Skip to Content

Changes for page POC Specification

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2026/02/08 08:23
From version 1.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/19 16:13
Change comment: Imported from XAR
To version 2.4
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2026/01/20 20:23
Change comment: Renamed back-links.

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -POC (Proof of Concept)
1 +POC Specification
Content
... ... @@ -1,100 +1,62 @@
1 -= POC (Proof of Concept) =
1 += POC Specification =
2 2  
3 -**Status:** ✅ Planning Complete - Ready for Development
4 -**Version:** 1.0
5 -**Goal:** Prove that AI can extract claims and determine verdicts automatically without human intervention
3 +**This section contains detailed specifications for FactHarbor POC phases.**
6 6  
7 ----
5 +**Core Philosophy:** Prove the AKEL automation works before building production features. Each POC phase validates critical technical capabilities.
8 8  
9 -== Overview ==
7 +{{warning}}
8 +**Critical Innovation in POC1 Context-Aware Analysis:**
10 10  
11 -POC1 tests the core FactHarbor capability: Can AI automatically extract factual claims from articles and evaluate them with reasonable verdicts?
10 +POC1 tests whether AI can understand that an article's overall credibility is not simply the average of its individual claim verdicts. An article with mostly accurate facts can still be misleading if it draws unsupported conclusions.
12 12  
13 -**What POC Tests:**
14 -* AI claim extraction from article text
15 -* AI verdict generation with confidence scores
16 -* Fully automated approach viability (no human editing)
17 -* Output comprehensibility to users
12 +See [[Article Verdict Problem>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Article-Verdict-Problem]] for full discussion.
13 +{{/warning}}
18 18  
19 -**What POC Excludes (Intentional Simplifications):**
20 -* Scenarios (deferred to POC2 - architectural questions remain)
21 -* Evidence display (deferred)
22 -* Production infrastructure (simplified single-call architecture)
23 -* Full data model (stateless POC)
15 +== POC Phase Navigation ==
24 24  
25 -**Key Decision:** Test AI capability first, add architectural complexity in POC2 based on learnings.
17 +* **[[POC Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]]** Complete POC1 & POC2 specification (v4.0)
18 +* **[[POC Summary>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Summary]]** Executive overview
19 +* **[[Article Verdict Problem>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Article-Verdict-Problem]]** Why context-aware analysis matters
26 26  
27 ----
21 +== Roadmap Navigation ==
28 28  
29 -== POC Documentation ==
23 +* **[[POC1 Roadmap>>Archive.FactHarbor.Roadmap.POC1.WebHome]]** Core Workflow with Quality Gates
24 +* **[[POC2 Roadmap>>Archive.FactHarbor.Roadmap.POC2.WebHome]]** Robust Quality & Reliability
25 +* **[[Requirements Roadmap Matrix>>Archive.FactHarbor.Roadmap.Requirements-Roadmap-Matrix.WebHome]]** Phase assignments
30 30  
31 -**POC-Specific Pages:**
32 -* [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] - Complete POC specification (17 sections, 1,197 lines)
33 -* [[Summary>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Summary]] - Executive overview and consolidated analysis
27 +== Key Specifications ==
34 34  
35 ----
29 +**POC1 Goal:** Prove AI can extract claims and evaluate them with context-aware analysis
36 36  
37 -== Related Specification Pages ==
31 +**POC1 Output:** 5 components
38 38  
39 -**Core Specification:**
40 -* [[Requirements (Full System)>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.WebHome]] - FR1-FR13, NFR1-NFR5
