Changes for page Requirements
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 20:34
To version 1.5
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/16 20:54
on 2025/12/16 20:54
Change comment:
Update document after refactoring.
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Parent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.WebHome1 +FactHarbor.Archive.FactHarbor V0\.9\.23 Lost Data.Specification.WebHome - Content
-
... ... @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ 9 9 **Who**: Anyone (no login required). 10 10 11 11 **Can**: 12 + 12 12 * Browse and search claims 13 13 * View scenarios, evidence, verdicts, and timelines 14 14 * Compare scenarios and explore assumptions ... ... @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ 18 18 * **Submit claims automatically** by providing text to analyze - new claims are added automatically unless equal claims already exist in the system 19 19 20 20 **Cannot**: 22 + 21 21 * Modify existing content 22 22 * Access draft content 23 23 * Participate in governance decisions ... ... @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ 29 29 **Who**: Registered and logged-in users (extends Reader capabilities). 30 30 31 31 **Can**: 34 + 32 32 * Everything a Reader can do 33 33 * Submit claims 34 34 * Submit evidence ... ... @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ 38 38 * Request human review of AI-generated content 39 39 40 40 **Cannot**: 44 + 41 41 * Publish or mark content as "reviewed" or "approved" 42 42 * Override expert or maintainer decisions 43 43 * Directly modify AKEL or quality gate configurations ... ... @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ 47 47 **Who**: Trusted community members, appointed by maintainers. 48 48 49 49 **Can**: 54 + 50 50 * Review contributions from Contributors and AKEL drafts 51 51 * Validate AI-generated content (Mode 2 → Mode 3 transition) 52 52 * Edit claims, scenarios, and evidence ... ... @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ 57 57 * Participate in audit sampling 58 58 59 59 **Cannot**: 65 + 60 60 * Approve Tier A content for "Human-Reviewed" status (requires Expert) 61 61 * Change governance rules 62 62 * Unilaterally change expert conclusions without process ... ... @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ 63 63 * Bypass quality gates 64 64 65 65 **Note on AI-Drafted Content**: 72 + 66 66 * Reviewers can validate AI-generated content (Mode 2) to promote it to "Human-Reviewed" (Mode 3) 67 67 * For Tier B and C, Reviewers have approval authority 68 68 * For Tier A, only Experts can grant "Human-Reviewed" status ... ... @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ 72 72 **Who**: Subject-matter specialists in specific domains (medicine, law, science, etc.). 73 73 74 74 **Can**: 82 + 75 75 * Everything a Reviewer can do 76 76 * **Final authority** on Tier A content "Human-Reviewed" status 77 77 * Validate complex or controversial claims in their domain ... ... @@ -81,11 +81,13 @@ 81 81 * Override AKEL suggestions in their domain (with documentation) 82 82 83 83 **Cannot**: 92 + 84 84 * Change platform governance policies 85 85 * Approve content outside their expertise domain 86 86 * Bypass technical quality gates (but can flag for adjustment) 87 87 88 88 **Specialization**: 98 + 89 89 * Experts are domain-specific (e.g., "Medical Expert", "Legal Expert", "Climate Science Expert") 90 90 * Cross-domain claims may require multiple expert reviews 91 91 ... ... @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ 94 94 **Who**: Reviewers or Experts assigned to sampling audit duties. 95 95 96 96 **Can**: 107 + 97 97 * Review sampled AI-generated content against quality standards 98 98 * Validate quality gate enforcement 99 99 * Identify patterns in AI errors or hallucinations ... ... @@ -102,16 +102,19 @@ 102 102 * Contribute to audit statistics and transparency reports 103 103 104 104 **Cannot**: 116 + 105 105 * Change audit sampling algorithms (maintainer responsibility) 106 106 * Bypass normal review workflows 107 107 * Audit content they personally created 108 108 109 109 **Selection**: 122 + 110 110 * Auditors selected based on domain expertise and review quality 111 111 * Rotation to prevent audit fatigue 112 112 * Stratified assignment (Tier A auditors need higher expertise) 113 113 114 114 **Audit Focus**: 128 + 115 115 * Tier A: Recommendation 30-50% sampling rate, expert auditors 116 116 * Tier B: Recommendation 10-20% sampling rate, reviewer/expert auditors 117 117 * Tier C: Recommendation 5-10% sampling rate, reviewer auditors ... ... @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ 121 121 **Who**: Maintainers or trusted long-term contributors. 122 122 123 123 **Can**: 138 + 124 124 * All Reviewer and Expert capabilities (cross-domain) 125 125 * Manage user accounts and permissions 126 126 * Handle disputes and conflicts ... ... @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ 131 131 * Oversee audit system performance 132 132 133 133 **Cannot**: 149 + 134 134 * Change core data model or architecture 135 135 * Override technical system constraints 136 136 * Make unilateral governance decisions without consensus ... ... @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ 140 140 **Who**: Core team members responsible for the platform. 