Changes for page Requirements

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 20:34

From 4.1 to 3.1 From 8.3 to 8.2

From version 8.2

edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/16 20:25

Change comment: Update document after refactoring.

To version 4.1

edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/12 19:37

Change comment: Imported from XAR

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Parent

@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
--FactHarbor.Archive.FactHarbor.Specification.WebHome
++FactHarbor.Specification.WebHome

Content

@@ -1,643 +1,91 @@
  = Requirements =
--This page defines **Roles**, **Responsibilities**, and **Rules** for contributors and users of FactHarbor.
++This chapter defines the requirements for FactHarbor.
--== Roles ==
++== User Roles ==
  === Reader ===
++* **Responsibilities**: Browse, search, view scenarios/verdicts, flag issues.
++* **Permissions**: Read-only access.
++* **Limitations**: Cannot change content.
--**Who**: Anyone (no login required).
--
--**Can**:
--* Browse and search claims
--* View scenarios, evidence, verdicts, and timelines
--* Compare scenarios and explore assumptions
--* Flag issues, errors, contradictions, or suspicious patterns
--* Use filters, search, and visualization tools
--* Create personal views (saved searches, bookmarks - local browser storage)
--* **Submit claims automatically** by providing text to analyze - new claims are added automatically unless equal claims already exist in the system
--
--**Cannot**:
--* Modify existing content
--* Access draft content
--* Participate in governance decisions
--
--**Note**: Readers can request human review of AI-generated content by flagging it.
--
  === Contributor ===
++* **Responsibilities**: Submit claims, draft scenarios, attach evidence.
++* **Permissions**: Create/Edit drafts, comment.
++* **Limitations**: Cannot publish without review.
--**Who**: Registered and logged-in users (extends Reader capabilities).
--
--**Can**:
--* Everything a Reader can do
--* Submit claims
--* Submit evidence
--* Provide feedback
--* Suggest scenarios
--* Flag content for review
--* Request human review of AI-generated content
--
--**Cannot**:
--* Publish or mark content as "reviewed" or "approved"
--* Override expert or maintainer decisions
--* Directly modify AKEL or quality gate configurations
--
  === Reviewer ===
++* **Responsibilities**: Validate contributions, check consistency.
++* **Permissions**: Change status to "Published" or "Rejected".
--**Who**: Trusted community members, appointed by maintainers.
++=== Expert ===
++* **Responsibilities**: Domain-specific judgment, refine assumptions.
++* **Permissions**: Attach expert annotations, propose re-evaluation.
--**Can**:
--* Review contributions from Contributors and AKEL drafts
--* Validate AI-generated content (Mode 2 → Mode 3 transition)
--* Edit claims, scenarios, and evidence
--* Add clarifications or warnings
--* Change content status: `draft` → `in review` → `published` / `rejected`
--* Approve or reject **Tier B and C** content for "Human-Reviewed" status
--* Flag content for expert review
--* Participate in audit sampling
--
--**Cannot**:
--* Approve Tier A content for "Human-Reviewed" status (requires Expert)
--* Change governance rules
--* Unilaterally change expert conclusions without process
--* Bypass quality gates
--
--**Note on AI-Drafted Content**:
--* Reviewers can validate AI-generated content (Mode 2) to promote it to "Human-Reviewed" (Mode 3)
--* For Tier B and C, Reviewers have approval authority
--* For Tier A, only Experts can grant "Human-Reviewed" status
--
--=== Expert (Domain-Specific) ===
--
--**Who**: Subject-matter specialists in specific domains (medicine, law, science, etc.).
--
--**Can**:
--* Everything a Reviewer can do
--* **Final authority** on Tier A content "Human-Reviewed" status
--* Validate complex or controversial claims in their domain
--* Define domain-specific quality standards
