Changes for page AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL)
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 20:33
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Parent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -FactHarbor.Specification.WebHome 1 +FactHarbor.Archive.FactHarbor V0\.9\.18.Specification.WebHome - Content
-
... ... @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ 50 50 == Inputs and Outputs == 51 51 52 52 === Inputs === 53 + 53 53 * User-submitted claims or evidence 54 54 * Uploaded documents 55 55 * URLs or citations ... ... @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ 57 57 * Embeddings (from local or federated peers) 58 58 59 59 === Outputs (publication mode varies by risk tier) === 61 + 60 60 * ClaimVersion (draft or AI-generated) 61 61 * ScenarioVersion (draft or AI-generated) 62 62 * EvidenceVersion (summary + metadata, draft or AI-generated) ... ... @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ 75 75 === Mode 1: Draft-Only (Never Public) === 76 76 77 77 **Used for:** 80 + 78 78 * Failed quality gate checks 79 79 * Sensitive topics flagged for expert review 80 80 * Unclear scope or missing critical sources ... ... @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ 85 85 === Mode 2: Published as AI-Generated (No Prior Human Review) === 86 86 87 87 **Requirements:** 91 + 88 88 * All automated quality gates passed (see below) 89 89 * Risk tier permits AI-draft publication (Tier B or C) 90 90 * Contradiction search completed successfully ... ... @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ 98 98 ``` 99 99 100 100 **User actions:** 105 + 101 101 * Browse and read content 102 102 * Request human review (escalates to review queue) 103 103 * Flag for expert attention ... ... @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ 105 105 === Mode 3: Published as Human-Reviewed === 106 106 107 107 **Requirements:** 113 + 108 108 * Human reviewer or domain expert validated 109 109 * All quality gates passed 110 110 * Visible "Human-Reviewed" mark with reviewer role and timestamp ... ... @@ -127,12 +127,13 @@ 127 127 **Domains:** Medical, legal, elections, safety/security, major reputational harm 128 128 129 129 **Publication policy:** 136 + 130 130 * Human review REQUIRED before "Human-Reviewed" status 131 131 * AI-generated content MAY be published but: 132 - ** Clearly flagged as AI-draft with prominent disclaimer133 - ** May have limited visibility134 - ** Auto-escalated to expert review queue135 - ** User warnings displayed139 +** Clearly flagged as AI-draft with prominent disclaimer 140 +** May have limited visibility 141 +** Auto-escalated to expert review queue 142 +** User warnings displayed 136 136 137 137 **Audit rate:** Recommendation: 30-50% of published AI-drafts sampled in first 6 months 138 138 ... ... @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ 141 141 **Domains:** Contested public policy, complex science, causality claims, significant financial impact 142 142 143 143 **Publication policy:** 151 + 144 144 * AI-draft CAN publish immediately with clear labeling 145 145 * Sampling audits conducted (see Audit System below) 146 146 * High-engagement items auto-escalated to expert review ... ... @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ 153 153 **Domains:** Definitions, simple factual lookups with strong primary sources, historical facts, established scientific consensus 154 154 155 155 **Publication policy:** 164 + 156 156 * AI-draft default publication mode 157 157 * Sampling audits sufficient 158 158 * Community flagging available ... ... @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ 167 167 All AI-generated content must pass these automated checks before Mode 2 publication: 168 168 169 169 === Gate 1: Source Quality === 179 + 170 170 * Primary sources identified and accessible 171 171 * Source reliability scored against whitelist 172 172 * Citation completeness verified ... ... @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ 183 183 * **Bubble detection** – Conspiracy theories, echo chambers, ideologically isolated sources 184 184 185 185 **Search coverage requirements:** 196 + 186 186 * Academic literature (BOTH supporting AND opposing views) 187 187 * Reputable media across diverse political/ideological