Changes for page Roles & Publication Modes

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2026/02/08 08:32

From 1.3 to 1.2

From version 1.2

edited by Robert Schaub
on 2026/02/08 08:30

Change comment: Renamed back-links.

To version 1.1

edited by Robert Schaub
on 2026/01/20 21:40

Change comment: Imported from XAR

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
  **Who**: Community members who suggest system improvements
  **Responsibilities:**
--
  * Participate in sampling audits (analyze patterns, not individual outputs)
  * Suggest algorithm/prompt improvements based on findings
  * Document systematic issues observed
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
  * Contribute to system improvement discussions
  **Can:**
--
  * Edit published content (changes apply immediately, Wikipedia-style)
  * Flag quality issues (for sampling audit)
  * Earn reputation through contributions
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
  * Participate in RFC (Request for Comments) processes
  **Cannot:**
--
  * Approve content before publication
  * Override quality gates
  * Act as gatekeepers
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@
  **Who**: Contributors with proven track record and domain expertise
  **Responsibilities:**
--
  * Same as Contributors, plus:
  * Review complex algorithm changes
  * Provide domain expertise on contested claims
@@ -47,7 +47,6 @@
  * Mentor new contributors
  **Can:**
--
  * Everything Contributors can do, plus:
  * Participate in higher-level system design decisions
  * Review RFC proposals
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@
  * Access more detailed system metrics
  **Cannot:**
--
  * Approve content before publication
  * Override quality gates
  * Act as gatekeepers
@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@
  **Who**: Team members focused on community health and abuse prevention
  **Responsibilities:**
--
  * Handle abuse, spam, and harassment
  * Enforce community guidelines
  * Respond to user reports
@@ -73,7 +73,6 @@
  * Manage bans and appeals
  **Can:**
--
  * Hide abusive content
  * Ban users for policy violations
  * Review appeals
@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@
  * Escalate serious issues to Governing Team
  **Cannot:**
--
  * Approve content for publication
  * Review content quality before publication
  * Override quality gates for content
@@ -99,7 +99,6 @@
  **Not a permanent role**: Contacted externally when needed for contested claims in their domain
  **When used:**
--
  * Medical claims with life/safety implications
  * Legal interpretations with significant impact
  * Scientific claims with high controversy
@@ -106,7 +106,6 @@
  * Technical claims requiring specialized knowledge
  **Process:**
--
  * Moderator identifies need for expert input
  * Contact expert externally (don't require them to be users)
  * Trusted Contributor provides written opinion with sources
@@ -128,7 +128,6 @@
  **Status**: Not visible to public
  **When Used:**
--
  * Quality gates failed
  * Confidence below threshold
  * Structural integrity issues
@@ -135,7 +135,6 @@
  * Insufficient evidence
  **What Happens:**
--
  * Content remains private
  * System logs failure reasons
  * Prompts/algorithms improved based on patterns
@@ -148,7 +148,6 @@
  **Status**: Published and visible to all users
  **When Used:**
--
  * Quality gates passed
  * Confidence ≥ threshold
  * Meets structural requirements
@@ -155,7 +155,6 @@
  * Sufficient evidence found
  **Includes:**
--
  * Confidence score displayed (0-100%)
  * Risk tier badge (A/B/C)
  * Quality indicators
@@ -163,13 +163,11 @@
  * Sampling audit status
  **Labels by Risk Tier:**
--
  * **Tier A (High Risk):** "⚠️ AI-Generated - High Impact Topic - Seek Professional Advice"
  * **Tier B (Medium Risk):** "🤖 AI-Generated - May Contain Errors"
  * **Tier C (Low Risk):** "🤖 AI-Generated"
  **User Contributions:**
--
  * User edits apply immediately (Wikipedia model)
  * All changes logged and versioned
  * May be selected for sampling audit
@@ -180,7 +180,6 @@
  **V0.9.50 Decision:** No centralized approval workflow.
  **Rationale:**
--
  * Defeats automation purpose
  * Creates bottleneck
  * Inconsistent quality
@@ -187,7 +187,6 @@
  * Not scalable
  **What Replaced It:**
--
  * Better quality gates
  * Sampling audits for system improvement
  * Transparent confidence scoring
@@ -200,13 +200,11 @@
  **Status**: Visible to all users
  **Includes:**
--
  * AI-generated analyses (default state after passing gates)
  * User-contributed content
  * Edited/improved content
  **Quality Indicators** (displayed with content):
--
  * **Confidence Score**: 0-100% (AI's confidence in analysis)
  * **Source Quality Score**: 0-100% (based on source track record)
  * **Controversy Flag**: If high dispute/edit activity
@@ -216,7 +216,6 @@
  * **Review Status**: AI-generated / Enhanced by contributors
  **Automatic Warnings:**
--
  * Confidence < 60%: "Low confidence - use caution"
  * Source quality < 40%: "Sources may be unreliable"
  * High controversy: "Disputed - multiple interpretations exist"
@@ -229,7 +229,6 @@
  **Status**: Not visible to regular users (only to moderators)
  **Reasons:**
--
  * Spam or advertising
  * Personal attacks or harassment
  * Illegal content
@@ -238,7 +238,6 @@
  * Abuse or harmful content
  **Process:**
--
  * Automated detection flags for moderator review
  * Moderator confirms and hides
  * Original author notified with reason
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@
  == 6. Related Pages ==
--* [[AKEL>>Archive.FactHarbor 2026\.02\.08.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]] - AI system
++* [[AKEL>>FactHarbor.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]] - AI system
  * [[Workflows>>FactHarbor.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]] - Process workflows
  * [[Architecture>>FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] - System architecture
  * [[Decision Processes>>FactHarbor.Organisation.Decision-Processes.WebHome]] - Governance
@@ -297,3 +297,4 @@
  - Explicit "cannot" lists for each role
  - Publication mode details
  - Content state specifications
++

Changes for page Roles & Publication Modes

Summary

Details

Applications

Navigation

Need help?