--* Set reliability thresholds for domain sources
--* Participate in risk tier assignment review
--* Override AKEL suggestions in their domain (with documentation)
--
--**Cannot**:
--* Change platform governance policies
--* Approve content outside their expertise domain
--* Bypass technical quality gates (but can flag for adjustment)
--
--**Specialization**:
--* Experts are domain-specific (e.g., "Medical Expert", "Legal Expert", "Climate Science Expert")
--* Cross-domain claims may require multiple expert reviews
--
--=== Auditor ===
--
--**Who**: Reviewers or Experts assigned to sampling audit duties.
--
--**Can**:
--* Review sampled AI-generated content against quality standards
--* Validate quality gate enforcement
--* Identify patterns in AI errors or hallucinations
--* Provide feedback for system improvement
--* Flag content for immediate review if errors found
--* Contribute to audit statistics and transparency reports
--
--**Cannot**:
--* Change audit sampling algorithms (maintainer responsibility)
--* Bypass normal review workflows
--* Audit content they personally created
--
--**Selection**:
--* Auditors selected based on domain expertise and review quality
--* Rotation to prevent audit fatigue
--* Stratified assignment (Tier A auditors need higher expertise)
--
--**Audit Focus**:
--* Tier A: Recommendation 30-50% sampling rate, expert auditors
--* Tier B: Recommendation 10-20% sampling rate, reviewer/expert auditors
--* Tier C: Recommendation 5-10% sampling rate, reviewer auditors
--
  === Moderator ===
++* **Responsibilities**: Handle abuse, spam, and manipulation.
++* **Permissions**: Hide content, ban users.
--**Who**: Maintainers or trusted long-term contributors.
++=== Maintainer / Administrator ===
++* **Responsibilities**: Node config, security, role assignment.
++* **Permissions**: System configuration.
--**Can**:
--* All Reviewer and Expert capabilities (cross-domain)
--* Manage user accounts and permissions
--* Handle disputes and conflicts
--* Enforce community guidelines
--* Suspend or ban abusive users
--* Finalize publication status for sensitive content
--* Review and adjust risk tier assignments
--* Oversee audit system performance
++=== AKEL (AI) ===
++* **Responsibilities**: Propose drafts, normalize, classify.
++* **Permissions**: Create machine-generated drafts.
++* **Limitations**: Never publishes without human approval.
--**Cannot**:
--* Change core data model or architecture
--* Override technical system constraints
--* Make unilateral governance decisions without consensus
++== Functional Requirements ==
--=== Maintainer ===
++=== Claim Intake & Normalization ===
++* **FR1**: Support text, URL, document input.
++* **FR2**: Normalize wording while preserving original.
++* **FR3**: Classify by domain/type.
++* **FR4**: Cluster similar claims.
--**Who**: Core team members responsible for the platform.
++=== Scenario System ===
++* **FR5**: Create scenarios linked to clusters.
++* **FR6**: Require Definitions, Assumptions, Boundaries.
++* **FR7**: Full versioning.
++* **FR8**: Side-by-side comparison.
--**Can**:
--* All Moderator capabilities
--* Change data model, architecture, and technical systems
--* Configure quality gates and AKEL parameters
--* Adjust audit sampling algorithms
--* Set and modify risk tier policies
--* Make platform-wide governance decisions
--* Access and modify backend systems
--* Deploy updates and fixes
--* Grant and revoke roles
++=== Evidence Management ===
++* **FR9**: Ingest external sources.
++* **FR10**: Assess reliability/quality.
++* **FR11**: Link evidence to multiple scenarios.
--**Governance**:
--* Maintainers operate under organizational governance rules
--* Major policy changes require Governing Team approval
--* Technical decisions made collaboratively
++=== Verdicts & Truth Landscape ===
++* **FR12**: Likelihood-based verdicts **per scenario**.
++* **FR13**: Aggregate into Truth Landscape.
++* **FR14**: Show evolution over time.
------
++=== Workflow & Audit ===
++* **FR15**: Draft -> Review -> Publish states.
