Changes for page Requirements

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Parent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.WebHome
	1	+Test.FactHarbor V0\.9\.23 Lost Data.Specification.WebHome

Content

...	...	@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
9	9	**Who**: Anyone (no login required).
10	10
11	11	**Can**:
	12	+
12	12	* Browse and search claims
13	13	* View scenarios, evidence, verdicts, and timelines
14	14	* Compare scenarios and explore assumptions
...	...	@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
18	18	* **Submit claims automatically** by providing text to analyze - new claims are added automatically unless equal claims already exist in the system
19	19
20	20	**Cannot**:
	22	+
21	21	* Modify existing content
22	22	* Access draft content
23	23	* Participate in governance decisions
...	...	@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
29	29	**Who**: Registered and logged-in users (extends Reader capabilities).
30	30
31	31	**Can**:
	34	+
32	32	* Everything a Reader can do
33	33	* Submit claims
34	34	* Submit evidence
...	...	@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
38	38	* Request human review of AI-generated content
39	39
40	40	**Cannot**:
	44	+
41	41	* Publish or mark content as "reviewed" or "approved"
42	42	* Override expert or maintainer decisions
43	43	* Directly modify AKEL or quality gate configurations
...	...	@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
47	47	**Who**: Trusted community members, appointed by maintainers.
48	48
49	49	**Can**:
	54	+
50	50	* Review contributions from Contributors and AKEL drafts
51	51	* Validate AI-generated content (Mode 2 → Mode 3 transition)
52	52	* Edit claims, scenarios, and evidence
...	...	@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
57	57	* Participate in audit sampling
58	58
59	59	**Cannot**:
	65	+
60	60	* Approve Tier A content for "Human-Reviewed" status (requires Expert)
61	61	* Change governance rules
62	62	* Unilaterally change expert conclusions without process
...	...	@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
63	63	* Bypass quality gates
64	64
65	65	**Note on AI-Drafted Content**:
	72	+
66	66	* Reviewers can validate AI-generated content (Mode 2) to promote it to "Human-Reviewed" (Mode 3)
67	67	* For Tier B and C, Reviewers have approval authority
68	68	* For Tier A, only Experts can grant "Human-Reviewed" status
...	...	@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
72	72	**Who**: Subject-matter specialists in specific domains (medicine, law, science, etc.).
73	73
74	74	**Can**:
	82	+
75	75	* Everything a Reviewer can do
76	76	* **Final authority** on Tier A content "Human-Reviewed" status
77	77	* Validate complex or controversial claims in their domain
...	...	@@ -81,11 +81,13 @@
81	81	* Override AKEL suggestions in their domain (with documentation)
82	82
83	83	**Cannot**:
	92	+
84	84	* Change platform governance policies
85	85	* Approve content outside their expertise domain
86	86	* Bypass technical quality gates (but can flag for adjustment)
87	87
88	88	**Specialization**:
	98	+
89	89	* Experts are domain-specific (e.g., "Medical Expert", "Legal Expert", "Climate Science Expert")
90	90	* Cross-domain claims may require multiple expert reviews
91	91
...	...	@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@
94	94	**Who**: Reviewers or Experts assigned to sampling audit duties.
95	95
96	96	**Can**:
	107	+
97	97	* Review sampled AI-generated content against quality standards
98	98	* Validate quality gate enforcement
99	99	* Identify patterns in AI errors or hallucinations
...	...	@@ -102,16 +102,19 @@
102	102	* Contribute to audit statistics and transparency reports
103	103
104	104	**Cannot**:
	116	+
105	105	* Change audit sampling algorithms (maintainer responsibility)
106	106	* Bypass normal review workflows
107	107	* Audit content they personally created
108	108
109	109	**Selection**:
	122	+
110	110	* Auditors selected based on domain expertise and review quality
111	111	* Rotation to prevent audit fatigue
112	112	* Stratified assignment (Tier A auditors need higher expertise)
113	113
114	114	**Audit Focus**:
	128	+
115	115	* Tier A: Recommendation 30-50% sampling rate, expert auditors
116	116	* Tier B: Recommendation 10-20% sampling rate, reviewer/expert auditors
117	117	* Tier C: Recommendation 5-10% sampling rate, reviewer auditors
...	...	@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@
121	121	**Who**: Maintainers or trusted long-term contributors.
122	122
123	123	**Can**:
	138	+
124	124	* All Reviewer and Expert capabilities (cross-domain)
125	125	* Manage user accounts and permissions
126	126	* Handle disputes and conflicts
...	...	@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@
131	131	* Oversee audit system performance
132	132
133	133	**Cannot**:
	149	+
134	134	* Change core data model or architecture
135	135	* Override technical system constraints
136	136	* Make unilateral governance decisions without consensus
...	...	@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@
140	140	**Who**: Core team members responsible for the platform.
141	141
142	142	**Can**:
	159	+
143	143	* All Moderator capabilities
144	144	* Change data model, architecture, and technical systems
145	145	* Configure quality gates and AKEL parameters
...	...	@@ -151,14 +151,15 @@
151	151	* Grant and revoke roles
152	152
153	153	**Governance**:
	171	+
