Wiki source code of Automation Level
Version 3.3 by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/16 20:26
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
1.1 | 1 | **Automation Level** |
| 2 | |||
| |
2.1 | 3 | == Evolution of Automation == |
| 4 | |||
| 5 | === Level 0 (POC) - Current === | ||
| 6 | **Philosophy**: Demonstrate AI-generated publication with quality oversight | ||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | **Key Feature**: POC explicitly publishes AI-generated content (Mode 2), demonstrating scalable publication model with quality gates. | ||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | **Automation**: | ||
| 11 | * Risk tier classification | ||
| 12 | * Quality gates enforcement | ||
| 13 | * Contradiction search | ||
| 14 | * AI-draft publication (Tier C, some Tier B) | ||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | **Human Role**: | ||
| 17 | * Tier A review | ||
| 18 | * Audit sampling (recommendations: 30-50% A, 10-20% B, 5-10% C) | ||
| 19 | * Quality standard refinement | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | === Level 1 (Beta 0) === | ||
| 22 | **Philosophy**: Scale AI publication while maintaining quality through audits | ||
| 23 | |||
| 24 | **Automation**: | ||
| 25 | * Expanded AI publication (most Tier B, all Tier C) | ||
| 26 | * Mature contradiction detection | ||
| 27 | * Cross-scenario analysis | ||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | **Human Role**: | ||
| 30 | * Tier A oversight | ||
| 31 | * Continued audits (rates adjust as confidence increases) | ||
| 32 | * Expert domain validation | ||
| 33 | |||
| 34 | === Level 2 (Release 1.0) === | ||
| 35 | **Philosophy**: Efficient AI publication with strategic human oversight | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | **Automation**: | ||
| 38 | * Comprehensive AI generation and publication | ||
| 39 | * Federated knowledge sharing | ||
| 40 | * Advanced anomaly detection | ||
| 41 | |||
| 42 | **Human Role**: | ||
| 43 | * Tier A final approval | ||
| 44 | * Strategic audits (high-value sampling) | ||
| 45 | * Policy and ethics decisions | ||
| 46 | |||
| 47 | === Level 3 (Future) === | ||
| 48 | **Philosophy**: Distributed intelligence with human governance | ||
| 49 | |||
| 50 | **Automation**: | ||
| 51 | * Cross-node contradiction detection | ||
| 52 | * Shared audit learnings | ||
| 53 | * Sophisticated bubble detection | ||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | **Human Role**: | ||
| 56 | * Governance | ||
| 57 | * Ethical oversight | ||
| 58 | * Tier A authority | ||
| 59 | * Conflict resolution | ||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | == Important Note == | ||
| 62 | |||
| 63 | All numeric values (sampling rates, percentages) are **recommendations**, not fixed rules. Actual rates determined by: | ||
| 64 | * Audit performance metrics | ||
| 65 | * Domain-specific requirements | ||
| 66 | * Community consensus | ||
| 67 | * Governing Team decisions | ||
| 68 | |||
| |
3.1 | 69 | {{include reference="Test.FactHarborV09.Specification.Diagrams.Automation Level_Mermaid.WebHome"}} |
| 70 |