++* **FR16**: Moderation tools.
++* **FR17**: Full audit trail.
--== Content Publication States ==
--
--=== Mode 1: Draft ===
--* Not visible to public
--* Visible to contributor and reviewers
--* Can be edited by contributor or reviewers
--* Default state for failed quality gates
--
--=== Mode 2: AI-Generated (Published) ===
--* **Public** and visible to all users
--* Clearly labeled as "AI-Generated, Awaiting Human Review"
--* Passed all automated quality gates
--* Risk tier displayed (A/B/C)
--* Users can:
--  ** Read and use content
--  ** Request human review
--  ** Flag for expert attention
--* Subject to sampling audits
--* Can be promoted to Mode 3 by reviewer/expert validation
--
--=== Mode 3: Human-Reviewed (Published) ===
--* **Public** and visible to all users
--* Labeled as "Human-Reviewed" with reviewer/expert attribution
--* Passed quality gates + human validation
--* Highest trust level
--* For Tier A, requires Expert approval
--* For Tier B/C, Reviewer approval sufficient
--
--=== Rejected ===
--* Not visible to public
--* Visible to contributor with rejection reason
--* Can be resubmitted after addressing issues
--* Rejection logged for transparency
--
------
--
--== Contribution Rules ==
--
--=== All Contributors Must: ===
--* Provide sources for claims
--* Use clear, neutral language
--* Avoid personal attacks or insults
--* Respect intellectual property (cite sources)
--* Accept community feedback gracefully
--
--=== AKEL (AI) Must: ===
--* Mark all outputs with `AuthorType = AI`
--* Pass quality gates before Mode 2 publication
--* Perform mandatory contradiction search
--* Disclose confidence levels and uncertainty
--* Provide traceable reasoning chains
--* Flag potential bubbles or echo chambers
--* Submit to audit sampling
--
--=== Reviewers Must: ===
--* Be impartial and evidence-based
--* Document reasoning for decisions
--* Escalate to experts when appropriate
--* Participate in audits when assigned
--* Provide constructive feedback
--
--=== Experts Must: ===
--* Stay within domain expertise
--* Disclose conflicts of interest
--* Document specialized terminology
--* Provide reasoning for domain-specific decisions
--* Participate in Tier A audits
--
------
--
--== Quality Standards ==
--
--=== Source Requirements ===
--* Primary sources preferred over secondary
--* Publication date and author must be identifiable
--* Sources must be accessible (not paywalled when possible)
--* Contradictory sources must be acknowledged
--* Echo chamber sources must be flagged
--
--=== Claim Requirements ===
--* Falsifiable or evaluable
--* Clear definitions of key terms
--* Boundaries and scope stated
--* Assumptions made explicit
--* Uncertainty acknowledged
--
--=== Evidence Requirements ===
--* Relevant to the claim and scenario
--* Reliability assessment provided
--* Methodology described (for studies)
--* Limitations noted
--* Conflicting evidence acknowledged
--
------
--
--== Risk Tier Assignment ==
--
--**Automated (AKEL)**: Initial tier suggested based on domain, keywords, impact
--**Human Validation**: Moderators or Experts can override AKEL suggestions
--**Review**: Risk tiers periodically reviewed based on audit outcomes
--
--**Tier A Indicators**:
--* Medical diagnosis or treatment advice
--* Legal interpretation or advice
--* Election or voting information
--* Safety or security sensitive
--* Major financial decisions
--* Potential for significant harm
--
--**Tier B Indicators**:
--* Complex scientific causality
--* Contested policy domains
--* Historical interpretation with political implications
--* Significant economic impact claims
--
--**Tier C Indicators**:
--* Established historical facts
--* Simple definitions
--* Well-documented scientific consensus
--* Basic reference information
--
------
--
--
------
--
--== User Role Hierarchy Diagram ==
--
--The following diagram visualizes the complete role hierarchy:
--
--{{include reference="Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Diagrams.User Class Diagram.WebHome"/}}