41 -* [[User Needs>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.User Needs]] - UN-1 through UN-17
42 -* [[Gap Analysis>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.GapAnalysis]] - Feature gaps, proposes FR14-FR43
33 +1. Analysis Summary (context-aware, 4-6 sentences)
34 +2. Claims Identification (3-5 claims)
35 +3. Claims Verdicts (verdict + confidence + reasoning)
36 +4. Article Summary (optional)
37 +5. Usage Statistics (cost tracking)
43 43  
44 -**Architecture & Design:**
45 -* [[Architecture>>FactHarbor.Specification.Architecture.WebHome]] - System architecture and design
46 -* [[AKEL>>FactHarbor.Specification.AI Knowledge Extraction Layer (AKEL).WebHome]] - AI subsystem
47 -* [[Data Model>>FactHarbor.Specification.Data Model.WebHome]] - Database schema
48 -* [[Workflows>>FactHarbor.Specification.Workflows.WebHome]] - Process workflows
39 +**POC1 Philosophy:**
49 49  
50 ----
41 +* Context-aware analysis (article ≠ sum of claims)
42 +* Cost efficiency tracking (viable at scale)
43 +* Fail-fast learning (test critical capabilities)
51 51  
52 -== Key POC Specifications ==
45 +**POC1 Success Criteria:**
53 53  
54 -**Output Components (4):**
55 -1. Analysis Summary (3-5 sentences)
56 -2. Claims Identification (3-5 claims)
57 -3. Claims Verdicts (verdict + confidence + risk tier + reasoning per claim)
58 -4. Article Summary (optional, 3-5 sentences)
47 +* AI quality ≥70% (including context-aware assessment)
48 +* Cost per analysis <$0.05 (target)
49 +* Minimal manual editing (<30%)
59 59  
60 -**Publication Mode:** Mode 2 (AI-Generated, No Prior Human Review)
51 +**POC1 → POC2 Decision Gate:** GO / NO-GO / ITERATE
61 61  
62 -**Quality Gates:** 4 simplified gates (Source Quality, Contradiction Search, Uncertainty, Structural Integrity)
53 +See [[POC Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] for complete specification.
63 63  
64 -**Success Criteria:** ≥70% AI quality without manual editing
65 -
66 ----
67 -
68 68  == POC vs. Full System ==
69 69  
70 -|=Aspect|=POC1|=Full System
71 -|Scenarios|None (deferred to POC2)|Core component (Claims → Scenarios → Verdicts)
72 -|Workflow|3 steps|6 phases with quality gates
73 -|AKEL|Single API call|Multi-component orchestrated pipeline
74 -|Data|Stateless (no DB)|PostgreSQL + Redis + S3
75 -|Architecture|Simplified proof-of-concept|Production architecture
76 -|Requirements|FR-POC-1 to FR-POC-7|FR1-FR43 (full system)
77 -
78 -**Gap Between POC and Beta:** Significant architectural expansion needed (scenarios, components, data model).
79 -
80 ----
81 -
82 -== Decision Gate ==
83 -
84 -After POC testing complete, team makes one of three decisions:
85 -
86 -**GO (Proceed to POC2):** AI quality ≥70%, approach validated
87 -**NO-GO (Pivot or Stop):** AI quality < 60%, fundamental flaws identified
88 -**ITERATE (Improve POC):** AI quality 60-70%, specific improvements needed
89 -
90 ----
91 -
92 -**Next Steps:**
93 -1. Review [[Requirements>>FactHarbor.Specification.POC.Requirements]] for detailed specifications
94 -2. Review [[Gap Analysis>>FactHarbor.Specification.Requirements.GapAnalysis]] for feature priorities
95 -3. Begin POC development
96 -4. Test with diverse articles
97 -5. Make GO/NO-GO decision
98 -
99 -**Document Version:** 2.0 (Updated after Specification Cross-Check)
100 -
57 +|= Feature |= POC1 |= POC2 |= Full System
58 +| Scenarios | ❌ Deferred | ✅ Multiple | ✅ + Persistence
59 +| Evidence Display | ❌ None | ✅ With sources | ✅ + Quality scoring
60 +| Quality Gates | 🟡 4 simplified | ✅ 6 comprehensive | ✅ + ML validation
61 +| Database | ❌ Stateless | ✅ PostgreSQL | ✅ + Redis + S3
62 +| User Contributions | ❌ Read-only | ✅ Enabled | ✅ + Reputation