perspectives 188 188 * Official contradictions (retractions, corrections, updates, amendments) ... ... @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ 190 190 * Cross-cultural and international perspectives 191 191 192 192 **Search must actively avoid algorithmic bubbles:** 204 + 193 193 * Deliberately seek opposing viewpoints 194 194 * Check for echo chamber patterns in source clusters 195 195 * Identify tribal or ideological source clustering ... ... @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ 197 197 * Verify diversity of perspectives represented 198 198 199 199 **Outcomes:** 212 + 200 200 * **Strong counter-evidence found** → Auto-escalate to Tier B or draft-only mode 201 201 * **Significant uncertainty detected** → Require uncertainty disclosure in verdict 202 202 * **Bubble indicators present** → Flag for expert review and human validation ... ... @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ 203 203 * **Limited perspective diversity** → Expand search or flag for human review 204 204 205 205 === Gate 3: Uncertainty Quantification === 219 + 206 206 * Confidence scores calculated for all claims and verdicts 207 207 * Limitations explicitly stated 208 208 * Data gaps identified and disclosed ... ... @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ 210 210 * Alternative scenarios considered 211 211 212 212 === Gate 4: Structural Integrity === 227 + 213 213 * No hallucinations detected (fact-checking against sources) 214 214 * Logic chain valid and traceable 215 215 * References accessible and verifiable ... ... @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ 217 217 * Premises clearly stated 218 218 219 219 **If any gate fails:** 235 + 220 220 * Content remains in draft-only mode 221 221 * Failure reason logged 222 222 * Human review required before publication ... ... @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ 231 231 === Sampling Strategy === 232 232 233 233 Audits prioritize: 250 + 234 234 * **Risk tier** (higher tiers get more frequent audits) 235 235 * **AI confidence score** (low confidence → higher sampling rate) 236 236 * **Traffic and engagement** (high-visibility content audited more) ... ... @@ -242,11 +242,12 @@ 242 242 1. System selects content for audit based on sampling strategy 243 243 2. Human auditor reviews AI-generated content against quality standards 244 244 3. Auditor validates or corrects: 245 - * Claim extraction accuracy 246 - * Scenario appropriateness 247 - * Evidence relevance and interpretation 248 - * Verdict reasoning 249 - * Contradiction search completeness 262 + 263 +* Claim extraction accuracy 264 +* Scenario appropriateness 265 +* Evidence relevance and interpretation 266 +* Verdict reasoning 267 +* Contradiction search completeness 250 250 4. Audit outcome recorded (pass/fail + detailed feedback) 251 251 5. Failed audits trigger immediate content review 252 252 6. Audit results feed back into system improvement ... ... @@ -254,6 +254,7 @@ 254 254 === Feedback Loop (Continuous Improvement) === 255 255 256 256 Audit outcomes systematically improve: 275 + 257 257 * **Query templates** – Refined based on missed evidence patterns 258 258 * **Retrieval source weights** – Adjusted for accuracy and reliability 259 259 * **Contradiction detection heuristics** – Enhanced to catch missed counter-evidence ... ... @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ 272 272 273 273 == Architecture Overview == 274 274 275 -{{include reference="FactHarbor.Specification.Diagrams.AKEL Architecture.WebHome"/}} 294 +{{include reference="FactHarbor.Archive.FactHarbor V0\.9\.23 Lost Data.Specification.Diagrams.AKEL Architecture.WebHome"/}} 276 276 277 277 ---- 278 278 ... ... @@ -327,8 +327,7 @@ 327 327 328 328 == Related Pages == 329 329 330 -* [[Automation>>FactHarbor.Specification.Automation.WebHome]] 331 -* [[Requirements (Roles)>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] 332 -* [[Workflows>>FactHarbor.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]] 349 +* [[Automation>>FactHarbor.Specification V0\.9\.18.Automation.WebHome]] 350 +* [[Requirements (Roles)>>FactHarbor.Specification V0\.9\.18.Requirements.WebHome]] 351 +* [[Workflows>>FactHarbor.Specification V0\.9\.18.Workflows.WebHome]] 333 333 * [[Governance>>FactHarbor.Organisation.Governance]] 334 -