Skip to Content

Changes for page POC Specification

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2026/02/08 08:23
From version 2.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/24 21:53
Change comment: Imported from XAR
To version 1.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/19 16:13
Change comment: Imported from XAR

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -POC Specification
1 +POC (Proof of Concept)
Content
... ... @@ -1,61 +1,100 @@
1 -= POC Specification =
1 += POC (Proof of Concept) =
2 2  
3 -**This section contains detailed specifications for FactHarbor POC phases.**
3 +**Status:** ✅ Planning Complete - Ready for Development
4 +**Version:** 1.0
5 +**Goal:** Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention
4 4  
5 -**Core Philosophy:** Prove the AKEL automation works before building production features. Each POC phase validates critical technical capabilities.
7 +---
6 6  
7 -{{warning}}
8 -**Critical Innovation in POC1 Context-Aware Analysis:**
9 +== Overview ==
9 9  
10 -POC1 tests whether AI can understand that an article's overall credibility is not simply the average of its individual claim verdicts. An article with mostly accurate facts can still be misleading if it draws unsupported conclusions.
11 +POC1 tests the core FactHarbor capability: Can AI automatically extract factual claims from articles and evaluate them with reasonable verdicts?
11 11  
12 -See [[Article Verdict Problem>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Article-Verdict-Problem]] for full discussion.
13 -{{/warning}}
13 +**What POC Tests:**
14 +* AI claim extraction from article text
15 +* AI verdict generation with confidence scores
16 +* Fully automated approach viability (no human editing)
17 +* Output comprehensibility to users
14 14  
15 -== POC Phase Navigation ==
19 +**What POC Excludes (Intentional Simplifications):**
20 +* Scenarios (deferred to POC2 - architectural questions remain)
21 +* Evidence display (deferred)
22 +* Production infrastructure (simplified single-call architecture)
23 +* Full data model (stateless POC)
16 16  
17 -* **[[POC Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]]** Complete POC1 & POC2 specification (v4.0)
18 -* **[[POC Summary>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Summary]]** Executive overview
19 -* **[[Article Verdict Problem>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Article-Verdict-Problem]]** Why context-aware analysis matters
25 +**Key Decision:** Test AI capability first, add architectural complexity in POC2 based on learnings.
20 20  
21 -== Roadmap Navigation ==
27 +---
22 22  
23 -* **[[POC1 Roadmap>>FactHarbor.Roadmap.POC1.WebHome]]** Core Workflow with Quality Gates
24 -* **[[POC2 Roadmap>>FactHarbor.Roadmap.POC2.WebHome]]** Robust Quality & Reliability
25 -* **[[Requirements Roadmap Matrix>>FactHarbor.Roadmap.Requirements-Roadmap-Matrix.WebHome]]** Phase assignments
29 +== POC Documentation ==
26 26  
27 -== Key Specifications ==
31 +**POC-Specific Pages:**
32 +* [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] - Complete POC specification (17 sections, 1,197 lines)
33 +* [[Summary>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Summary]] - Executive overview and consolidated analysis
28 28  
29 -**POC1 Goal:** Prove AI can extract claims and evaluate them with context-aware analysis
35 +---
30 30  
31 -**POC1 Output:** 5 components
32 -1. Analysis Summary (context-aware, 4-6 sentences)
37 +== Related Specification Pages ==
38 +
39 +**Core Specification:**
40 +* [[Requirements (Full System)>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] - FR1-FR13, NFR1-NFR5
41 +* [[User Needs>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.User Needs]] - UN-1 through UN-17
42 +* [[Gap Analysis>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.GapAnalysis]] - Feature gaps, proposes FR14-FR43
43 +
44 +**Architecture & Design:**
45 +* [[Architecture>>FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] - System architecture and design
46 +* [[AKEL>>FactHarbor.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]] - AI subsystem
47 +* [[Data Model>>FactHarbor.Specification.Data Model.WebHome]] - Database schema
48 +* [[Workflows>>FactHarbor.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]] - Process workflows
49 +
50 +---
51 +
52 +== Key POC Specifications ==
53 +
54 +**Output Components (4):**
55 +1. Analysis Summary (3-5 sentences)
33 33  2. Claims Identification (3-5 claims)
34 -3. Claims Verdicts (verdict + confidence + reasoning)
35 -4. Article Summary (optional)
36 -5. Usage Statistics (cost tracking)
57 +3. Claims Verdicts (verdict + confidence + risk tier + reasoning per claim)
58 +4. Article Summary (optional, 3-5 sentences)
37 37  
38 -**POC1 Philosophy:**
39 -* Context-aware analysis (article ≠ sum of claims)
40 -* Cost efficiency tracking (viable at scale)
41 -* Fail-fast learning (test critical capabilities)
60 +**Publication Mode:** Mode 2 (AI-Generated, No Prior Human Review)
42 42  
43 -**POC1 Success Criteria:**
44 -* AI quality ≥70% (including context-aware assessment)
45 -* Cost per analysis <$0.05 (target)
46 -* Minimal manual editing (<30%)
62 +**Quality Gates:** 4 simplified gates (Source Quality, Contradiction Search, Uncertainty, Structural Integrity)
47 47  
48 -**POC1 → POC2 Decision Gate:** GO / NO-GO / ITERATE
64 +**Success Criteria:** ≥70% AI quality without manual editing
49 49  
50 -See [[POC Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] for complete specification.
66 +---
51 51  
52 52  == POC vs. Full System ==
53 53  
54 -|= Feature |= POC1 |= POC2 |= Full System
55 -| Scenarios | ❌ Deferred | ✅ Multiple | ✅ + Persistence
56 -| Evidence Display | ❌ None | ✅ With sources | ✅ + Quality scoring
57 -| Quality Gates | 🟡 4 simplified | ✅ 6 comprehensive | ✅ + ML validation
58 -| Database | ❌ Stateless | ✅ PostgreSQL | ✅ + Redis + S3
59 -| User Contributions | ❌ Read-only | ✅ Enabled | ✅ + Reputation
70 +|=Aspect|=POC1|=Full System
71 +|Scenarios|None (deferred to POC2)|Core component (Claims → Scenarios → Verdicts)
72 +|Workflow|3 steps|6 phases with quality gates
73 +|AKEL|Single API call|Multi-component orchestrated pipeline
74 +|Data|Stateless (no DB)|PostgreSQL + Redis + S3
75 +|Architecture|Simplified proof-of-concept|Production architecture
76 +|Requirements|FR-POC-1 to FR-POC-7|FR1-FR43 (full system)
60 60  
61 -**
78 +**Gap Between POC and Beta:** Significant architectural expansion needed (scenarios, components, data model).
79 +
80 +---
81 +
82 +== Decision Gate ==
83 +
84 +After POC testing complete, team makes one of three decisions:
85 +
86 +**GO (Proceed to POC2):** AI quality ≥70%, approach validated
87 +**NO-GO (Pivot or Stop):** AI quality < 60%, fundamental flaws identified
88 +**ITERATE (Improve POC):** AI quality 60-70%, specific improvements needed
89 +
90 +---
91 +
92 +**Next Steps:**
93 +1. Review [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] for detailed specifications
94 +2. Review [[Gap Analysis>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.GapAnalysis]] for feature priorities
95 +3. Begin POC development
96 +4. Test with diverse articles
97 +5. Make GO/NO-GO decision
98 +
99 +**Document Version:** 2.0 (Updated after Specification Cross-Check)
100 +