--
------
--
------
--
--== Role Hierarchy Diagrams ==
--
--=== User Class Diagram ===
--
--The following class diagram visualizes the complete user role hierarchy:
--
--{{include reference="Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Diagrams.User Class Diagram.WebHome"/}}
--
--=== Human User Roles ===
--
--This diagram shows the two-track progression for human users:
--
--{{include reference="Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Diagrams.Human User Roles.WebHome"/}}
--
--=== Technical and System Users ===
--
--This diagram shows system processes and their management:
--
--{{include reference="Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Diagrams.Technical and System Users.WebHome"/}}
--
--**Key Design Principles**:
--* **Two tracks from Contributor**: Content Track (Reviewer) and Technical Track (Maintainer)
--* **Technical Users**: System processes (AKEL, bots) managed by Maintainers
--* **Separation of concerns**: Editorial authority independent from technical authority
--
------
--
--
--
------
--
--= Functional Requirements =
--
--
--
--This page defines what the FactHarbor system must **do** to fulfill its mission.
--
--Requirements are structured as FR (Functional Requirement) items and organized by capability area.
--
-----
--
--== Claim Intake & Normalization ==
--
--=== FR1 – Claim Intake ===
--
--The system must support Claim creation from:
--* Free-text input (from any Reader)
--* URLs (web pages, articles, posts)
--* Uploaded documents and transcripts
--* Structured feeds (optional, e.g. from partner platforms)
--* Automated ingestion (federation input)
--* AKEL extraction from multi-claim texts
--
--**Automatic submission**: Any Reader can submit text, and new claims are added automatically unless identical claims already exist.
--
--=== FR2 – Claim Normalization ===
--
--* Convert diverse inputs into short, structured, declarative claims
--* Preserve original phrasing for reference
--* Avoid hidden reinterpretation; differences between original and normalized phrasing must be visible
--
--=== FR3 – Claim Classification ===
--
--* Classify claims by topic, domain, and type (e.g., quantitative, causal, normative)
--* Assign risk tier (A/B/C) based on domain and potential impact
--* Suggest which node / experts are relevant
--
--=== FR4 – Claim Clustering ===
--
--* Group similar claims into Claim Clusters
--* Allow manual correction of cluster membership
--* Provide explanation why two claims are considered "same cluster"
--
-----
--
--== Scenario System ==
--
--=== FR5 – Scenario Creation ===
--
--* Contributors, Reviewers, and Experts can create scenarios
--* AKEL can propose draft scenarios
--* Each scenario is tied to exactly one Claim Cluster
--
--=== FR6 – Required Scenario Fields ===
--
--Each scenario includes:
--* Definitions (key terms)
--* Assumptions (explicit, testable where possible)
--* Boundaries (time, geography, population, conditions)
--* Scope of evidence considered
--* Intended decision / context (optional)
--
--=== FR7 – Scenario Versioning ===
--
--* Every change to a scenario creates a new version
--* Previous versions remain accessible with timestamps and rationale
--* ParentVersionID links versions
--
--=== FR8 – Scenario Comparison ===
--
--* Users can compare scenarios side by side
--* Show differences in assumptions, definitions, and evidence sets
--
-----
--
--== Evidence Management ==
--
--=== FR9 – Evidence Ingestion ===
--
--* Attach external sources (articles, studies, datasets, reports, transcripts) to Scenarios
--* Allow multiple pieces of evidence per Scenario
--* Support large file uploads (with size limits)
--
--=== FR10 – Evidence Assessment ===
--
--For each piece of evidence:
--* Assign reliability / quality ratings
--* Capture who rated it and why
--* Indicate known limitations, biases, or conflicts of interest
--* Track evidence version history
--
--=== FR11 – Evidence Linking ===
--
--* Link one piece of evidence to multiple scenarios if relevant