154	154	* Maintainers operate under organizational governance rules
155	155	* Major policy changes require Governing Team approval
156	156	* Technical decisions made collaboratively
157	157
158		-
159	159	== 2. Content Publication States ==
160	160
161	161	=== 2.1 Mode 1: Draft ===
	179	+
162	162	* Not visible to public
163	163	* Visible to contributor and reviewers
164	164	* Can be edited by contributor or reviewers
...	...	@@ -165,18 +165,20 @@
165	165	* Default state for failed quality gates
166	166
167	167	=== 2.2 Mode 2: AI-Generated (Published) ===
	186	+
168	168	* **Public** and visible to all users
169	169	* Clearly labeled as "AI-Generated, Awaiting Human Review"
170	170	* Passed all automated quality gates
171	171	* Risk tier displayed (A/B/C)
172	172	* Users can:
173		- ** Read and use content
174		- ** Request human review
175		- ** Flag for expert attention
	192	+** Read and use content
	193	+** Request human review
	194	+** Flag for expert attention
176	176	* Subject to sampling audits
177	177	* Can be promoted to Mode 3 by reviewer/expert validation
178	178
179	179	=== 2.3 Mode 3: Human-Reviewed (Published) ===
	199	+
180	180	* **Public** and visible to all users
181	181	* Labeled as "Human-Reviewed" with reviewer/expert attribution
182	182	* Passed quality gates + human validation
...	...	@@ -185,15 +185,16 @@
185	185	* For Tier B/C, Reviewer approval sufficient
186	186
187	187	=== 2.4 Rejected ===
	208	+
188	188	* Not visible to public
189	189	* Visible to contributor with rejection reason
190	190	* Can be resubmitted after addressing issues
191	191	* Rejection logged for transparency
192	192
193		-
194	194	== 3. Contribution Rules ==
195	195
196	196	=== 3.1 All Contributors Must: ===
	217	+
197	197	* Provide sources for claims
198	198	* Use clear, neutral language
199	199	* Avoid personal attacks or insults
...	...	@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@
201	201	* Accept community feedback gracefully
202	202
203	203	=== 3.2 AKEL (AI) Must: ===
	225	+
204	204	* Mark all outputs with `AuthorType = AI`
205	205	* Pass quality gates before Mode 2 publication
206	206	* Perform mandatory contradiction search
...	...	@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@
210	210	* Submit to audit sampling
211	211
212	212	=== 3.3 Reviewers Must: ===
	235	+
213	213	* Be impartial and evidence-based
214	214	* Document reasoning for decisions
215	215	* Escalate to experts when appropriate
...	...	@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@
217	217	* Provide constructive feedback
218	218
219	219	=== 3.4 Experts Must: ===
	243	+
220	220	* Stay within domain expertise
221	221	* Disclose conflicts of interest
222	222	* Document specialized terminology
...	...	@@ -223,10 +223,10 @@
223	223	* Provide reasoning for domain-specific decisions
224	224	* Participate in Tier A audits
225	225
226		-
227	227	== 4. Quality Standards ==
228	228
229	229	=== 4.1 Source Requirements ===
	253	+
230	230	* Primary sources preferred over secondary
231	231	* Publication date and author must be identifiable
232	232	* Sources must be accessible (not paywalled when possible)
...	...	@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@
234	234	* Echo chamber sources must be flagged
235	235
236	236	=== 4.2 Claim Requirements ===
	261	+
237	237	* Falsifiable or evaluable
238	238	* Clear definitions of key terms
239	239	* Boundaries and scope stated
...	...	@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@
241	241	* Uncertainty acknowledged
242	242
243	243	=== 4.3 Evidence Requirements ===
	269	+
244	244	* Relevant to the claim and scenario
245	245	* Reliability assessment provided
246	246	* Methodology described (for studies)
...	...	@@ -247,7 +247,6 @@
247	247	* Limitations noted
248	248	* Conflicting evidence acknowledged
249	249
250		-
251	251	== 5. Risk Tier Assignment ==
252	252
253	253	**Automated (AKEL)**: Initial tier suggested based on domain, keywords, impact
...	...	@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@
255	255	**Review**: Risk tiers periodically reviewed based on audit outcomes
256	256
257	257	**Tier A Indicators**:
	283	+
258	258	* Medical diagnosis or treatment advice
259	259	* Legal interpretation or advice
260	260	* Election or voting information
...	...	@@ -263,6 +263,7 @@
263	263	* Potential for significant harm
264	264
265	265	**Tier B Indicators**:
	292	+
266	266	* Complex scientific causality
267	267	* Contested policy domains
268	268	* Historical interpretation with political implications
...	...	@@ -269,6 +269,7 @@
269	269	* Significant economic impact claims
270	270
271	271	**Tier C Indicators**:
	299	+
272	272	* Established historical facts
273	273	* Simple definitions
274	274	* Well-documented scientific consensus
...	...	@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@
281	281
282	282	The following diagram visualizes the complete role hierarchy:
283	283
284		-{{include reference="Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Diagrams.User Class Diagram.WebHome"}}
	312	+{{include reference="Test.FactHarbor V0\.9\.23 Lost Data.Specification.Diagrams.User Class Diagram.WebHome"}}
285	285
286	286
287	287
...	...	@@ -620,4 +620,4 @@
620	620	* [[Automation>>Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Automation.WebHome]]
621	621	* [[Workflows>>Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]]
622	622	* [[Governance>>Test.FactHarborV09.Organisation.Governance]]
623		-
	651	+{{/include}}