Changes for page Workflows
Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2026/02/08 08:26
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,12 +1,47 @@ 1 1 = Workflows = 2 + 2 2 FactHarbor workflows are **simple, automated, focused on continuous improvement**. 4 + 3 3 == 1. Core Principles == 6 + 4 4 * **Automated by default**: AI processes everything 5 5 * **Publish immediately**: No centralized approval (removed in V0.9.50) 6 6 * **Quality through monitoring**: Not gatekeeping 7 7 * **Fix systems, not data**: Errors trigger improvements 8 8 * **Human-in-loop**: Only for edge cases and abuse 12 + 9 9 == 2. Claim Submission Workflow == 14 + 15 +=== 2.1 Claim Extraction === 16 + 17 +When users submit content (text, articles, web pages), FactHarbor first extracts individual verifiable claims: 18 + 19 +**Input Types:** 20 + 21 +* Single claim: "The Earth is flat" 22 +* Text with multiple claims: "Climate change is accelerating. Sea levels rose 3mm in 2023. Arctic ice decreased 13% annually." 23 +* URLs: Web pages analyzed for factual claims 24 + 25 +**Extraction Process:** 26 + 27 +* LLM analyzes submitted content 28 +* Identifies distinct, verifiable factual claims 29 +* Separates claims from opinions, questions, or commentary 30 +* Each claim becomes independent for processing 31 + 32 +**Output:** 33 + 34 +* List of claims with context 35 +* Each claim assigned unique ID 36 +* Original context preserved for reference 37 + 38 +This extraction ensures: 39 + 40 +* Each claim receives focused analysis 41 +* Multiple claims in one submission are all processed 42 +* Claims are properly isolated for independent verification 43 +* Context is preserved for accurate interpretation 44 + 10 10 ``` 11 11 User submits → Duplicate detection → Categorization → Processing queue → User receives ID 12 12 ``` ... ... @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ 18 18 {{include reference="FactHarbor.Specification.Diagrams.Claim and Scenario Workflow.WebHome"/}} 19 19 20 20 == 3. Automated Analysis Workflow == 56 + 21 21 ``` 22 22 Claim from queue 23 23 ↓ ... ... @@ -37,34 +37,45 @@ 37 37 ``` 38 38 **Timeline**: 10-30 seconds 39 39 **90%+ published automatically** 76 + 40 40 == 3.5 Evidence and Verdict Workflow == 78 + 41 41 {{include reference="FactHarbor.Specification.Diagrams.Evidence and Verdict Workflow.WebHome"/}} 80 + 42 42 == 4. Publication Workflow == 82 + 43 43 **Standard (90%+)**: Pass quality gates → Publish immediately with confidence scores 44 44 **High Risk (<10%)**: Risk > 80% → Moderator review 45 45 **Low Quality**: Confidence < 40% → Improvement queue → Re-process 86 + 46 46 == 5. User Contribution Workflow == 88 + 47 47 ``` 48 48 Contributor edits → System validates → Applied immediately → Logged → Reputation earned 49 49 ``` 50 50 **No approval required** (Wikipedia model) 51 51 **New contributors** (<50 reputation): Limited to minor edits 94 + 52 52 == 5.5 Quality and Audit Workflow == 53 53 54 54 {{include reference="FactHarbor.Specification.Diagrams.Quality and Audit Workflow.WebHome"/}} 55 55 56 - 57 57 == 6. Flagging Workflow == 100 + 58 58 ``` 59 59 User flags issue → Categorize (abuse/quality) → Automated or manual resolution 60 60 ``` 61 61 **Quality issues**: Add to improvement queue → System fix → Auto re-process 62 62 **Abuse**: Moderator review → Action taken 106 + 63 63 == 7. Moderation Workflow == 108 + 64 64 **Automated pre-moderation**: 95% published automatically 65 65 **Moderator queue**: Only high-risk or flagged content 66 66 **Appeal process**: Different moderator → Governing Team if needed 112 + 67 67 == 8. System Improvement Workflow == 114 + 68 68 **Weekly cycle**: 69 69 ``` 70 70 Monday: Review error patterns ... ... @@ -81,18 +81,26 @@ 81 81 ``` 82 82 New algorithm → Split traffic (90% control, 10% test) → Run 1 week → Compare metrics → Deploy if better 83 83 ``` 131 + 84 84 == 9. Quality Monitoring Workflow == 133 + 85 85 **Continuous**: Every hour calculate metrics, detect anomalies 86 86 **Daily**: Update source track records, aggregate error patterns 87 87 **Weekly**: System improvement cycle, performance review 137 + 88 88 == 10. Source Track Record Workflow == 139 + 89 89 **Initial score**: New source starts at 50 (neutral) 90 90 **Daily updates**: Calculate accuracy, correction frequency, update score 91 91 **Continuous**: All claims using source recalculated when score changes 143 + 92 92 == 11. Re-Processing Workflow == 145 + 93 93 **Triggers**: System improvement deployed, source score updated, new evidence, error fixed 94 94 **Process**: Identify affected claims → Re-run AKEL → Compare → Update if better → Log change 148 + 95 95 == 12. Related Pages == 150 + 96 96 * [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] 97 -* [[Architecture>>FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] 152 +* [[Architecture>>Archive.FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] 98 98 * [[Data Model>>FactHarbor.Specification.Data Model.WebHome]]