--* Make dependencies explicit (e.g., "Scenario A uses subset of evidence used in Scenario B")
--* Use ScenarioEvidenceLink table with RelevanceScore
--
-----
--
--== Verdicts & Truth Landscape ==
--
--=== FR12 – Scenario Verdicts ===
--
--For each Scenario:
--* Provide a **probability- or likelihood-based verdict**
--* Capture uncertainty and reasoning
--* Distinguish between AKEL draft and human-approved verdict
--* Support Mode 1 (draft), Mode 2 (AI-generated), Mode 3 (human-reviewed)
--
--=== FR13 – Truth Landscape ===
--
--* Aggregate all scenario-specific verdicts into a "truth landscape" for a claim
--* Make disagreements visible rather than collapsing them into a single binary result
--* Show parallel scenarios and their respective verdicts
--
--=== FR14 – Time Evolution ===
--
--* Show how verdicts and evidence evolve over time
--* Allow users to see "as of date X, what did we know?"
--* Maintain complete version history for auditing
--
-----
--
--== Workflow, Moderation & Audit ==
--
--=== FR15 – Workflow States ===
--
--* Draft → In Review → Published / Rejected
--* Separate states for Claims, Scenarios, Evidence, and Verdicts
--* Support Mode 1/2/3 publication model
--
--=== FR16 – Moderation & Abuse Handling ===
--
--* Allow Moderators to hide content or lock edits for abuse or legal reasons
--* Keep internal audit trail even if public view is restricted
--* Support user reporting and flagging
--
--=== FR17 – Audit Trail ===
--
--* Every significant action (create, edit, publish, delete/hide) is logged with:
--  ** Who did it
--  ** When (timestamp)
--  ** What changed (diffs)
--  ** Why (justification text)
--
-----
--
--== Quality Gates & AI Review ==
--
--=== FR18 – Quality Gate Validation ===
--
--Before AI-generated content (Mode 2) publication, enforce:
--* Gate 1: Source Quality
--* Gate 2: Contradiction Search (MANDATORY)
--* Gate 3: Uncertainty Quantification
--* Gate 4: Structural Integrity
--
--=== FR19 – Audit Sampling ===
--
--* Implement stratified sampling by risk tier
--* Recommendation: 30-50% Tier A, 10-20% Tier B, 5-10% Tier C
--* Support audit workflow and feedback loop
--
--=== FR20 – Risk Tier Assignment ===
--
--* AKEL suggests tier based on domain, keywords, impact
--* Moderators and Experts can override
--* Risk tier affects publication workflow
--
-----
--
  == Federation Requirements ==
--=== FR21 – Node Autonomy ===
++* **FR18**: Node autonomy.
++* **FR19**: Configurable data sharing.
++* **FR20**: Sync with conflict handling.
++* **FR21**: Node discovery.
--* Each node can run independently (local policies, local users, local moderation)
--* Nodes decide which other nodes to federate with
--* Trust levels: Trusted / Neutral / Untrusted
--
--=== FR22 – Data Sharing Modes ===
--
--Nodes must be able to:
--* Share claims and summaries only
--* Share selected claims, scenarios, and verdicts
--* Share full underlying evidence metadata where allowed
--* Opt-out of sharing sensitive or restricted content
--
--=== FR23 – Synchronization & Conflict Handling ===
--
--* Changes from remote nodes must be mergeable or explicitly conflict-marked
--* Conflicting verdicts are allowed and visible; not forced into consensus
--* Support push/pull/subscription synchronization
--
--=== FR24 – Federation Discovery ===
--
--* Discover other nodes and their capabilities (public endpoints, policies)
--* Allow whitelisting / blacklisting of nodes
--* Global identifier format: `factharbor://node_url/type/local_id`
--
--=== FR25 – Cross-Node AI Knowledge Exchange ===
--
--* Share vector embeddings for clustering
--* Share canonical claim forms
--* Share scenario templates
--* Share contradiction alerts
--* NEVER share model weights
--* NEVER override local governance
--
-----
--
  == Non-Functional Requirements ==
--=== NFR1 – Transparency ===
++* **NFR1 - Transparency**: Visible reasoning and AKEL labeling.
++* **NFR2 - Security**: Role-based access, secure storage.
++* **NFR3 - Privacy**: Minimal data retention, compliance hooks.
