Changes for page Specification
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 20:33
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 1 -{{warning title="Version 0.8 ae(Draft)"}}1 +{{warning title="Version 0.8x (Delta Update)"}} 2 2 This document describes the **Specification** of FactHarbor. It is a working draft. 3 3 {{/warning}} 4 4 ... ... @@ -6,39 +6,17 @@ 6 6 7 7 This section defines the technical architecture, data models, and functional requirements of FactHarbor. 8 8 9 -== Mission == 10 - 11 -**FactHarbor brings clarity and transparency to a world full of unclear, controversial, and misleading information by shedding light on the context, assumptions, and evidence behind claims — empowering people to better understand and judge wisely.** 12 - 13 -== Purpose == 14 - 15 -Modern society faces a deep informational crisis: 16 -* Misinformation spreads faster than corrections. 17 -* High-quality evidence is buried under noise. 18 -* Meanings shift depending on context — but this is rarely made explicit. 19 -* Users lack tools to understand *why* information conflicts. 20 -* Claims are evaluated without clearly defined assumptions. 21 - 22 -FactHarbor introduces structure, transparency, and comparative reasoning. It provides: 23 -* Multiple valid scenarios for ambiguous claims. 24 -* Transparent assumptions, definitions, and boundaries. 25 -* Full evidence provenance. 26 -* Likelihood-based verdicts (one per scenario). 27 -* Versioning and temporal change tracking. 28 -* Hybrid AI–human collaboration. 29 - 30 30 == Core Concepts == 31 31 32 -* **Claim**: A statement needing structured interpretation. 33 -* **Scenario**: Definitions, assumptions, boundaries, and context. 34 -* **Evidence**: Information supporting or contradicting a scenario. 35 -* **Verdict**: Likelihood estimate based on weighted evidence **for a specific scenario**. 36 -* **Summary View**: User-facing overview. 37 -* **AKEL**: AI subsystem for drafting and assistance (human supervised). 38 -* **Federation**: Decentralized nodes hosting datasets. 39 -* **Truth Landscape**: The aggregation of multiple scenario-dependent verdicts showing where a claim is plausible. 40 -* **Time Evolution**: Versioning of all entities allowing historical views. 11 +FactHarbor structures reasoning about claims into transparent, inspectable steps: 41 41 13 +* **Claims and Claim Clusters** – people submit real-world statements; similar phrasings are grouped. 14 +* **Scenarios** – each claim is evaluated under clearly defined contexts (assumptions, definitions, boundaries). 15 +* **Evidence** – sources and data are collected and linked to specific scenarios. 16 +* **Verdicts** – **There is no single verdict for a claim.** Instead, there is a distinct verdict for **each scenario** against which the claim is evaluated. 17 +* **Truth Landscape** – the aggregation of these multiple scenario-dependent verdicts shows where (under which assumptions) a claim is plausible and where it is not. 18 +* **Time Evolution** – all important entities (claims, scenarios, evidence links, verdicts) are versioned. 19 + 42 42 == Functional Lifecycle == 43 43 44 44 The system follows a six-step lifecycle: ... ... @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ 46 46 1. **Claim submission**: Automatic extraction and normalisation; Cluster detection. 47 47 2. **Scenario building**: Clarifying definitions and assumptions; AI proposals with human approval. 48 48 3. **Evidence handling**: AI-assisted retrieval; Human assessment of reliability; Explicit scenario linking. 49 -4. **Verdict creation**: AI-generated draft verdicts; Human refinement; Reasoning explanations. 27 +4. **Verdict creation**: AI-generated draft verdicts **per scenario**; Human refinement; Reasoning explanations. 50 50 5. **Public presentation**: Concise summaries; Truth Landscape comparison; Deep dives. 51 51 6. **Time evolution**: Versioning of all entities; Re-evaluation triggers when evidence changes. 52 52