141 141 142 142 **Can**: 159 + 143 143 * All Moderator capabilities 144 144 * Change data model, architecture, and technical systems 145 145 * Configure quality gates and AKEL parameters ... ... @@ -151,14 +151,15 @@ 151 151 * Grant and revoke roles 152 152 153 153 **Governance**: 171 + 154 154 * Maintainers operate under organizational governance rules 155 155 * Major policy changes require Governing Team approval 156 156 * Technical decisions made collaboratively 157 157 158 - 159 159 == 2. Content Publication States == 160 160 161 161 === 2.1 Mode 1: Draft === 179 + 162 162 * Not visible to public 163 163 * Visible to contributor and reviewers 164 164 * Can be edited by contributor or reviewers ... ... @@ -165,18 +165,20 @@ 165 165 * Default state for failed quality gates 166 166 167 167 === 2.2 Mode 2: AI-Generated (Published) === 186 + 168 168 * **Public** and visible to all users 169 169 * Clearly labeled as "AI-Generated, Awaiting Human Review" 170 170 * Passed all automated quality gates 171 171 * Risk tier displayed (A/B/C) 172 172 * Users can: 173 - ** Read and use content174 - ** Request human review175 - ** Flag for expert attention192 +** Read and use content 193 +** Request human review 194 +** Flag for expert attention 176 176 * Subject to sampling audits 177 177 * Can be promoted to Mode 3 by reviewer/expert validation 178 178 179 179 === 2.3 Mode 3: Human-Reviewed (Published) === 199 + 180 180 * **Public** and visible to all users 181 181 * Labeled as "Human-Reviewed" with reviewer/expert attribution 182 182 * Passed quality gates + human validation ... ... @@ -185,15 +185,16 @@ 185 185 * For Tier B/C, Reviewer approval sufficient 186 186 187 187 === 2.4 Rejected === 208 + 188 188 * Not visible to public 189 189 * Visible to contributor with rejection reason 190 190 * Can be resubmitted after addressing issues 191 191 * Rejection logged for transparency 192 192 193 - 194 194 == 3. Contribution Rules == 195 195 196 196 === 3.1 All Contributors Must: === 217 + 197 197 * Provide sources for claims 198 198 * Use clear, neutral language 199 199 * Avoid personal attacks or insults ... ... @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ 201 201 * Accept community feedback gracefully 202 202 203 203 === 3.2 AKEL (AI) Must: === 225 + 204 204 * Mark all outputs with `AuthorType = AI` 205 205 * Pass quality gates before Mode 2 publication 206 206 * Perform mandatory contradiction search ... ... @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ 210 210 * Submit to audit sampling 211 211 212 212 === 3.3 Reviewers Must: === 235 + 213 213 * Be impartial and evidence-based 214 214 * Document reasoning for decisions 215 215 * Escalate to experts when appropriate ... ... @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ 217 217 * Provide constructive feedback 218 218 219 219 === 3.4 Experts Must: === 243 + 220 220 * Stay within domain expertise 221 221 * Disclose conflicts of interest 222 222 * Document specialized terminology ... ... @@ -223,10 +223,10 @@ 223 223 * Provide reasoning for domain-specific decisions 224 224 * Participate in Tier A audits 225 225 226 - 227 227 == 4. Quality Standards == 228 228 229 229 === 4.1 Source Requirements === 253 + 230 230 * Primary sources preferred over secondary 231 231 * Publication date and author must be identifiable 232 232 * Sources must be accessible (not paywalled when possible) ... ... @@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ 234 234 * Echo chamber sources must be flagged 235 235 236 236 === 4.2 Claim Requirements === 261 + 237 237 * Falsifiable or evaluable 238 238 * Clear definitions of key terms 239 239 * Boundaries and scope stated ... ... @@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ 241 241 * Uncertainty acknowledged 242 242 243 243 === 4.3 Evidence Requirements === 269 + 244 244 * Relevant to the claim and scenario 245 245 * Reliability assessment provided 246 246 * Methodology described (for studies) ... ... @@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ 247 247 * Limitations noted 248 248 * Conflicting evidence acknowledged 249 249 250 - 251 251 == 5. Risk Tier Assignment == 252 252 253 253 **Automated (AKEL)**: Initial tier suggested based on domain, keywords, impact ... ... @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ 255 255 **Review**: Risk tiers periodically reviewed based on audit outcomes 256 256 257 257 **Tier A Indicators**: 283 + 258 258 * Medical diagnosis or treatment advice 259 259 * Legal interpretation or advice 260 260 * Election or voting information ... ... @@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ 263 263 * Potential for significant harm 264 264 265 265 **Tier B Indicators**: 292 + 266 266 * Complex scientific causality 267 267 * Contested policy domains 268 268 * Historical interpretation with political implications ... ... @@ -269,6 +269,7 @@ 269 269 * Significant economic impact claims 270 270 271 271 **Tier C Indicators**: 299 + 272 272 * Established historical facts 273 273 * Simple definitions 274 274 * Well-documented scientific consensus ... ... @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ 281 281 282 282 The following diagram visualizes the complete role hierarchy: 283 283 284 -{{include reference=" Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Diagrams.User Class Diagram.WebHome"}}312 +{{include reference="FactHarbor.Archive.FactHarbor V0\.9\.23 Lost Data.Specification.Diagrams.User Class Diagram.WebHome"}} 285 285 286 286 287 287 ... ... @@ -620,4 +620,5 @@ 620 620 * [[Automation>>Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Automation.WebHome]] 621 621 * [[Workflows>>Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]] 622 622 * [[Governance>>Test.FactHarborV09.Organisation.Governance]] 623 - 651 +{{/include}} 652 +{{/include}}