++* **NFR4 - Performance**: < 2s response (POC).
++* **NFR5 - Scalability**: Support thousands of users (Release 1.0).
++* **NFR6 - Interoperability**: Open API.
++* **NFR7 - Observability**: Metrics and logs.
++* **NFR8 - Maintainability**: Modular architecture.
++* **NFR9 - Usability**: Progressive disclosure of complexity.
--* All assumptions, evidence, and reasoning behind verdicts must be visible
--* AKEL involvement must be clearly labeled
--* Users must be able to inspect the chain of reasoning and versions
--
--=== NFR2 – Security ===
--
--* Role-based access control
--* Transport-level security (HTTPS)
--* Secure storage of secrets (API keys, credentials)
--* Audit trails for sensitive actions
--
--=== NFR3 – Privacy & Compliance ===
--
--* Configurable data retention policies
--* Ability to redact or pseudonymize personal data when required
--* Compliance hooks for jurisdiction-specific rules (e.g. GDPR-like deletion requests)
--
--=== NFR4 – Performance ===
--
--* POC: typical interactions < 2 s
--* Release 1.0: < 300 ms for common read operations after caching
--* Degradation strategies under load
--
--=== NFR5 – Scalability ===
--
--* POC: 50 internal testers on one node
--* Beta 0: 100 external testers on one node
--* Release 1.0: **2000+ concurrent users** on a reasonably provisioned node
--
--Technical targets for Release 1.0:
--* Scalable monolith or early microservice architecture
--* Sharded vector database (for semantic search)
--* Optional IPFS or other decentralized storage for large artifacts
--* Horizontal scalability for read capacity
--
--=== NFR6 – Interoperability ===
--
--* Open, documented API
--* Modular AKEL that can be swapped or extended
--* Federation protocols that follow open standards where possible
--* Standard model for external integrations
--
--=== NFR7 – Observability & Operations ===
--
--* Metrics for performance, errors, and queue backlogs
--* Logs for key flows (claim intake, scenario changes, verdict updates, federation sync)
--* Health endpoints for monitoring
--
--=== NFR8 – Maintainability ===
--
--* Clear module boundaries (API, core services, AKEL, storage, federation)
--* Backward-compatible schema migration strategy where feasible
--* Configuration via files / environment variables, not hard-coded
--
--=== NFR9 – Usability ===
--
--* UI optimized for **exploring complexity**, not hiding it
--* Support for saved views, filters, and user-level preferences
--* Progressive disclosure: casual users see summaries, advanced users can dive deep
--
-----
--
  == Release Levels ==
--=== Proof of Concept (POC) ===
++* **POC (Fully Automated)**: Single node. **"Text to Truth Landscape"** workflow. Automated extraction, scenario generation, and verdict computation.
++* **Beta 0**: Few nodes, external testers. Expanded manual workflows and moderation.
++* **Release 1.0**: Scalable, Federated, High Automation. Multi-node federation.
--* Single node
--* Limited user set (50 internal testers)
--* Basic claim → scenario → evidence → verdict flow
--* Minimal federation (optional)
--* AI-generated publication (Mode 2) demonstration
--* Quality gates active
--
--=== Beta 0 ===
--
--* One or few nodes
--* External testers (100)
--* Expanded workflows and basic moderation
--* Initial federation experiments
--* Audit sampling implemented
--
--=== Release 1.0 ===
--
--* 2000+ concurrent users
--* Scalable architecture
--* Sharded vector DB
--* IPFS optional
--* High automation (AKEL assistance)
--* Multi-node federation with full sync protocol
--* Mature audit system
--
-----
--
--
--
--== Related Pages ==
--
--
--
--* [[AKEL (AI Knowledge Extraction Layer)>>FactHarbor.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]]
--* [[Automation>>FactHarbor.Specification.Automation.WebHome]]
--* [[Workflows>>FactHarbor.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]]
--* [[Governance>>FactHarbor.Organisation.Governance]]
--

Changes for page Requirements

Summary

Details

Applications

Navigation

Need help?