Skip to Content

Changes for page Data Examples

Last modified by Robert Schaub on 2025/12/24 20:30
From version 1.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/16 21:42
Change comment: Imported from XAR
To version 2.1
edited by Robert Schaub
on 2025/12/17 13:57
Change comment: Imported from XAR

Summary

Details

Page properties
Parent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -FactHarbor.Specification.WebHome
1 +Test.FactHarbor.Specification.WebHome
Content
... ... @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
34 34  |Domain|energy_transport|[A]
35 35  |ClaimType|literal|[A]
36 36  |Evaluability|empirical|[A]
37 -|SafetyCategory|medium|[A]
37 +|RiskTier|medium|[A]
38 38  |ClusterID|CL_EnergyEff|[A]
39 39  |Status|active|
40 40  
... ... @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
50 50  |Assumptions|EU 2020–24 grid mix, electrolysis 69%, compression losses 10%, fuel cell 55%. [M]
51 51  |ContextBoundary|Europe, 2020–2024 technology|[H]
52 52  |EvaluationMethod|Comparative WTW energy analysis|[A]
53 -|SafetyClass|low
53 +|RiskTier|low
54 54  |Status|active|
55 55  
56 56  
... ... @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
129 129  |Domain|health_lifestyle|
130 130  |ClaimType|literal|
131 131  |Evaluability|empirical|
132 -|SafetyCategory|high|
132 +|RiskTier|high|
133 133  
134 134  
135 135  == 8. Scenario S_CW_01 — “Short daily immersions in healthy adults” ==
... ... @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
142 142  |Assumptions|Healthy adults, no cardiovascular risk|
143 143  |ContextBoundary|6+ months, 8–14°C|
144 144  |EvaluationMethod|Health outcome comparison|
145 -|SafetyClass|high|
145 +|RiskTier|high|
146 146  
147 147  
148 148  == 9. Evidence ==
... ... @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
199 199  |Domain|politics_private_beliefs|
200 200  |ClaimType|metaphorical|
201 201  |Evaluability|non-falsifiable|
202 -|SafetyCategory|low|
202 +|RiskTier|low|
203 203  
204 204  
205 205  == 14. Scenario S_ER_01 — Literal paranormal interpretation ==
... ... @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@
209 209  |Definitions|“Communicate” = literal paranormal communication [H]|
210 210  |Assumptions|Paranormal abilities exist [H]|
211 211  |EvaluationMethod|Not empirically testable|
212 -|SafetyClass|low|
212 +|RiskTier|low|
213 213  |Evaluability|non-falsifiable|
214 214  
215 215  
... ... @@ -227,8 +227,8 @@
227 227  
228 228  == 16. Verdict ==
229 229  
230 -LikelihoodRange: **undefined**
231 -Status: **non-evaluable**
230 +LikelihoodRange: **undefined**
231 +Status: **non-evaluable**
232 232  Reasoning: claim is non-falsifiable.
233 233  
234 234  
... ... @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@
244 244  |Domain|rhetoric|
245 245  |ClaimType|rhetorical|
246 246  |Evaluability|non-falsifiable|
247 -|SafetyCategory|low|
247 +|RiskTier|low|
248 248  
249 249  
250 250  == 18. Scenario S_Witch_01 — Literal interpretation ==
... ... @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
264 264  
265 265  == 20. Verdict ==
266 266  
267 -Likelihood: **undefined**
267 +Likelihood: **undefined**
268 268  Reasoning: rhetorical, not empirical.
269 269  
270 270  
... ... @@ -271,25 +271,25 @@
271 271  = Automation Summary Across Examples =
272 272  
273 273  == 21. Fully Automatable [A] ==
274 -* Claim normalization
275 -* Claim clustering
276 -* Evidence metadata extraction
277 -* Initial scenario scaffolding
278 -* Reliability heuristics
279 -* Relevance ranking
280 -* Draft verdicts
281 -* Trigger detection
274 +* Claim normalization
275 +* Claim clustering
276 +* Evidence metadata extraction
277 +* Initial scenario scaffolding
278 +* Reliability heuristics
279 +* Relevance ranking
280 +* Draft verdicts
281 +* Trigger detection
282 282  
283 283  == 22. Mixed [M] ==
284 -* Assumptions
285 -* Context boundaries
286 -* Relevance scoring
287 -* Reasoning chain
288 -* Uncertainty factors
284 +* Assumptions
285 +* Context boundaries
286 +* Relevance scoring
287 +* Reasoning chain
288 +* Uncertainty factors
289 289  
290 290  == 23. Human-only [H] ==
291 -* Definitions
292 -* Ethical constraints
293 -* High-risk scenario approval
294 -* Interpretation of meaning
295 -* Final verdict approval
291 +* Definitions
292 +* Ethical constraints
293 +* High-risk scenario approval
294 +* Interpretation of meaning
295 +* Final verdict approval