 553 | |||
| 554 | === Standard Response to Large Donors === | ||
| 555 | |||
| 556 | {{code language="text"}} | ||
| 557 | "Thank you for your interest in supporting FactHarbor! | ||
| 558 | |||
| 559 | For credibility as an independent fact-checking organization, | ||
| 560 | no single funder may finance more than 20% of our budget | ||
| 561 | (IFCN Code of Principles). | ||
| 562 | |||
| 563 | With our current budget of CHF [X], we can accept maximum | ||
| 564 | CHF [20%] as direct donation. | ||
| 565 | |||
| 566 | Alternative models: | ||
| 567 | - Distribution over multiple years | ||
| 568 | - Establishing supporting foundation | ||
| 569 | - Matching fund model | ||
| 570 | |||
| 571 | Your support means a great deal. We're confident we can find | ||
| 572 | a solution that matches your intent while preserving our | ||
| 573 | independence." | ||
| 574 | {{/code}} | ||
| 575 | |||
| 576 | === Checklist Before Accepting === | ||
| 577 | |||
| 578 | {{code language="text"}} | ||
| 579 | □ Amount <20% of annual budget? | ||
| 580 | □ NOT media company? | ||
| 581 | □ NOT political party? | ||
| 582 | □ NOT involved in active fact-checks? | ||
| 583 | □ Source clear and legal? | ||
| 584 | □ Contract with firewall ready? | ||
| 585 | □ Publication planned? | ||
| 586 | □ Ethics board consulted (>CHF 50K)? | ||
| 587 | □ Board approved? | ||
| 588 | □ Monitoring system ready? | ||
| 589 | |||
| 590 | All checked? → ACCEPT ✅ | ||
| 591 | {{/code}} | ||
| 592 | |||
| 593 | ---- | ||
| 594 | |||
| 595 | **Related Pages:** | ||
| 596 | * FactHarbor Bylaws | ||
| 597 | * Funding Sources | ||
| 598 | * IFCN Signatory Application | ||
| 599 | * Governance Structure | ||
| 600 | * Transparency Policy | ||
| 601 | |||
| 602 | **Document Owner:** Board of Directors | **Review:** Annual | ||
| 603 | |||
| 604 | ---- | ||
| 605 | |||
| 606 | **For Questions:** | ||
| 607 | * Legal counsel for contracts | ||
| 608 | * IFCN for best practices | ||
| 609 | * Other fact-checkers for experience |